Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Study of the velocity plateau of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The velocity plateau of a field-driven Dzyaloshinskii domain wall ends at a breakdown field close to $1.11\,D/(\mu_0 M_s \Delta)$, not at a damping-controlled field.

desk verdict Solid, useful paper on the velocity plateau in Dzyaloshinskii domain walls; the plateau-end formula is predictive but overextended to samples where its DMI-dominance precondition fails. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08282 v1 pith:D75HZQIR submitted 2019-08-22 cond-mat.mes-hall

V. Krizakova , J. Pena Garcia , J. Vogel , N. Rougemaille , D. de Souza Chaves , S. Pizzini , A. Thiaville This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords domainwalldynamicsDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionvelocityplateauWalkerbreakdownverticalBlochlinesspinwaveemissionperpendicularmagneticanisotropymicromagneticsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Field-driven chiral domain walls in magnetic multilayers do not abruptly slow down after the Walker field; instead they keep a nearly constant high speed, forming a velocity plateau whose end, this paper argues, is a simple field. Experiments on four stacks with different magnetization and DMI strengths, together with two-dimensional micromagnetic simulations, show that the plateau speed is close to the Walker velocity and that the wall is strongly corrugated and full of $2\pi$ vertical Bloch lines. The paper identifies the plateau with the negative-mobility regime of one-dimensional wall dynamics and proposes that the extra energy is dissipated when $2\pi$ Bloch lines annihilate through Bloch points and emit spin waves. The central quantitative result is that the plateau ends at $H_S \approx 1.11\,D/(\mu_0 M_s \Delta)$, a numerical factor times the DMI effective field that is independent of damping in the low-damping limit.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the corrugated-wall description of the negative-mobility regime, in which a meandering wall experiences curvature-induced fields $H_q=\frac{\sigma}{2\mu_0 M_s}\frac{\partial^2 q}{\partial y^2}$ that add to the drive on lagging parts and nucleate $2\pi$ vertical Bloch lines. A $2\pi$ vertical Bloch line is a twist of the wall magnetization angle by $2\pi$; it is topologically stable and disappears through a Bloch point, radiating spin waves, with energy $\lambda=16\sqrt{A_{\rm ex}\Delta \pi D}$ per unit thickness. Two integral relations carry the argument: an averaged wall equation expressing momentum conservation, and an energy balance in which Bloch-line annihilation supplies a dominant share of the extra dissipation needed to move at the Walker velocity. The terminal field comes from mapping the one-dimensional minimum-velocity field onto the DMI field, giving Eq. (8).

What would settle it

Measure the plateau-end field $B_{\rm break}$ in a series of samples in which $D/(M_s \Delta)$ is varied by, say, a factor of two while the wall width is kept fixed; if $B_{\rm break}$ does not track $1.11\,D/(\mu_0 M_s \Delta)$ within experimental error, the central quantitative claim fails. A complementary check is to image the predicted spin-wave wakes at the moments when $2\pi$ vertical Bloch lines annihilate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the end of the high-velocity plateau of a Dzyaloshinskii domain wall is the Slonczewski field of the one-dimensional wall model, evaluated with the DMI effective field in place of the wall anisotropy field: $H_S=\frac{1+\alpha^2}{\sqrt{2+\alpha^2}}H_D=\frac{\pi(1+\alpha^2)}{2\sqrt{2+\alpha^2}}\frac{D}{\mu_0 M_s \Delta}\approx 1.11\,\frac{D}{\mu_0 M_s \Delta}$ for small damping. Above the Walker field the wall corrugates; lagging parts of the wall precess faster and nucleate $2\pi$ vertical Bloch lines, and the annihilation of these topologically stable lines through Bloch points releases their energy as spin waves. This dissipation, together with localized precession in the lagging parts, lets the wall keep moving at essentially the Walker velocity instead of falling into low-mobility precessional motion. The claim is supported by Kerr-microscopy velocities in four samples and by micromagnetic simulations that reproduce both the plateau speed and the breakdown field, and the paper shows that the end of the plateau is not set by dense packing of vertical Bloch lines.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the breakdown field derived for a straight wall in the one-dimensional model continues to give the end of the plateau for a strongly corrugated two-dimensional wall once the DMI effective field is substituted for the wall anisotropy field, even though the paper admits the corrugated-wall model cannot be applied directly to the simulated wall shapes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above the Walker field, a wide strip with strong DMI should keep a constant velocity near the Walker velocity instead of dropping to low mobility; the plateau is the negative-mobility regime of the one-dimensional model.
  • The breakdown field is set by material parameters alone: $B_{\rm break}\approx 1.11\,D/(\mu_0 M_s \Delta)$, so increasing $D/M_s$ or the wall width $\Delta$ extends the plateau.
  • The end of the plateau is not governed by vertical Bloch lines packing to a maximum density; their destruction, not their crowding, sets the energetics.
  • In narrow strips the corrugation needed for the plateau is suppressed, so the usual one-dimensional Walker breakdown (or even two successive breakdowns) reappears; the simulations place the crossover near 500 nm for the studied parameters.
  • Annihilation of a $2\pi$ vertical Bloch line through a Bloch point radiates spin waves, and this channel accounts for at least one third, likely more, of the extra energy dissipated while moving at the Walker velocity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the breakdown field is independent of damping at low damping, the same plateau field range should in principle be accessible in materials with higher Gilbert damping; the paper does not state this consequence.
  • The spin-wave bursts accompanying Bloch-line annihilation are a testable fingerprint: time-resolved magnetic imaging or microwave emission measurements should see intermittent bursts whose rate matches the observed annihilation rate on the plateau.
  • The same corrugation-and-Bloch-line mechanism may set saturation velocities for current-driven domain walls under spin-orbit torque, where comparable wall shapes are expected, but the paper studies field drive only.
  • The scaling formula gives an application-oriented dial: tuning $D/M_s$ by interface or alloy engineering changes the plateau range without changing its speed, which could help stabilize high-speed wall motion in devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports field-driven domain-wall velocity measurements on four asymmetric multilayer stacks with PMA and interfacial DMI, together with Mumax3 micromagnetic simulations. The experiments show a velocity plateau above the Walker field whose height scales roughly with D/Ms and whose field extent depends on D, Ms, and Keff. Simulations reproduce the plateau and reveal that the moving wall is corrugated and contains 2π vertical Bloch lines; the paper argues that VBL pair annihilation dissipates energy via spin-wave emission, sustaining the wall near the Walker velocity. The central quantitative claim is Eq. (8), which identifies the end of the plateau with the Slonczewski field HS ≈ 1.11 D/(μ0 Ms Δ) in the low-damping limit.

Significance. If correct, Eq. (8) gives a parameter-free prediction for the plateau-end field using independently measured D, Ms, and Keff, with no parameter fitted to the plateau dynamics. This would be a useful design rule for spintronic devices. The paper is also valuable for its detailed micromagnetic statistics of 2π VBL dynamics and its energy-balance argument. However, the universality of the numerical factor is not fully established: sample (iv) deviates from the prediction by factors 2.3 (simulation) and 1.7 (experiment), and the derivation's precondition HD >> HKDW is never checked.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Eq. (8)] Equation (8) is derived under the condition HD >> HKDW, but the paper never quantifies HKDW for the four samples. For sample (iv) in Table I (D = 0.2 mJ/m^2, Ms = 0.35 MA/m, Keff = 0.06 MJ/m^3, Δ ≈ 8.2 nm), standard estimates of the Néel-wall magnetostatic anisotropy give HKDW comparable to or larger than HD, so the DMI-dominated limit invoked in the derivation is not satisfied. This matters because sample (iv) is precisely the one with the largest discrepancy between the predicted BS = 80 mT and Bsim_break = 35 mT. The authors should either compute HKDW for all samples and restrict the claim to the HD >> HKDW regime, or revise Eq. (8) to include the magnetostatic contribution.
  2. [Table I and Section V] The statement in Section V that the agreement of Eq. (8) with experiments and simulations is 'quantitatively very good' is not supported for sample (iv): the simulated breakdown field is 35 mT, the experimental one is 60 mT, and the predicted Slonczewski field is 80 mT. This is a factor-2.3 error against simulations and a factor-1.7 error against experiment. The paper should report these deviations explicitly and discuss their origin, rather than summarizing the agreement as very good.
  3. [Section V, corrugated-wall model] The identification of the 1D Slonczewski field with the end of the 2D velocity plateau is explicitly heuristic: the text states that Slonczewski's steady-state corrugated-wall model 'cannot be directly applied' to the simulated walls, yet Eq. (8) uses the 1D result with HD substituted for HKDW. The authors should provide a quantitative argument for why the 1D plateau-end field should survive 2D corrugations, or clearly present Eq. (8) as an empirical interpolation supported only in the parameter range where it has been tested.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table I caption] Bexp_break for samples (i) and (ii) are lower bounds because the plateau extends to the largest measurable field; this should be stated in the caption or text to avoid an impression of exact agreement.
  2. [Section VI and Abstract] The conclusion and abstract repeat the 'simply proportional' phrasing without the HD >> HKDW qualification; please add this qualification to the abstract and conclusion.
  3. [Appendix] The Bloch-point annihilation occurs in a one-cell-thick simulation, so the Bloch point is numerically virtual; a sentence on how this discretization might affect the estimated VBL annihilation energy would strengthen the energy-balance argument.
  4. [Section V, Eq. (4)] The notation << ... >> is not defined at first use; please define it as the combined spatial and temporal average.
  5. [References] Reference [31] is cited as an arXiv preprint; please update to the published version if one exists.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (8) predicts the plateau end from independently measured D, Ms, and Keff via Slonczewski's 1D result, with no parameter fitted to the plateau velocity or to B_break.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim is Eq. (8), HS = (1+alpha^2)/sqrt(2+alpha^2) HD = pi(1+alpha^2)/(2 sqrt(2+alpha^2)) D/(mu0 Ms Delta), with HS ~ 1.11 D/(mu0 Ms Delta) in the small-damping limit. The inputs D, Ms, and Keff (hence Delta) are determined by magnetometry and by in-plane-field velocity measurements in the flow regime, not by fitting the plateau velocity or B_break. Equation (8) is obtained by applying the DMI-dominated limit of the 1D Slonczewski model (Eq. 6), not by inverting the experimental plateau curves, so the plateau-end prediction is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The micromagnetic Mumax3 simulations independently solve the LLG equation with the same material parameters and reproduce the plateau and its end without any fitting to B_break. The identification of the plateau end with the Slonczewski field is an explanatory hypothesis supported by the simulations. The paper explicitly states the condition 'when the DMI-induced field satisfies HD >> HKDW this 1D model applies,' and the possible failure of this condition for sample (iv), where the predicted BS = 80 mT versus Bsim_break = 35 mT, is a validity/robustness concern rather than a circular reduction. Reference [24] is a self-citation for the D values and for earlier velocity measurements, but those measurements are made in the flow regime outside the plateau and are externally falsifiable; they are not a self-supporting uniqueness theorem. No step in the derivation chain reduces the predicted quantity to a fitted parameter, a definitional identity, or a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on measured Ms and Keff, a flow-regime-derived D, plus assumed Aex and alpha. The main unproven step is the transfer of the 1D Slonczewski field to the 2D corrugated wall regime. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • DMI strength D = 1.45, 1.5, 0.2, 0.2 mJ/m^2 (Table I)
    Estimated from the in-plane field dependence of DW velocity in the flow regime (Ref. 24). The central claim depends linearly on D through Eq. 8.
  • Exchange stiffness Aex = 16 pJ/m for samples (i) and (ii); 4 pJ/m for samples (iii) and (iv)
    Not directly measured for these samples; chosen as representative values. Enters the domain wall width Delta = sqrt(Aex/Keff) and therefore the predicted HS.
  • Damping constant alpha = 0.15
    Assumed in all simulations. It affects simulated absolute velocities and the Walker field, although the low-damping analytic HS is independent of alpha.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation as solved by Mumax3 accurately describes the DW dynamics in these films.
    Used in all simulations (Section III). This is the standard micromagnetic framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The 1D Slonczewski (q,Phi) model with purely second-degree effective anisotropy remains valid for DMI-stabilized chiral walls when HD is substituted for HKDW.
    Used to derive Eq. 8 (Section V). The authors acknowledge the corrugated-wall model cannot be directly applied, making this a heuristic extension.
  • domain assumption The samples can be represented as single-layer ferromagnets with uniform Ms, Keff, D and no disorder.
    All simulations use one layer of cells and uniform parameters. The authors state disorder was checked not to affect the main results (Section III).
  • ad hoc to paper In the DMI-dominated regime, only 2 pi vertical Bloch lines are relevant objects; 1 pi VBLs are energetically unfavored.
    Underlies the VBL counting and the energy balance argument (Section IV). Motivated by chirality but not rigorously proven.
  • domain assumption The one-cell-thick discretization captures the essential VBL dynamics even though Bloch points are numerically virtual.
    Appendix VII: the annihilation of 2 pi VBLs through Bloch points is inferred from 2D angle profiles, while a true 3D Bloch point cannot exist in a one-cell-thick mesh.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Study of the velocity plateau of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D75HZQIR

@misc{pith2026190808282,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Study of the velocity plateau of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D75HZQIR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08282}
}
read the original abstract

We study field-driven domain wall (DW) velocities in asymmetric multilayer stacks with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI), both experimentally and by micromagnetic simulations. Using magneto-optical Kerr microscopy under intense and nanoseconds-long fields, we show that DWs in these films propagate at velocities up to hundreds of m/s and that, instead of the expected decrease of velocity after the Walker field, a long plateau with constant velocity is observed, before breakdown. Both the maximum speed and the field extent of the velocity plateau strongly depend on the values of the spontaneous magnetization and the DMI strength, as well as on the magnetic anisotropy. Micromagnetic simulations reproduce these features in sufficiently wide strips, even for perfect samples. A physical model explaining the microscopic origin of the velocity plateau is proposed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08282 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Domain wall velocity versus easy-axis field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scheme of simulation geometry with depicted mi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simulated field-driven DW velocity for (a) Ms=1.01 MA/m and Ku=1.44 MJ/m3 so that Keff=0.80 MJ/m3 , and different values of DMI strength and (b) fixed D=1.5 mJ/m2 , Keff=0.44 MJ/m3 and varying spon￾taneous magnetization. The different lengths of the velocity plateau for D=1.5 mJ/m2 and Ms=1.01 MA/m in (a) and (b) result from the different Keff values (see discussion later in the text). Ms = 0.756 MA/m, Ku = 0.80 MJ/… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sequence of images of the normalized magnetization components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of local DW magnetization angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scheme of 2π VBLs in Dzyaloshinskii domain walls, in statics (a,b) and around the Walker field under positive z field drive (c,d). The winding of the 2π VBL is opposite between (a) and (b), and (c) and (d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Field dependency of DW parameters: velocity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Time evolution of the profiles of local magnetization angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author I. E. \ Dzyaloshinskii ,\ @noop journal journal Sov. Phys. JETP \ volume 5 ,\ pages 1259 ( year 1957 ) NoStop

    work page 1957

  2. [2]

    Moriya ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author T. Moriya ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 120 ,\ pages 91 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

    work page 1960

  3. [3]

    Heinze , author K

    author author S. Heinze , author K. von Bergmann , author M. Menzel , author J. Brede , author A. Kubetzka , author R. Wiesendanger , author G. Bihlmayer , \ and\ author S. Bl \" u gel ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 713 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Chen , author T

    author author G. Chen , author T. Ma , author A. T. \ N'Diaye , author H. Kwon , author C. Won , author Y. Wu , \ and\ author A. K. \ Schmid ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 2671 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Fert , author V

    author author A. Fert , author V. Cros , \ and\ author J. Sampaio ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 152 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Thiaville , author S

    author author A. Thiaville , author S. Rohart , author E. Ju \' e , author V. Cros , \ and\ author A. Fert ,\ 10.1209/0295-5075/100/57002 journal journal EPL \ volume 100 ,\ pages 57002 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1209/0295-5075/100/57002 2012

  7. [7]

    author author T. A. \ Moore , author I. M. \ Miron , author G. Gaudin , author G. Serret , author S. Auffret , author B. Rodmacq , author A. Schuhl , author S. Pizzini , author J. Vogel , \ and\ author M. Bonfim ,\ 10.1063/1.3062855 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 93 ,\ eid 262504 ( year 2008 ),\ 10.1063/1.3062855 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3062855

  8. [8]

    author author I. M. \ Miron , author T. Moore , author H. Szambolics , author L. D. \ Buda-Prejbeanu , author S. Auffret , author S. Rodmacq , B.and Pizzini , author J. Vogel , author M. Bonfim , author A. Schuhl , \ and\ author G. Gaudin ,\ 10.1038/NMAT3020 journal journal Nat. Mater. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 419 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat3020

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    \ Ryu , author T

    author author K.-S. \ Ryu , author T. L. , author S.-H. \ Yang , \ and\ author S. Parkin ,\ 10.1038/NNANO.2013.102 journal journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 527 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    Emori , author U

    author author S. Emori , author U. Bauer , author S.-M. \ Ahn , author E. Martinez , \ and\ author G. Beach ,\ 10.1038/NMAT3675 journal journal Nat. Mater. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 611 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    author author S. S. P. \ Parkin , author M. Hayashi , \ and\ author L. Thomas ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 320 ,\ pages 190 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  4. [12]

    author author L. R. \ Walker ,\ @noop note Bell Telephone Laboratories Memorandum (1956, unpublished); see however the presentation by Dillon Dillon1963 and the later paper by Schryer and Walker Schryer1974 NoStop

    1956

  5. [13]

    author author J. C. \ Slonczewski ,\ @noop journal journal Intern.\ J.\ Magnetism \ volume 2 ,\ pages 85 ( year 1972 a ) NoStop

    1972

  6. [14]

    author author N. L. \ Schryer \ and\ author L. R. \ Walker ,\ @noop journal journal J.\ Appl.\ Phys. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 5406 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  7. [15]

    author author A. P. \ Malozemoff \ and\ author J. C. \ Slonczewski ,\ @noop title Magnetic Domain Walls in Bubble Materials \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address New York ,\ year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979

  8. [16]

    author author A. H. \ Bobeck , author I. Danylchuk , author J. P. \ Remeika , author L. G. \ van Uitert , \ and\ author E. M. \ Walters ,\ title Proceedings of the international conference on ferrites 1970 , \ \ ( publisher U. of Tokyo Press ,\ address Tokyo ,\ year 1971 )\ p....

    1970

  9. [17]

    author author B. E. \ Argyle , author J. C. \ Slonczewski , \ and\ author A. F. \ Mayadas ,\ @noop journal journal AIP\ Conf.\ Proc. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 175 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972

  10. [18]

    author author F. H. \ de Leeuw ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans.\ Magn. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 596 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  11. [19]

    author author V. V. \ Volkov , author V. A. \ Bokov , \ and\ author V. I. \ Karpovich ,\ @noop journal journal Sov.\ Phys.\ Solid State \ volume 24 ,\ pages 1315 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  12. [20]

    author author J. C. \ Slonczewski ,\ @noop journal journal AIP\ Conf.\ Proc. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 170 ( year 1972 b ) NoStop

    1972

  13. [21]

    Dourlat , author V

    author author A. Dourlat , author V. Jeudy , author A. Lema \^ i tre , \ and\ author C. Gourdon ,\ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ B \ volume 78 ,\ pages 161303(R) ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  14. [22]

    Gourdon , author L

    author author C. Gourdon , author L. Thevenard , author S. Haghgoo , \ and\ author A. C \- e bers ,\ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 014428 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  15. [23]

    Yoshimura , author K.-J

    author author Y. Yoshimura , author K.-J. \ Kim , author T. Taniguchi , author T. Tono , author K. Ueda , author R. Hiramatsu , author T. Moriyama , author N. Yamada , author Y. Nakatani , \ and\ author T. Ono ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 157 ( year...

    2016

  16. [24]

    author author T. H. \ Pham , author J. Vogel , author J. Sampaio , author M. Va n atka , author J.-C. \ Rojas-Sanchez , author M. Bonfim , author D. S. \ Chaves , author F. Choueikani , author P. Ohresser , author E. Otero , author A. Thiaville , \ and\ author S. Pizzini ,\ @n...

    2016

  17. [25]

    Ajejas , author V

    author author F. Ajejas , author V. Krizakova , author D. de Souza Chaves , author J. Vogel , author P. Perna , author R. Guerrero , author A. Gudin , author J. Camarareo , \ and\ author S. Pizzini ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 202402 ( year ...

    2017

  18. [26]

    Yamada \ and\ author Y

    author author K. Yamada \ and\ author Y. Nakatani ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Express \ volume 8 ,\ pages 093004 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  19. [27]

    author author D. de Souza Chaves ,\ @noop title The dynamics of chiral domain walls in multilayer films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy \ ( publisher PhD, Universit\' e Grenoble Alpes ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  20. [28]

    Vansteenkiste , author J

    author author A. Vansteenkiste , author J. Leliaert , author M. Dvornik , author M. Helsen , author F. Garcia-Sanchez , \ and\ author B. Van Waeyenberge ,\ @noop journal journal AIP Adv. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 107133 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  21. [29]

    Boulle , author S

    author author O. Boulle , author S. Rohart , author L. D. \ Buda-Prejbeanu , author E. Ju\'e , author I. M. \ Miron , author S. Pizzini , author J. Vogel , author G. Gaudin , \ and\ author A. Thiaville ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.217203 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume...

    doi

  22. [30]

    For the magnetic bubbles, there is a natural way to do it Malozemoff1979 as the bubble has an interior

    @noop note To define a winding sense, the DW needs to be oriented. For the magnetic bubbles, there is a natural way to do it Malozemoff1979 as the bubble has an interior. Stop

  23. [31]

    Cheng , author M

    author author R. Cheng , author M. Li , author A. Sapkota , author A. Pokhrel , author T. Mewes , author C. Mewes , author D. Xiao , author M. De Graef , \ and\ author V. Sokalski ,\ @noop note ArXiv:1809.02730v1 NoStop

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Hubert \ and\ author R

    author author A. Hubert \ and\ author R. Sch\" a fer ,\ @noop title Magnetic Domains \ ( publisher Springer Verlag, Berlin ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  25. [33]

    Hubert ,\ @noop journal journal AIP\ Conf.\ Proc

    author author A. Hubert ,\ @noop journal journal AIP\ Conf.\ Proc. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 178 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  26. [34]

    Nakatani \ and\ author N

    author author Y. Nakatani \ and\ author N. Hayashi ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE\ Trans.\ Magn. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 2179 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  27. [35]

    author author J. C. \ Slonczewski ,\ @noop journal journal J.\ Appl.\ Phys. \ volume 44 ,\ pages 1759 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973

  28. [36]

    author author J. C. \ Slonczewski ,\ @noop journal journal J.\ Appl.\ Phys. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 2705 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  29. [37]

    Lemerle , author J

    author author S. Lemerle , author J. Ferr\'e , author C. Chappert , author V. Mathet , author T. Giamarchi , \ and\ author P. Le Doussal ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.849 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 849 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Thiaville , author Y

    author author A. Thiaville , author Y. Nakatani , author F. Pi \' e chon , author J. Miltat , \ and\ author T. Ono ,\ @noop journal journal Eur.\ Phys.\ J. B \ volume 60 ,\ pages 15 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  31. [39]

    Thiaville \ and\ author J

    author author A. Thiaville \ and\ author J. Miltat ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Topology in Magnetism ,\ series Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences , Vol.\ volume 192 ,\ editor edited by\ editor J. Zang, V. Cros and A. Hoffmann \ ( year 2018 )\ pp.\ pages 41--73 NoStop

    2018

  32. [40]

    author author J. F. \ Dillon , Jr. ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Magnetism, vol. III ,\ editor edited by\ editor G. Rado \ and\ editor H. Suhl \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address New York ,\ year 1963 )\ pp.\ pages 415--464 NoStop

    1963

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.