Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Structure of amorphous Cu$_2$GeTe$_3$ and a model for its fast phase-change mechanism

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The amorphous phase of Cu2GeTe3 is a distorted copy of the crystal, reached when Cu atoms move into the centers of 6-fold rings.

desk verdict Useful new experimental partial structure data for a phase-change material, wrapped in a ring-based mechanism that is plausible but rests on one RMC configuration. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07297 v1 pith:TLAJNVZQ submitted 2019-08-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jens R. Stellhorn , Benedict Paulus , Shinya Hosokawa , Wolf-Christian Pilgrim , Nathalie Boudet , Nils Blanc , Yuji Sutou This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Cu2GeTe3phase-changematerialanomalousx-rayscatteringreverseMonteCarloringstatisticswrongbondsamorphousstructuretetrahedralcoordination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to determine the atomic structure of amorphous Cu2GeTe3 and to explain why this phase-change material switches so fast. Using anomalous x-ray scattering and extended x-ray absorption fine structure data, analyzed with reverse Monte Carlo simulation, it concludes that the amorphous phase is structurally close to the crystal: bond lengths barely change, tetrahedral coordination is preserved in a distorted form, and many 6-fold rings survive. The proposed mechanism is that small atomic motions, especially of Cu atoms moving toward the centers of the crystal's 6-fold rings, create wrong Cu-Cu and Te-Te bonds, densify the material, and fragment some rings while leaving others intact. If correct, this means the crystal-amorphous transition is a short-displacement rearrangement, which would explain the low power and short pulse width needed to amorphize this material.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 6-fold ring of the Cu2GeTe3 crystal, identified by ring-statistics analysis of the reverse Monte Carlo configuration. Ring statistics computed with the R.I.N.G.S. program give the size distribution of irreducible closed bond paths; the crystal has only 6-rings, while the amorphous model has a maximum at 6 plus many 3-rings and some larger rings. The proposed phase-change mechanism is literally a geometric operation on this motif: atoms move toward the ring centers, converting a 6-ring into smaller rings while creating new Cu-Cu, Te-Te, and Cu-Ge contacts. This operation unifies the density increase, the high Cu coordination, the 60° bond-angle peak, and the persistence of 6-ring character in one picture.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to repeat the same RMC fitting from several independent random starting configurations and constraint sets (for example, different minimum Cu-Ge distances and inclusion or exclusion of the 3-ring penalty) and check whether the 6-ring-centered distribution, the roughly 5.4 Cu coordination, and the wrong-bond fractions persist. If the structural conclusions vary beyond the quoted uncertainties, the specific ring-center-motion model is not uniquely determined by the data. Alternatively, a melt-quench ab initio molecular dynamics run at the experimental density that reproduces the measured partial structure factors could track whether atoms indeed move predominantly toward 6-ring centers during quenching.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that amorphous Cu2GeTe3 is best described as a distorted derivative of the Imm2 crystal rather than a chemically randomized network. In the crystal, all atoms sit in corner-sharing CuTe4 and GeTe4 tetrahedra and every ring is 6-membered. In the amorphous model extracted from the data, average interatomic distances are within about 0.1 Å of the crystal values, the bond-angle distribution clusters near 109° with an extra 60° component, and the ring statistics show a broad distribution centered at 6-membered rings. The paper argues that the transition is driven by atoms, particularly Cu, moving toward the centers of the 6-fold rings. That motion raises the Cu coordination to about 5.4, creates Cu-Cu and Te-Te wrong bonds that do not exist in the crystal, fragments rings into 3- and 5-membered loops, and increases the density, while preserving many distorted 6-ring motifs. Because amorphization and crystallization are then reverses of the same small displacements, the fast switching is explained without large-scale bond rupture.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that a single reverse Monte Carlo configuration, started from one random 10,000-atom box with manually set minimum interatomic distances, faithfully represents the real amorphous network; because reverse Monte Carlo is stochastic and does not guarantee a unique solution, the coordination numbers, bond-angle distributions, and ring statistics could depend on the starting configuration and constraints.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Amorphous and crystalline Cu2GeTe3 are structurally close, so the crystal-amorphous transition is a short-range rearrangement rather than a global reconfiguration.
  • Fast switching follows from the preservation of 6-fold ring motifs: crystallization is the reverse of small ring-center displacements and requires no umbrella-flip-type motion.
  • The high mobility of Cu atoms is a key enabler of the transition, consistent with the increased Cu coordination and wrong-bond formation in the amorphous state.
  • Coordination numbers are all greater in the amorphous phase than in the crystal, explaining the higher density and the negative optical contrast of this material.
  • AXS data establish Cu-Ge bonds that previous experiments could not confirm; removing them degrades the fit, so any model of the amorphous phase must include them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's picture implies that the energy cost of switching is set by the barrier for Cu displacement into ring centers rather than by a network-breaking transition; a direct calculation of that barrier, not reported here, would be a natural next step.
  • If ring-center displacement is the universal mechanism for tetrahedrally bonded phase-change materials, then Cu content or any dopant that pins Cu mobility should change crystallization speed in a predictable way, an experimentally testable extension.
  • The specific ring building blocks (Cu2Te triangles, Cu2GeTe2 pentagons, Cu3GeTe2 hexagons) could be probed further by element-selective EXAFS or by training a machine-learned potential on the RMC configuration and computing vibrational and kinetic properties.
  • Because the amorphous phase is denser and has wrong bonds, optical contrast here likely tracks Cu coordination and homopolar bond density rather than resonant p-bonding as in GeSbTe; looking for a correlation between reflectivity and Cu coordination across compositions would test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports anomalous x-ray scattering (AXS) and extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements on amorphous Cu2GeTe3, combined with reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) modeling to extract partial structure factors, pair correlation functions, coordination numbers, bond angle distributions, and ring statistics. On this basis, the authors propose a phase-change mechanism in which atoms, especially Cu, move toward the centers of the 6-fold rings of the crystalline structure, producing wrong bonds, smaller rings, and a broader ring distribution while preserving some distorted 6-membered ring motifs. The paper argues that this structural similarity explains the experimentally observed fast amorphization and crystallization behavior of this phase-change material.

Significance. The experimental AXS data and the direct comparison between RMC fits with and without Cu-Ge bonds are valuable: the limited-versus-full model comparison (§2) gives a concrete, data-driven argument for the presence of Cu-Ge bonds, and the fitted partial structure factors and pair correlations are consistent with the measured total scattering and XAFS. If the structural model is robust, the proposed mechanism is an attractive explanation for the fast phase change in Cu2GeTe3, linking the increased density, negative optical contrast, and short-displacement rearrangement. However, the central structural claims (coordination numbers, bond-angle distribution, and especially ring statistics) are derived from a single RMC configuration without ensemble averaging or uncertainty quantification, so the quantitative support for the phase-change model is currently incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2 and §3] The RMC analysis uses a single 10,000-atom input configuration with manually adjusted minimum interatomic distances, and all structural outputs in §3 and §4 (coordination numbers, bond angle distributions, ring statistics) are read from this one run. Since RMC is a stochastic, ill-posed inverse method, the reported ring statistics and coordination numbers could vary substantially between independent runs that fit the data equally well. The sensitivity in Table 3 between the "present" and "limited" models (CuGe 0.73 vs 0, GeTe 1.83 vs 2.68) already demonstrates that derived quantities depend strongly on input choices. The manuscript should either report an ensemble of RMC runs with different random initial configurations and constraint values, or provide convergence diagnostics and explicit statements about the variability. Without this, the specific network features that underlie the phase-change model are not established with the claimed certainty.
  2. [§4.3 and §4.4] The phase-change model is built on the ring statistics shown in Fig. 5, in particular the maximum at n=6 and the large number of 3-fold rings. The penalty test in §4.3 shows that removing 60° bond angles degrades the fit, but it does not validate the actual ring-size distribution; it only establishes that some population of small angles is needed to reproduce the data. The paper should add a direct sensitivity analysis of the ring statistics, for example by computing ring distributions from multiple RMC configurations, by varying the coordination cutoff, or by comparing against AIMD-derived ring statistics. Without such tests, the assertion that "the dominance of the 6-rings ... contributes to the high speed of the phase transition" (last paragraph of §4.4) rests on a feature that may be an artifact of a single stochastic model.
  3. [§4.1 and Table 3] The coordination numbers in Table 3 are obtained by integrating partial pair correlation functions up to "the first minimum ... around 3.0 Å", but no precise cutoff values or estimates of the sensitivity to this choice are given. In disordered phases, the first minima of gij(r) are often shallow, and small changes in the cutoff can change coordination numbers by several tenths. Because the increased coordination numbers and the presence of wrong bonds are central to the proposed mechanism, the authors should quantify how the coordination numbers and the derived ring statistics vary with reasonable changes in the cutoff and state whether the qualitative conclusions in §4.4 are robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2] The first sentence of the second paragraph, "The AXS experiment were performed at the beamline BM02", contains a grammatical error; it should read "The AXS experiments were performed".
  2. [§3] The text says "Figures 3 and 2 give an overview" but the figures are numbered Fig. 2 and Fig. 3; please reorder the citation or the figures so the numbering is consistent.
  3. [Table 3] The table caption does not define the "limited" model; please state in the caption that this refers to the RMC run using only the total structure factor and XAFS data with Cu-Ge bond formation excluded.
  4. [§4.2] The bond angle distribution is described as being calculated "around the individual elements", but the definition of a bond (the cutoff used to define a neighbor pair) is not given in that subsection; please state the cutoff or refer explicitly to the cutoff used for coordination numbers.
  5. [Fig. 5] The caption states the inset shows the crystal structure, but it would be helpful to specify that the ring statistics for the crystal are computed for the same ring definition (irreducible rings) and to note that only 6-membered rings are present in the crystal.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the RMC structural outputs are fit to external AXS/XAFS data, and the phase-change model is an interpretation rather than a derived prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain in this paper is not circular. The structural quantities (coordination numbers, bond-angle distributions, ring statistics) are outputs of a reverse Monte Carlo model constrained by measured AXS and XAFS data, not by the conclusions drawn from them. The paper states: 'In each simulation step, individual atoms are moved randomly to minimize the difference between experimental structure factors and those computed from the simulated configuration using a Metropolis algorithm.' The Cu-Ge bond inference is supported by a control run excluding Cu-Ge contacts, which degrades the fit to the experimental data; this is a model-comparison argument, not the reaffirmation of an input. The 3-ring significance test likewise compares a constrained run against the unconstrained fit. The proposed phase-change mechanism (Section 4.4) is explicitly a qualitative model—'only small movements of the atoms are required to reach the amorphous state'—derived from the crystal structure and the fitted amorphous ring statistics, and it is not presented as a mathematical prediction or as a quantity fitted to data. The paper's self-citations to earlier AXS methodology are procedural and are not load-bearing for the central claim, and no uniqueness theorem is imported to force the interpretation. The main weakness, reliance on a single RMC configuration without ensemble averaging, is a robustness/uncertainty concern rather than a circularity, because the configuration was not constructed to reproduce the claimed ring statistics or the phase-change model. No circular step can be exhibited; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central structural model rests on a single RMC configuration fitted to experimental data with manually adjusted distance constraints; the ring statistics are derived from that same configuration. The phase-change mechanism additionally assumes that static structural similarity implies a low-barrier transformation path, and that the as-deposited film represents the device-relevant melt-quenched amorphous phase. No invented physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • RMC minimum interatomic distances (pair-specific) = Cu-Cu 2.45, Cu-Ge 2.35, Cu-Te 2.35, Ge-Ge 2.35, Ge-Te 2.35, Te-Te 2.45 Å; Cu-Ge raised to 3.1 Å in the exclusion runs
    Chosen near covalent radii and 'adjusted to fit the first coordination shells adequately' in Section 2. These hard-sphere constraints directly shape the partial pair correlations, coordination numbers, and ring statistics.
  • Coordination number cutoff = ~3.0 Å (first minimum of g_ij(r))
    Section 4.1 sets the cutoff for the coordination numbers in Table 3 to the first minimum around 3.0 Å. Different cutoffs change the tabulated coordination numbers, which are central to the structural interpretation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A single reverse Monte Carlo run, starting from one random 10,000-atom configuration, yields a representative structural model of the amorphous phase.
    Section 2 reports only one initial random configuration and no ensemble averaging or convergence tests. RMC is a stochastic inverse method, so coordination numbers and ring statistics may depend on the chosen run.
  • domain assumption The as-deposited sputtered amorphous film has essentially the same structure as the melt-quenched film used in devices.
    The experimental section states that the as-deposited phase exhibits almost identical properties compared to the melt-quenched film, citing refs [4] and [6]; structural identity is assumed rather than directly measured in this work.
  • domain assumption Ring statistics and bond-angle distributions calculated from the RMC configuration represent physical covalent bonding network motifs.
    Section 4.3 uses the R.I.N.G.S. program with cutoff-based connectivity. The choice of connectivity cutoff and the assignment of 'wrong bonds' are not validated against an independent probe.
  • ad hoc to paper Static structural similarity between crystal and amorphous phases is sufficient to infer a dynamical phase-change mechanism.
    The model in Section 4.4 is inferred from static ring and coordination data. No energy landscape, transition path, or time-dependent simulation is provided, so the mechanism is an interpretive extension beyond the measurements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structure of amorphous Cu$_2$GeTe$_3$ and a model for its fast phase-change mechanism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TLAJNVZQ

@misc{pith2026190807297,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structure of amorphous Cu$_2$GeTe$_3$ and a model for its fast phase-change mechanism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TLAJNVZQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07297}
}
abstract

The structure of amorphous Cu$_2$GeTe$_3$ is investigated by a combination of anomalous x-ray scattering and extended x-ray absorption fine structure experiments. The experimental data are analyzed with a reverse Monte Carlo modeling procedure, and interpreted in terms of the short- and intermediate-range order. Based on this information, a model for the phase transition in Cu$_2$GeTe$_3$ is proposed, in which atoms move toward the center of the 6-fold rings of the crystal structure, leading to the formation of wrong bonds and a broader distribution of ring structures, but also preserving some structural motifs of the crystal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07297 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental data. (a) AXS, (b) Ge XAFS, (c) Cu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. RMC results for the partial structure factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Bond angle distribution in a-CGT, around Cu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ring statistics in a-CGT. Inset: c-CGT. 4.3. Ring statistics These features can be understood by consider￾ing the rings statistics, which were calculated using the R.I.N.G.S. program.[31] A “ring” is defined as a closed path of covalent bonds originating from and leadi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Model for the phase transition in CGT. The crystal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wuttig, N

    M. Wuttig, N. Yamada, Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage, Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 824–832

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    S. R. Ovshinsky, Reversible electrical switching phe- nomena in disordered structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 (1968) 1450

    work page 1968

  3. [3]

    Sutou, T

    Y. Sutou, T. Kamada, M. Sumiya, Y. Saito, J. Koike, Crystallization process and thermal stability of Ge 1Cu2Te3 amorphous thin films for use as phase change materials, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 872

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Saito, Y

    Y. Saito, Y. Sutou, J. Koike, Optical contrast and laser- induced phase transition in Ge1Cu2Te3 thin film, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 (2013) 051910

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Yamada, E

    N. Yamada, E. Ohno, K. Nishiuchi, N. Akahira, M. Takao, Rapid-phase transitions of GeTe-Sb 2Te3 pseudobinary amorphous thin films for an optical disk memory, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991) 2849

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    Saito, Y

    Y. Saito, Y. Sutou, J. Koike, Phase change character- istics in GeTe-CuTe pseudobinary alloy films, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 26973–26980

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Shportko, S

    K. Shportko, S. Kremers, M. Woda, D. Lencer, J. Robertson, M. Wuttig, Resonant bonding in crys- talline phase-change materials, Nat. Mater. 7 (2008) 653–658

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    G. E. Delgado, A. J. Mora, M. Pirela, A. Vel´ asquez- Vel´ asquez, M. Villarreal, B. J. Fern´ andez, Struc- tural refinement of the ternary chalcogenide compound Cu2GeTe3 by x-ray powder diffraction, Phys. Stat. Sol. A 201 (13) (2004) 2900–2904. 7

    work page 2004

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    J´ ov´ ari, Y

    P. J´ ov´ ari, Y. Sutou, I. Kaban, Y. Saito, J. Koike, Fourfold coordinated te atoms in amorphous GeCu2Te3 phase change material, Scr. Mater. 68 (2013) 122

    2013

  2. [10]

    Kamimura, S

    K. Kamimura, S. Hosokawa, N. Happo, H. Ikemoto, Y. Sutou, S. Shindo, Y. Saito, J. Koike, Xafs analysis on amorphous and crystalline new phase change material GeCu2Te3, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 18 (2016) 248

    2016

  3. [11]

    J. M. Skelton, K. Kobayashi, Y. Sutou, S. R. Elliott, Origin of the unusual reflectance and density contrasts in the phase-change material Cu 2GeTe3, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 (2013) 224105

    2013

  4. [12]

    Chen, X.-B

    N.-K. Chen, X.-B. Li, X.-P. Wang, M.-J. Xia, S.-Y. Xie, H.-Y. Wang, Z. Song, S. Zhanga, H.-B. Suna, Origin of high thermal stability of amorphous Ge 1Cu2Te3 alloy. a significant cu-bonding reconfiguration modulated by te lone-pair electrons for crystallization, Acta Mater. 90 (2...

    2015

  5. [13]

    Kohara, K

    S. Kohara, K. Kato, S. Kimura, H. Tanaka, T. Usuki, K. Suzuya, H. Tanaka, Y. Moritomo, T. Matsunaga, N. Yamada, Y. Tanaka, H. Suematsu, M. Takata, Struc- tural basis for the fast phase change of Ge 2Sb2Te5: Ring statistics analogy between the crystal and amor- phous states, Ap...

    2006

  6. [14]

    Akola, R

    J. Akola, R. O. Jones, Structural phase transitions on the nanoscale the crucial pattern in the phase-change materials Ge2Sb2Te5 and GeTe, Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 235201–1–10

    2007

  7. [15]

    Akola, R

    J. Akola, R. O. Jones, Structure of amorphous Ge8Sb2Te11 GeTe-Sb2Te3 alloys and optical storage, Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 134118

    2009

  8. [16]

    Heged¨ us, S

    J. Heged¨ us, S. R. Elliott, Microscopic origin of the fast crystallization ability of Ge-Sb-Te phase-change mem- ory materials, Nat. Mater. 7 (2008) 399–405

    2008

  9. [17]

    A. V. Kolobov, P. Fons, A. I. Frenkel, A. L. Ankudi- nov, J. Tominaga, T. Uruga, Understanding the phase- change mechanism of rewritable optical media, Nat. Mater. 3 (2004) 703–708

    2004

  10. [18]

    Hosokawa, W.-C

    S. Hosokawa, W.-C. Pilgrim, A. H¨ ohle, D. Szubrin, N. Boudet, J.-F. B´ erar, K. Maruyama, Key experi- mental information on intermediate-range atomic struc- tures in amorphous Ge 2Sb2Te5 phase change material, J. Appl. Phys. 111 (2012) 083517

    2012

  11. [19]

    Waseda, Novel Application of Anomalous (Reso- nance) X-Ray Scattering for Structural Characteriza- tion of Disordered Materials, Berlin, Springer, 1984

    Y. Waseda, Novel Application of Anomalous (Reso- nance) X-Ray Scattering for Structural Characteriza- tion of Disordered Materials, Berlin, Springer, 1984

    1984

  12. [20]

    Krogh-Moe, A method for converting experimental x- ray intensities to an absolute scale, Acta Cryst

    J. Krogh-Moe, A method for converting experimental x- ray intensities to an absolute scale, Acta Cryst. 9 (11) (1956) 951–953

    1956

  13. [21]

    Norman, The fourier transform method for normal- izing intensities, Acta Cryst

    N. Norman, The fourier transform method for normal- izing intensities, Acta Cryst. 10 (1957) 370

    1957

  14. [22]

    Hosokawa, I

    S. Hosokawa, I. Oh, M. Sakurai, W.-C. Pilgrim, N. Boudet, J.-F. B´ erar, S. Kohara, Anomalous x-ray scattering study of Ge xSe1−x glassy alloys across the stiffness transition composition, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 014201

    2011

  15. [23]

    J. R. Stellhorn, S. Hosokawa, W.-C. Pilgrim, Micro- scopic structure analysis in disordered materials using anomalous x-ray scattering, Z. Phys. Chem. 228 (10-12) (2014) 1005–1031

    2014

  16. [24]

    Hosokawa, Y

    S. Hosokawa, Y. Wang, J.-F. B´ erar, J. Greif, W.-C. Pil- grim, K. Murase, Anomalous x-ray scattering studies on glassy Ge xSe1−x across the stiffness threshold compo- sition x = 0.20, Z. Phys. Chem. 216 (2002) 1219–1238

    2002

  17. [25]

    Hosokawa, W.-C

    S. Hosokawa, W.-C. Pilgrim, J.-F. B´ erar, S. Kohara, Anomalous x-ray scattering studies on semiconducting and metallic glasses, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 208 (2012) 291

    2012

  18. [26]

    Gereben, P

    O. Gereben, P. J´ ov´ ari, L. Temleitner, L. Pusztai, A new version of the RMC++ reverse monte carlo programme, aimed at investigating the structure of covalent glasses, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 9 (2007) 3021–3027

    2007

  19. [27]

    Gereben, L

    O. Gereben, L. Pusztai, RMC POT: A computer code for reverse monte carlo modeling the structure of dis- ordered systems containing molecules of arbitrary com- plexity, J. Comput. Chem. 33 (2012) 2285–2291

    2012

  20. [28]

    Pyykk¨ o, Refitted tetrahedral covalent radii for solids, Phys

    P. Pyykk¨ o, Refitted tetrahedral covalent radii for solids, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 024115

    2012

  21. [29]

    J´ ov´ ari, I

    P. J´ ov´ ari, I. Kaban, J. Steiner, B. Beuneu, A. Sch¨ op, A. Webb, ‘Wrong bonds’ in sputtered amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 (2007) 335212–1–9

    2007

  22. [30]

    J´ ov´ ari, I

    P. J´ ov´ ari, I. Kaban, J. Steiner, B. Beuneu, A. Sch¨ op, A. Webb, Local order in amorphous Ge 2Sb2Te5 and GeSb2Te4, Phys. Rev. B 77 (3) (2008) 035202

    2008

  23. [31]

    S. L. Roux, P. Jund, Ring statistics analysis of topolog- ical networks, Comp. Mater. Sci. 49 (2010) 70–83

    2010

  24. [32]

    Momma, F

    K. Momma, F. Izumi, Vesta 3 for three-dimensional vi- sualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Cryst. 44 (2011) 1272–1276

    2011

  25. [33]

    Kobayashi, J

    K. Kobayashi, J. M. Skelton, Y. Saito, S. Shindo, M. Kobata, P. Fons, A. V. Kolobov, S. Elliott, D. Ando, Y. Sutou, Understanding the fast phase-change mecha- nism of tetrahedrally bonded Cu2GeTe3 comprehensive analyses of electronic structure and transport phenom- ena, Phys. ...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.