Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Accessing temperature waves: a dispersion relation perspective

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The first-order dual-phase-lag heat equation predicts that heat propagates as a bandpass-filtered wave whose best mode has $Q_{\max}=\sqrt{1/Z-1}$, and for graphite this mode sits at $k=4.3\times10^6\,\mathrm{m^{-1}}$ with $Q=25$.

desk verdict The Q-factor analysis is a genuinely useful analytical tool, but the graphite 'rationalization' fits the same data it claims to explain and should not be read as independent confirmation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07612 v1 pith:QM3KJR35 submitted 2019-08-18 cond-mat.mes-hall

Marco Gandolfi , Giulio Benetti , Christ Glorieux , Claudio Giannetti , Francesco Banfi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords temperaturewavesdual-phase-lagmodeldispersionrelationqualityfactorbandpassfiltertransientthermalgratingnanodevicesgraphite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's goal is to give experimentalists a simple analytical tool for deciding when heat propagates as a wave rather than diffusing. Working from the first-order dual-phase-lag (DPL) heat equation, the authors derive the complex dispersion relation for temperature and introduce a modal quality factor $Q$ that separates underdamped (wave-like) from overdamped and non-oscillatory modes. They show that when the temperature-gradient delay $\tau_T$ is shorter than the heat-flux delay $\tau_q$, a material acts as a bandpass filter for temperature waves: for a spatial temperature pulse, underdamped oscillations exist only for wavevectors between two cutoffs, with peak $Q$ at $k_{Q\max}=(\alpha\tau_q Z)^{-1/2}$ and $Q_{\max}=\sqrt{1/Z-1}$. For a forced oscillation in time, the same physics gives a resonance at $\omega_{Q\max}=Z^{-1/2}/\tau_q$ with $Q_{\max}=Z^{-1/2}$. Applying the formulas to the transient-grating experiment on graphite reproduces the measured $\omega$–$k$ dispersion and explains why two low-wavevector modes were not seen, while predicting a best-accessible mode at $Q=25$ for $k=4.3\times10^6\,\mathrm{m^{-1}}$.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the Jeffreys-type temperature equation obtained from a first-order Taylor expansion of the DPL constitutive relation $\mathbf{q}(t+\tau_q)=-\kappa_T\nabla T(t+\tau_T)$ combined with energy conservation: $(\tau_q/\alpha)\partial_t^2 T-\partial_x^2 T+\alpha^{-1}\partial_t T-\tau_T\partial_t\partial_x^2 T=0$. In dimensionless form it becomes the complex dispersion relation $\tilde{k}^2(1+iZ\tilde{\omega})=\tilde{\omega}^2(1-i/\tilde{\omega})$, with $Z=\tau_T/\tau_q$. The authors solve this relation in two complementary scenarios—real $\tilde{k}$ with complex $\tilde{\omega}$ (spatial pulse) and real $\tilde{\omega}$ with complex $\tilde{k}$ (forced oscillation)—and define the modal quality factor $Q=|\tilde{\omega}_1|/\tilde{\omega}_2$ (or $Q=|\tilde{k}_1|/|\tilde{k}_2|$) to classify modes. The $Q$-factor is what turns the model into a filter picture: it yields the cutoff wavevectors, the optimal wavevector or frequency, and the maximum attainable quality factor.

What would settle it

Measure the temperature-wave dispersion in graphite at 80 K with transient gratings spanning the predicted passband, especially near the predicted optimum $k=4.3\times10^6\,\mathrm{m^{-1}}$ (period $1.5\,\mu\mathrm{m}$): if no peak in $Q$ appears near that wavevector, or if oscillations persist beyond the predicted upper cutoff $\tilde{k}_{\mathrm{hi}}$, the bandpass picture fails. A more direct check is to measure the Normal and Umklapp phonon lifetimes below 100 K; if $Z=\tau_N/\tau_U$ is not near $1.7\times10^{-3}$, the paper's graphite parameter identification is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the first-order DPL model, although it is a parabolic Jeffreys-type equation, supports genuinely wave-like temperature propagation only inside a finite window of wavevectors, and the window is fixed by the ratio $Z=\tau_T/\tau_q$. For a localized temperature pulse, oscillatory modes with complex $\tilde{\omega}$ and real $\tilde{k}$ exist when $0<Z<1$, and underdamped motion ($Q>1$) occurs only for $0<Z<1/2$, with wavevectors in the passband $\tilde{k}_{Q=1,\mathrm{lo}}<|\tilde{k}|<\tilde{k}_{Q=1,\mathrm{hi}}$. The quality factor reaches its single maximum $Q_{\max}=\sqrt{1/Z-1}$ at $|\tilde{k}|=Z^{-1/2}$; in the forced-oscillation scenario the analogous maximum is $Q_{\max}=Z^{-1/2}$ at $|\tilde{\omega}|=Z^{-1/2}$. In the Cattaneo–Vernotte limit $Z\to0$, the pulse scenario becomes a high-pass filter and the maximum $Q$ diverges. Fitting the graphite transient-grating data with $\tau_T=3\,\mathrm{ps}$ and $\tau_q=1.8\,\mathrm{ns}$ gives $Z=1.7\times10^{-3}$, reproduces the measured dispersion, and yields $Q=2.7$ and $3.3$ for the two dark modes, values the paper argues explain their non-detection.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the first-order Taylor-expanded dual-phase-lag constitutive equation, rather than the exact DPL relation or some other non-Fourier model, correctly describes heat transport in the materials considered, because only that truncation produces the Jeffreys equation whose passband and Q-factor are analyzed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For graphite at 80 K, the fitted delays set $Z=1.7\times10^{-3}$, so the best-accessible temperature wave sits at $k=4.3\times10^6\,\mathrm{m^{-1}}$ (grating period $1.5\,\mu\mathrm{m}$), with $Q=25$ and oscillation times in the 0.4–10 ns window.
  • The two dark modes of the transient-grating experiment fall inside the passband but at low $Q$ (2.7 and 3.3), which the paper argues is why they were not detected.
  • In the Cattaneo–Vernotte limit $Z=0$, the pulse scenario becomes a high-pass filter with no upper cutoff; a nonzero $\tau_T$ creates the upper cutoff $\tilde{k}_{\mathrm{hi}}$.
  • For solid helium at 0.6 K the same formulas give $Q\approx100$ at $\lambda\approx600\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, and for strongly correlated oxides and iridates they give $Q\approx4$ and $Q\approx100$ on picosecond/nanometer scales, pointing to all-solid-state thermal nanodevices.
  • The authors state that the same analysis transfers to mass transport through the generalized Fick law, so mass-density wave-like oscillations should obey the same bandpass conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable design rule implicit in the paper: match the excitation periodicity to $k_{Q\max}=(\alpha\tau_q Z)^{-1/2}$, because the passband narrows as $Z$ approaches $1/2$ and the highest-$Q$ mode sits at that wavevector.
  • If the graphite parameter identification is right, directly measuring Normal and Umklapp phonon lifetimes below 100 K should give $Z=\tau_N/\tau_U\approx1.7\times10^{-3}$, confirming the picture without fitting.
  • Because the two excitation scenarios coincide only for $Q\ge5$, low-$Q$ experiments must choose the pulse or forced-oscillation formulation that matches their geometry; the paper's comparison shows where the difference matters.
  • The dual-phase-lag mass-transport analog could be tested in two-phase composites whose $Z$ is tunable by volume fraction and phase thermal conductivities, looking for a passband in mass-density waves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the first-order Taylor-expanded dual-phase-lag (DPL) heat-conduction model, which reduces to a Jeffreys-type equation for the temperature field. It derives the complex dispersion relation for two excitation scenarios: a spatially localized temperature pulse (complex frequency, real wavevector) and a forced temporal oscillation (real frequency, complex wavevector). A modal quality factor Q is introduced, and the paper shows that for the spatial-pulse case the system behaves as a bandpass filter in wavevector when Z = tau_T/tau_q is in (0,1/2), with explicit formulas for the passband edges and for the maximum Q. The forced-oscillation case is shown to have a resonant Q maximum at omega = Z^{-1/2}. The results are applied to several material systems, most prominently to graphite, where the model is fitted to the transient thermal grating data of Huberman et al. and used to rationalize the two unobserved 'dark' modes as low-Q modes. The paper also surveys quantum materials and proposes design criteria for thermal nanodevices.

Significance. The analytical core of the paper is a useful contribution. The derivation from Eq. (5) to Eqs. (13)-(18) and (22)-(26) is internally consistent, and the paper provides explicit, closed-form expressions for the bandpass edges and maximum Q-factor that could be readily used by experimentalists. The comparison between the two excitation scenarios (Figs. 5-6) is instructive, and the breadth of the application section gives the formalism practical visibility. The authors are also careful to qualify the 'wave-like' nature of the solutions of a parabolic equation. However, the physical conclusions rest on two assumptions that need substantially more support: the first-order Taylor truncation of the DPL equation is conceded in footnote 1 not to be equivalent to the exact DPL model, and the graphite validation fits the two delay times to the very data that the model then claims to explain. These issues affect the central claims of the paper, but they are addressable with additional analysis and reframing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Footnote 1 and Eqs. (4)-(20)] The central bandpass result, including Eqs. (16), (18), and (20), is a property of the Jeffreys equation (4), not of the DPL model as such. Footnote 1 concedes that the exact DPL model is equivalent to a single-phase-lag model and that first-order Taylor expansion of DPL and of the single-phase-lag model yield different constitutive equations. The manuscript does not state the range of Z, omega, or k over which the first-order Jeffreys equation faithfully approximates the exact DPL dynamics, nor does it bound the error introduced by the truncation. Without this characterization, the claim that the DPL model predicts a bandpass filter for temperature waves is not fully established. At minimum, the paper should reframe its claims as predictions of the first-order Jeffreys surrogate and provide a quantitative criterion for the validity of the truncation.
  2. [Section 6, Fig. 7] The graphite case study is circular in its current form. The paper fits tau_T and tau_q to the Huberman et al. experimental omega(k) points and then uses the same fitted values to compute the theoretical dispersion curve and the Q values (2.7 and 3.3) that 'explain' the two dark modes. The agreement therefore does not constitute an independent validation of the model. The authors state that the fitted delays are 'consistent' with expectations from Fig. 8, but this consistency is not quantified. I recommend an out-of-sample test, a propagation of fit uncertainties, or an independent determination of tau_T and tau_q from microscopic data with error bars before the graphite rationalization is used as evidence for the model.
  3. [Section 6, Fig. 8 and Table 1] The identification tau_T = tau_N and tau_q = tau_U is an ad hoc modeling assumption that is load-bearing for the graphite analysis, and the quantitative support is questionable. The scattering times from graphene are extrapolated from 100 K down to 80 K, while the cited Huberman et al. experiment is titled and reported at temperatures above 100 K. The manuscript states the experiment was performed at 80 K, but the reference says otherwise. This inconsistency needs to be resolved, and the extrapolation should be justified with an estimate of its uncertainty. As written, the values used for the graphite predictions rest on an assumption that may point at the wrong temperature regime.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (20)] The displayed formula for k_{Q=1,lo(hi)} is difficult to parse and appears to have a typographical error. Solving Q=1 from Eq. (16) gives k_{Q=1,lo(hi)} = sqrt((1-Z - sqrt(1-2Z))/Z^2) for the lower edge and the corresponding plus-sign expression for the upper edge; the denominator should be Z^2. Please correct the formula and clarify the sign convention.
  2. [Section 6, paragraph on dark modes] The two dark-mode wavevectors are given as 2.5 x 10^-5 m^-1 and 3 x 10^-5 m^-1, but the grating periodicities quoted in the same paragraph correspond to k = 2.56 x 10^5 m^-1 and 3.0 x 10^5 m^-1. The exponent sign is evidently a typo and should be fixed.
  3. [Table 1 and Fig. 7] The graphite parameters tau_T = 3 ps and tau_q = 1.8 ns are fit results, yet no uncertainties or confidence intervals are reported. Given that the Q values for the dark modes are derived from these parameters, the absence of error bars makes it difficult to judge whether the Q difference between observed and dark modes is statistically meaningful.
  4. [Section 3 and 4, definition of Q] The modal quality factor is defined as Q = |omega_1|/omega_2 for the spatial-pulse case and Q = |k_1|/|k_2| for the forced case. This differs from the conventional oscillator quality factor by a factor of 2 (where Q = omega_0/(2 gamma) for e^{-gamma t} cos(omega_0 t)). The convention is internally consistent, but it should be stated explicitly so that readers do not compare these values directly with literature Q factors without conversion.
  5. [Conclusions] There are a few typographical issues in the final sections, including 'graphine' instead of 'graphene' and 'Aknowledgements' instead of 'Acknowledgements'. These do not affect the technical content.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Core DPL dispersion and Q-factor derivations are self-contained, but the graphite case study fits tau_T and tau_q to Huberman's omega(k) data and then reuses those same fitted parameters to 'validate' the dispersion, compute Q(k), and compare group velocity, making that application partially circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 6, graphite case study (after Eq. 16; Figure 7 caption and text following 'we then fit the experimental data of Huberman et al.')]
    "we then fit the the experimental data of Huberman et al. via the ω1 vs k dispersion given by Equation 15 (i.e. with the dispersion relation for the case ω˜∈C and k˜∈R) with dimensional variables restored and τT and τQ as fitting parameters. ... The best fit values are found to be τT = 3 ps and τQ=1.8 ns ... The theoretical ω1 vs k dispersion, with the optimal fit parameters inserted, is plotted as a full blue line ... The theoretical ω1 vs k dispersion very well fits the experimental one. ..."

    The two delay times are the only free parameters of the fitted dispersion curve, so the statement that Eq. 15 'very well fits' the measured ω1(k) is a report of fit quality, not an independent prediction. The same fitted τT and τQ are then inserted into Eq. 16 to generate the Q(k) curve, including Qmax=25, the pass-band, and the dark-mode values Q=2.7 and 3.3, and into Eq. 21 to obtain vg=3300 m/s for comparison with the measured ~3200 m/s. That group velocity is the derivative of the fitted dispersion curve, so the 3% agreement is an inherited property of the fit rather than an independent check.

full rationale

The analytical core of the paper, Sections 3-5, is not circular: starting from the first-order DPL constitutive equation (Eq. 2) and energy conservation (Eq. 3), the Jeffreys equation (Eq. 4) is derived, and Eqs. (6), (13)-(20), (24)-(26) follow algebraically from the complex exponential ansatz with no fitted parameters. The bandpass edges, the maximum Q expression, and the CV high-pass limit are genuine consequences of the model, not disguised inputs. The self-citation to the authors' earlier work [33] is used only to supply illustrative material parameters for BiSCOO and iridates in Table 1; it is not load-bearing for the central derivation and therefore does not by itself raise the circularity score. Footnote 1 is an honest caveat that the exact DPL model is equivalent to a single-phase-lag model and that only the first-order Taylor expansion produces the Jeffreys equation; this is a modeling assumption about which truncation to use, not a circular step. The circularity concern is confined to the graphite case study in Section 6: tau_T and tau_q are fitted to Huberman's measured omega(k) data, and the same values are then used to plot the 'theoretical' dispersion, compute Q(k) including the dark-mode Q values, and compare the derivative group velocity to experiment. The fit cannot validate the model it was used to calibrate, so those comparisons are partially circular even though the dark-mode Q values are out-of-sample in the sense that no Q data were fitted. Because the central dispersion/Q-factor formalism is derived rather than fitted, the paper is not 8-10 on the circularity scale; because the headline graphite predictions are entangled with the fit, it is not 0-2. A score of 5 reflects this partial, application-level circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central bandpass/Q-factor results rest on the first-order DPL model, which is assumed rather than derived; the graphite application rests on a two-parameter fit to the same data it explains, on the identification of tau with phonon scattering times, and on literature values for alpha, kappa_T, and the scattering rates.

free parameters (2)
  • tau_q (heat flux delay time, graphite fit) = 1.8 ns
    Fitted to the Huberman et al. omega-k dispersion data in Section 6, used to compute the graphite Q(k) and predicted optimal grating period.
  • tau_T (temperature gradient delay time, graphite fit) = 3 ps
    Same two-parameter fit to the same dispersion data; the paper argues consistency with tau_T=tau_N from independent graphene phonon linewidth data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption First-order Taylor expansion of the DPL constitutive equation (Eq. 2) governs the systems addressed.
    The whole dispersion analysis starts from Eq. (4), the Jeffreys equation obtained by expanding the exact DPL relation. Footnote 1 notes the exact model is equivalent to a single-lag model; the first-order expansion is what yields the Jeffreys equation analyzed here.
  • domain assumption Small temperature variations so kappa_T and C are constant.
    Section 2 states small temperature variations and ignores the temperature dependence of kappa_T and C, which is needed for the linear dispersion relation.
  • ad hoc to paper For graphite, tau_T=tau_N and tau_q=tau_U (normal and Umklapp phonon scattering times).
    Section 6 states the identifications tau_T=tau_N and tau_Q=tau_U hold, used to give physical meaning to the fitted delays and to extrapolate to temperatures where data are unavailable.
  • domain assumption Phonon scattering data from graphene are representative of in-plane graphite phonon dynamics.
    Section 6 cites van der Waals interactions among graphite layers as not drastically affecting individual graphene layer dynamics, allowing use of graphene data for graphite.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Accessing temperature waves: a dispersion relation perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QM3KJR35

@misc{pith2026190807612,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Accessing temperature waves: a dispersion relation perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QM3KJR35}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07612}
}
read the original abstract

In order to account for non-Fourier heat transport, occurring on short time and length scales, the often-praised Dual-Phase-Lag (DPL) model was conceived, introducing a causality relation between the onset of heat flux and the temperature gradient. The most prominent aspect of the first-order DPL model is the prediction of wave-like temperature propagation, the detection of which still remains elusive. Among the challenges to make further progress is the capability to disentangle the intertwining of the parameters affecting wave-like behaviour. This work contributes to the quest, providing a straightforward, easy-to-adopt, analytical mean to inspect the optimal conditions to observe temperature wave oscillations. The complex-valued dispersion relation for the temperature scalar field is investigated for the case of a localised temperature pulse in space, and for the case of a forced temperature oscillation in time. A modal quality factor is introduced showing that, for the case of the temperature gradient preceding the heat flux, the material acts as a bandpass filter for the temperature wave. The bandpass filter characteristics are accessed in terms of the relevant delay times entering the DPL model. The optimal region in parameters space is discussed in a variety of systems, covering nine and twelve decades in space and time-scale respectively. The here presented approach is of interest for the design of nanoscale thermal devices operating on ultra-fast and ultra-short time scales, a scenario here addressed for the case of quantum materials and graphite.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07612 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematics of (a) temperature pulse in space and (b) forced temperature oscillation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dispersion relation and Q-factor for the ˜ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Partitioning of the the k˜ − Z plane (panel a) and ˜ω − Z plane (panel b) in regions were the temperature oscillation is underdamped (yellow), overdamped (dark gray) and non￾oscillating (white). (a) ˜ω ∈ C and k˜ ∈ R case. A lin-log scale is adopted. The red-dashed line represents the curve k˜Qmax vs Z, the black-dashed (continuous) line represents k˜ lo (k˜Q=1,lo) vs Z, the green-dashed (continuous) line represents… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dispersion relation and Q-factor for the case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Q-factor vs |k˜| for the case ˜ω ∈ C and k˜ ∈ R (black curve). Q factor vs |ω˜| for the case k˜ ∈ C and ˜ω ∈ R (red curve). The plots are obtained setting Z = 0.01. Q = 1 reference (black-dashed line) highlighting the transition between the underdamped and overdamped r…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dispersion relation for Z = 0.01 in lin-log scale. Top panel: |ω˜1| (vertical axis) vs ˜|k| (top horizontal axis) for the case ˜ω ∈ C and k˜ ∈ R. Bottom panels: |ω˜| (vertical axis) vs |k˜ 1| (bottom horizontal axis) for the case ˜ω ∈ R and k˜ ∈ C. The Q-factor is plot…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) ω1 (left axis, blue color) and Q-factor (right axis, black color) vs k (horizontal axis) for the in-plane temperature oscillations in graphite at 80 K. The vertical axis are in lin scale, whereas the horizontal axis is in log scale. The full circles represent the o…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Average phonon scattering time for Umklapp (black curve, left axis) and Normal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fourier, Theorie analytique de la chaleur, par M

    J. Fourier, Theorie analytique de la chaleur, par M. Fourier, Chez Firmin Didot, p` ere et fils, 1822

    work page

  2. [2]

    Huberman, R

    S. Huberman, R. A. Duncan, K. Chen, B. Song, V. Chiloyan, Z. Ding, A. A. Maznev, G. Chen, K. A. Nelson, Observation of second sound in graphite at temperatures above 100 k, Science 364 (6438) (2019) 375–379. doi:10.1126/science.aav3548

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav3548 2019

  3. [3]

    Ackerman, R

    C. Ackerman, R. Guyer, Temperature pulses in dielectric solids, Annals of Physics 50 (1) (1968) 128–185

    work page 1968

  4. [4]

    D. G. Cahill, W. K. Ford, K. E. Goodson, G. D. Mahan, A. Majumdar, H. J. Maris, R. Merlin, S. R. Phillpot, Nanoscale thermal transport, Journal of Applied Physics 93 (2) (2003) 793–818. doi:10.1063/1.1524305

    doi:10.1063/1.1524305 2003

  5. [5]

    D. G. Cahill, P. V. Braun, G. Chen, D. R. Clarke, S. Fan, K. E. Good- son, P. Keblinski, W. P. King, G. D. Mahan, A. Majumdar, H. J. Maris, S. R. Phillpot, E. Pop, L. Shi, Nanoscale thermal transport. ii. 2003-2012, Applied Physics Reviews 1 (1) (2014) 011305. doi:10.1063/1.4832615

    doi:10.1063/1.4832615 2014

  6. [6]

    S. Volz, J. Ordonez-Miranda, A. Shchepetov, M. Prunnila, J. Ahopelto, T. Pezeril, G. Vaudel, V. Gusev, P. Ruello, E. M. Weig, M. Schu- bert, M. Hettich, M. Grossman, T. Dekorsy, F. Alzina, B. Graczykowski, E. Chavez-Angel, J. Sebastian Reparaz, M. R. Wagner, C. M. Sotomayor- Torres, S. Xiong, S. Neogi, D. Donadio, Nanophononics: state of the art and persp...

    doi:10.1140/epjb/ 2016

  7. [7]

    D. Jou, V. A. Cimmelli, Constitutive equations for heat conduction in nanosystems and nonequilibrium processes: an overview, Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics 7 (2) (2016) 196–222

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    D. Y. Tzou, Macro-to microscale heat transfer: the lagging behavior, John Wiley & Sons, 2014

    work page 2014

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Vermeersch, N

    B. Vermeersch, N. Mingo, Quasiballistic heat removal from small sources studied from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 045205. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.97.045205

    2018

  2. [10]

    Cattaneo, Sulla conduzione del calore, Atti Sem

    C. Cattaneo, Sulla conduzione del calore, Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena 3 (1948) 83–101

    1948

  3. [11]

    Cattaneo, A form of heat-conduction equations which eliminates the paradox of instantaneous propagation, Comptes Rendus 247 (1958) 431

    C. Cattaneo, A form of heat-conduction equations which eliminates the paradox of instantaneous propagation, Comptes Rendus 247 (1958) 431

    1958

  4. [12]

    Vernotte, Les paradoxes de la theorie continue de l’equation de la chaleur, Compt

    P. Vernotte, Les paradoxes de la theorie continue de l’equation de la chaleur, Compt. Rendu 246 (1958) 3154–3155

    1958

  5. [13]

    Vernotte, Some possible complications in the phenomena of thermal conduction, Compte Rendus 252 (1961) 2190–2191

    P. Vernotte, Some possible complications in the phenomena of thermal conduction, Compte Rendus 252 (1961) 2190–2191

    1961

  6. [14]

    D. D. Joseph, L. Preziosi, Heat waves, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 41–73. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.41

    1989 doi

  7. [15]

    D. Y. Tzou, A unified field approach for heat conduction from macro-to micro-scales, Journal of Heat Transfer 117 (1) (1995) 8–16

    1995

  8. [16]

    D. Y. Tzou, The generalized lagging response in small-scale and high-rate heating, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 38 (17) (1995) 3231–3240

    1995

  9. [17]

    D. Y. Tzou, Experimental support for the lagging behavior in heat propa- gation, Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 9 (4) (1995) 686–693. 35

    1995

  10. [18]

    Ord´ o˜ nez-Miranda, J

    J. Ord´ o˜ nez-Miranda, J. J. Alvarado-Gil, Exact solution of the dual-phase- lag heat conduction model for a one-dimensional system excited with a periodic heat source, Mechanics Research Communications 37 (3) (2010) 276 – 281. doi:10.1007/s10035-010-0195-6

    2010 doi

  11. [19]

    D. Tang, N. Araki, Wavy, wavelike, diffusive thermal responses of finite rigid slabs to high-speed heating of laser-pulses, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 42 (5) (1999) 855–860

    1999

  12. [20]

    Guyer, K

    R. Guyer, K. J.A., Solution of the linearized boltzmann equation, Physical Review 148 (1966) 766–778

    1966

  13. [21]

    Torres, A

    P. Torres, A. Ziabari, A. Torell´ o, J. Bafaluy, J. Camacho, X. Cartoix` a, A. Shakouri, F. Alvarez, Emergence of hydrodynamic heat transport in semiconductors at the nanoscale, Physical Review Materials 2 (7) (2018) 076001

    2018

  14. [22]

    K. M. Hoogeboom-Pot, J. N. Hernandez-Charpak, X. Gu, T. D. Frazer, E. H. Anderson, W. Chao, R. W. Falcone, R. Yang, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, et al., A new regime of nanoscale thermal transport: Collec- tive diffusion increases dissipation efficiency, Proceedings of the Natio...

    2015

  15. [23]

    T. D. Frazer, J. L. Knobloch, K. M. Hoogeboom-Pot, D. Nardi, W. Chao, R. W. Falcone, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, J. N. Hernandez-Charpak, Engineering nanoscale thermal transport: Size- and spacing-dependent cooling of nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Applied 11 (2019) 024042. doi:...

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    J. A. Johnson, A. A. Maznev, J. Cuffe, J. K. Eliason, A. J. Minnich, T. Kehoe, C. M. S. Torres, G. Chen, K. A. Nelson, Direct measure- ment of room-temperature nondiffusive thermal transport over micron distances in a silicon membrane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 025901. doi:10....

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    T. Q. Qiu, C. L. Tien, Heat transfer mechanisms during short-pulse laser heating of metals, Journal of Heat Transfer 115 (4) (1993) 835. doi:10. 1115/1.2911377

    1993

  18. [26]

    S. D. Brorson, J. G. Fujimoto, E. P. Ippen, Femtosecond electronic heat- transport dynamics in thin gold films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1962–

    1987

  19. [28]

    Ord´ o˜ nez-Miranda, J

    J. Ord´ o˜ nez-Miranda, J. Alvarado-Gil, Thermal characterization of granular materials using a thermal-wave resonant cavity under the dual-phase lag model of heat conduction, Granular Matter 12 (2010) 569–577. doi:10. 1007/s10035-010-0195-

    2010

  20. [29]

    L. Wang, X. Wei, Heat conduction in nanofluids, Chaos, Solitons and Frac- tals 39 (5) (2009) 2211–2215. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.072

    2009 doi

  21. [30]

    Khayat, J

    R. Khayat, J. DeBruyn, M. Niknami, D. Stranges, R. Khorasany, Non- fourier effects in macro- and micro-scale non-isothermal flow of liquids and gases. review, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 97 (2015) 163–177. doi:10.1038/ncomms7290

    2015 doi

  22. [31]

    C. Li, J. Miao, K. Yang, X. Guo, J. Tu, P. Huang, D. Zhang, Fourier and non-fourier bio-heat transfer models to predict ex vivo temperature response to focused ultrasound heating, Journal of Applied Physics 123 (17) (2018). doi:10.1063/1.5022622

    2018 doi

  23. [32]

    M. V. Fran¸ ca, H. R. B. Orlande, Estimation of parameters of the dual- phase-lag model for heat conduction in metal-oxide-semiconductor field- effect transistors, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 92 (2018) 107 – 111. 37

    2018

  24. [33]

    Gandolfi, G

    M. Gandolfi, G. L. Celardo, F. Borgonovi, G. Ferrini, A. Avella, F. Banfi, C. Giannetti, Emergent ultrafast phenomena in correlated oxides and heterostructures, Physica Scripta 92 (3) (2017) 034004. doi:10.1088/ 1402-4896/aa54cc

    2017

  25. [34]

    L. Li, L. Zhou, M. Yang, An expanded lattice boltzmann method for dual phase lag model, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 93 (2016) 834–838

    2016

  26. [35]

    T. T. Lam, E. Fong, Heat diffusion vs. wave propagation in solids subjected to exponentially-decaying heat source: analytical solution, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 50 (11) (2011) 2104–2116

    2011

  27. [36]

    T. T. Lam, A unified solution of several heat conduction models, Interna- tional Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 56 (1-2) (2013) 653–666

    2013

  28. [37]

    Tzou, Z.-Y

    D. Tzou, Z.-Y. Guo, Nonlocal behavior in thermal lagging, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 49 (7) (2010) 1133–1137

    2010

  29. [38]

    Ramadan, Semi-analytical solutions for the dual phase lag heat con- duction in multilayered media, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 48 (1) (2009) 14–25

    K. Ramadan, Semi-analytical solutions for the dual phase lag heat con- duction in multilayered media, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 48 (1) (2009) 14–25

    2009

  30. [39]

    Zhang, B.-Y

    M.-K. Zhang, B.-Y. Cao, Y.-C. Guo, Numerical studies on dispersion of thermal waves, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 67 (2013) 1072–1082

    2013

  31. [40]

    M. Xu, J. Guo, L. Wang, L. Cheng, Thermal wave interference as the origin of the overshooting phenomenon in dual-phase-lagging heat conduction, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 50 (5) (2011) 825–830

    2011

  32. [41]

    Ordonez-Miranda, J

    J. Ordonez-Miranda, J. Alvarado-Gil, Thermal wave oscillations and ther- mal relaxation time determination in a hyperbolic heat transport model, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 48 (11) (2009) 2053–2062. 38

    2009

  33. [42]

    Torii, W.-J

    S. Torii, W.-J. Yang, Heat transfer mechanisms in thin film with laser heat source, International journal of heat and mass transfer 48 (3-4) (2005) 537–544

    2005

  34. [43]

    Ramadan, M

    K. Ramadan, M. Al-Nimr, Analysis of transient heat transfer in multi- layer thin films with nonlinear thermal boundary resistance, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 48 (9) (2009) 1718–1727

    2009

  35. [45]

    Singh, E

    A. Singh, E. B. Tadmor, Thermal parameter identification for non-fourier heat transfer from molecular dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 299 (2015) 667 – 686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.07. 008

    2015 doi

  36. [46]

    A. H. Akbarzadeh, Y. Cui, Z. T. Chen, Thermal wave: from nonlocal continuum to molecular dynamics, RSC Advances 7 (2017) 13623–13636. doi:10.1039/C6RA28831F

    2017 doi

  37. [47]

    Ord´ o˜ nez-Miranda, J

    J. Ord´ o˜ nez-Miranda, J. J. Alvarado-Gil, Frequency-modulated hyperbolic heat transport and effective thermal properties in layered systems, Inter- national Journal of Thermal Sciences 49 (1) (2010) 209 – 217. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.07.005

    2010 doi

  38. [48]

    Grosso, G

    G. Grosso, G. Parravicini, Solid State Physics, Elsevier Science, 2000

    2000

  39. [49]

    Tamura, D

    S. Tamura, D. C. Hurley, J. P. Wolfe, Acoustic-phonon propagation in superlattices, Physical Review B 38 (1988) 1427–1449. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.38.1427

    1988

  40. [50]

    Giannetti, F

    C. Giannetti, F. Banfi, D. Nardi, G. Ferrini, F. Parmigiani, Ultrafast laser pulses to detect and generate fast thermomechanical transients in matter, 39 IEEE Photonics Journal 1 (1) (2009) 21–32. doi:10.1109/JPHOT.2009. 2025050

    2009 doi

  41. [51]

    Travagliati, D

    M. Travagliati, D. Nardi, C. Giannetti, V. Gusev, P. Pingue, V. Piazza, G. Ferrini, F. Banfi, Interface nano-confined acoustic waves in polymeric surface phononic crystals, Applied Physics Letters 106 (2) (2015). doi: 10.1063/1.4905850

    2015 doi

  42. [52]

    Cepellotti, G

    A. Cepellotti, G. Fugallo, L. Paulatto, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, N. Marzari, Phonon hydrodynamics in two-dimensional materials, Nature communica- tions 6 (2015) 6400

    2015

  43. [53]

    P. J. Antaki, New interpretation of non-fourier heat conduction in processed meat, Journal of Heat Transfer 127 (2) (2005) 189–193

    2005

  44. [54]

    Roetzel, N

    W. Roetzel, N. Putra, S. K. Das, Experiment and analysis for non-fourier conduction in materials with non-homogeneous inner structure, Interna- tional Journal of Thermal Sciences 42 (6) (2003) 541 – 552. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/S1290-0729(03)00020-6

    2003 doi

  45. [55]

    Liu, Y.-S

    K.-C. Liu, Y.-S. Chen, Analysis of heat transfer and burn damage in a laser irradiated living tissue with the generalized dual-phase-lag model, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 103 (2016) 1–9

    2016

  46. [56]

    Y. Zhang, Generalized dual-phase lag bioheat equations based on nonequi- librium heat transfer in living biological tissues, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 52 (21-22) (2009) 4829–4834

    2009

  47. [57]

    Afrin, J

    N. Afrin, J. Zhou, Y. Zhang, D. Tzou, J. Chen, Numerical simulation of thermal damage to living biological tissues induced by laser irradiation based on a generalized dual phase lag model, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 61 (7) (2012) 483–501

    2012

  48. [58]

    S. H. Chun, K. Jong-Woo, J. Kim, H. Zheng, C. C. Stoumpos, C. D. Malliakas, J. F. Mitchell, K. Mehlawat, Y. Singh, Y. Choi, T. Gog, A. Al- Zein, M. M. Sala, M. Krisch, J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, 40 B. J. Kim, Direct evidence for dominant bond-directional interact...

    2015 doi

  49. [59]

    Nembrini, S

    N. Nembrini, S. Peli, F. Banfi, G. Ferrini, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, R. Comin, K. Foyevtsova, A. Damascelli, A. Avella, C. Giannetti, Track- ing local magnetic dynamics via high-energy charge excitations in a rel- ativistic mott insulator, Physical Review B 94 (2016) 201119. doi...

    2016 doi

  50. [60]

    Ziman, Electrons and Phonons, the Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids, Oxford University Press, 2001

    J. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons, the Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids, Oxford University Press, 2001

    2001

  51. [61]

    Fugallo, A

    G. Fugallo, A. Cepellotti, L. Paulatto, M. Lazzeri, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, Thermal conductivity of graphene and graphite: collective excitations and mean free paths, Nano letters 14 (11) (2014) 6109–6114

    2014

  52. [62]

    H. O. Pierson, Handbook of carbon, graphite, diamonds and fullerenes: processing, properties and applications, William Andrew, 2012

    2012

  53. [63]

    DeSorbo, W

    W. DeSorbo, W. Tyler, The specific heat of graphite from 13 to 300 k, The Journal of Chemical Physics 21 (10) (1953) 1660–1663

    1953

  54. [64]

    A. J. Minnich, Multidimensional quasiballistic thermal transport in tran- sient grating spectroscopy, Physical Review B 92 (2015) 085203. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.085203

    2015 doi

  55. [65]

    Bencivenga, R

    F. Bencivenga, R. Mincigrucci, F. Capotondi, L. Foglia, D. Naumenko, A. A. Maznev, E. Pedersoli, A. Simoncig, F. Caporaletti, V. Chiloyan, R. Cucini, F. Dallari, R. A. Duncan, T. D. Frazer, G. Gaio, A. Gessini, L. Giannessi, S. Huberman, H. Kapteyn, J. Knobloch, G. Kurdi, N. M...

    2019

  56. [66]

    Aichlmayr, F

    H. Aichlmayr, F. Kulacki, The effective thermal conductivity of saturated porous media, Vol. 39 of Advances in Heat Transfer, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 377 – 460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2717(06)39004-1

    2006 doi

  57. [67]

    Peterson, C

    G. Peterson, C. Li, Heat and mass transfer in fluids with nanoparticle suspensions, Vol. 39 of Advances in Heat Transfer, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 257 – 376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2717(06)39003-X

    2006 doi

  58. [68]

    L. Wang, X. Wei, Equivalence between dual-phase-lagging and two-phase- system heat conduction processes, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 51 (7) (2008) 1751 – 1756. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijheatmasstransfer.2007.07.013

    2008 doi

  59. [69]

    S. Peli, E. Cavaliere, G. Benetti, M. Gandolfi, M. Chiodi, C. Cancellieri, C. Giannetti, G. Ferrini, L. Gavioli, F. Banfi, Mechanical properties of Ag nanoparticle thin films synthesized by supersonic cluster beam deposition, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120 (8) (2016) 467...

    2016 doi

  60. [70]

    Benetti, C

    G. Benetti, C. Caddeo, C. Melis, G. Ferrini, C. Giannetti, N. Winckel- mans, S. Bals, M. J. Van Bael, E. Cavaliere, L. Gavioli, et al., Bottom-up mechanical nanometrology of granular Ag nanoparticles thin films, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121 (40) (2017) 22434–22441. d...

    2017 doi

  61. [71]

    Benetti, M

    G. Benetti, M. Gandolfi, M. J. Van Bael, L. Gavioli, C. Giannetti, C. Cad- deo, F. Banfi, Photoacoustic sensing of trapped fluids in nanoporous thin films: device engineering and sensing scheme, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10 (33) (2018) 27947–27954. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b07925

    2018 doi

  62. [72]

    Benetti, E

    G. Benetti, E. Cavaliere, R. Brescia, S. Salassi, R. Ferrando, A. Vantomme, L. Pallecchi, S. Pollini, S. Boncompagni, B. Fortuni, et al., Tailored Ag–Cu– 42 Mg multielemental nanoparticles for wide-spectrum antibacterial coating, Nanoscale 11 (4) (2019) 1626–1635. doi:10.1039/...

    2019 doi

  63. [1965]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1962

    1962 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.