Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Tunable room-temperature spin galvanic and spin Hall effects in van der Waals heterostructures

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Putting monolayer graphene on WS2 produces gate-tunable spin-to-charge conversion at room temperature, with efficiencies comparable to heavy metals.

desk verdict Strong experimental paper with a real temperature-mismatch flaw in the efficiency extraction; worth refereeing but the headline numbers need caution. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07868 v1 pith:EJJNNIIT submitted 2019-08-21 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.app-ph

L. Antonio Benítez , Williams Savero Torres , Juan F. Sierra , Matias Timmermans , Jose H. Garcia , Stephan Roche , Marius V. Costache , Sergio O. Valenzuela This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords spin-to-chargeconversionspinHalleffectinversegalvanicgrapheneWS2proximityspin-orbitcouplingvanderWaalsheterostructuresroom-temperaturespintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that putting monolayer graphene in contact with the semiconductor WS2 creates a large, electrically tunable spin-to-charge conversion at room temperature. The conversion comes from proximity-induced spin-orbit coupling in the graphene and is carried by two distinct mechanisms, the spin Hall effect and the inverse spin galvanic effect, which the authors separate with spin precession measurements. If the claim holds, graphene-WS2 could serve as a ferromagnet-free building block for spin generation and for manipulating magnetization in ultra-compact memory devices, with efficiencies comparable to or better than platinum, tantalum, and tungsten.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the spin texture that graphene inherits from WS2: proximity-induced spin-orbit coupling creates an out-of-plane spin component plus a winding in-plane texture, so the spin Hall effect and the inverse spin galvanic effect generate spins in orthogonal directions. The measurement protocol exploits that orthogonality: an in-plane magnetic field precesses only the spin-Hall-generated spins, while an out-of-plane field precesses only the spin-galvanic-generated spins. The argument is carried by the anisotropic Bloch diffusion equation, whose spin lifetimes are fixed from separate pristine-graphene and graphene-WS2 spin precession measurements, leaving each conversion efficiency as the single scaling factor in the fit.

What would settle it

Make devices with different WS2 strip widths and check that the extracted conversion lengths stay the same; if they vary, the single-channel diffusion model is missing physics. Alternatively, test Onsager reciprocity explicitly by swapping the injection and detection contacts and comparing the two measured voltages.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using a Hall bar in which a WS2 flake covers one graphene arm, the authors measure nonlocal voltages while a ferromagnetic electrode injects spins, and they monitor the signal as a function of magnetic-field direction. The data show an antisymmetric spin-precession signal for an in-plane field, assigned to the inverse spin Hall effect, and for an out-of-plane field, assigned to the spin galvanic effect. All measurements are taken below the gate voltage at which WS2 becomes conducting, so the signals come from the proximity-modified graphene rather than from the WS2 itself. Fitting the anisotropic spin diffusion equation with independently measured spin lifetimes, tau_s^|| = (6 +/- 1) ps and tau_s^perp = (52 +/- 10) ps, they extract theta_SHE ~ 0.3% and alpha_SGE ~ 0.1%, which correspond to lambda_IEE values of about 3.75 nm and 0.42 nm. They also find that the inverse spin Hall signal peaks near the charge neutrality point while the spin galvanic signal changes sign between electron and hole doping, with the temperature dependence of the spin Hall signal consistent with calculations of the spin Hall conductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The extracted conversion efficiencies assume that the spin diffusion model, using the two spin lifetimes measured from other electrodes, completely describes what happens in the graphene-WS2 region; if the WS2 strip or its interface adds extra spin loss or an extra conversion channel, the quoted efficiencies would be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Room-temperature spin generation without ferromagnets becomes practical in a single graphene-WS2 layer, since both spin-to-charge and charge-to-spin conversion are demonstrated.
  • Electrostatic gating acts as a switch: the spin Hall signal peaks near the charge neutrality point, and the spin galvanic signal changes sign with carrier type, making the device a tunable spin conversion element.
  • The spin Hall conversion efficiency, lambda_IEE ~ 3.75 nm, is comparable to or larger than the values typically quoted for heavy metals, which makes van der Waals heterostructures competitive for spin-orbit-torque memory technologies.
  • Because the spin lifetimes are measured in the same device, the extracted efficiencies have no adjustable transport parameters and can be compared directly against computed spin Hall conductivities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gate-dependent sign change of the spin galvanic effect is robust, it could be used to write a ferromagnet with either polarity simply by choosing the gate voltage, without reversing the current direction.
  • The paper notes that intrinsic theory underestimates the measured spin galvanic efficiency; a testable extension is to intentionally introduce or remove sulphur vacancies in WS2 and track whether alpha_SGE changes, which would flag an extrinsic contribution.
  • Because the conversion happens at the graphene-WS2 interface, the same measurement protocol should transfer to other TMDC spacers, offering a systematic way to compare the strength of proximity spin-orbit coupling across materials.
  • The close match between the measured and computed temperature dependence of the spin Hall signal suggests that theta_SHE could be used as a quantitative probe of proximity spin-orbit coupling strength in other van der Waals pairs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports nonlocal spin-precession measurements in monolayer graphene/WS2 Hall-bar devices, claiming room-temperature spin-to-charge (StC) conversion with separate contributions from the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE) and the spin galvanic effect (SGE). The measurement scheme relies on the orthogonal spin orientations of the two effects: out-of-plane spins precess under in-plane fields to give the ISHE signal, while in-plane spins precess under out-of-plane fields to give the SGE signal. Using spin-transport parameters independently extracted from nonlocal Hanle measurements, the authors fit each antisymmetric lineshape with a single scaling factor, obtaining theta_SHE ~ 0.3% and alpha_SGE ~ 0.1% at room temperature. They further report gate-dependent conversion with a peak near the charge neutrality point, a sign change of the SGE between electrons and holes, and agreement of the SHE signal with a computed spin Hall conductivity as a function of carrier density and temperature.

Significance. If the quantitative extraction is correct, the result is significant: it would demonstrate electric-field-tunable, ferromagnet-free, room-temperature StC conversion in a van der Waals heterostructure, with lambda_IEEE values (3.75 nm for the SHE channel and 0.42 nm for the SGE channel) comparable to or larger than typical heavy-metal values. The measurement protocol has clear strengths: the antiparallel/parallel subtraction removes non-spin backgrounds, the SHE and SGE channels are separated by symmetry, and the spin-transport parameters entering the model are measured rather than freely adjusted. However, the central quantitative claims rest on a temperature-matching assumption that is not documented, and the quoted efficiencies lack uncertainty propagation. These issues, together with an over-stated comparison to intrinsic theory and an unaddressed discrepancy with a contemporaneous report, require revision before the quantitative conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 and main text (p. 5)] The spin-transport parameters used to compute the spin densities in the StC fits are extracted from measurements performed at 200 K, while the StC lineshapes in Figs. 2c and 2d are measured at 300 K. The caption explicitly states that measurements in Figs. 2a, 2b, 2e, and 2f are performed at 200 K, and the text quotes tau_s^|| = (6 +/- 1) ps and tau_s^perp = (52 +/- 10) ps from these data. The subsequent fits of the 300 K Hanle traces use these parameters with only the conversion efficiency as a scaling factor. If tau_s^||, tau_s^perp, or the diffusion constants change between 200 and 300 K, the scaling factor absorbs the resulting change in the calculated spin density at the detector, directly biasing theta_SHE and alpha_SGE and therefore the headline lambda_IEEE values of 3.75 nm and 0.42 nm. A room-temperature nonlocal spin-precession calibration on the same electrode pair, or a documented argument for temperature independence, is needed.
  2. [Fig. 2 and Section on StC conversion efficiencies] The quoted efficiencies theta_SHE ~ 0.3% and alpha_SGE ~ 0.1% are given without uncertainties, despite the reported (6 +/- 1) ps and (52 +/- 10) ps spin lifetimes and the use of a one-parameter scaling fit. A propagation of these uncertainties through the Bloch-diffusion model, together with the fit uncertainty of the precession lineshapes, is required to support the quantitative comparison with Pt, Ta, W, Bi/Ag, and alpha-Sn. The claim that the agreement is 'excellent' should also be quantified, for example with residuals or a reduced chi-square metric.
  3. [Abstract, p. 2, and p. 8 (Discussion)] The abstract and introduction state that the observed SHE conversion efficiency as a function of carrier density and temperature is 'well reproduced' by theoretical calculations of the spin Hall conductivity, but the Discussion acknowledges that intrinsic theory yields an alpha_SGE at least one order of magnitude smaller than the measured value and that a large SHE is incompatible with the observed anisotropic spin relaxation. The extrinsic mechanisms invoked (sulfur vacancies, resonant scattering) are not included in the Fig. 4b calculations. This internal tension should be resolved: either provide an explicit calculation including extrinsic contributions, or soften the claim to qualitative agreement for R*_ISHE and state clearly that the SGE magnitude is not captured by the intrinsic theory.
  4. [p. 8, Note referencing Ref. [33]] The appended note states that Ref. [33], a study of the spin galvanic effect in graphene/WS2, does not observe SGE modulation or the SHE at room temperature. Because the central claim of the present manuscript is room-temperature coexistence of the SHE and SGE, this discrepancy is directly relevant to the paper's credibility. The authors should discuss possible origins of the difference, such as WS2/graphene interface quality, device geometry, the gate-voltage range, or measurement protocol, rather than merely citing the conflicting work.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and p. 2] There are typos: 'interconvertion' should be 'interconversion', 'efficiencies' should be 'efficiencies', and 'substraction' should be 'subtraction'.
  2. [p. 4] The phrase 'electrodes magnetizations' should be 'electrode magnetizations'.
  3. [Methods] In the Device Fabrication section, 'subtrate' should be 'substrate', and 'two- and four-terminal measurements' would read better as 'two-terminal and four-terminal measurements'.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption and main text] The description 'solid lines represent M1x' is ambiguous because the lines in Fig. 3a are green; the text should specify 'green solid lines' and use a consistent notation for the projected magnetization component.
  5. [p. 2 and throughout] The inverse spin galvanic effect is abbreviated both ISGE and IGSE on p. 2; one abbreviation should be used consistently.
  6. [Fig. 4] The inset of Fig. 4a claims R*_ISHE varies roughly as 1/T, but no fit line or fit uncertainty is shown; adding the fit and its parameters would make the claim quantitative.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central Hanle-lineshape extraction is self-contained; secondary theoretical validation is partly circular because the SHC calculation parameters were adjusted to match the measured trends.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, discussion of Fig. 4b (temperature dependence of the SHE spin-to-charge conversion)]
    "Figure 4b shows the computed spin Hall conductivity σSHE xy in the weak disorder limit [19] (see Supplementary Section III). The parameters used for the calculations to match the experimental trends are within a factor two of those obtained by density functional theory [16, 19]. Notably, the theoretical model describes qualitatively all of the experimentally observed features, including the relative magnitude of the positive and negative extrema, their approximate width and the temperature T∼ 200 K at which the change in sign is observed."

    This step uses the agreement between the computed spin Hall conductivity and the measured R*_ISHE as a validation of the proximity-effect interpretation ('the excellent agreement with theoretical expectations prove that the phenomena originate from SOI proximity effects'). However, the calculation is not a parameter-free prediction: the parameters were explicitly adjusted to match the experimental trends. The agreement is therefore partly obtained by construction rather than independently confirming the data. The central extraction of theta_SHE and alpha_SGE from the Hanle lineshapes does not rely on this calculation, so the circularity is confined to the theoretical-validation step.

full rationale

The paper's primary result—room-temperature gate-tunable spin-to-charge conversion from the SHE and ISGE in graphene-WS2—is derived from Hanle spin-precession lineshapes in Figs. 2c and 2d. The conversion efficiencies are extracted as the single scaling factors in fits to the measured antisymmetric lineshapes, with the spin transport parameters (tau_s^||=(6 +/- 1) ps, tau_s^perp=(52 +/- 10) ps) characterized in the same devices via Figs. 2e and 2f. This is a legitimate parameter extraction, not a circular reduction: the spin dynamics are measured independently of the conversion-efficiency fit, and the lineshape shape carries the information. The high score of 4 comes from the secondary validation in Fig. 4b: the spin Hall conductivity calculation uses parameters chosen to match the experimental trends and is cited from partially overlapping authors (refs. [16,19]), so the 'agreement' is not an independent first-principles confirmation. A further non-circular caveat is that the spin-dynamics characterization for the fits was performed at 200 K while the conversion efficiencies are stated for room temperature (300 K); this is a temperature-extrapolation assumption that could bias the scaling factors, but it is not a by-construction equivalence. No uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation forces the main conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental extraction relies on two fitted conversion efficiencies and two fitted spin lifetimes as free parameters, plus a theoretical calculation whose microscopic parameters are adjusted to match the data. The central assumption is that the anisotropic spin diffusion model captures all spin dynamics in the graphene-WS2 region. The paper also leans on DFT-based models of proximity spin-orbit coupling and, when those fail, postulates extrinsic defects without direct evidence.

free parameters (5)
  • theta_SHE (spin Hall angle) = approx 0.3%
    Fitted scaling factor from the ISHE spin precession lineshape in Fig. 2c; no uncertainty quoted.
  • alpha_SGE (spin galvanic conversion efficiency) = approx 0.1%
    Fitted scaling factor from the SGE spin precession lineshape in Fig. 2d; no uncertainty quoted.
  • tau_s^|| (in-plane spin lifetime) = 6 +/- 1 ps
    Obtained by fitting spin precession in the graphene-WS2 region (Fig. 2f) using the solution of the anisotropic Bloch diffusion equation.
  • tau_s^perp (out-of-plane spin lifetime) = 52 +/- 10 ps
    Obtained from the same fit as tau_s^||; the anisotropy ratio zeta = 8 +/- 3 is used in the model.
  • Theoretical parameters for spin Hall conductivity (SOI strengths and disorder) = not reported; within factor 2 of DFT
    The paper states 'The parameters used for the calculations to match the experimental trends are within a factor two of those obtained by density functional theory'; these are adjusted to reproduce the measured temperature dependence of R*ISHE.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The anisotropic Bloch-Torrey diffusion equation describes spin transport in both pristine graphene and graphene-WS2.
    Used to fit spin precession data and to calculate spin and spin-current densities from which theta_SHE and alpha_SGE are extracted (Fig. 2c-f, Supplementary Section II).
  • domain assumption The nonlocal voltage is proportional to the spin accumulation projected along the detector magnetization, with no additional charge-based artifacts after antiparallel and parallel subtraction.
    Standard assumption in nonlocal spin precession; the paper invokes it when interpreting V_nl and the antisymmetric lineshapes.
  • domain assumption WS2 remains insulating for back-gate voltages below V_T^g, so no charge current flows in the WS2.
    Verified by Ids versus Vg in Fig. 2a; all spin-to-charge measurements are taken at Vg below V_T^g to avoid current in the TMDC.
  • domain assumption The proximity-induced spin texture and spin-orbit Hamiltonian of graphene-WS2 are given by the DFT-based models of Refs. [15,16].
    Used to interpret the sign change of the SGE across the charge neutrality point and to compute sigma_xy^z in Fig. 4b.
  • ad hoc to paper Extrinsic mechanisms, such as sulfur vacancies and resonant scattering, can account for the discrepancy between the intrinsic theory and the observed magnitudes.
    Invoked without direct microstructural evidence to explain why the intrinsic model under-predicts alpha_SGE by an order of magnitude and deems a large SHE incompatible with the measured spin relaxation anisotropy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable room-temperature spin galvanic and spin Hall effects in van der Waals heterostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EJJNNIIT

@misc{pith2026190807868,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable room-temperature spin galvanic and spin Hall effects in van der Waals heterostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EJJNNIIT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07868}
}
read the original abstract

Spin-orbit coupling stands as a powerful tool to interconvert charge and spin currents and to manipulate the magnetization of magnetic materials through the spin torque phenomena. However, despite the diversity of existing bulk materials and the recent advent of interfacial and low-dimensional effects, control of the interconvertion at room-temperature remains elusive. Here, we unequivocally demonstrate strongly enhanced room-temperature spin-to-charge (StC) conversion in graphene driven by the proximity of a semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenide(WS2). By performing spin precession experiments in properly designed Hall bars, we separate the contributions of the spin Hall and the spin galvanic effects. Remarkably, their corresponding conversion effiencies can be tailored by electrostatic gating in magnitude and sign, peaking nearby the charge neutrality point with a magnitude that is comparable to the largest efficiencies reported to date. Such an unprecedented electric-field tunability provides a new building block for spin generation free from magnetic materials and for ultra-compact magnetic memory technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07868 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. All-electrical creation and control of giant spin-galvanic effect in 1T-MoTe2/graphene heterostructures at room temperature

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A gate voltage switches the sign of a room-temperature spin-to-charge conversion signal in graphene/MoTe2 heterostructures, with a claimed efficiency of about 7.6 percent.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [33]

    Charge-to-Spin Conversion by the Rashba-Edelstein Effect in 2D van der Waals Heterostructures up to Room Temperature

    Ghiasi, T.S., Kaverzin, A. A., Blah, P. J., & van Wees, B. J. Charge-to-spin conversion by the Rashba-Edelstein effect in 2D van der Waals heterostructures up to room temperature. arXiv:1905.01371 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1905

  2. [1]

    O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C

    Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H., & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    C., Nitta, J., Frolov, S

    Manchon A., Koo, H. C., Nitta, J., Frolov, S. M., & Duine, R. A. New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Nature Mater. 14, 871-882 (2015). 9

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    Soumyanarayanan, A., Reyren, N., Fert. A. & Panagopoulos, C. Emergent phenomena induced by spin-orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces. Nature 539, 509-517 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [4]

    Sander, D. et al. The 2017 magnetism roadmap. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 363001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    M., Jungwirth, T., Sinova, J., Thiaville, A., Garello, K., & Gambardella, P

    Manchon A., ˘Zelezn´ y, J., Miron, I. M., Jungwirth, T., Sinova, J., Thiaville, A., Garello, K., & Gambardella, P. Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. accepted (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    C., Vila, L., Desfonds, G., Gambarelli, S., Attan, J

    Rojas S´ anchez, J. C., Vila, L., Desfonds, G., Gambarelli, S., Attan, J. P., De Teresa, J. M., Magn, C. & Fert, A. Spin-to-charge conversion using Rashba coupling at the interface between non-magnetic materials. Nat. Commun. 4, 1944 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [7]

    Spin to Charge Conversion at Room Temperature by Spin Pumping into a New Type of Topological Insulator: α-Sn Films

    Rojas-S´ anchez, J.-C., Oyarz´ un, S., Fu, Y., Marty, A., Vergnaud, C., Gambarelli, S., Vila, L., Jamet, M., Ohtsubo, Y., Taleb-Ibrahimi, A., Le F` evre, P., Bertran, F., Reyren, N., George, J.-M., & Fert, A. Spin to Charge Conversion at Room Temperature by Spin Pumping into a New Type of Topological Insulator: α-Sn Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 096602 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    & Kar, G

    Garello, K., Yasin, F., Couet, S., Souriau, L., Swerts, J., Rao, S., Van Beek, S., Kim, W., Liu, E., Kundu, S., Tsvetanova, D., Jossart, N., Croes, K., Grimaldi, E., Baumgartner, M., Crotti, D., Furn´ emont, A., Gambardella, P. & Kar, G. S. SOT-MRAM 300MM Integration for Low P...

    2018

  2. [9]

    & Barth´ el´ emy, A

    Bibes, M. & Barth´ el´ emy, A. Oxide spintronics.IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 54, 1003-1023 (2007)

    2007

  3. [10]

    Geim, A. K. & Grigorieva, I. V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419-425 (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    S., Mishchenko, A., Carvalho, A

    Novoselov, K. S., Mishchenko, A., Carvalho, A. & Castro Neto, A. H. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 353, aac9439 (2016)

    2016

  5. [12]

    Proximity-Induced Ferromagnetism in Graphene Revealed by the Anomalous Hall Effect on transition-metal dichalcogenides

    Wang, Z., Tang, C., Sachs, R., Barlas, Y., & Shi, J. Proximity-Induced Ferromagnetism in Graphene Revealed by the Anomalous Hall Effect on transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 016603 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    C., Kaverzin, A

    Leutenantsmeyer, J. C., Kaverzin, A. A., Wojtaszek, M. & van Wees, B.J. Proximity induced room temperature ferromagnetism in graphene probed with spin currents.2D Mater. 4, 014001 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    A., Sierra, J

    Ben´ ıtez, L. A., Sierra, J. F., Savero Torres, W., Arrighi, A., Bonell, F., Costache, M. V. & Valenzuela, S. O. Strongly anisotropic spin relaxation in graphene-transition metal dichalco- 10 genide heterostructures at room temperature. Nat. Phys. 14, 303-308 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    & Fabian, J

    Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides: A platform for prox- imity spin-orbit physics and optospintronics. Phys. Rev. B 92, 155403 (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    & Fabian, J

    Gmitra, M., Kochan, D., H¨ ogl, P. & Fabian, J. Trivial and inverted Dirac bands and the emergence of quantum spin Hall states in graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 93, 155104 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    W., Garcia, J

    Cummings, A. W., Garcia, J. H., Fabian, J.,& Roche, S. Giant Spin Lifetime Anisotropy in Graphene Induced by Proximity Effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206601 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    S., Ingla-Ayns, J., Kaverzin, A

    Ghiasi, T. S., Ingla-Ayns, J., Kaverzin, A. A., & van Wees, B. J. Large Proximity-induced spin lifetime anisotropy in transition-metal dichalcogenide/graphene heterostructures Nano Lett. 17, 7528-7532 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    H., Cummings, A.W., & Roche, S

    Garcia, J. H., Cummings, A.W., & Roche, S. Spin Hall effect and weak antilocalization in graphene/transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures. Nano Lett. 17, 5078 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    Optimal charge-to-spin conversion in graphene on transition metal dichalcogenide

    Offidani, M., Milletar` ı, M., Raimondi, R., & Ferreira, A. Optimal charge-to-spin conversion in graphene on transition metal dichalcogenide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 0196801 (2017)

    2017

  14. [21]

    Y., Taychatanapat, T., Balakrishnan,J., Koon, G.K.W., Yeo, Y., Lahiri, J., Carvalho, A., Rodin, A

    Avsar, A., Tan, J. Y., Taychatanapat, T., Balakrishnan,J., Koon, G.K.W., Yeo, Y., Lahiri, J., Carvalho, A., Rodin, A. S., O’Farrell, E.C.T., Eda, G., Castro Neto, A. H. & ¨Ozyilmaz, B. Spin-orbit proximity effect in graphene. Nat. Commun. 5, 4875 (2014)

    2014

  15. [22]

    Kaverzin, A. A. & van Wees, B. J. Electron transport nonlocality in monolayer graphene modified with hydrogen silsesquioxane polymerization Phys. Rev. B 91, 165412 (2015)

    2015

  16. [23]

    Wang, Y., Cai, X., Reutt-Robey, J., & Fuhrer, M. S. Neutral-current Hall effects in disordered graphene. Phys. Rev. B 92, 161411(R) (2015)

    2015

  17. [24]

    M., Waintail, X., Nikoli´ c, B

    Van Tuan, D., Marmoleho-Tejada, J. M., Waintail, X., Nikoli´ c, B. K., Valenzuela, S. O. & Roche, S. Spin Hall Effect and Origins of Nonlocal Resistance in Adatom-Decorated Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 176602 (2016)

    2016

  18. [25]

    K., Ingla-Ayn´ es, J., Herling, F., Garcia, J

    Safeer, C. K., Ingla-Ayn´ es, J., Herling, F., Garcia, J. H., Vila, M., Ontoso, N., Calvo, M. R., Roche, S., Hueso, L. E. & Casanova, F. Room-Temperature Spin Hall Effect in Graphene/MoS2 van der Waals Heterostructures Nano Lett. 19, 1074-1082 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    Valenzuela, S. O.. & Tinkham, M. Direct electronic measurement of the spin Hall effect. Nature 442, 176-179 (2006)

    2006

  20. [27]

    Valenzuela, S. O. & Tinkham, M. Electrical detection of spin currents: The spin-current 11 induced Hall effect. J. App. Phys 101, 09B103 (2007)

    2007

  21. [28]

    & Maekawa, S

    Kimura, T., Otani, Y., Sato, T., Takahashi, S. & Maekawa, S. Room-Temperature Reversible Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 156601 (2007)

    2007

  22. [29]

    & Valenzuela, S.O

    Savero Torres, W., Sierra, J.F., Ben´ ıtez, L.A., Bonell, F., Costache, M.V. & Valenzuela, S.O. Spin precession and spin Hall effect in monolayer graphene/Pt nanostructures. 2D Mater. 4, 041008 (2017)

    2017

  23. [30]

    E., Costache, M

    Raes, B., Scheerder, J. E., Costache, M. V., Bonell, F., Sierra, J. F., Cuppens, J., Van de Vondel, J., & Valenzuela S. O. Determination of the spin-lifetime anisotropy in graphene using oblique spin precession. Nat. Commun. 7, 11444 (2016)

    2016

  24. [31]

    C., Vaz, D.C., Naganuma, H., Sicoli, G., Attan´ e, J

    Lesne, E., Fu, Y., Rojas-S´ anchez, J. C., Vaz, D.C., Naganuma, H., Sicoli, G., Attan´ e, J. -P, Jamet, M., Jacquet, E., George, J. -M, Barth´ el´ emy, A., Jaffr` es, H., Fert, A., Bibes, M. & Vila, L. Highly efficient and tunable spin-to-charge conversion through Rashba coupling...

    2016

  25. [32]

    G., Cazalilla, M

    Ferreira, A., Rappoport, T. G., Cazalilla, M. A. & Castro Neto, A. H. Extrinsic Spin Hall Effect Induced by Resonant Skew Scattering in GraphenePhys. Rev. Lett. 112, 066601 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    M., Parui, S., Sierra, J

    Gebeyehu, Z. M., Parui, S., Sierra, J. F., Timmermans, M., Esplandiu, M. J., Brems, S., Huyghebaert, C., Garello, K., Costache, M. V., & Valenzuela, S. O. Spin communication over 30 µm long channels of chemical vapor deposited graphene on SiO 2 2D Mater. 6, 034003 (2019). Ackn...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.