Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Superconductivity in V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys]{Evolution of high field superconductivity and high critical current density in the as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read As-cast vanadium-zirconium alloys carry large superconducting currents in magnetic fields up to 16 tesla.

desk verdict First magnetization-Jc data for V-rich V1-xZrx alloys with a plausible microstructure story, but the wire comparison needs transport Jc to support it. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07288 v1 pith:V7IS7NZD submitted 2019-08-20 cond-mat.supr-con

L. S. Sharath Chandra , Sabyasachi Paul , Ashish Khandelwal , Archna Sagdeo , R. Venkatesh , Kranti Kumar , A. Banerjee , M. K. Chattopadhyay This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductivityV-ZralloyscriticalcurrentdensityfluxpinningeutecticreactionZrV2Lavesphaseas-casthighmagneticfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that simple, as-cast vanadium–zirconium alloys—no drawing, rolling, or heat treatment—can carry large dissipationless electric currents even in magnetic fields up to 16 tesla. The material with 40 percent zirconium, V0.60Zr0.40, does best, with a critical current density above 1000 A/mm² at zero field and substantial current at high fields. These alloys solidify from the melt through peritectic and eutectic reactions, producing a mixture of a vanadium-rich phase, two compositionally distinct versions of the ZrV2 phase, and zirconium-rich regions. The ZrV2 phase superconducts below 8.5 K and dominates the electrical properties once its content passes a percolation threshold of less than 10 atomic percent zirconium. The authors attribute the strong flux pinning to grain boundaries formed by the eutectic reaction at low fields and to point defects—compositional variations and fine β-Zr precipitates—at high fields, concluding that promoting the eutectic reaction is the key to improving critical current.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on two standard analysis tools applied to magnetization data: the critical state model, which converts the width of the magnetization hysteresis loop into a critical current density via $J_c = 2\Delta M/[a(1-a/3b)]$, and the Dew-Hughes decomposition of the normalized pinning force density $F_p/F_{p,m} = A h^{0.5}(1-h)^2 + B h^2(1-h)$, where $h=H/H_{irr}$. The first term represents pinning by grain boundaries (normal surface pins) and the second by point defects ($\Delta\kappa$ pins); the fitted weights $A$ and $B$ let the authors assign the relative importance of the two microstructural features at each temperature.

What would settle it

Direct magneto-optical imaging of the flux distribution in V0.60Zr0.40 at 2 K would show whether the magnetization hysteresis follows a single critical state profile across the β-V and ZrV2 phases; if distinct flux fronts with different Jc are visible in different phases, the reported bulk Jc and pinning attributions would not be reliable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the as-cast, arc-melted V1−xZrx alloys with x > 0.1 are high-field superconductors whose critical current density (Jc) is comparable to that of modern NbTi wires: for x = 0.29, 0.33 and 0.40, Jc(0) exceeds $10^{3}$ A/$mm^{2}$, and at 4 K the V0.60Zr0.40 alloy retains significant Jc up to fields above 11 T, where NbTi no longer carries current. The work identifies the microstructural origins of this performance by analysing the normalized pinning force density. The dominant low-field pinning is core interaction with normal surface pins, which the authors identify with the grain boundaries produced by the eutectic reaction; a second contribution from point defects (Δκ pinning) becomes relatively more important at high fields and lower temperatures. The paper also establishes that superconductivity percolates through the ZrV2 phase at zirconium concentrations between 5 and 10 atomic percent, far below the eutectic composition, and that the upper critical field at zero temperature is about 17.5 T with significant paramagnetic limiting and spin-orbit coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the whole multiphase sample behaves like one uniform superconductor when the magnetization loop is converted into a critical current density; if the different superconducting phases each support their own flux profile, the reported Jc values and pinning attributions would be off.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • V-rich alloys with x > 0.1 are bulk superconductors with Jc in the 10^2–10^3 A/mm^2 range, and Jc rises with zirconium content up to x = 0.40.
  • The V0.60Zr0.40 alloy has the highest Jc at every field and temperature measured, and sustains current up to an irreversibility field of 15 T at 2 K.
  • Grain boundaries from the eutectic reaction dominantly pin flux at low magnetic fields, while point defects—compositional variations and fine β-Zr precipitates—dominate at high fields.
  • The percolation threshold for superconductivity through the ZrV2 phase is between x = 0.05 and x = 0.10.
  • The upper critical field of these alloys is about 17.5 T at zero temperature, and paramagnetic effects and spin-orbit coupling both shape Hc2(T).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test cooling-rate or annealing variations; a natural next experiment would vary the quench rate to change the eutectic lamellar spacing and check whether Jc scales with it, as the pinning model implies.
  • The same two-term Dew-Hughes decomposition could be applied to other as-cast multiphase superconductors, but only if the composite's flux profile is a single critical state; local magneto-optical imaging would verify this.
  • If the point-defect pinning is indeed compositional in origin, then a controlled annealing that homogenizes the Zr distribution should lower the high-field Jc, separating the effect of β-Zr precipitates from that of concentration fluctuations.
  • The comparison with NbTi wires uses the technical Jc of commercial wires; for a fair engineering assessment, the as-cast alloy's grain-boundary fraction, porosity, and brittle phase content would need to be factored into an effective conductor cross-section.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports structural, electrical, and magnetic characterization of arc-melted, as-cast V_{1-x}Zr_x alloys with x = 0–0.40. X-ray diffraction, SEM/EDS, and metallography show that rapid cooling drives successive peritectic and eutectic reactions, producing five phases (β-V, two ZrV2-type phases, α-Zr, and β-Zr precipitates), and resistivity shows that the ZrV2 phases percolate for x > 0.05, giving a zero-resistance transition near 8.5 K. The authors extract the critical current density Jc = 2ΔM/[a(1−a/3b)] from magnetization hysteresis, report Jc values up to about 10^3 A/mm² with the best performance in V0.60Zr0.40, and compare these with transport Jc data of NbTi and Nb3Sn wires. They determine Hc2(T) from M(H) deviations and fit it to the WHH model with parameters α = 2.1 and λ = 1.8, obtaining Hc2(0) ≈ 17.5 T. The normalized pinning force is fitted as a weighted sum of a grain-boundary term h^{0.5}(1−h)^2 and a point-defect term h^2(1−h), and a low-field peak at 2 K is attributed to flux pinning in the β-V phase using Hc2(β-V) ≈ 1.2 T. The conclusions claim large dissipationless current for x > 0.1 and identify eutectic-derived grain boundaries and point defects as the dominant pinning centers.

Significance. The paper's main value is its detailed metallurgical documentation of the non-equilibrium solidification path in V-rich V-Zr alloys and its identification of ZrV2 percolation for zirconium contents above about 10 at.%. It appears to present the first magnetization-based critical current density characterization for this composition range, with the as-cast V0.60Zr0.40 alloy showing Jc of order 10^3 A/mm² at low field and hysteresis persisting to roughly 15 T at 2 K; if confirmed by transport measurements, this would be a notable result for inexpensive, unprocessed alloys containing two superconducting phases. The directly measured zero-resistance and magnetization transitions are mutually consistent, and the authors are commendably explicit about their fit parameters (α = 2.1, λ = 1.8 and the A/B weights), which aids reproducibility.

major comments (4)
  1. [III, Fig. 6 and Conclusions] The load-bearing quantity of the paper is the critical current density Jc = 2ΔM/[a(1−a/3b)] extracted from magnetization hysteresis, yet the samples are five-phase composites in which only the ZrV2 network (percolating for x>0.05, Sf(ZrV2)=89–99% in Table I) is superconducting at the measurement temperatures and fields used for the high-field comparison (H>1.2 T at 2 K, where β-V is already normal). Applying the homogeneous Bean formula with the full sample cross-section yields an effective magnetization current density, but the manuscript never demonstrates that this quantity equals the current the specimen can actually transport along its length; a transport Jc measurement is required before the comparison to the transport critical currents of NbTi and Nb3Sn wires in Fig. 6 can be taken at face value. In addition, the Conclusions state that the Jc of the x>0.29 alloys is 'in the range of modern Nb-Ti wires', which is inconsistent with the Fig. 6 caption reporting that V0.60Zr0.40 is 'about 5 times smaller than that of modern NbTi wire below 11 T and 4 K'; this contradiction should be resolved and the claims re-based on a consistent definition.
  2. [III, Fig. 7 and Table II] The pinning-mechanism attribution rests on a two-parameter fit Fp/Fp,m = A h^0.5(1−h)^2 + B h^2(1−h) to the very data from which Fp was constructed. The weights A and B are fit parameters, but no uncertainties or fit-quality measures are given, so the claim that A/B>1 makes grain boundaries 'the predominant pinning centres' is not quantitatively supported. More importantly, the manuscript states that 'the low field peak observed at 2 K could not be explained by the functional forms given in table 2 unless we take different HC2/Hirr (∼ 1.2 T) in estimating h'; assigning the peak to β-V by re-scaling h with Hc2(β-V)=1.2 T changes the meaning of the abscissa between the two components of the same plot. Because the peak's interpretation is chosen after seeing the data, the two-pinning-mechanism decomposition is not a falsifiable test, and the statement that the peak 'indicates that the β-V phase exists all the way up to x=0.40' should be softened accordingly.
  3. [III, Fig. 5(b)] The temperature dependence of Hc2 is obtained by reading fields at which M(H) deviates from the normal state and then fitting the WHH model with two free parameters, α=2.1 and λ=1.8. The claimed error of less than 2% in Hc2 is stated without an error analysis, and the sensitivity of Hc2(0)≈17.5 T to the choice of α and λ is not shown. Since the same Hc2/Hirr values define the reduced field h used in the pinning-force analysis, the unquantified fit freedom propagates directly into the pinning-mechanism conclusions; at minimum the fit residuals and parameter covariance should be reported.
  4. [III, Table I] The superconducting volume fraction Sf(ZrV2) is estimated as M(5.7 K)/M(2 K) in a 10 mT ZFC measurement. This ratio is not a volume fraction: the ZFC shielding signal depends on the demagnetizing factor of the composite, on the lower critical fields of the two phases, and on the interconnectivity of the ZrV2 network (β-V regions embedded inside the ZrV2 matrix would be screened before contributing their own shielding signal). The statement that 'Sf(ZrV2) is not 100% for any of the present alloys which indicates that the β-V phase exists all the way up to x=0.40' therefore goes beyond what the magnetization ratio alone can establish; the XRD and metallography evidence is the more direct support and should be used instead.
minor comments (5)
  1. [III, Fig. 6] The manuscript does not report the sample dimensions a and b used in the Bean formula for each alloy, nor their measurement uncertainty; without these values the absolute scale of Jc(H) in Fig. 6 cannot be independently checked.
  2. [III, Fig. 6] Figure 6 shows Jc(H) without error bars, although the hysteresis width near the irreversibility field becomes comparable to the measurement noise; representative error bars or a stated noise floor would make the high-field behavior, including the comparison to wire data, easier to evaluate.
  3. [III, Fig. 7] In the discussion of Fig. 7 the text refers to 'curve 1', 'curve 2', and 'curve 3' while the figure legend identifies the mechanisms only loosely; explicit labels (grain-boundary, point-defect, β-V) on the plot would remove ambiguity.
  4. [III, Fig. 5(b)] The WHH fit parameters (α = 2.1, λ = 1.8) are given in the text but not in the Fig. 5(b) caption or in a table; placing them with the figure would make the dotted, dashed, and solid lines self-explanatory.
  5. [III] There is a typo in the pinning discussion: 'fornctional form' should read 'functional form', and the field-sweep protocol used for the M(H) loops (rate, averaging, and field range) should be stated so that the ΔM data can be reproduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central quantities are measured or fitted as data description, and the load-bearing comparisons rest on standard external formulas.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The upper critical field Hc2(T) is read from magnetization deviations and then fitted with the WHH model; the parameters alpha=2.1 and lambda=1.8 are fitting parameters for the same data, not independent predictions, and the fitted curve is not used as evidence that the model is correct beyond describing the measured Hc2(T). The critical current density Jc is obtained from the standard Bean critical-state expression Jc = 2*Delta M/[a(1-a/3b)]; this is an application of an external textbook formula to measured hysteresis loops, not a quantity constructed from the conclusion it supports. Applying this homogeneous formula to multiphase alloys is a modeling assumption and a potential correctness risk, but it is not circular. The pinning-force analysis uses the Dew-Hughes functional forms with fitted weights A and B for the two mechanisms; fitting weights to the same normalized pinning-force curve is data description, and the paper does not present the fitted decomposition as an independent prediction. The low-field peak at 2 K is explained by taking the beta-V Hc2 to be about 1.2 T, which is presented as a known property of the beta-V phase rather than a parameter fitted from the pinning-force peak. The self-citations (refs. 29, 31, 42) are methodological references to standard procedures for Hc2 estimation, the Bean formula, and Dew-Hughes-type pinning analysis; they are not load-bearing in the sense of importing an unverified uniqueness claim or defining the target result into existence. The comparisons with NbTi and Nb3Sn wires are external benchmarks applied to the magnetically derived Jc, and any concern about comparability of magnetization-derived versus transport Jc is a correctness/validity concern, not circularity. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited under the required standard, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rely on standard solidification theory, the critical state model, and Dew-Hughes pinning functions. The fitted WHH parameters (alpha, lambda) and pinning force weights (A, B) are data-dependent, and the low-field peak explanation uses a fixed Hc2 for beta-V.

free parameters (5)
  • WHH paramagnetic parameter alpha = 2.1
    Fitted to the Hc2(T) data to reproduce the upward curvature; not independently constrained.
  • WHH spin-orbit coupling parameter lambda = 1.8
    Fitted together with alpha to match Hc2(T) at low temperatures.
  • A (grain boundary pinning weight) = not reported
    Weight for the h^0.5(1-h)^2 component in the Fp/Fp,m fit; fitted to measured pinning force.
  • B (point defect pinning weight) = not reported
    Weight for the h^2(1-h) component in the Fp/Fp,m fit; fitted to measured pinning force.
  • Hc2 of beta-V at 2 K used to explain low-field peak = 1.2 T
    Chosen to normalize h for the low-field pinning peak at 2 K; taken as a known value for beta-V but used post hoc to make the peak consistent with volume Delta-kappa pinning.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The equilibrium V-Zr phase diagram (peritectic at 1300 C, eutectic at 1230 C, eutectoid at 777 C) from Ref 1 and 20 is correct.
    Used to interpret the phases observed in XRD and SEM and to label the as-cast microstructure as peritectic, hypo-eutectic, etc.
  • domain assumption The critical state model with a single sample dimension a and b applies to a multi-phase composite superconductor.
    Used to convert M(H) hysteresis into JC values; if the flux profile is not uniform across beta-V and ZrV2 regions, the JC magnitude is not exact.
  • domain assumption The Dew-Hughes functional forms for flux pinning (normal surface, point Delta-kappa, volume Delta-kappa) correctly describe pinning in this alloy.
    Used to interpret Fp/Fp,m(h) and to attribute pinning to grain boundaries and point defects.
  • domain assumption Magnetization at 5.7 K represents only the ZrV2 shielding response, so Sf(ZrV2) = M(5.7K)/M(2K).
    Used to estimate superconducting volume fractions; ignores inter-phase shielding and demagnetization effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconductivity in V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys]{Evolution of high field superconductivity and high critical current density in the as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V7IS7NZD

@misc{pith2026190807288,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconductivity in V$_1-x$Zr$_x$ alloys]Evolution of high field superconductivity and high critical current density in the as-cast V$_1-x$Zr$_x$ alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V7IS7NZD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07288}
}
abstract

We report here the structural, electrical and magnetic properties of as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys ($x$ =0 - 0.4) at low temperatures. We observe that all the alloys undergo successive peritectic and eutectic reactions during cooling from the melt which leads to the formation of five phases, namely, a body centred cubic $\beta$-V phase, two phases with slightly different compositions having face centred cubic ZrV$_2$ structure, a hexagonal closed packed $\alpha$-Zr phase, and the $\beta$-Zr precipitates. The amount of each phase is found to be dependent on the concentration of zirconium in vanadium. The $\beta$-V and ZrV$_2$ phases show superconductivity below 5.3~K and 8.5~K respectively. We show that the critical current density is large for V-rich V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys with $x >$ 0.1. The grain boundaries generated from the eutectic reaction, and the point defects formed due to the variation in the composition are found to be responsible for the pinning of flux lines in low and high magnetic fields respectively. Our studies reveal that the choice of the composition and the heat treatment which leads to eutectic reaction are important in improving the critical current density in this alloy system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07288 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (color online) X-ray diffraction patterns of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (color online) Scanning electron microscopy images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (color online) Temperature dependence of magneti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (color online) (a) Magnetic field dependence of mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (color online) Normalized pinning force density of t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Two channel heat conduction in the superconducting state of the as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys

    cond-mat.supr-con 2019-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    In as-cast V1-xZrx alloys, superconducting-state thermal conductivity exceeds BCS predictions, but the 'two-parallel-channel' explanation uses a series model that contradicts the claimed normal channel.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. T. Williams, Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. Paper 13305 ( The vanadium-zirconium alloy system , Iowa state collage) pp.1-73 (1954)

    work page 1954

  2. [2]

    X. -S. Zhao, G. -H. Yuan, M. -Y. Yao, Q. Yue, and J. -Y. Shen, Calphad 36 163 (2012) and the references therein

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    J. Cui, C. Guo, L. Zou, C. Li, and Z. Du, Calphad 53 122 (2016) and the references therein

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Inoue, T

    K. Inoue, T. Kuroda, and K. Tachikawa, J. Nucl. Mat. 133&134 815 (1985)

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Tenhover, IEEE Trans

    M. Tenhover, IEEE Trans. Mag. 17 1021 (1981)

    work page 1981

  6. [6]

    Tachikawa, Cryogenics 19 307 (1979)

    K. Tachikawa, Cryogenics 19 307 (1979)

    work page 1979

  7. [7]

    B. S. Brown, J. W. Hafstrom and T. E. Klippert, J. Appl. Phys. 48 1759 (1977)

    work page 1977

  8. [8]

    I. A. Naskidashvili, L. S. Topchyan, A. I. Naskidashvi-Li and E. S. Makarenkov, Rad. Effects Lett. 85 97 (1984)

    work page 1984

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Inoue, H

    K. Inoue, H. Wada, T. Kuroda, and K. Tachikawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 38 939 (1981)

    1981

  2. [10]

    Hishinuma, A

    Y. Hishinuma, A. Kikuchi, Y. Iijima, Y. Yoshida, T. Takeuchi, A. Nishimura and K. Inoue, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 17 1031 (2004)

    2004

  3. [11]

    Segal, C

    C. Segal, C. Tarantini, Z. H. Sung, P. J. Lee, B. Sailer, M. Thoener, K. Schlenga, A. Ballarino, L. Bottura, B. Bordini, C. Scheuerlein, and D. C. Larbalestier, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29 085003 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Inoue, T

    K. Inoue, T. Kuroda, and K. Tachikawa, IEEE Trans. Mag. 15 635 (1979)

    1979

  5. [13]

    T. P. Beales, Jo Jutson, L. L. Lay, and M. M \"o lgg, J. Mater. Chem. 7 653 (1997)

    1997

  6. [14]

    Imaduddin, Hendrik, S

    A. Imaduddin, Hendrik, S. D. Yudanto, H. Nugraha, P. Sebleku, and A. W. Pramono, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1091 012004 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    u z, A. Bi c er and M. G \

    Y. Aky \"u z, A. Bi c er and M. G \"u r \"u , Mater. Des. 28 2500 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Y. Ma, Z. Gao, Y. Qi, X. Zhang, L. Wang, Z. Zhang, and D. Wang, Physica C 469 651 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Huang, C

    H. Huang, C. Yao, C. Dong, X. Zhang, D. Wang, Z. Cheng, J. Li, S. Awaji, H. Wen and Y. Ma, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31 015017 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Motowidlo, United States Patent US 9385295 B2 1 (2016)

    L. Motowidlo, United States Patent US 9385295 B2 1 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    J. L. H. Lindenhovius, E. M. Hornsveld, A. den Ouden, W. A. J. Wessel, and H. H. J. ten Kate, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 10 975 (2000)

    2000

  12. [20]

    Servant, J

    C. Servant, J. Phase Equilib. Diff. 26 39 (2005)

    2005

  13. [21]

    T. R. Finlayson and H. R. Khan, Appl. Phys. 17 165 (1978)

    1978

  14. [22]

    See eg. S. V. Vonsovsky, Yu. A. Izyumov, and E. Z. Kurmaev in Superconductivity of transition metals, their alloys and compounds (Translated by E. H. Brandt and A. P. Zavarnitsyn) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) (1982)

    1982

  15. [23]

    Akahama, M

    Y. Akahama, M. Kobayashi, and H. Kawamura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59 3843 (1990)

    1990

  16. [24]

    Yasohama, and N

    K. Yasohama, and N. Usui, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 7 1128 (1968)

    1968

  17. [25]

    Kraus, and G

    W. Kraus, and G. Nolze, J. Appl. Cryst. 29 301 (1996)

    1996

  18. [26]

    A. R. Bailey in Introductory Practical Metallography (Metallurgical Services Laboratories Ltd., Surrey, England) (1974)

    1974

  19. [27]

    S. B. Roy, Z. Hossain, A. K. Pradhan, C. Mazumdar, P. Chaddah, R. Nagarajan, C. Godart and L. C. Gupta, Physica C 228 319 (1994) and the references therein

    1994

  20. [28]

    S. B. Roy, Z. Hossain, A. K. Pradhan, P. Chaddah, R. Nagarajan, and L. C. Gupta, Physica C 256 90 (1996) and the references therein

    1996

  21. [29]

    L. S. Sharath Chandra, M. K. Chattopadhyay and S. B. Roy, Phil. Mag. 92 3866 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand and P. C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. 147 295 (1966)

    1966

  23. [31]

    Shyam Sundar, M. K. Chattopadhyay, L. S. Sharath Chandra, and S. B. Roy, Physica C 519 13 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Enderlein, A

    G. Enderlein, A. Handstein, F. Lange, and P. Verges, Cryogenics 13 426 (1973)

    1973

  25. [33]

    O. V. Chernyj, G. F. Tikhinskij, G. E. Storozhilov, M. B. Lazareva, L. A. Kornienko, N. F. Andrlevskaya, V. V. Slezov, V. V. Sagalovich, D. Ya Starodubov, and S. I. Savchenko, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 4 318 (1991)

    1991

  26. [34]

    Boutboul, S

    T. Boutboul, S. Le Naour, D. Leroy, L. Oberli, and V. Previtali, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 16 1184 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Miyashita, H

    K. Miyashita, H. Sato, M. Arika, and R. Takahashi, Ele. Eng. Jpn 156 24 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    H. Lin, C. Yao, H. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Zhang, C. Dong, D. Wang, and Y. Ma, Sci. Rep. 5 11506 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Fl \"u kiger, D

    R. Fl \"u kiger, D. Uglietti, C. Senatore, and F. Buta, Cryogenics 48 293 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Hishinuma, A

    Y. Hishinuma, A. Kikuchi, Y. Iijima, Y. Yoshida, T. Takeuchi, K. Inoue, and A. Nishimura, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 16 1196 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Inoue, and K

    K. Inoue, and K. Tachikawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 29 386 (1976)

    1976

  32. [40]

    Inoue, K

    K. Inoue, K. Tachikawa, and Y. Iwasa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 18 235 (1971)

    1971

  33. [41]

    Dew-Hughes, Phil

    D. Dew-Hughes, Phil. Mag. 30 293 (1974)

    1974

  34. [42]

    Matin, L

    Md. Matin, L. S. Sharath Chandra, M. K. Chattopadhyay, R. K. Meena, Rakesh Kaul, M. N. Singh, A. K. Sinha, and S. B. Roy, J. Appl. Phys. 113 163903 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.