Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Libra: Is it Really about Money?

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that Libra is best understood not as a bid to create a new currency but as Facebook's effort to become the high-assurance identity provider for financial services.

desk verdict A well-written 2019 opinion essay arguing Libra is really an identity play; the core claim is plausible but unsupported at its decisive step, yet it deserves a serious policy referee. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07474 v2 pith:BRULUHXQ submitted 2019-08-20 cs.CY

Valerie Khan , Geoffrey Goodell This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CY
keywords LibraFacebookdigitalidentityhigh-assuranceauthenticationfinancialsurveillancedatabrokersanti-money-launderingCalibra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to reframe the public debate about Facebook's Libra: instead of asking whether the 'stablecoin' will disrupt banks, it asks what Libra does for Facebook's data business. It proposes that Libra is best seen as a critical enabler for Facebook to acquire a new source of personal data, specifically high-assurance digital identity information, by cooperating with financial regulators concerned about money laundering and terrorist financing. A sympathetic reader should care because if the argument is right, Libra's real stakes are not monetary but political: control over who can prove who they are in the financial system, and the power to link that proof to Facebook's existing advertising profiles. The paper therefore argues that state actors beyond financial regulators—those responsible for reputational risks, the rule of law, public safety, and national defence—should treat Libra as a matter of identity governance, not just payments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the authors' definition of identity as the linkage of transactions or attributes, combined with the process of record linking or entity resolution. Under this view, once Facebook authenticates a user for a financial transaction, each subsequent transaction is another attribute attached to the same unitary person, so a high-assurance identity is built up silently regardless of formal 'separation' between Calibra and Facebook's ad database. The paper also uses the closed-loop design of Calibra and the FATF-driven regulatory demand for know-your-customer data as the machinery that hands Facebook this position: regulators want the surveillance, and Facebook is offering to build it without public funds.

What would settle it

The claim would be falsified by an implementation in which the Libra association adopts a genuinely neutral digital identity standard with multiple independent identity providers, Calibra is not the mandatory authentication hub, and a technical audit shows that transaction-side data cannot be correlated with Facebook's advertising identifiers; under those conditions Libra would not give Facebook privileged access to high-assurance identity data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, the discovery is that Libra's centre of gravity is Section 5 of its whitepaper—the goal of 'an open identity standard'—not the digital currency itself. The paper claims that Facebook can use the regulatory demand for anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing controls to position itself as the authentication provider for the financial system: everyone who wants to use Libra would pass through Facebook's apps, and the transaction data that regulators want collected becomes inseparable from identity data. Because identity is really just the linkage of transactions or attributes, 'keeping Calibra data separate' from Facebook's database cannot prevent the formation of a unitary, high-assurance profile. The authors conclude that Libra would let Facebook complete the 'transparent citizen' and hand a private advertising company the role of gatekeeper for financial identity, a role traditionally reserved to governments.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that financial regulators will in practice accept Facebook as the identity provider for the financial system and will permit Libra's identity data to be combined with Facebook's existing advertising profiles, despite any formal promise to keep them separate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Facebook would control the identity layer of a large share of digital financial services, able to observe or infer every transaction routed through its authentication.
  • Regulators' anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing objectives would be met by a private, advertising-funded surveillance system, making Facebook a de facto public-identity authority.
  • Promises to keep Calibra's data separate from Facebook's ad profiles would not hold, because identity emerges from the pattern of transactions themselves.
  • Competing digital identity efforts would face an incumbent that already reaches 2.5 billion users across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger.
  • Defence, rule-of-law, and public-safety agencies would need to treat control of financial identity as a strategic question, since the same infrastructure can be used to influence or control populations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper's frame is right, the same identity layer could be extended beyond payments to credit scoring, insurance, employment verification, and government services, turning Facebook into an identity oracle for decisions far beyond advertising (the paper notes banks' interest in social-media credit data but does not develop this full generalization).
  • A testable extension would be to watch the Libra association's later standards: if genuine third-party identity providers that do not route through Facebook are marginalized or absent, the prediction is confirmed; if the standard is genuinely neutral and unlinkable, the prediction fails.
  • The paper's identity-as-linkage argument implies that privacy-preserving digital identity systems must make unlinkability a first-class design goal rather than attempt to separate silos of data after the fact; the authors gesture at this with the McIntyre anonymity principle but do not propose a technical architecture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that Facebook's Libra should not be read primarily as a financial innovation but as a strategic vehicle for Facebook to position itself as the provider of high-assurance digital identity for the financial sector. It grounds this reading in the Libra whitepaper's Section 5 on open identity standards, Facebook's existing data-broker practices, and the company's need for new data sources after slowing growth. The paper contends that by cooperating with financial regulators concerned with money laundering and terrorism, Facebook can gain privileged access to identity data, ultimately enabling a 'transparent citizen' with implications for privacy, the rule of law, and national security. The argument is presented as a policy-oriented synthesis of press reports, hearing testimony, and industry analyses rather than as an empirical study.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper usefully redirects policy attention toward the identity-related dimensions of Libra, which are commonly overshadowed by purely monetary or financial-stability concerns. The paper is clearly argued and non-circular: it assembles relevant references from congressional hearings, press reports, and industry analyses, and it explicitly acknowledges the regulator demand for data separation. Its strength is as a timely, hypothesis-generating commentary that names a concrete risk for state actors. However, it does not provide systematic evidence for Facebook's dominant intent, does not test alternative explanations for Libra's design, and offers no falsifiable predictions. The significance therefore rests on the plausibility of the narrative rather than on demonstrated causation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Tell me who you are, and I tell you what you want] The assertion that 'identity is really just the linkage of transactions or attributes. After a small number of transactions, the identity is known, even if it is never linked to exogenous information beyond the transactions themselves' is load-bearing because it is the only mechanism offered to show that Calibra transaction data, even if kept separate, yields high-assurance identity. The paper equivocates between the behavioral uniqueness of a pseudonymous profile and the recovery of the regulator-issued legal identity collected at onboarding. The cited literature on re-identification (refs [7] and [8]) supports record linkage across datasets, not the recovery of a legal name from pure transaction sequences without auxiliary data. The authors should either provide evidence for this claim or substantially soften it; otherwise the abstract's assertion of 'high-assurance digital identity information' lacks a supporting mechanism.
  2. [Abstract and Tell me who you are, and I tell you what you want] The argument assumes that financial regulators will, in effect, accept Facebook as the identity provider for the financial system and will permit the combination of Libra identity data with Facebook's existing advertising data. This premise appears in the abstract and in the section 'Tell me who you are, and I tell you what you want,' yet the paper also acknowledges that 'Regulators will demand Facebook to keep information from Calibra separate to the rest of the Facebook database.' The paper does not explain how this regulatory demand will be overcome, nor does it consider the possibility that regulators might insist on a neutral identity provider or on technical separation of Calibra from Facebook's core data. Because this premise is central to the paper's conclusion, it requires direct support or an explicit analysis of the regulatory negotiation, rather than being stated as an assumption.
  3. [The winner takes it all] The paper's central motive inference—that Libra is primarily a vehicle for Facebook to acquire identity data—is presented as a settled conclusion, but the evidence consists of selected press reports, testimony, and the placement of Section 5 in the Libra whitepaper. The paper does not systematically weigh alternative motivations, such as payments revenue, financial inclusion, or competitive pressure from WeChat Pay and other payment platforms, nor does it engage the public commitments of Libra executives and Calibra regarding data separation. If the manuscript is intended as a scholarly claim, it should either adopt an explicit evidentiary standard for motive inference or be framed more cautiously as a hypothesis to be investigated. As written, the strength of the conclusion exceeds the evidence adduced.
minor comments (5)
  1. [The winner takes it all (p. 6)] The name 'Markus' appears where 'Marcus' is intended; the paper should be consistent with the spelling used in the cited hearing.
  2. [Works Cited, ref. [8]] Reference [8] is listed as a Wikipedia entry but the URL points to an American Journal of Public Health article; the citation should be corrected and the source clearly identified.
  3. [Introduction and identity discussion] The paper uses 'identity' in several senses—legal identity, online account, behavioral profile—without defining them; a brief taxonomy or definition at first use would improve precision.
  4. [Digital Identity – a worthy business] The three market-size estimates (refs [25], [26], [27]) differ considerably in value and growth rate; one or two sentences explaining the methodological sources of these differences would help the reader interpret them.
  5. [A matter of power] The sentence about FATF Recommendations [18] is imprecise: FATF's customer due diligence requirements oblige payment providers to identify the customer and understand the transaction, but FATF does not simply require collecting 'information about the buyer, the seller and the transaction' as stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper makes an interpretive policy argument with explicit premises, no fitted inputs, and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

This is an argumentative policy essay rather than a derivation or empirical prediction, so there is no fitted parameter, equation, or self-citation chain that could reduce the conclusion to its inputs. The central claim that Libra is an enabler for Facebook to obtain personal data rests on the explicit premise that Calibra will collect transaction and KYC data and on the contested assertion that 'identity is really just the linkage of transactions or attributes.' That assertion is a stipulated definition used to argue that regulatory separation of transaction data from identity data is conceptually difficult; it is not a result derived from the paper's own conclusions, nor is it an input that has been renamed as a prediction. The argument is therefore non-circular, though the definitional move may be substantively debatable. Since no load-bearing self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, or fitted inputs appear, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is not a mathematical or empirical study, so it introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on domain assumptions about Facebook's motives, regulator behavior, and the significance of the whitepaper's identity language.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Facebook's core business incentive is to maximize acquisition of personal data.
    The paper's thesis depends on this assumption, stated in the introduction and throughout, but it is not independently proven.
  • domain assumption Financial regulators will require high-assurance identity and will accept Facebook as the provider.
    The claim that Facebook gains privileged access relies on regulator cooperation, discussed in the sections about money laundering and the House hearing.
  • domain assumption The identity standard in the Libra whitepaper is a deliberate, central element of the project.
    The paper treats the mention of an open identity standard in Section 5 of the whitepaper as a 'prolepsis' or hidden goal, which is an interpretive assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Libra: Is it Really about Money?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRULUHXQ

@misc{pith2026190807474,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Libra: Is it Really about Money?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRULUHXQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07474}
}
read the original abstract

The announcement by Facebook that Libra will "deliver on the promise of 'the internet of money'" has drawn the attention of the financial world. Regulators, institutions, and users of financial products have all been prompted to react and, so far, no one managed to convince the association behind Libra to apply the brakes or to convince regulators to stop the project altogether. In this article, we propose that Libra might be best seen not as a financial newcomer, but as a critical enabler for Facebook to acquire a new source of personal data. By working with financial regulators seeking to address concerns with money laundering and terrorism, Facebook can position itself for privileged access to high-assurance digital identity information. For this reason, Libra merits the attention of not only financial regulators, but also the state actors that are concerned with reputational risks, the rule of law, public safety, and national defence.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Constitutional and Regulatory: De-Identified Data and Third Party Data Mining: The Risk of Re-Identification of Personal Information,

    C. Porter, “Constitutional and Regulatory: De-Identified Data and Third Party Data Mining: The Risk of Re-Identification of Personal Information,” University of Washington Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce & Technology, 4 August 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [8]

    Record Linkage,

    H. L. Dunn, “Record Linkage,” Wikipedia, 29 Aug 2011. [Online]. Available: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.36.12.1412. [Accessed 09 Aug 2019]

    work page doi:10.2105/ajph.36.12.1412 2011

  3. [1]

    Whitepaper,

    Libra Association, “Whitepaper,” libra.org, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://libra.org/en-US/white-paper/#what-is-next-for-libra. [Accessed 09 Jul 2019]

    work page 2019

  4. [2]

    Facebook’s Libra forcing China to step up plans for its own cryptocurrency, says central bank official,

    F. Tang, “Facebook’s Libra forcing China to step up plans for its own cryptocurrency, says central bank official,” South China Morning Post, 8 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3017716/facebooks-libra- forcing-china-step-plans-its-own. [Accessed 9 Jul 2019]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [3]

    The New York Times,

    G. Fleishman, “The New York Times,” The New York Times, 14 Dec 2000. [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20171229172420/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/14 /technology/cartoon-captures-spirit-of-the-internet.html. [Accessed 5 Jul 2019]

    arXiv 2000

  6. [4]

    The Transparent Citizen,

    J. R. Reidenberg, “The Transparent Citizen,” Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal , Chicago, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [5]

    Claims-based identity for windows,

    D. Chappell, “Claims-based identity for windows,” Wikipedia, Feb 2011. [Online]. Available: http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/D/0/7D0B5166-6A8A-418A- ADDD-95EE9B046994/Claims-Based%20Identity%20for%20Windows.pdf. [Accessed 6 Jul 2019]

    work page 2011

  8. [6]

    The Intersect,

    Washington Post, “The Intersect,” The Washington Post, 19 Aug 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr- consent/?destination=%2fnews%2fthe-intersect%2fwp%2f2016%2f08%2f19%2f98- personal-data-points-that-facebook-uses-to-target-ads-to- you%2f%3f&utm_term=.12f0a02fa594. [Accessed 5 Jul 2019]

    work page 2016

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Law Students Teach Scalia About Privacy and the Web,

    N. Cohen, “Law Students Teach Scalia About Privacy and the Web,” The New York Times, 17 May 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/technology/internet/18link.html?auth=login- email. [Accessed 5 Jul 2019]

    2009

  2. [10]

    OSEPH McINTYRE, executor of estate of MARGARET McINTYRE, deceased, PETITIONER v. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION,

    Supreme Court of the United States, “OSEPH McINTYRE, executor of estate of MARGARET McINTYRE, deceased, PETITIONER v. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION,” Supreme Court of the United States, 19 Apr 1995. [Online]. Available: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-986.ZO.html. [Acces...

    1995

  3. [11]

    Kirkpatrick, The Facebook effect: The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World, Simon & Schuster, 2010

    D. Kirkpatrick, The Facebook effect: The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World, Simon & Schuster, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Facebook currency chief faces withering questioning from Democrats in Congress,

    L. Feiner, “Facebook currency chief faces withering questioning from Democrats in Congress,” CNBC, 17 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/17/facebook-currency-chief-questioned-at-house- financial-services-hearing.html. [Accessed 29 Jul 2019]. 9

    2019

  5. [13]

    Alex Jones was banned from Facebook, but an hour later he was back on Facebook livestreaming,

    T. Haselton, “Alex Jones was banned from Facebook, but an hour later he was back on Facebook livestreaming,” CNBC, 2 May 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/02/alex-jones-banned-from-facebook-but-hes- already-back.html. [Accessed 26 Jul 2019]

    2019

  6. [14]

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's exchange with Facebook's crypto boss exposed a big problem about who actually controls the Libra currency,

    A. Oreskovic, “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's exchange with Facebook's crypto boss exposed a big problem about who actually controls the Libra currency,” Business Insider, 18 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.in/alexandria- ocasio-cortezs-exchange-with-fac...

    2019

  7. [15]

    Committee Democrats Call on Facebook to Halt Cryptocurrency Plans,

    M. Waters, C. Maloney, L. Clay, A. Green and S. F. Lynch, “Committee Democrats Call on Facebook to Halt Cryptocurrency Plans,” US House Committee on Financial Services, 2 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404...

    2019

  8. [16]

    Facebook’s head of Libra crypto project tells Senate it needs help from governments and regulators,

    S. Rodriguez, “Facebook’s head of Libra crypto project tells Senate it needs help from governments and regulators,” CNBC, 9 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/09/facebooks-head-of-libra-project-responds-to- senate-banking-committee.html. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  9. [17]

    Why closed-loop systems like Libra won't change the world,

    I. Kaminska, “Why closed-loop systems like Libra won't change the world,” CNBC/ FT Alphaville, 18 Jun 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2019/06/21/1561127474000/Why-closed-loop-systems-like- Libra-won-t-change-the-world-/. [Accessed 15 Aug 2019]

    2019

  10. [18]

    FATF Recommendations,

    The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), “FATF Recommendations,” fatf-gafi, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.fatf- gafi.org/publications/fatfrecommendations/documents/fatf-recommendations.html. [Accessed 16 Aug 2019]

    2019

  11. [19]

    Facebook to Banks: Give Us Your Data, We’ll Give You Our Users,

    E. Glazer, D. Seetharaman and A. Andriotis, “Facebook to Banks: Give Us Your Data, We’ll Give You Our Users,” The Wall Street Journal, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-to-banks-give-us-your-data-well-give-you-our- users-1533564049. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  12. [20]

    The Conference Call That Shook Investor Faith in Facebook,

    D. Seetharaman, “The Conference Call That Shook Investor Faith in Facebook,” The Wall Street Journal, 26 Jul 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the- conference-call-that-shook-investor-faith-in-facebook-1532589109?mod=article_inline. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2018

  13. [21]

    Social Implications of the Computer Utility,

    P. Armer, “Social Implications of the Computer Utility,” The RAND Corporation, Aug

  14. [22]

    Facebook Buys Friendster Patents for $40M,

    L. Gannes, “Facebook Buys Friendster Patents for $40M,” Gigaom, 4 Aug 2010. [Online]. Available: https://gigaom.com/2010/08/04/facebook-buys-friendster-patents- for-40m/. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2010

  15. [23]

    Banks are working on using info from Facebook and other social media when millennials have no credit history,

    L. Brinded, “Banks are working on using info from Facebook and other social media when millennials have no credit history,” Business Insider, 23 Sep 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.com/yasaman-hadjibashi-at-barclays-africa- 10 banks-using-big-data-and-so...

    2016

  16. [24]

    Does Facebook Need A Humanitarian Partner For Its New Digital Currency?,

    M. Gharib, “Does Facebook Need A Humanitarian Partner For Its New Digital Currency?,” National Public Radio, 19 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://text.npr.org/s.php?sId=743157256. [Accessed 26 Jul 2019]

    2019

  17. [25]

    DIGITAL IDENTITY Technology Evolution, Regulatory Analysis & Forecasts 2019-2024,

    J. Moar, “DIGITAL IDENTITY Technology Evolution, Regulatory Analysis & Forecasts 2019-2024,” Juniper Research, 9 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.juniperresearch.com/researchstore/fintech-payments/digital- identity?utm_campaign=pr1_digitalidentity_financial_jul19&utm...

    2019

  18. [26]

    The Future of Personal ID to 2021,

    L. Rude, “The Future of Personal ID to 2021,” Smithers Pira, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.smitherspira.com/news/2016/july/edocuments-to-dominate-personal-id- market. [Accessed 28 Jul 2019]

    2021

  19. [27]

    [Online]

    Global Market Insights, “Personal Identity Management Market Size, Industry Outlook, Regional Analysis (U.S., Germany, UK, Italy, Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, UAE, South Africa), Application Development, Competitive Landscape & Foreca...

    2018

  20. [28]

    Digital Identity, Restoring trust in a digital world,

    Mastercard, “Digital Identity, Restoring trust in a digital world,” Mastercard, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mastercard.us/en-us/issuers/products-and- solutions/mastercard-digital-identity-service.html. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  21. [29]

    Visa Set to Launch Blockchain-Based Digital Identity System with IBM in Q1 2019,

    M. Huillet, “Visa Set to Launch Blockchain-Based Digital Identity System with IBM in Q1 2019,” cointelegraph, 22 Oct 2018. [Online]. Available: https://cointelegraph.com/news/visa-set-to-launch-blockchain-based-digital-identity- system-with-ibm-in-q1-2019. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  22. [30]

    PAYPAL’S FIRST BLOCKCHAIN BET: DIGITAL IDENTITY,

    P. H. Madore, “PAYPAL’S FIRST BLOCKCHAIN BET: DIGITAL IDENTITY,” CCN, 2 Apr 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.ccn.com/paypals-first-blockchain-bet-digital-identity/. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  23. [31]

    Microsoft ION brings decentralized identity management to the bitcoin blockchain,

    D. Riley, “Microsoft ION brings decentralized identity management to the bitcoin blockchain,” Silicon Angle, 13 May 2019. [Online]. Available: https://siliconangle.com/2019/05/13/microsoft-ion-brings-decentralized-identity- management-bitcoin-blockchain/. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  24. [32]

    Together we're building a new identity ecosystem,

    DIF, “Together we're building a new identity ecosystem,” DIF, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://identity.foundation/. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  25. [33]

    Microsoft Launches Decentralized Identity Tool on Bitcoin Blockchain,

    L. Cuen, “Microsoft Launches Decentralized Identity Tool on Bitcoin Blockchain,” Coindesk, 13 May 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.coindesk.com/microsoft- launches-decentralized-identity-tool-on-bitcoin-blockchain. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  26. [34]

    Coinbase Acquires Digital Identity Startup Distributed Systems,

    N. De, “Coinbase Acquires Digital Identity Startup Distributed Systems,” coindesk, 15 Aug 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.coindesk.com/coinbase-acquires-digital- identity-startup-distributed-systems. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2018

  27. [35]

    OWI & RegTechLab defragment the Identity Industry startup scene,

    C. D'Ambrosi, “OWI & RegTechLab defragment the Identity Industry startup scene,” One World Identity, 10 Feb 2017. [Online]. Available: 11 https://oneworldidentity.com/owi-regtech-lab-defragement-the-identity-industry- startup-scene/. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2017

  28. [36]

    2.5 billion people use at least one of Facebook’s apps,

    J. Constine, “2.5 billion people use at least one of Facebook’s apps,” Techcrunch , 25 Jul

  29. [37]

    FTC approves record $5B fine for Facebook,

    B. Ortutay, “FTC approves record $5B fine for Facebook,” AP News, 13 Jul 2019. [Online]. Available: https://apnews.com/7fa2c8a26b34436d89a1c7aff9914f70. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2019

  30. [38]

    The IRA, Social Media and Political Polarization in the United States, 2012-2018,

    P. N. Howard, B. Ganesh and D. Liotsiou, “The IRA, Social Media and Political Polarization in the United States, 2012-2018,” University of Oxford, Oxford, 2018

    2012

  31. [39]

    Demographic and Social Statistics Civil Registration and Vital Statistics,

    UNSTATS, “Demographic and Social Statistics Civil Registration and Vital Statistics,” UNSTATS, Aug 2016. [Online]. Available: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic- social/crvs/. [Accessed 15 Aug 2019]

    2016

  32. [1967]

    Available: https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:yg201wp3748/yg201wp3748.pdf

    [Online]. Available: https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:yg201wp3748/yg201wp3748.pdf. [Accessed 26 Jul 2019]

    2019

  33. [2018]

    Available: https://techcrunch.com/2018/07/25/facebook-2-5-billion- people/

    [Online]. Available: https://techcrunch.com/2018/07/25/facebook-2-5-billion- people/. [Accessed 2 Jul 2019]

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.