Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 62 references

Spectral rigidity of random Schr\"odinger operators via Feynman-Kac formulas

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Feynman–Kac method proves number rigidity of eigenvalues for a broad class of one-dimensional random Schrödinger operators.

desk verdict A genuinely new and carefully proved sufficient condition for number rigidity of 1D random Schrödinger spectra; the imported Feynman-Kac theorem is the only external pillar, and it is a fair citation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08422 v2 pith:QZFKHOWT submitted 2019-08-22 math-ph math.MPmath.PR

Pierre Yves Gaudreau Lamarre , Promit Ghosal , Yuchen Liao This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 60G5547D0882B44
keywords randomSchrödingeroperatorsnumberrigidityFeynman–Kacformulasself-intersectionlocaltimeeigenvaluepointprocessstationaryGaussiannoiseBrownianbridgeAiry-2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a general method for proving number rigidity of the eigenvalue point process of one-dimensional random Schrödinger operators of the form $-\frac12\Delta+V+\xi$, where $V$ is a deterministic potential and $\xi$ is a stationary Gaussian noise. Number rigidity means that, for every bounded set, the configuration of eigenvalues outside the set determines the number of eigenvalues inside it. The method converts rigidity into a small-time variance estimate: using Feynman–Kac formulas, $\operatorname{Var}[\operatorname{Tr} e^{-tH_I}]$ is bounded in terms of the self-intersection local time of Brownian motion or reflected Brownian motion on the domain. The main theorem states that on $\mathbb R$ and on the half-line the spectrum is number rigid whenever $V$ grows faster than a noise-dependent threshold, and that on bounded intervals the spectrum is always number rigid. The result matters because it provides a unified route to rigidity for white, fractional, $L^p$-singular, and bounded Gaussian noises under mild domain and boundary conditions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the random Feynman–Kac kernel $\hat K(t;x,y)$ of Definition 2.18, whose diagonal integral reproduces the semigroup trace: $\operatorname{Tr}[e^{-t\hat H_I}]=\int_I \hat K(t;x,x)\,dx$ (Proposition 2.22). The kernel is an explicit expectation over bridges of Brownian motion, or of reflected Brownian motion on the half-line or a bounded interval, of $\exp(-\langle L_t(Z),V\rangle-\xi(L_t(Z)))$ plus boundary local-time terms, where $L_t(Z)$ is the occupation measure. With this identity, $\operatorname{Var}[\operatorname{Tr}\hat K(t)]$ becomes the double integral in Lemma 4.5, and the proof reduces to four estimates: the potential term decays exponentially in $x,y$ where $V$ grows; the noise terms $e^{B_t}$ and $e^{C_t}$ stay bounded; the overlap term $e^{D_t}-1$ decays like $t^d$ by the self-intersection local time bound (2.13); and compact support of $\gamma$ adds a Gaussian separation factor. Applying Proposition 2.2 with test functions $f_n(x)=e^{-t_n x}$ closes the argument.

What would settle it

Compute, numerically or analytically, $\operatorname{Var}[\operatorname{Tr} e^{-tH}]$ for small $t$ on a bounded interval with Dirichlet boundary conditions and white noise, and compare with the integral formula of Lemma 4.5 evaluated from the Feynman–Kac kernel; a mismatch would falsify the variance identity. Alternatively, exhibit a stationary Gaussian noise satisfying Assumption 2.5 for which the trace identity of Proposition 2.22 fails, or a pair $(V,\xi)$ satisfying the theorem's hypotheses and growth condition (2.14) whose spectrum is provably not number rigid.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a sufficient criterion (Theorem 2.23): under its assumptions on domain, boundary conditions, potential, and noise, the spectrum of $\hat H_I$ is number rigid if a rate $d>1$ satisfies the self-intersection local time bound (2.13) and the deterministic potential obeys the growth condition (2.14) — $\lim_{|x|\to\infty} V(x)/|x|^{2/(2d-1)}=\infty$ for compactly supported covariance, and $\lim_{|x|\to\infty} V(x)/|x|^{2/(d-1)}=\infty$ otherwise. For a bounded interval $I=(0,b)$, no growth condition is required: the spectrum is always number rigid. For the four noise classes considered, the rate $d$ is explicit, giving superlinear growth for white noise, $V(x)/|x|^{2/H}\to\infty$ for fractional noise with index $H\in(1/2,1)$, and analogous thresholds for $L^p$-singular and bounded noises. The paper also establishes a limitation of the method: for the stochastic Airy operator with linear potential the variance of the exponential statistic has positive limit $(4\pi)^{-1}$ as $t\to0$, so the stated growth thresholds are the best achievable with this semigroup technique, even though that particular spectrum is known to be rigid by other means.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Proposition 2.22, the Feynman–Kac trace identity asserting $\operatorname{Tr}[e^{-t\hat H_I}]=\int_I \hat K(t;x,x)\,dx$; if this representation failed for some stationary Gaussian noise satisfying Assumption 2.5, the variance formula and the rigidity conclusion would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bounded-interval random Schrödinger operators of the stated class are always number rigid, with no growth condition on $V$.
  • For white noise on $\mathbb R$ or $(0,\infty)$, rigidity follows once $V(x)/|x|\to\infty$; for fractional noise with index $H$, once $V(x)/|x|^{2/H}\to\infty$.
  • The same variance mechanism gives explicit decay rates for $\operatorname{Var}[\operatorname{Tr} e^{-tH}]$ as $t\to0$ (Theorem 4.1), so the method is quantitative rather than purely qualitative.
  • The Airy-2 variance limit $(4\pi)^{-1}$ shows that exponential linear statistics cannot prove rigidity for potentials with only linear growth, so the growth thresholds in the theorems are optimal within this method.
  • The constant-noise harmonic-oscillator example shows some growth condition is genuinely needed: a non-compactly-supported bounded noise with $V(x)\sim x^2$ produces a non-rigid spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the variance estimate is built on the trace identity, any improvement in the small-time bound (2.13) for a noise class immediately relaxes the required growth of $V$; refining self-intersection local time estimates for reflected bridges would sharpen all thresholds in Theorem 2.25.
  • The Feynman–Kac route is not inherently tied to one-dimensional Brownian local time: on lattices or in higher dimensions where a Feynman–Kac formula and analogous intersection-time bounds exist, the same variance-vanishing scheme would yield rigidity criteria for those operators.
  • The sharp-threshold question is likely decoupled from rigidity itself: the Airy-2 spectrum is rigid even though the exponential-statistic variance does not vanish, suggesting rigidity may hold well below the paper's growth thresholds, requiring different linear statistics to access it.
  • One could test the method's boundary numerically: compute $\operatorname{Var}[\operatorname{Tr} e^{-tH}]$ at small $t$ for $V(x)=\kappa|x|+\nu$ with white noise; Conjecture 2.31 predicts a positive liminf, and a zero value would indicate the superlinear condition is not necessary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general Feynman-Kac method for proving number rigidity (in the sense of Ghosh-Peres) of the eigenvalue point process of one-dimensional random Schrödinger operators of the form -1/2 Δ + V + ξ, where ξ is a stationary Gaussian noise whose covariance satisfies Assumption 2.5. The main result, Theorem 2.23, states that under the local-time growth condition (2.13), the spectrum is number rigid on R and on the half-line when the deterministic potential V grows sufficiently fast at infinity, and that on bounded intervals rigidity holds unconditionally. Theorem 2.25 specializes these results to white, fractional, L^p-singular, and bounded noises, producing explicit growth thresholds such as |x| for white noise and |x|^{2/H} for fractional noise. The proof proceeds by representing the trace of the semigroup through the Feynman-Kac formula (Proposition 2.22), deriving an exact variance formula for exponential linear statistics (Lemma 4.5), and then estimating the variance using self-intersection local time bounds, large deviations for Brownian local times, and Gaussian tail estimates. Section 5 shows that the Airy-2 point process cannot be proved rigid by exponential linear statistics, since the relevant variance tends to the nonzero constant (4π)^{-1}.

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial and novel contribution: it provides the first general framework for proving number rigidity of RSO spectra without relying on determinantal, Pfaffian, or other integrable structure. The paper contains complete and carefully written proofs of the main technical estimates: the variance identity (4.8), the midpoint-coupling bounds in Lemmas 4.6-4.8, the large-deviation input (3.5), the transition density bounds in Appendix A, and the explicit Airy-kernel computation in Section 5. The sufficient conditions are parameter-free and are shown to be essentially optimal for the method by Proposition 2.27 and Example 2.28. The only external pillar is the Feynman-Kac identity of Proposition 2.22, imported from the companion work [29]; this is a legitimate citation, and I found no mismatch between its stated hypotheses and Assumptions 2.5, 2.12, and 2.13. The stress-test concern about circularity does not land as a concrete flaw: the rigidity conclusion does not reduce to the Feynman-Kac input, and the method is used as a tool rather than as the target statement.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1] In the first sentence, 'tn → 0 as n → 0' should read 'as n → ∞'; this typo appears just before the definition of the test functions f_n.
  2. [Sections 2.4-2.5] Since Proposition 2.22 is the single externally imported result on which all variance estimates are built, it would improve readability to add one sentence explicitly verifying that Assumptions 2.5, 2.12, and 2.13 imply the hypotheses of [29, Theorem 2.23], so that a reader can check the applicability without consulting the companion paper in detail.
  3. [Section 5] The proof of Proposition 2.27 computes Var[Tr[e^{-2t\hat H^{(2)}_{(0,\infty)}}]] while the proposition is stated with e^{-t\hat H^{(2)}_{(0,\infty)}}; the harmless rescaling t \mapsto t/2 should be mentioned explicitly to avoid confusion.
  4. [Section 4.9.2] In equation (4.40), the Gaussian kernel G_{ct^{1+2/a}} is used without restating the variance convention from (2.10); adding a brief parenthetical that G_s has variance s would make the display self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the rigidity derivation is self-contained, and the cited Feynman-Kac representation is independent prior work, not an assumed form of the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 2.23) is derived by a genuine variance-criterion argument. Proposition 2.2 reduces number rigidity to the vanishing variance of exponential linear statistics; Proposition 2.22 supplies the Feynman-Kac identity Tr[e^{-tH_I}] = Tr[Khat(t)]; Lemma 4.5 computes the variance of Tr[Khat(t)] by Gaussian integration; Lemmas 4.6-4.9 bound the four resulting factors; and Section 4.3.3 assembles them with (2.13) and (2.14). Nowhere is the target property 'number rigid' used as an input. Condition (2.13) is a Brownian self-intersection local-time estimate that is independent of rigidity, and (2.14) is a growth condition on the deterministic potential V. The examples in Theorem 2.25 are obtained by inserting the seminorm bounds of Lemma 4.2 into (3.1), not by fitting any parameter to rigidity data. The only load-bearing external input is Proposition 2.22, imported from [29, Theorem 2.23] (with related references [30,37]); this is prior work by the first author, but it is quoted with explicit hypotheses and provides a semigroup representation, not the rigidity conclusion. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem invoked to force the choice, and no ansatz smuggled in through a self-citation. The Airy-2 counterexample (Proposition 2.27) is computed independently from determinantal point process formulas and standard Airy-kernel identities. I therefore cannot exhibit any concrete reduction of the conclusion to its own inputs, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; all constants are universal given the assumptions. The axioms are the explicitly stated hypotheses on noise, domain, and potential, plus standard prior theorems on Feynman-Kac representations and Brownian local times. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.5: the noise covariance seminorm satisfies ||f||_γ^2 ≤ c_γ(||f||_{q1}^2 + ... + ||f||_{qℓ}^2) for some 1 ≤ q_i ≤ 2.
    Restricts the class of stationary Gaussian noises so that integration against Brownian local times is well defined and the small-time rate (2.13) can be derived. Used in Lemma 4.2 and equation (4.6).
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.12: I is R, (0,∞), or (0,b), with the stated Dirichlet, Robin, or mixed boundary conditions.
    Defines the operator and selects the reflected Brownian bridge processes X and Y used in the Feynman-Kac kernels in Definition 2.18.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.13: V is bounded below and locally integrable; for unbounded I, V(x)/log|x| → ∞.
    Ensures compact resolvent and the variance upper bounds. The stronger growth conditions in (2.14) are used to force the variance of exponential statistics to vanish.
  • standard math Feynman-Kac identity for Tr[e^{-tH}] with singular multiplicative Gaussian noise, Proposition 2.22, taken from [29, Theorem 2.23].
    External theorem that connects the spectral exponential statistic to an integral of bridge expectations over local times. This is the load-bearing bridge between spectrum and Brownian path estimates.
  • standard math Large deviations for Brownian self-intersection local time, [17, Theorem 4.2.1], and exponential moments for Bessel bridge maxima, [38, Remark 3.1].
    Used in Proposition 3.1 to prove the stochastic domination (3.1) and in Lemma 4.9 for dominated convergence estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral rigidity of random Schr\"odinger operators via Feynman-Kac formulas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QZFKHOWT

@misc{pith2026190808422,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral rigidity of random Schr\"odinger operators via Feynman-Kac formulas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QZFKHOWT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08422}
}
abstract

We develop a technique for proving number rigidity (in the sense of Ghosh-Peres) of the spectrum of general random Schr\"odinger operators (RSOs). Our method makes use of Feynman-Kac formulas to estimate the variance of exponential linear statistics of the spectrum in terms of self-intersection local times. Inspired by recent results concerning Feynman-Kac formulas for RSOs with multiplicative white noise by Gorin, Shkolnikov and the first-named author, we use this method to prove number rigidity for a class of one-dimensional continuous RSOs of the form $-\frac12\Delta+V+\xi$, where $V$ is a deterministic potential and $\xi$ is a stationary Gaussian noise. Our results require only very mild assumptions on the domain on which the operator is defined, the boundary conditions on that domain, the regularity of the potential $V$, and the singularity of the noise $\xi$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    P. Y. Gaudreau Lamarre. Semigroups for one-dimensiona l Schr¨ odinger operators with multiplicative Gaussian noise. Preprint, arXiv:1902.05047v3, 2019

    arXiv 1902

  2. [1]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables , volume 55 of National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series . For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printi ng Office, W ashington, D.C., 1964

    work page 1964

  3. [2]

    Aizenman and P

    M. Aizenman and P. Martin. Structure of Gibbs states of on e-dimensional Coulomb systems. Comm. Math. Phys. , 78(1):99–116, 1980/81

    work page 1980

  4. [3]

    Baddeley, P

    A. Baddeley, P. Gregori, J. Mateu, R. Stoica, and D. Stoya n, editors. Case studies in spatial point process modeling, volume 185 of Lecture Notes in Statistics . Springer, New York, 2006. Including papers from the Conference on Spatial Point Process Modelling and its Ap plications held in Benic` assim, 2004

    work page 2006

  5. [4]

    Bauerschmidt, P

    R. Bauerschmidt, P. Bourgade, M. Nikula, and H.-T. Yau. T he two-dimensional Coulomb plasma: quasi-free approximation and central limit theorem. arXiv:1609.08582, Sep 2016

    arXiv 2016

  6. [5]

    Bauerschmidt, P

    R. Bauerschmidt, P. Bourgade, M. Nikula, and H.-T. Yau. L ocal density for two-dimensional one- component plasma. Comm. Math. Phys. , 356(1):189–230, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    Bloemendal and B

    A. Bloemendal and B. Vir´ ag. Limits of spiked random matr ices I. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 156(3- 4):795–825, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [7]

    A. I. Bufetov. Conditional measures of determinantal po int processes. Preprint, arXiv:1605.01400v1, 2016

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    A. I. Bufetov. Rigidity of determinantal point processe s with the Airy, the Bessel and the gamma kernel. Bull. Math. Sci. , 6(1):163–172, 2016

    2016

  2. [9]

    A. I. Bufetov. Quasi-symmetries of determinantal point processes. Ann. Probab., 46(2):956–1003, 2018

    2018

  3. [10]

    A. I. Bufetov, Y. Dabrowski, and Y. Qiu. Linear rigidity of stationary stochastic processes. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 38(7):2493–2507, 2018

    2018

  4. [11]

    A. I. Bufetov, P. P. Nikitin, and Y. Qiu. On number rigidi ty for Pfaffian point processes. Mosc. Math. J., 19(2):217–274, 2019

    2019

  5. [12]

    A. I. Bufetov and Y. Qiu. Conditional measures of genera lized Ginibre point processes. J. Funct. Anal. , 272(11):4671–4708, 2017

    2017

  6. [13]

    A. I. Bufetov and Y. Qiu. Determinantal point processes associated with Hilbert spaces of holomorphic functions. Comm. Math. Phys. , 351(1):1–44, 2017

    2017

  7. [14]

    Carmona and J

    R. Carmona and J. Lacroix. Spectral theory of random Schr¨ odinger operators . Probability and its Applications. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1990

    1990

  8. [15]

    R. A. Carmona and S. A. Molchanov. Stationary parabolic Anderson model and intermittency. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 102(4):433–453, 1995

    1995

  9. [16]

    Chatterjee

    S. Chatterjee. Rigidity of the three-dimensional hier archical coulomb gas. Prob. Theory and Related Fields, Apr 2019

    2019

  10. [17]

    X. Chen. Random walk intersections , volume 157 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010. Large deviati ons and related topics

    2010

  11. [18]

    X. Chen. Quenched asymptotics for Brownian motion in ge neralized Gaussian potential. Ann. Probab., 42(2):576–622, 2014

    2014

  12. [19]

    Chen and W

    X. Chen and W. V. Li. Large and moderate deviations for in tersection local times. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 128(2):213–254, 2004

    2004

  13. [20]

    K. L. Chung and Z. X. Zhao. From Brownian motion to Schr¨ odinger’s equation , volume 312 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamen tal Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995

    1995

  14. [21]

    D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones. An introduction to the theory of point processes. Vol. II . Probability and its Applications (New York). Springer, New York, second edi tion, 2008. General theory and structure. RIGIDITY OF RANDOM SCHR ¨ODINGER OPERATORS VIA FEYNMAN-KAC FORMULAS 29

    2008

  15. [22]

    Dereudre

    D. Dereudre. Introduction to the theory of Gibbs point p rocesses. In Stochastic geometry, volume 2237 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 181–229. Springer, Cham, 2019

    2019

  16. [23]

    Dereudre, A

    D. Dereudre, A. Hardy, T. Lebl´ e, and M. Ma ¨ ıda. DLR equations and rigidity for the Sine-beta process. arXiv:1809.03989, Sep 2018

    2018 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Edelman and B

    A. Edelman and B. D. Sutton. From random matrices to stoc hastic operators. J. Stat. Phys. , 127(6):1121–1165, 2007

    2007

  18. [25]

    Fukushima and S

    M. Fukushima and S. Nakao. On spectra of the Schr¨ odinge r operator with a white Gaussian noise potential. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete , 37(3):267–274, 1976/77

    1976

  19. [26]

    Ganguly and S

    S. Ganguly and S. Sarkar. Ground states and hyperunifor mity of the hierarchical Coulomb gas in all dimensions. arXiv:1904.05321, Apr 2019

    1904 arXiv

  20. [27]

    G¨ artner and W

    J. G¨ artner and W. K¨ onig. Moment asymptotics for the co ntinuous parabolic Anderson model. Ann. Appl. Probab., 10(1):192–217, 2000

    2000

  21. [28]

    G¨ artner, W

    J. G¨ artner, W. K¨ onig, and S. A. Molchanov. Almost sure asymptotics for the continuous parabolic Anderson model. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 118(4):547–573, 2000

    2000

  22. [30]

    P. Y. Gaudreau Lamarre and M. Shkolnikov. Edge of spiked beta ensembles, stochastic Airy semigroups and reflected Brownian motions. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 55(3):1402–1438, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    S. Ghosh. Determinantal processes and completeness of random exponentials: the critical case. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 163(3-4):643–665, 2015

    2015

  24. [32]

    S. Ghosh. Palm measures and rigidity phenomena in point processes. Electron. Commun. Probab. , 21:Paper No. 85, 14, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Ghosh and M

    S. Ghosh and M. Krishnapur. Rigidity hierarchy in rando m point fields: random polynomials and determinantal processes. Preprint, arXiv:1510.08814, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Ghosh and J

    S. Ghosh and J. Lebowitz. Number rigidity in superhomog eneous random point fields. J. Stat. Phys. , 166(3-4), 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Ghosh and J

    S. Ghosh and J. L. Lebowitz. Generalized stealthy hyper uniform processes: maximal rigidity and the bounded holes conjecture. Comm. Math. Phys. , 363(1), 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Ghosh and Y

    S. Ghosh and Y. Peres. Rigidity and tolerance in point pr ocesses: Gaussian zeros and Ginibre eigenval- ues. Duke Math. J. , 166(10):1789–1858, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Gorin and M

    V. Gorin and M. Shkolnikov. Stochastic Airy semigroup t hrough tridiagonal matrices. Ann. Probab., 46(4):2287–2344, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Gruet and Z

    J.-C. Gruet and Z. Shi. The occupation time of Brownian m otion in a ball. J. Theoret. Probab., 9(2):429– 445, 1996

    1996

  31. [39]

    Holroyd and T

    A. Holroyd and T. Soo. Insertion and deletion tolerance of point processes. Electron. J. Probab., 18:no. 74, 24, 2013

    2013

  32. [40]

    Kallenberg

    O. Kallenberg. Random measures, theory and applications , volume 77 of Probability Theory and Sto- chastic Modelling . Springer, Cham, 2017

    2017

  33. [41]

    Kamae, U

    T. Kamae, U. Krengel, and G. L. O’Brien. Stochastic ineq ualities on partially ordered spaces. Ann. Probability, 5(6):899–912, 1977

    1977

  34. [42]

    Karandikar

    R. Karandikar. On pathwise stochastic integration. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 57(1):11–18, 1995

    1995

  35. [43]

    A. N. Kolmogorov. Stationary sequences in Hilbert spac e. Vestnik MGU , 2(6):1–40, 1941

    1941

  36. [44]

    Kolmogorov

    A.N. Kolmogorov. Interpolation und Extrapolation von stationaeren zufaelligen Folgen. Izvestiya Math- ematics, 5(1):3–14, 1941

    1941

  37. [45]

    W. K¨ onig. The parabolic Anderson model . Pathways in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, [Cham],

  38. [46]

    Krishnapur, B

    M. Krishnapur, B. Rider, and B. Vir´ ag. Universality of the stochastic Airy operator. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 69(1):145–199, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    N. Minami. Definition and self-adjointness of the stoch astic Airy operator. Markov Process. Related Fields, 21(3, part 2):695–711, 2015

    2015

  40. [48]

    Okounkov

    A. Okounkov. Generating functions for intersection nu mbers on moduli spaces of curves. Int. Math. Res. Not. , (18):933–957, 2002

    2002

  41. [49]

    Olshanski

    G. Olshanski. The quasi-invariance property for the Ga mma kernel determinantal measure. Adv. Math., 226(3):2305–2350, 2011

    2011

  42. [50]

    V. G. Papanicolaou. The probabilistic solution of the t hird boundary value problem for second order elliptic equations. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 87(1):27–77, 1990

    1990

  43. [51]

    Peres and A

    Y. Peres and A. Sly. Rigidity and tolerance for perturbe d lattices. Preprint, arXiv:1409.4490v1, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    J. A. Ram ´ ırez, B. Rider, and B. Vir´ ag. Beta ensembles, stochastic Airy spectrum, and a diffusion. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 24(4):919–944, 2011

    2011

  45. [53]

    Reda and J

    C. Reda and J. Najnudel. Rigidity of the Sine β process. Electron. Commun. Probab. , 23, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of modern mathematical physics. IV. Analysis of ope rators. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-L ondon, 1978. 30 PIERRE YVES GAUDREAU LAMARRE, PROMIT GHOSAL, AND YUCHEN L IAO

    1978

  47. [55]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor. Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , volume 293 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles o f Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, third edition, 1999

    1999

  48. [56]

    B. Simon. Schr¨ odinger semigroups. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 7(3):447–526, 1982

    1982

  49. [57]

    B. Simon. Operator theory . A Comprehensive Course in Analysis, Part 4. American Mathe matical Society, Providence, RI, 2015

    2015

  50. [58]

    Sznitman

    A.-S. Sznitman. Brownian motion, obstacles and random media . Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998

    1998

  51. [59]

    L. A. Takhtajan. Quantum mechanics for mathematicians , volume 95 of Graduate Studies in Mathe- matics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

    2008

  52. [60]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom. Level-spacing distributions a nd the Airy kernel. Comm. Math. Phys. , 159(1):151–174, 1994

    1994

  53. [61]

    W. H. Young. On the multiplication of successions of fou rier constants. Proc. of the Royal Soc. of London. Series A , 87(596):331–339, 1912. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA E-mail address : plamarre@princeton.edu Columbia University, New York City, NY 10027, US...

    1912

  54. [2016]

    Random walk in random potential

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.