Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Design of a High Strength, High Ductility 12 wt% Mn Medium Manganese Steel With Hierarchical Deformation Behaviour

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 12 wt% Mn medium-manganese steel with a necklace-and-core grain structure reaches 54% elongation by transforming coarse core austenite to martensite first and then activating twinning and transformation in fine necklace austenite.

desk verdict A genuinely useful process-plus-properties paper on a new 12Mn medium-Mn steel; the two-stage mechanism is plausible but not nailed down, and the paper itself flags most of the gaps. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07258 v3 pith:NTD2GVPF submitted 2019-08-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

T W J Kwok , K M Rahman , X Xu , I Bantounas , J F Kelleher , S Daswari , T Alam , R Banerjee
show 1 more author
D Dye
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords mediummanganesesteelTRIPTWIPhierarchicaldeformationnecklacemicrostructurein-situneutrondiffractionstackingfaultenergyaustenitestability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a 12 wt% Mn medium-manganese steel, Fe-12Mn-4.8Al-2Si-0.32C-0.3V, processed through continuous hot and warm rolling plus a 30-minute intercritical anneal, with a yield strength of 1.09 GPa, a tensile strength of 1.26 GPa and 54% elongation. The central claim is that this combination comes from a hierarchical two-stage deformation sequence written into the microstructure: coarse retained-austenite 'core' grains transform to martensite first, and only afterwards do fine 'necklace' austenite grains deform by twinning and transformation. The evidence combines interrupted-tensile EBSD, TEM twin identification, and in-situ neutron diffraction, including a second sharp rise in the BCC (110) peak intensity at the onset of the second hardening stage. If the claim is right, it shows an industrially simple rolling route, with no quench and no cold rolling, can convert a medium-Mn steel into a high-strength, high-ductility material by engineering where TRIP and TWIP activate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the necklace-core microstructure produced by the continuous hot and warm rolling plus intercritical anneal. Coarse, unrecrystallised prior-austenite grains form the 'core', while fine austenite and ferrite grains nucleated at prior grain boundaries form the 'necklace'. Because the fine necklace grains are enriched in Mn and depleted in Al relative to the cores, the two austenite populations inherit different stacking-fault energies and Md temperatures, which the paper uses to explain why cores transform to martensite in stage A while necklace grains twin and transform in stage B. The in-situ neutron diffraction signature, an early rise of the BCC (110) peak at about 1.7% strain and a second sharp rise at about 7.7% strain coinciding with the start of stage B, is the experimental indicator that carries the two-stage claim.

What would settle it

Watch one tensile specimen's microstructure as it deforms: if the first twins appear in coarse core grains before any martensite, or if necklace grains transform before core grains, the hierarchical claim is wrong. A quantitative version is to measure the local stacking-fault energy or austenite stability of individual core and necklace grains, for example by in-situ synchrotron diffraction or TEM fault-width measurement, and check that the predicted core-transforms/necklace-twins ordering survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own account, the discovery is that deformation in this steel is hierarchical and separable. In stage A, from about 0.02 to 0.25 true strain, the coarse, less-stable core austenite grains transform to martensite; serrated flow and a fluctuating hardening rate mark this transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP), and the austenite fraction falls while ferrite and martensite rise. In stage B, from about 0.25 to 0.43 true strain, the cores have largely transformed and the load shifts to the fine necklace austenite grains, which then deform by a mix of twinning and transformation; the hardening rate steadies near 2.8 GPa, twins are confirmed by TEM in necklace grains, and the BCC (110) peak intensity rises sharply for a second time. The net result is 54% elongation with sustained hardening to fracture in a steel processed without quenching or cold rolling.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the empirical stability calculations, stacking-fault energy and the Md temperature, the upper temperature for strain-induced martensite, plus the assumption that carbon is equal in core and necklace austenite, correctly predict that cores transform before necklace grains twin; if those numbers are wrong, the two-stage mechanism is a correlation without a proven cause.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The process route can be transferred to conventional strip production, since it avoids the quench-cold-roll-re-anneal steps that make batch processing expensive.
  • The mechanism gives alloy designers two independent knobs: the composition and size of core austenite set the stage-A TRIP contribution, while necklace austenite composition sets the stage-B TWIP plus TRIP contribution.
  • The U30 energy-absorption comparison places this steel above the Future Steel Vehicle TWIP550/900 benchmark at similar alloy cost, supporting medium-Mn steel for crash-energy and armour applications.
  • The persistence of a high hardening rate, near 2.8 GPa, through stage B means the steel retains load-bearing capacity to large strains, so ductility is not bought at the cost of early necking.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hierarchy is robust, the same necklace-core motif could be designed into other TRIP and TWIP alloy families: leave coarse, less-stable grains to supply early transformation plasticity and fine, Mn-enriched grains to supply late twinning and transformation.
  • The paper leaves open whether grain size, grain orientation, or local composition differences control which necklace grains twin versus transform; mapping twin and martensite initiation grain-by-grain in situ would settle this.
  • The authors' own future-work target, removing vanadium and lowering Mn to 8 wt% or below, is a direct test of whether the hierarchy, rather than the expensive alloying, is what delivers the properties.
  • Since the stability inputs rely on the lever-rule carbon assumption, atom-probe carbon profiles across core and necklace interfaces could either confirm the stacking-fault-energy ranking or require its revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design of a 12 wt% Mn medium manganese steel (Fe-12Mn-4.8Al-2Si-0.32C-0.3V) processed by a continuous route of hot rolling, warm rolling, and a 30 min intercritical anneal, producing a necklace-core microstructure of coarse elongated austenite grains surrounded by fine austenite-ferrite necklace grains. Tensile testing gives 1.09 GPa yield strength, 1.26 GPa tensile strength, and 54% elongation, with two stages of work hardening. Using interrupted EBSD, TEM, APT, and in-situ neutron diffraction, the authors propose a two-stage hierarchical deformation mechanism: core austenite transforms to martensite during Stage A, and necklace austenite subsequently deforms by a combination of twinning-induced plasticity and transformation-induced plasticity during Stage B. The paper closes with an assessment of alloy cost versus energy absorption (U30) relative to commercial and literature medium Mn steels.

Significance. If the hierarchical mechanism and the continuous processing route are taken at face value, the paper offers an industrially attractive route toward third-generation AHSS property combinations and introduces a microstructure design concept based on stability differences between core and necklace austenite. The direct mechanical property measurements are valuable, and the multi-technique characterization (EBSD, TEM, APT, neutron diffraction) is a strength. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly acknowledging the limitations of the empirical SFE and Md models and the interpretative nature of the neutron BCC lattice-strain analysis. The central mechanistic claim, however, is supported by qualitative spatial attribution in EBSD and by neutron data from a differently processed ingot, so the significance of the paper depends on whether that claim is subsequently strengthened or appropriately softened.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Fig. 5] The claim that TRIP in Stage A is 'mostly confined within the core austenite grains' is not quantitatively established. As stated in Section 3.2, EBSD cannot distinguish ferrite from alpha-prime martensite (both are indexed as BCC), the non-indexed area fraction reaches <0.2 at large strains, and the phase-fraction curves in Fig. 5h therefore track combined BCC area rather than martensite specifically. The white arrows identify only selected regions of blocky martensite, and no per-region phase quantification is provided to separate core from necklace transformation. Without such quantification, the central hierarchical sequence remains a qualitative interpretation.
  2. [Section 3.3, Fig. 10] The second rise in BCC (110) integrated intensity at 7.7% strain is assigned to necklace austenite transformation in Stage B, but this experiment was performed on an ingot that was furnace cooled rather than water quenched, warm rolled to lower reductions, and exhibited a different tensile curve (Fig. 8). Moreover, neutron diffraction provides no spatial discrimination between core and necklace regions. The assignment of this intensity increase specifically to necklace austenite is therefore not supported by the data; it could also reflect continued transformation in the core or other microstructural changes.
  3. [Section 4.2, Table 1] The explanation of why core austenite transforms while necklace austenite twins and transforms relies on SFE and Md values from empirical models (Pierce et al., Nohara et al.) calibrated on high-Mn austenitic steels and austenitic stainless steels, together with the lever-rule assumption that carbon is equal and negligible in ferrite. The authors acknowledge that the Md values 'should be interpreted conceptually,' but these stability parameters carry the causal weight of the hierarchical mechanism. A sensitivity test, such as varying C, Mn, and Al within the reported EDS/APT uncertainties and recomputing SFE and Md, would show whether the predicted ordering of core versus necklace stability is robust; without it, the mechanism remains a correlation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract vs. Section 5] The abstract reports tensile strength of 1.26 GPa, while Section 5 states a 'true ultimate tensile strength of 1.9 GPa'; please clarify in both places which value is engineering and which is true stress, and report both consistently.
  2. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'a significant area (<0.2)' is ambiguous; please specify 'area fraction less than 0.2' and state whether this is the maximum non-indexed fraction at the largest strain.
  3. [Section 4.3] The U30 comparator is defined up to a true strain of 0.3, described as 'the limit of useful ductility,' but no justification is given for this cutoff; one sentence explaining the choice would make the metric easier to interpret.
  4. [Section 3.3] The text correctly cautions that limited reliance should be placed on BCC lattice strains beyond the macroscopic yield point, yet Fig. 10b is later used to infer TRIP from BCC intensity changes; please clarify which BCC intensity features are considered reliable despite the compositional heterogeneity of martensite versus ferrite.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, e.g., 'succesful' in Section 1, 'absorbtion' in Section 4.3, and 'dfferences' in Section 4.2; a careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mechanical-property and hierarchical-deformation claims are observational, and the SFE/Md calculations are explicitly presented as conceptual aids rather than as fitted predictors.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—achieving 1.09 GPa yield strength, 1.26 GPa tensile strength, 54% elongation, and a two-stage core-austenite TRIP followed by necklace-austenite TWIP+TRIP deformation sequence—are supported directly by tensile testing, interrupted EBSD maps, TEM, and in-situ neutron diffraction intensity changes. No model parameter is fitted to the deformation data and then renamed as a prediction. The SFE and M_d values in Table 1 are computed from composition using literature correlations (Pierce et al., Nohara et al.) and used only to rationalize why core and necklace austenite might behave differently; the authors explicitly state that 'M d temperatures in Table 1 should therefore be interpreted conceptually' and that the SFE model 'may be erroneous as the empirical model [30] used in this study was not developed for use in medium Mn steel.' This is a caveated interpretive aid, not a load-bearing derivation. The few self-citations (Rahman et al. on TWIP behavior) provide background on twinning and are not used to justify the present steel's mechanism. The two-stage hierarchy itself is inferred from qualitative EBSD and a separately processed neutron specimen, which is an evidence-strength concern rather than circularity: the interpretation could be wrong if the EBSD ferrite/martensite ambiguity or the different neutron-ingot processing misleads, but the reasoning does not reduce by construction to its inputs. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The U30 comparator is a metric, not an entity. All phases and mechanisms are standard metallurgical concepts.

free parameters (1)
  • U30 useful ductility limit. = 0.3 true strain.
    Chosen by hand as the upper limit of useful ductility for the energy absorption comparator; no physical justification beyond the authors' assertion.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The stacking fault energy model of Pierce et al. applies to this 12Mn medium manganese steel.
    Used in Table 1 to compute SFE of core and necklace austenite. The model was developed for Fe-Mn-Al-Si steels; the paper notes the calculation may be erroneous for medium Mn compositions.
  • domain assumption The Md temperature equation of Nohara et al., based on austenitic stainless steels, applies to this alloy.
    Used to estimate austenite stability differences. Section 4.2 says the Md values 'should be interpreted conceptually', indicating limited applicability.
  • domain assumption Carbon is negligible in ferrite and equal in core and necklace austenite, estimated by the lever rule.
    Section 3.1 Table 1 footnote. APT confirms negligible C in ferrite but the equality of C between the two austenite types is assumed.
  • domain assumption The non-indexed regions in EBSD (up to 20% of area) do not bias the phase fraction trends.
    Section 3.2 says the significant non-indexed area means results are interpreted qualitatively. The volume fraction trends rely on indexed regions being representative.
  • domain assumption Core austenite retains a higher dislocation density than necklace austenite after recovery.
    Introduction and Section 4.1 presume this to explain the high yield strength; no direct dislocation density measurement is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design of a High Strength, High Ductility 12 wt% Mn Medium Manganese Steel With Hierarchical Deformation Behaviour." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NTD2GVPF

@misc{pith2026190807258,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design of a High Strength, High Ductility 12 wt% Mn Medium Manganese Steel With Hierarchical Deformation Behaviour},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NTD2GVPF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07258}
}
read the original abstract

A novel medium Mn steel of composition Fe-12Mn-4.8Al-2Si-0.32C-0.3V was manufactured with 1.09 GPa yield strength, 1.26 GPa tensile strength and 54% elongation. The thermomechanical process route was designed to be industrially translatable and consists of hot and then warm rolling before a 30 min intercritical anneal. The resulting microstructure comprised of coarse elongated austenite grains in the rolling direction surrounded by necklace layers of fine austenite and ferrite grains. The tensile behaviour was investigated by in-situ neutron diffraction and the evolution of microstructure studied with Electron Backscattered Diffraction (EBSD). It was found that the coarse austenite grains contributed to the first stage of strain hardening by transforming into martensite and the fine austenite necklace grains contributed to the second stage of strain hardening by a mixture of twinning and transformation induced plasticity (TWIP and TRIP) mechanisms. This hierarchical deformation behaviour contributed to the exceptional ductility of this steel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07258 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Thermomechanical processing schedule showing extracted samples, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the in-situ neutron diffraction tensile ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) EBSD IQ+PM and corresponding (b) qualitative SEM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Mn ion map with 9.3 at% iso-surface obtained from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: EBSD IQ+PM of interrupted tensile specimens obtained parallel to the transverse direction at (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Engineering stress strain curve for the steel studied. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Unfortunately, due to the large strains involved, a sig￾nificant area (<0.2) was not indexed in EBSD and so microstructural results will be interpreted and discussed qualitatively. From t = 0 − 0.28, the austenite volume fraction steadily decreased while ferrite conte…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Engineering stress-strain curves of the tensile specimen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Lattice strain dependence on engineering stress of (a) FCC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Full neutron diffraction pattern and measured peaks when, from bottom to top, unstrained, at macroscopic yield point and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of cost and energy absorbtion (U30) between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Some newly discovered properties of Iron and Manganese

    Hadfield RA. Some newly discovered properties of Iron and Manganese. Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers 1888;93:61

    work page

  2. [2]

    High Mn TWIP Steels for Automotive Applications

    De Cooman BC, Chin Kg, Kim J. High Mn TWIP Steels for Automotive Applications. New Trends and Developments in Automotive System Engineering 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steels

    De Cooman BC, Estrin Y, Kim SK. Twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steels. Acta Materialia 2018;142:283

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Effect of grain and twin bound- aries on the hardening mechanisms of twinning-induced plastic- ity steels

    Bouaziz O, Allain S, Scott C. Effect of grain and twin bound- aries on the hardening mechanisms of twinning-induced plastic- ity steels. Scripta Materialia 2008;58:484

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    The effect of grain size on the twin initiation stress in a TWIP steel

    Rahman KM, Vorontsov VA, Dye D. The effect of grain size on the twin initiation stress in a TWIP steel. Acta Materialia 2015;89:247

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    The dynamic behaviour of a twinning induced plasticity steel

    Rahman KM, Vorontsov VA, Dye D. The dynamic behaviour of a twinning induced plasticity steel. Materials Science and Engineering A 2014;589:252

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Current state of Fe-Mn- Al-C low density steels

    Chen S, Rana R, Haldar A, Ray RK. Current state of Fe-Mn- Al-C low density steels. Progress in Materials Science 2017; 89:345

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Ultra high-strength and ductile FeMnAlC light-weight steels

    Bausch M, et al. Ultra high-strength and ductile FeMnAlC light-weight steels. Technical report, Luxembourg 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Joining TWIP to TWIP and TWIP to aluminium: A com- parative study between joining processes, joint properties and mechanical performance

    Papadimitriou I, Efthymiadis P, Kotadia HR, Sohn IR, Sridhar S. Joining TWIP to TWIP and TWIP to aluminium: A com- parative study between joining processes, joint properties and mechanical performance. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2017;30:195

    2017

  2. [10]

    Effects of cold rolling reduction ratio on microstructures and tensile properties of intercritically annealed medium-Mn steels

    Kim MT, Park TM, Baik KH, Choi WS, Han J. Effects of cold rolling reduction ratio on microstructures and tensile properties of intercritically annealed medium-Mn steels. Materials Science and Engineering A 2019;752:43

    2019

  3. [11]

    Observation of the TWIP+TRIP Plasticity-Enhancement Mechanism in Al-Added 6 Wt Pct Medium Mn Steel

    Lee S, Lee K, De Cooman BC. Observation of the TWIP+TRIP Plasticity-Enhancement Mechanism in Al-Added 6 Wt Pct Medium Mn Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2015;46:2356

    2015

  4. [12]

    Annealing Temperature Dependence of the Tensile Behavior of 10pct Mn Multi-phase TWIP-TRIP Steel

    Lee S, De Cooman BC. Annealing Temperature Dependence of the Tensile Behavior of 10pct Mn Multi-phase TWIP-TRIP Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2014;45:6039

    2014

  5. [13]

    A strong and ductile 7Mn steel manufactured by warm rolling and exhibiting both transformation and twin- ning induced plasticity

    Hu B, Luo H. A strong and ductile 7Mn steel manufactured by warm rolling and exhibiting both transformation and twin- ning induced plasticity. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2017; 725:684

    2017

  6. [14]

    Analysis of the Tensile Be- havior of 12pct Mn Multi-phase ( α+γ) TWIP+TRIP Steel by Neutron Diffraction

    Lee S, Woo W, de Cooman BC. Analysis of the Tensile Be- havior of 12pct Mn Multi-phase ( α+γ) TWIP+TRIP Steel by Neutron Diffraction. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2016;47:2125

    2016

  7. [15]

    Novel ferrite- austenite duplex lightweight steel with 77% ductility by trans- formation induced plasticity and twinning induced plasticity mechanisms

    Sohn SS, Choi K, Kwak JH, Kim NJ, Lee S. Novel ferrite- austenite duplex lightweight steel with 77% ductility by trans- formation induced plasticity and twinning induced plasticity mechanisms. Acta Materialia 2014;78:181

    2014

  8. [16]

    Deformation Microstructure and Deformation-Induced Marten- site in Austenitic Fe-Cr-Ni Alloys Depending on Stacking Fault Energy

    Tian Y, Gorbatov OI, Borgenstam A, Ruban AV, Hedstr¨ om P. Deformation Microstructure and Deformation-Induced Marten- site in Austenitic Fe-Cr-Ni Alloys Depending on Stacking Fault Energy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2017;48:1

    2017

  9. [17]

    Coupled strengthening in a medium manganese lightweight steel with an inhomogeneously grained structure of austenite

    Lee CY, Jeong J, Han J, Lee SJ, Lee S, Lee YK. Coupled strengthening in a medium manganese lightweight steel with an inhomogeneously grained structure of austenite. Acta Materi- alia 2015;84:1

    2015

  10. [18]

    The influence of silicon additions on the deformation behavior of austenite-ferrite duplex medium manganese steels

    Sun B, Fazeli F, Scott C, Brodusch N, Gauvin R, Yue S. The influence of silicon additions on the deformation behavior of austenite-ferrite duplex medium manganese steels. Acta Mate- rialia 2018;148:249

    2018

  11. [19]

    Austenite stability of ultrafine- grained transformation-induced plasticity steel with Mn parti- tioning

    Lee S, Lee SJ, De Cooman BC. Austenite stability of ultrafine- grained transformation-induced plasticity steel with Mn parti- tioning. Scripta Materialia 2011;65:225

    2011

  12. [20]

    Difference in transformation behavior between ferrite and austenite forma- tions in medium manganese steel

    Nakada N, Mizutani K, Tsuchiyama T, Takaki S. Difference in transformation behavior between ferrite and austenite forma- tions in medium manganese steel. Acta Materialia 2014;65:251

    2014

  13. [21]

    On the selection of the optimal intercrit- ical annealing temperature for medium Mn TRIP steel

    Lee S, De Cooman BC. On the selection of the optimal intercrit- ical annealing temperature for medium Mn TRIP steel. Metal- lurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2013;44:5018

    2013

  14. [22]

    Tensile Behavior of Intercritically An- nealed 10 pct Mn Multi-phase Steel

    Lee S, De Cooman BC. Tensile Behavior of Intercritically An- nealed 10 pct Mn Multi-phase Steel. Metallurgical and Materi- als Transactions A 2014;45A:709

    2014

  15. [23]

    Tensile behavior of intercritically an- nealed ultra-fine grained 8% mn multi-phase steel

    Lee S, De Cooman BC. Tensile behavior of intercritically an- nealed ultra-fine grained 8% mn multi-phase steel. Steel Re- search International 2015;86:1170

    2015

  16. [24]

    Super- high-strength and formable medium Mn steel manufactured by warm rolling process

    Hu B, He BB, Cheng GJ, Yen HW, Huang MX, Luo HW. Super- high-strength and formable medium Mn steel manufactured by warm rolling process. Acta Materialia 2019;174:131

    2019

  17. [25]

    The study of quanti- tativeness in atom probe analysis of alloying elements in steel

    Yamaguchi Y, Takahashi J, Kawakami K. The study of quanti- tativeness in atom probe analysis of alloying elements in steel. Ultramicroscopy 2009;109:541

    2009

  18. [26]

    Quantitative analysis of carbon content in cementite in steel by atom probe tomogra- phy

    Takahashi J, Kawakami K, Kobayashi Y. Quantitative analysis of carbon content in cementite in steel by atom probe tomogra- phy. Ultramicroscopy 2011;111:1233

    2011

  19. [27]

    Quantitative measure- ment of carbon content in Fe-C binary alloys by atom probe tomography

    Miyamoto G, Shinbo K, Furuhara T. Quantitative measure- ment of carbon content in Fe-C binary alloys by atom probe tomography. Scripta Materialia 2012;67:999

    2012

  20. [28]

    Necklace formation during dynamic re- crystallization: Mechanisms and impact on flow behavior

    Ponge D, Gottstein G. Necklace formation during dynamic re- crystallization: Mechanisms and impact on flow behavior. Acta Materialia 1998;46:69

    1998

  21. [29]

    Kinetics of Solute Partitioning During Intercritical Annealing of a Medium-Mn Steel

    Kamoutsi H, Gioti E, Haidemenopoulos GN, Cai Z, Ding H. Kinetics of Solute Partitioning During Intercritical Annealing of a Medium-Mn Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2015;46:4841

    2015

  22. [30]

    The influence of manganese content on the stacking fault and austenite/ϵ-martensite interfacial energies in Fe-Mn-(Al-Si) steels investigated by experiment and theory

    Pierce DT, Jim´ enez JA, Bentley J, Raabe D, Oskay C, Wittig JE. The influence of manganese content on the stacking fault and austenite/ϵ-martensite interfacial energies in Fe-Mn-(Al-Si) steels investigated by experiment and theory. Acta Materialia 2014;68:238

    2014

  23. [31]

    Composition and Grain Size Dependencies of Strain-induced Martensitic Transformation in Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steels

    Nohara K, Ono Y, Ohashi N. Composition and Grain Size Dependencies of Strain-induced Martensitic Transformation in Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steels. J Iron Steel Inst 1977; 63:772

    1977

  24. [32]

    Effect of strain rate on the strain-induced γ, α-martensite transformation and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steels

    Talonen J, Nenonen P, Pape G, H¨ anninen H. Effect of strain rate on the strain-induced γ, α-martensite transformation and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steels. Metallur- gical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2005;36 A:421

    2005

  25. [33]

    Derivation and variation in composition-dependent stacking fault energy maps based on subregular solution model in high-manganese steels

    Saeed-Akbari A, Imlau J, Prahl U, Bleck W. Derivation and variation in composition-dependent stacking fault energy maps based on subregular solution model in high-manganese steels. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metal- lurgy and Materials Science 2009;40:3076

    2009

  26. [34]

    Stacking fault energy and deforma- tion mechanisms in Fe-xMn-0.6C-yAl TWIP steel

    Kim JK, De Cooman BC. Stacking fault energy and deforma- tion mechanisms in Fe-xMn-0.6C-yAl TWIP steel. Materials Science and Engineering A 2016;676:216

    2016

  27. [35]

    Chemistry and Properties of Medium-Mn Two-Stage TRIP Steels

    Field DM, Qing J, van Aken DC. Chemistry and Properties of Medium-Mn Two-Stage TRIP Steels. Metallurgical and Mate- rials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2018;49:1

    2018

  28. [36]

    Use of Rietveld refinement for elastic macrostrain 11 determination and for evaluation of plastic strain history from diffraction spectra

    Daymond MR, Bourke MA, Von Dreele RB, Clausen B, Lorentzen T. Use of Rietveld refinement for elastic macrostrain 11 determination and for evaluation of plastic strain history from diffraction spectra. Journal of Applied Physics 1997;82:1554

    1997

  29. [37]

    Effect of δ-ferrite co- existence on hot deformation and recrystallization of austenite

    Dehghan-Manshadi A, Hodgson PD. Effect of δ-ferrite co- existence on hot deformation and recrystallization of austenite. Journal of Materials Science 2008;43:6272

    2008

  30. [38]

    In- creasing yield strength of medium Mn steel by engineering mul- tiple strengthening defects

    He BB, Huang BM, He SH, Qi Y, Yen HW, Huang MX. In- creasing yield strength of medium Mn steel by engineering mul- tiple strengthening defects. Materials Science and Engineering A 2018;724:11

    2018

  31. [39]

    Localized deformation in multiphase, ultra-fine-grained 6 Pct Mn transformation-induced plasticity steel

    Lee S, Lee SJ, Santhosh Kumar S, Lee K, De Cooman BC. Localized deformation in multiphase, ultra-fine-grained 6 Pct Mn transformation-induced plasticity steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2011;42:3638

    2011

  32. [40]

    Confined chemical and structural states at dislocations in Fe-9wt%Mn steels: A correlative TEM- atom probe study combined with multiscale modelling

    Kwiatkowski da Silva A, et al. Confined chemical and structural states at dislocations in Fe-9wt%Mn steels: A correlative TEM- atom probe study combined with multiscale modelling. Acta Materialia 2017;124:305

    2017

  33. [41]

    Dislocation Pipe Diffusion of Mn during Annealing of 5Mn Steel

    Lin J, et al. Dislocation Pipe Diffusion of Mn during Annealing of 5Mn Steel. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International 2016;23:1277

    2016

  34. [42]

    The effects of the initial martensite microstructure on the microstructure and tensile properties of intercritically annealed Fe-9Mn-0.05C steel

    Han J, Lee SJ, Jung JG, Lee YK. The effects of the initial martensite microstructure on the microstructure and tensile properties of intercritically annealed Fe-9Mn-0.05C steel. Acta Materialia 2014;78:369

    2014

  35. [43]

    Temperature-dependent micromechanical be- havior of medium-Mn transformation-induced-plasticity steel studied by in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction

    Zhang M, et al. Temperature-dependent micromechanical be- havior of medium-Mn transformation-induced-plasticity steel studied by in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Acta Mate- rialia 2017;141:294

    2017

  36. [44]

    Formation of martensite in austenitic stainless steels

    Angel T. Formation of martensite in austenitic stainless steels. J Iron Steel Inst 1954;:165

    1954

  37. [45]

    Understanding martensite and twin formation in austenitic steels: A model de- scribing TRIP and TWIP effects

    Galindo-Nava EI, Rivera-D´ ıaz-del Castillo PE. Understanding martensite and twin formation in austenitic steels: A model de- scribing TRIP and TWIP effects. Acta Materialia 2017;128:120

    2017

  38. [46]

    Correla- tion between deformation behavior and austenite characteristics in a Mn-Al type TRIP steel

    Xu YB, Zou Y, Hu ZP, Han DT, Chen SQ, Misra RD. Correla- tion between deformation behavior and austenite characteristics in a Mn-Al type TRIP steel. Materials Science and Engineering A 2017;698:126

    2017

  39. [47]

    Automotive Steels: Design, Metallurgy, Pro- cessing and Applications 2016

    Rana R, Singh S. Automotive Steels: Design, Metallurgy, Pro- cessing and Applications 2016

    2016

  40. [48]

    Future Steel Vehicle Phase 2 - Report

    WorldAutoSteel. Future Steel Vehicle Phase 2 - Report. Tech- nical report 2011

    2011

  41. [49]

    New ultrahigh-strength Mn-alloyed TRIP steels with improved formability manufactured by intercritical anneal- ing

    Luo H, Dong H. New ultrahigh-strength Mn-alloyed TRIP steels with improved formability manufactured by intercritical anneal- ing. Materials Science and Engineering A 2015;626:207

    2015

  42. [50]

    Microstructure and mechanical properties of hot-rolled medium-Mn steel containing 3% aluminum 2017

    Shao C, Hui W, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Weng Y. Microstructure and mechanical properties of hot-rolled medium-Mn steel containing 3% aluminum 2017

    2017

  43. [51]

    Com- bined Intercritical Annealing and Q&P Processing of Medium Mn Steel

    De Cooman BC, Lee SJ, Shin S, Seo EJ, Speer JG. Com- bined Intercritical Annealing and Q&P Processing of Medium Mn Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 2017;48:39

    2017

  44. [52]

    Microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti and Mo micro-alloyed medium Mn steel

    Lee D, Kim JK, Lee S, Lee K, De Cooman BC. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti and Mo micro-alloyed medium Mn steel. Materials Science and Engineering A 2017;706:1

    2017

  45. [53]

    Influence of Nb and V on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hot-Rolled Medium Mn Steels

    Zhu Y, Hu B, Luo H. Influence of Nb and V on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hot-Rolled Medium Mn Steels. Steel Research International 2017;1700389:1

    2017

  46. [54]

    Strong and ductile medium Mn steel with- out transformation-induced plasticity effect

    He BB, Huang MX. Strong and ductile medium Mn steel with- out transformation-induced plasticity effect. Materials Research Letters 2018;6:365

    2018

  47. [55]

    Novel 1.5 GPa-strength with 50%-ductility by transformation-induced plasticity of non-recrystallized austenite in duplex steels

    Sohn SS, Song H, Jo MC, Song T, Kim HS, Lee S. Novel 1.5 GPa-strength with 50%-ductility by transformation-induced plasticity of non-recrystallized austenite in duplex steels. Sci- entific Reports 2017;7:1

    2017

  48. [56]

    Experimental and numerical study of mechan- ical properties of multi-phase medium-Mn TWIP-TRIP steel: influences of strain rate and phase constituents

    Benzing J, et al. Experimental and numerical study of mechan- ical properties of multi-phase medium-Mn TWIP-TRIP steel: influences of strain rate and phase constituents. Acta Materi- alia 2019;177:250 12

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.