Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 45 references

Dynamics and stability of a compound particle -- a theoretical study

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives exact low-Reynolds solutions for a rigid sphere inside a liquid drop, and shows that a pulsatile flow can shuttle the compound particle without rupturing its drop.

desk verdict The exact rotation/translation results are solid and citable, but the breakup-time and pulsatile-flow claims rest on a first-order shape expansion pushed past its validity, plus some concrete sign/transcription errors. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08202 v1 pith:OMIM447Y submitted 2019-08-22 cond-mat.soft

Sravana Chaithanya , Sumesh P Thampi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft MSC 76D0776T99 PACS 47.55.dr47.63.mc
keywords compoundparticleStokesflowdropdeformationconcentricinclusionbreakuppulsatilecapillarynumbermicrofluidics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how a solid sphere confined inside a liquid drop, a compound particle, behaves when pushed, spun, or placed in an imposed flow. It solves the low-Reynolds Stokes equations analytically for a concentric inclusion and derives closed-form expressions for the flow fields, the drag and torque on the particle, and the time-dependent shape of the confining interface. The central results are that rotation preserves the concentric configuration, translation does not unless an extra body force is applied to the drop, and the deformed interface always relaxes exponentially toward a steady shape with a relaxation time set by the viscosity ratio and size ratio. On that basis it claims that a pulsatile flow whose period is shorter than the breakup time can transport the compound particle while keeping the drop intact. The practical interest is that these formulas give material-selection and operating-time guidelines for preparing and moving encapsulated cells, organisms, or colloids in microfluidic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the assumed interface shape truncated to a single quadrupole mode, $S(x,t)=r-\alpha a\,(1+b\,Ca\,x\cdot E\cdot x)$, where $E$ is the symmetric part of the imposed velocity-gradient tensor and $b$ is the single time-dependent amplitude. The kinematic boundary condition at the interface turns this shape ansatz into one scalar ordinary differential equation, $Ca\,\mathrm{d}b/\mathrm{d}t=-b\,g(\alpha,\lambda)-f(\alpha,\lambda)/h(\alpha,\lambda)$, whose coefficients are rational functions of the size ratio $\alpha$ and viscosity ratio $\lambda$. All subsequent statements, the exponential relaxation, the critical capillary number, the breakup time, the comparison among shear, uniaxial, and biaxial flows, and the pulsatile-flow protocol, follow algebraically once this scalar equation is accepted.

What would settle it

Measure the time-dependent shape of a compound particle in a steady shear flow at moderate capillary number. If the relaxation from a deformed state is not a single exponential with the predicted time constant $\tau$, and if the steady shape exceeds the quadrupole prediction with noticeable higher-order modes before the critical capillary number is reached, then the central truncation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the entire low-Reynolds dynamics of a concentric compound particle reduces to a small set of explicit formulas. For rotation, the spherical interface is an exact solution: the particle and drop rotate at different rates, and the torque on the particle is $L_P=-8\pi\Omega_P\mu a^3 \lambda\alpha^3/[1+\lambda(\alpha^3-1)]$. For translation, the concentric state is not steady because the drop lags behind the solid; the paper calculates the extra force $F_{\mathrm{ext}}$ needed to make $V_P=V_D$ and gives closed-form drag laws for the thin-film and interface-confinement limits. In a general linear flow, the interface shape $S(x,t)=r-\alpha a\,(1+b\,Ca\,x\cdot E\cdot x)$ evolves by $Ca\,\mathrm{d}b/\mathrm{d}t=-b\,g(\alpha,\lambda)-f(\alpha,\lambda)/h(\alpha,\lambda)$, an exponential relaxation with time scale $\tau=Ca\,h(\alpha,\lambda)/g(\alpha,\lambda)$. Setting the deformation parameter $D=1$ marks breakup when the deformed interface touches the solid inclusion, and the resulting critical capillary number and breakup time are tabulated for simple shear, uniaxial, and biaxial flows. Finally, because the interface needs a time $\tau$ to move, a square-wave pulsatile flow with period $T<t_b$ avoids $D=1$ and transports the particle without breaking the drop.

Load-bearing premise

The shape of the deformed drop is assumed to stay a single quadrupole mode, with no higher-order spherical harmonics, so the interface cannot develop more complex wrinkles or bulges during strong deformation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A rotating compound particle keeps a perfectly spherical drop, with drop angular velocity $\Omega_D=\Omega_P/[1+\lambda(\alpha^3-1)]$, so a concentric rotating configuration is a true steady state.
  • A translating compound particle drifts apart from its drop unless the drop is pulled by an external force; the required stabilizing force is given in closed form and is large for thin films.
  • For any fixed $\alpha$ and $\lambda$ there is a critical capillary number $Ca_{\mathrm{crit}}$ above which the deformed interface touches the solid inclusion ($D=1$); stable operation requires $Ca<Ca_{\mathrm{crit}}$, and thin films require $Ca_{\mathrm{crit}}\sim(\alpha-1)^{-2}$.
  • Among simple shear, uniaxial, and biaxial flows, biaxial flow is the most destructive: it gives the smallest $r_{\min}$ and the shortest breakup time because an oblate interface meets the inclusion sooner than a prolate one.
  • A square-wave pulsatile flow with period $T$ shorter than the breakup time keeps $D$ below 1 indefinitely, so a compound particle can be transported without rupture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-quadrupole truncation is reliable, the pulsatile protocol should be robust to waveform shape: any alternating on-off drive with off-time at least $\tau$ and on-time less than $t_b$ should reset the interface between pulses, a prediction that could be tested directly in a microfluidic channel with time-varying pumping.
  • The strong thin-film scalings, $Ca_{\mathrm{crit}}\propto(\alpha-1)^{-2}$ and $t_b\propto(\alpha-1)^{-1}$, imply that lubricating films can be made almost indefinitely stable by choosing a favorable viscosity ratio; the same shielding may be undesirable when internal mixing is wanted, since the recirculating flow that aids mixing is suppressed in that limit.
  • Applying the same perturbation machinery to an eccentric inclusion would likely reveal an additional translational drift mode needing its own control, but the exponential relaxation and pulsing strategy should carry over in modified form.
  • The exponential relaxation law suggests a direct experimental observable: measuring $D(t)$ after switching a steady shear flow off should yield a single-exponential decay with time constant $\tau$, and any systematic deviation would signal that higher harmonics have become important.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the low-Reynolds-number hydrodynamics of a concentric compound particle consisting of a rigid spherical inclusion inside a viscous drop. It reports analytical Stokes-flow solutions for rotation, translation, and general linear ambient flows, gives closed-form expressions for the viscous torque and drag, and derives an ordinary differential equation for the time evolution of the confining drop shape in the small-capillary-number limit. On the basis of this evolution equation, the paper predicts a critical capillary number and a breakup time at which the deformed interface touches the solid inclusion, and it proposes pulsatile flow as a method to transport compound particles without breakup. The manuscript also compares simple shear, uniaxial, and biaxial flows and discusses thin-film limits for all computed quantities.

Significance. If the results are valid, the paper provides useful closed-form reference solutions for a class of compound-particle problems that are usually treated numerically or in bispherical series. The derivation is self-contained, has no fitted parameters, and correctly recovers known compound-droplet limits in several places, which are genuine strengths. The pulsatile-flow idea is original and experimentally testable. However, the significance and the practical claims rest on extrapolating a first-order small-deformation calculation to the point of drop-inclusion contact, and that extrapolation is not controlled by the analysis as presented. The correctable nature of the identified problems makes a major revision the appropriate outcome.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.C, Eq. (14) and Fig. 7] The central evolution equation is obtained from the O(Ca) single-quadrupole shape ansatz S(x,t) = r - alpha a (1 + b Ca x.E.x). The paper then integrates this equation up to D = 1, the point at which the interface touches the solid inclusion. At contact, b Ca = 2(alpha - 1)/alpha from the rmin formula in Table I. For the parameters used in Fig. 7 (alpha = 1.5, Ca = 0.2) this gives b Ca = 0.67, and for alpha = 2 it gives b Ca = 1. These values are O(1), so the interface displacement is not small compared with the film thickness, and neither the restriction to a single quadrupole harmonic nor the neglect of O(Ca^2) corrections to the flow is justified. The clarification after Eq. (19) explicitly restricts the thin-film limit to (alpha - 1) ~ O(Ca), yet the same equations are used for alpha = 1.5 and alpha = 2 at Ca = 0.2 to predict Cacrit, tb, and the pulsatile-flow threshold. This is an internal inconsistency in the domain of validity and it undermines the breakup and transport claims.
  2. [Section II.C, Eq. (18)] The thin-film breakup time is reported as tb/G^-1 = -4/[15 lambda (alpha - 1)] - 4(15 lambda - 7)/(45 lambda) + O(alpha - 1). For alpha -> 1+ and lambda > 0, this expression tends to -infinity, which contradicts the statement in the same paragraph that the breakup time is very large. The sign is also inconsistent with the logarithmic expression for tb in Table I, whose argument gives a positive, large value in the thin-film limit. This equation needs to be re-derived and corrected before the breakup-time predictions can be trusted.
  3. [Section II.C, Eq. (16) and definition of breakup] The paper equates D = 1, i.e., contact between the deformed interface and the solid inclusion, with breakup of the confining drop. Contact is a geometric condition, not a dynamical rupture condition: whether the film then drains, dewets, or ruptures depends on additional physics that is not part of the model. Since the pulsatile-flow protocol is designed specifically to prevent D = 1, this identification is load-bearing and should be either justified with a separate argument or softened to a statement about onset of contact rather than breakup.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section II.B, Eq. (11)] Equation (11) appears to be inconsistent with the expression for V_D in Appendix A: the numerator contains 9 alpha^5 - 5 alpha^5 - 4, while the appendix gives 9 alpha^5 - 5 alpha^3 - 4. This is presumably a typographical error, but it should be corrected and the inequality V_D/V_P < 1 should be verified with the corrected expression.
  2. [Table I] Several entries in Table I are typeset in a way that is hard to parse; for example, the simple-shear expression for D reads as b Ca/(2 - 2 alpha), which is negative for alpha > 1, and the uniaxial and biaxial D entries are ambiguous. Please reformat the table so that each fraction is unambiguous.
  3. [Section II.E] The design criterion at the end of the pulsatile-flow section states that stability is maintained when T > tau, but the preceding discussion and Fig. 7 show that large T leads to breakup and small T prevents it. The inequality should read T < tau (or the definition of tau should be clarified), and the statement should be checked against the values used in Fig. 7.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained and parameter-free.

full rationale

The paper's central results are obtained by solving the steady Stokes equations for a concentric solid-in-drop geometry with only the stated boundary conditions, then using the kinematic interface condition to derive the scalar shape-evolution equation (Eq. 14). No empirical or fitted parameters enter the derivation; the functions f, g, and h are algebraic combinations of the geometric ratio alpha and viscosity ratio lambda obtained from the leading-order flow solution. The breakup criterion D=1 is not an input but a geometric contact condition following from the deformation parameter defined in Eq. 16, and the pulsatile-flow transport proposal follows by integrating the derived relaxation dynamics under the square-wave strain-rate input of Eq. 20, not by imposing the conclusion. Prior compound-droplet results are invoked only as limiting checks or comparisons (e.g., Eq. 10 versus Sadhal and Oguz, Eq. 12 versus Rushton and Davies), and none of these citations is load-bearing for the new transient dynamics or the pulsatile-flow protocol. There are no fitted inputs renamed as predictions, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation: the single-mode interface ansatz S = r - alpha a(1 + b Ca x.E.x) is explicitly stated and used consistently in the derivation. The skeptical concern that this O(Ca) quadrupole truncation is uncontrolled when breakup is approached is a domain-of-validity or correctness issue, not a circularity; the derivation does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities are used. The model relies on standard Stokes-flow assumptions, small-deformation expansion, and a quadrupole-only interface ansatz, all stated in Section I and II.C.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The flow is governed by steady Stokes equations with negligible inertia.
    Invoked in Section I, justified by the 1-100 micrometer size range and low Reynolds number.
  • domain assumption The droplet deformation is small, with all variables expanded in powers of the capillary number Ca.
    Introduced in Section I, required for the linearized interface condition and the shape ansatz.
  • ad hoc to paper The interface shape is described by a single quadrupole mode, r = alpha a (1 + b Ca x.E.x).
    Assumed in Section II.C for the deformation calculation; higher-order modes are neglected, which is a load-bearing truncation.
  • domain assumption Both fluids are Newtonian, the interface has constant surface tension, and no surfactants are present.
    State in Section I in the stress balance and capillary number definitions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamics and stability of a compound particle -- a theoretical study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OMIM447Y

@misc{pith2026190808202,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamics and stability of a compound particle -- a theoretical study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OMIM447Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08202}
}
read the original abstract

Particles confined in droplets are called compound particles. They are encountered in various biological and soft matter systems. Hydrodynamics can play a decisive role in determining the configuration and stability of these multiphase structures during their preparation and use. Therefore, we investigate the dynamics and stability of a concentric compound particle under external forces and imposed flows. Governing equations are solved analytically in the inertia-less limit using the standard technique of superposition of vector harmonics and the solutions obtained are reported in terms of steady state flow fields, viscous drag on the particle and the time evolution of the confining drop shape. The limiting form of compound particle as a thin film coated rigid particle is analyzed in each case. We find that concentric configuration of a rotating compound particle is a steady state solution, and we calculate the extra force required to stabilize the concentric configuration of a translating compound particle. A comprehensive comparison of drop deformations in various linear ambient flows is also provided. Based on the findings, we propose pulsatile flow as a reliable method to transport compound particles without breakup of the confining drop. Thus, our analysis provides useful guidelines in preparation and transportation of stable compound particles in the context of nucleated cells, aerosols, droplet-based encapsulation of motile organisms and polymer microcapsules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08202 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the compound particle system. A solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Velocity field and torque calculated due to rotation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Flow field generated by the particle translating in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) (b) Drag force on the particle translating inside [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Typical linear flow fields encountered in a microflu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Velocity field around a compound particle in an imposed simple shear flow in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Deformation dynamics, quantified as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    If the sur- rounding fluid is only the outer fluid then the vis- cous torque experienced by the particle is given by Louter P =−8πΩPλµa3

    Modified torque on a particle due to a thin film coating: Consider a rotating particle. If the sur- rounding fluid is only the outer fluid then the vis- cous torque experienced by the particle is given by Louter P =−8πΩPλµa3. This drag gets modified if the particle surface is covered by a coating of an- other fluid, say the inner fluid. If the thickness of the c...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This drag gets modified if the system containing the particle and the inner fluid is confined by an outer fluid

    Modified torque on a particle when particle-fluid system is confined by an interface: The viscous torque experienced by a particle rotating in the in- ner fluid alone is given by Linner P =−8πΩPµa3. This drag gets modified if the system containing the particle and the inner fluid is confined by an outer fluid. Right hand side of Fig. 2(b) shows this modification t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Modified Stokes drag on a particle due to a thin film coating: FP = Fouter P ( 1 + (1−λ)(α− 1) ) +O(α− 1)2, (9) where Fouter P =−6πλµaVP and (a) (b) (c) (d) FIG. 3. Flow field generated by the particle translating in- side a droplet for α = 2, (a) λ = 0, (b) λ = 1, (c) λ = 100. The domain is colored according to the magnitude of velocity |u|/VP , on which st...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Modified Stokes drag on a particle when the particle-fluid system is confined by an interface: FP = Finner P ( λα4(1−λ) + 2α5(3 + 2λ) 4 + 6α5 +λZ1 +λ2Z2 ) , (10) where Finner P = −6πµaVP , Z1 = 6α6 + 3α5− 10α3 + 9α− 8 andZ2 = 4α6− 9α5 + 10α3− 9α + 4. Eq. 10 may also be obtained from the analysis of compound droplets studied in Sadhal and Oguz [12]. However, ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Plessy, L

    C. Plessy, L. Desbois, T. Fujii, and P. Carninci, BioEs- says 35, 131 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    G. Choe, J. Park, H. Park, and J. Lee, Polymers 10, 997 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Gasperini, J

    L. Gasperini, J. F. Mano, and R. L. Reis, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140817 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    H. Wen, Y. Yu, G. Zhu, L. Jiang, and J. Qin, Lab Chip 15, 1905 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, T

    Q. Zhang, T. Wang, Q. Zhou, P. Zhang, Y. Gong, H. Gou, J. Xu, and B. ma, Sci. Rep. 7, 41192 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    R. E. Johnson and S. S. Sadhal, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 289 (1985)

    1985

  3. [11]

    S. Y. Reigh, L. Zhu, F. Gallaire, and E. Lauga, Soft Matter 13, 3161 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Modification to the drag force in these two cases is illustrated in Fig

    may be tedious[28] since the reported solutions are in series form in bispherical coordinates with infinite number of coefficients to be evaluated. Modification to the drag force in these two cases is illustrated in Fig. 4(a). Similar to that in Fig. 2(b), the reduction or increas...

  5. [13]

    K. M. Wisdom, J. A. Watson, X. Qu, F. Liu, G. S. Wat- son, and C. H. Chen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7992 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Thiele and S

    J. Thiele and S. Seiffert, Lab Chip 11, 3188 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    W. Wang, M. J. Zhang, R. Xie, X. J. Ju, C. Yang, C. L. Mou, D. A. Weitz, and L. Y. Chu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 8084 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Rushton and G

    E. Rushton and G. Davies, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 9, 337 (1983)

    1983

  9. [17]

    S. S. Sadhal and H. N. Oguz, J. Fluid Mech. 160, 511 (1985)

    1985

  10. [18]

    Qu and Y

    X. Qu and Y. Wang, Phys. Fluids 24, 123302 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    R. E. Johnson and S. S. Sadhal, J. Fluid Mech. 132, 295 (1983). 12

    1983

  12. [20]

    Davis and H

    A. Davis and H. Brenner, J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 107, 609 (1981)

    1981

  13. [21]

    H. A. Stone and L. G. Leal, J. Fluid Mech. 211, 123 (1990)

    1990

  14. [22]

    I. B. Bazhlekov, P. J. Shopov, and Z. D. Zapryanov, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 169, 1 (1995)

    1995

  15. [23]

    C. Zhou, P. Yue, and J. J. Feng, Phys. Fluids 18, 092105 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Mandal, U

    S. Mandal, U. Ghosh, and S. Chakraborty, J. Fluid Mech. 803, 200 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Y. Song, J. Xu, and Y. Yang, Phys. Fluids 22, 072003 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    N. Wang, C. Semprebon, H. Liu, C. Zhang, and H. Kusumaatmaja, arXiv:1906.01034 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P. Soni, R. M. Thaokar, and V. A. Juvekar, Phys. Fluids 30, 032102 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    W. B. Russel, D. A. Saville, and W. R. Schowalter, Col- loidal Dispersions (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

    1989

  21. [29]

    L. G. Leal, Advanced Transport Phenomena: Fluid Me- chanics and Convective Transport Processes , Cambridge Series in Chemical Engineering (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    N. A. Frankel and A. Acrivos, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 65 (1970)

    1970

  23. [31]

    Nadim and H

    A. Nadim and H. A. Stone, Stud. Appl. Math. 85, 53 (1991)

    1991

  24. [32]

    Pozrikidis, Boundary Integral and Singularity Meth- ods for Linearized Viscous Flow (Cambridge University Press, 1992)

    C. Pozrikidis, Boundary Integral and Singularity Meth- ods for Linearized Viscous Flow (Cambridge University Press, 1992)

    1992

  25. [33]

    Rushton and G

    E. Rushton and G. A. Davies, Appl. Sci. Res. 28, 37 (1973)

    1973

  26. [34]

    Choudhuri and B

    D. Choudhuri and B. Sri Padmavati, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 61, 317 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    R. E. Johnson, J. Fluid Mech. 110, 217 (1981)

    1981

  28. [36]

    G. I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A138, 41 (1932)

    1932

  29. [37]

    C. D. Westbrook, Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc. 134, 1243 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    H. Chen, Q. Xu, S. Liang, and J. Li, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 124003 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    P. M. Geethu, I. Yadav, S. K. Deshpande, V. K. Aswal, and D. K. Satapathy, Macromolecules 50, 6518 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Aubry, M

    G. Aubry, M. Zhan, and H. Lu, Lab Chip 15, 1424 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    M. He, J. S. Edgar, G. D. M. Jeffries, R. M. Lorenz, J. P. Shelby, and D. T. Chiu, Anal. Chem. 77, 1539 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    T. S. Kaminski, O. Scheler, and P. Garstecki, Lab Chip 16, 2168 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    C. H. Chen, A. R. Abate, D. Lee, E. M. Terentjev, and D. A. Weitz, Adv. Mater. 21, 3201 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    A. B. Basset, Treatise on Hydrodynamics (Deighton Bell, 1888)

  37. [45]

    Proudman and J

    I. Proudman and J. R. A. Pearson, J. Fluid Mech. 2, 237 (1957)

    1957

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.