Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Stabilization of small solutions of discrete NLS with potential having two eigenvalues

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a discrete NLS with two eigenvalue modes, every sufficiently small solution eventually selects one nonlinear bound state and radiates the other away.

desk verdict Resonant two-eigenvalue DNLS stabilization is real work with a fixable gap: the theorem overclaims positivity of the selected mode and states the wrong resonance hypothesis. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08630 v1 pith:DXXLMU2D submitted 2019-08-23 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Masaya Maeda This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q5535B3535P25
keywords discretenonlinearSchrödingerequationasymptoticstabilityFermiGoldenRuleboundstatesequipartitionofmassnormalformradiationdampingtwoeigenvalues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a selection rule for small solutions of a discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the integer lattice when the linear part has exactly two eigenvalues. If a nonlinearity-generated frequency $\omega_n=e_1+n(e_2-e_1)$ falls inside the continuous spectrum $[0,4]$ and a Fermi Golden Rule coefficient is positive, every sufficiently small $\ell^2$ solution eventually decomposes into one nonlinear bound state plus a free dispersive wave; the other discrete mode is radiated away. This is the resonant counterpart of an earlier no-resonance result in which stable two-mode quasi-periodic solutions exist. The paper also proves that the excited bound state is orbitally unstable and derives a parameter-free mass equipartition: the lost excited mass is split between the surviving bound state and radiation in a ratio fixed by the resonance index $N_0$.

What carries the argument

The proof decomposes $u=\varphi_1(z_1)+\varphi_2(z_2)+\eta$ with $\eta$ in the continuous-spectrum subspace, then applies two near-identity changes of variables: a symplectic diagonalization and a normal-form transformation that erases nonresonant monomials. The surviving resonant interaction is the term $\langle \bar z_1^{N_0-1}z_2^{N_0}G,\eta\rangle$ in the effective Hamiltonian, where $G$ is a Schwartz function built from the eigenfunctions and the nonlinearity. Writing the radiation field approximately as $Y=-\bar z_1^{N_0-1}z_2^{N_0}R_H^+(\omega_{N_0})G$ and substituting into the amplitude equations yields the damping identities $\frac12\frac{d}{dt}|z_1|^2=(N_0-1)\Gamma|z_1|^{2(N_0-1)}|z_2|^{2N_0}+\text{error}$ and $\frac12\frac{d}{dt}|z_2|^2=-N_0\Gamma|z_1|^{2(N_0-1)}|z_2|^{2N_0}+\text{error}$, with $\Gamma=-\operatorname{Im}\langle G,R_H^+(\omega_{N_0})G\rangle$. Positivity of $\Gamma$, the Fermi Golden Rule, makes the resonant product $|z_1|^{2(N_0-1)}|z_2|^{2N_0}$ integrable in time, forcing one amplitude to vanish at infinity; space-time and local-decay estimates then upgrade this to scattering of the remainder.

What would settle it

Choose a two-eigenvalue potential satisfying the resonance condition (1.7) for which the explicit formula (1.17) gives $\Gamma>0$, and numerically solve (1.1) from arbitrarily small initial data with nonzero overlap with both eigenfunctions; if both $|z_1(t)|$ and $|z_2(t)|$ stay bounded away from zero for all $t$, or the solution does not converge to a single bound state plus a free wave, the central claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central claim is Theorem 1.9: under the resonance condition (1.7) and the Fermi Golden Rule condition (FGR), there is $\delta>0$ such that any solution with $\|u(0)\|_{\ell^2}<\delta$ satisfies $u(t)=\varphi_j(z(t))+e^{it\Delta}\eta_++o(1)$ in $\ell^2$ and $|z(t)|\to\rho_+$, with $j\in\{1,2\}$, $\eta_+\in\ell^2$, and $\rho_++\|\eta_+\|_{\ell^2}\lesssim\|u(0)\|_{\ell^2}$. The limiting object $\varphi_j(z(t))$ is one of the two nonlinear bound states that bifurcate from the linear eigenfunctions, and the other mode's amplitude decays to zero. Under the same assumptions the excited bound state $\varphi_2$ is orbitally unstable, and the final mass obeys Theorem 1.16: when the ground bound state is selected, $\rho_+=|(u(0),\varphi_1)|^2+\frac{N_0-1}{N_0}|(u(0),\varphi_2)|^2+O(\varepsilon^4)$, while excited-state selection swaps the ratio to $\frac{N_0}{N_0-1}$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on the Fermi Golden Rule coefficient $\Gamma=-\operatorname{Im}\langle G,R_H^+(\omega_{N_0})G\rangle$ being strictly positive; if $\Gamma=0$, the damping terms in the amplitude equations vanish and the proof gives no decay of the resonant mode product, so selection fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the theorem is correct, the long-time dynamics of small solutions is one-mode: any resonance hitting the continuous spectrum destroys two-mode quasi-periodic bound states.
  • Every small solution acquires a well-defined asymptotic bound state and radiation field, so the nonlinearity acts as a selection mechanism rather than a small perturbation that preserves all linear modes.
  • The excited bound state is orbitally unstable, so small perturbations around it leave and the solution settles elsewhere, instead of persisting as a nearby excited state.
  • The asymptotic mass ratio is fixed by $N_0$ alone: ground-state selection splits the excited mass as $(N_0-1):1$ between the surviving bound state and radiation, and excited-state selection gives the reciprocal ratio.
  • Together with the no-resonance theory, the result completes the two-eigenvalue picture: without resonance, stable quasi-periodic solutions exist; with resonance and (FGR), they do not.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: ground-state selection should be generic among small data, since the excited state is unstable, but the paper does not identify the exceptional set of initial data that converges to $\varphi_2$.
  • Inference: for three or more eigenvalues, the same normal-form and radiation mechanism should generically eliminate multi-mode quasi-periodic solutions, because the frequency set generated by the eigenvalues is generically dense in $\mathbb{R}$; the paper states this expectation as a conjecture.
  • Inference: because the equipartition ratio is independent of the potential and coupling constants, a numerical experiment on a two-level discrete lattice with $N_0=2$ should see exactly half of the excited mass radiated and half absorbed; that would be a direct test of the mechanism.
  • Inference: for $N_0=2,3$ with pure cubic nonlinearity the leading coefficient $G$ vanishes, so a direct check of the theorem needs the generalized Fermi Golden Rule described in Remark 1.14; simulations should include quintic or higher-order terms to observe the predicted selection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies small l^2 solutions of a discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation on Z with a potential whose linear part has exactly two eigenvalues. Under the Fermi Golden Rule nondegeneracy Γ>0 and a resonance condition ω_{N0}∈(0,4), it claims that every sufficiently small solution decomposes into a nonlinear bound state plus a dispersive wave, i.e. one of the two bound states is selected while the other is damped; it further claims orbital instability of the excited state and a generalized equipartition property. The proof uses a nonlinear coordinate decomposition, Darboux and Birkhoff normal forms, Strichartz and Kato-smoothing estimates, and a bootstrap argument in which the Fermi Golden Rule provides L^2-integrability of the resonant product |z_1^{N0-1} z_2^{N0}|^2.

Significance. If correct, the result is a valuable discrete analogue of the selection/relaxation theorems for NLS with two eigenvalues, and it contrasts with the author's earlier quasi-periodic existence result [29] by showing that, for generic potentials in the FGR sense, resonant interactions destroy quasi-periodicity. The paper gives a concrete spectral criterion for Γ>0 via the distorted Fourier transform, and the main bootstrap is presented in considerable detail. However, the main theorem as stated is not fully supported by the proof: the asserted positivity of the selected bound-state amplitude is not established, and the theorem is stated under the wrong hypothesis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 1, Theorem 1.9] Theorem 1.9 is stated under assumption (1.5), namely ω_n ∉ [0,4] for all n, but the resonant condition (1.7), which is used throughout the paper to define N0 and the Fermi Golden Rule at ω_N0, is incompatible with (1.5). Under (1.5) the damping mechanism in the proof is not active and the statement is either vacuous or refers to the wrong setting. The intended hypothesis is (1.7); the theorem statement must be corrected.
  2. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.9; Proposition 4.14] The proof establishes that |z_j(t)| converge to limits ρ_j ≥ 0 and that ρ_1ρ_2 = 0, but it does not establish that one of the limits is strictly positive. The asserted existence of ρ_+ > 0 does not follow. For an initial datum with z(0)=0 (for instance u_0 ∈ P_c l^2), the normal-form estimates (3.1) and (3.6) preserve z=0, and all estimates in Section 4 are compatible with ρ_1=ρ_2=0; the integrability of |z_1^{N0-1}z_2^{N0}| only forces the product of the two limits to vanish. Thus the central claim that 'exactly one nonlinear bound state is selected' is not a consequence of the argument; at most 'at most one mode survives' is proved. The theorem should be weakened to ρ_+ ≥ 0 with an additional condition ensuring positivity (such as a quantitative lower bound on N_0|z_1(0)|^2 + (N_0-1)|z_2(0)|^2), or an additional argument must rule out ρ_1=ρ_2=0.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.9] In the first sentence of the proof, 'as t → 0' should read 'as t → ∞'.
  2. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.9] The phrase 'since |z_1^{N0-1} z_2^{N0}| is integrable, one of j=1,2 has to converge to 0' should be formulated as 'at least one of the limits ρ_1, ρ_2 is zero', because both limits may vanish.
  3. [Section 5, Theorem 1.15] The proof of Theorem 1.15 is omitted entirely ('We omit the proof'). Since this is one of the main results, the paper should at least provide a detailed sketch of the adaptation of [11, Theorem 1.4] to the present discrete setting, indicating which estimates are used and how the discrete Laplacian changes the argument.
  4. [Section 4.1] The text says 'we always assume H is generic in the sense of Lemma 5.3 of [14]' without stating the genericity condition. For self-containedness, the required assumptions should be stated explicitly, even if the proof is omitted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No meaningful circularity: the stabilization theorem follows from a self-contained normal-form reduction and an explicit nondegeneracy hypothesis, with self-citations used only as supporting external tools.

full rationale

The main claim of the paper, asymptotic selection of a single nonlinear bound state under the resonance condition (1.7) and the Fermi Golden Rule condition (FGR), is not assumed as an input. The normal-form machinery is proved in the paper: Darboux theorem (Proposition 3.1) and Birkhoff normal form (Proposition 3.3) are established in Sections 6.1 and 6.2, rather than imported as black boxes. The damping mechanism is derived from the effective Hamiltonian: substituting eta = Y + g with Y = -overline{z_1}^{N0-1} z_2^{N0} R_H^+(omega_N0) G into the modulated ODEs produces the identities (4.9)-(4.10), whose right-hand sides contain the explicit coefficient Im(G, R_H^+ G). The assumption that this coefficient is positive is an explicit nondegeneracy condition on the potential and the normal-form coefficient G; it is not fitted from the outcome and does not by itself assert that a bound state is selected. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction. The linear dispersive and Strichartz estimates are cited from Cuccagna-Tarulli [14], Pelinovsky-Stefanov [37], and Kevrekidis-Pelinovsky-Stefanov [25], which are independent external results used as tools. The paper does cite the author's earlier work [29] for existence of nonlinear bound states and for Darboux-type coordinates, and it delegates the proof of the orbital instability statement in Theorem 1.15 to the author's prior paper [11] with Cuccagna. These are self-citations, but they are not circular in the operative sense: the cited results are published supporting theorems with independent content, and the load-bearing derivation of the selection mechanism is carried out in the present paper rather than reduced to an unverified self-citation. For completeness, two correctness issues exist that are not circularity: Theorem 1.9 is stated under (1.5), which contradicts the resonance condition (1.7) used throughout, and Proposition 4.14 establishes only rho_1 rho_2 = 0, so the asserted rho_+ > 0 and the wording 'exactly one bound state remains' are stronger than the estimates strictly prove. These are proof or statement gaps, not cases where a conclusion is equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data. The proof assumes a spectral configuration, the Fermi Golden Rule nondegeneracy, and uses external estimates and bound-state constructions from [14,37,27,29]. The main theorem is not an input to any of these ingredients.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The discrete Schrödinger operator H = -Delta + V has exactly two eigenvalues e1 < e2; 0 and 4 are neither resonances nor eigenvalues; omega_n := e1 + n(e2 - e1) != 0,4 for all n, and for some N0 >= 2, omega_N0 in (0,4).
    Defines the class of potentials studied in Section 1 and provides the resonant frequency used throughout the proof.
  • domain assumption Fermi Golden Rule condition Gamma := Im langle R^+_H(omega_N0)G,G rangle > 0, equivalently the distorted Fourier transform hat G(+-xi_N0) != 0.
    This nondegeneracy is assumed in (FGR) and Remark 1.12; without it the damping integral in Proposition 4.10 is absent.
  • standard math External linear estimates hold for e^{-itH}P_c: dispersive decay, Strichartz, Kato smoothing, and the local decay estimate of Lemma 4.7.
    These bounds from [14,37,27] and Section 6.3 control the continuous-spectrum component eta in the bootstrap.
  • standard math Small nonlinear bound states phi_j(z) bifurcating from the eigenfunctions phi_j exist analytically (Proposition 1.4, from [29]).
    Used to decompose u = phi1(z1) + phi2(z2) + R[z]eta; the construction is taken from prior work by the author.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stabilization of small solutions of discrete NLS with potential having two eigenvalues." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DXXLMU2D

@misc{pith2026190808630,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stabilization of small solutions of discrete NLS with potential having two eigenvalues},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DXXLMU2D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08630}
}
abstract

We study the long time behavior of small (in $l^2$) solutions of discrete nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations with potential. In particular, we are interested in the case that the corresponding discrete Schr\"odinger operator has exactly two eigenvalues. We show that under the nondegeneracy condition of Fermi Golden Rule, all small solutions decompose into a nonlinear bound state and dispersive wave. We further show the instability of excited states and generalized equipartition property.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Masaya Maeda, Existence and asymptotic stability of quasi-periodic solution of discrete NLS with potential in Z, to appear in SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis

    work page

  2. [11]

    PDE 8 (2015), no

    Scipio Cuccagna and Masaya Maeda, On small energy stabilization in the NLS with a trapping potential, Anal. PDE 8 (2015), no. 6, 1289–1349

    work page 2015

  3. [1]

    Bambusi and T

    D. Bambusi and T. Penati, Continuous approximation of breathers in one- and two-dimensional DNLS lattices, Nonlinearity 23 (2010), no. 1, 143–157

    work page 2010

  4. [2]

    Dario Bambusi, Asymptotic stability of ground states in some Hamiltonian PDEs with symmetry, Comm. Math. Phys. 320 (2013), no. 2, 499–542

    work page 2013

  5. [3]

    Dario Bambusi and Scipio Cuccagna, On dispersion of small energy solutions to the nonlinear Klein Gordon equation with a potential, Amer. J. Math. 133 (2011), no. 5, 1421–1468

    work page 2011

  6. [4]

    F. S. Cataliotti, S. Burger, C. Fort, P. Maddaloni, F. Minardi, A. T rombettoni, A. Smerzi, and M. Inguscio, Josephson junction arrays with bose-einstein condensates, Science 293 (2001), no. 5531, 843–846

    work page 2001

  7. [5]

    Andrew Comech, Tuoc Van Phan, and Atanas Stefanov, Asymptotic stability of solitary waves in generalized Gross-Neveu model, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire34 (2017), no. 1, 157–196

    work page 2017

  8. [6]

    Scipio Cuccagna, Lp continuity of wave operators in Z, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 354 (2009), no. 2, 594–605

    work page 2009

Show all 46 references
  1. [7]

    D 238 (2009), no

    Scipio Cuccagna, On instability of excited states of the nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequation, Phys. D 238 (2009), no. 1, 38–54

    2009

  2. [8]

    Scipio Cuccagna, The Hamiltonian structure of the nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequation and the asymptotic stability of its ground states, Comm. Math. Phys. 305 (2011), no. 2, 279–331

    2011

  3. [9]

    Scipio Cuccagna, On the Darboux and Birkhoff steps in the asymptotic stability of solitons, Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste 44 (2012), 197–257

    2012

  4. [10]

    Scipio Cuccagna, On asymptotic stability of moving ground states of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), no. 6, 2827–2888. 30

    2014

  5. [12]

    Nonlinear Sci

    Scipio Cuccagna and Masaya Maeda, On orbital instability of spectrally stable vortices of the NLS in the plane, J. Nonlinear Sci. 26 (2016), no. 6, 1851–1894

    2016

  6. [13]

    Phan, On small energy stabilization in the NLKG with a trapping potential, Nonlinear Anal

    Scipio Cuccagna, Masaya Maeda, and Tuoc V. Phan, On small energy stabilization in the NLKG with a trapping potential, Nonlinear Anal. 146 (2016), 32–58

    2016

  7. [14]

    Scipio Cuccagna and Mirko Tarulli, On asymptotic stability of standing waves of discrete Schr¨ odingerequation in Z, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009), no. 3, 861–885

    2009

  8. [15]

    Scipio Cuccagna and Mirko Tarulli, On stabilization of small solutions in the nonlinear Dirac equation with a trapping potential, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 436 (2016), no. 2, 1332–1368

    2016

  9. [16]

    Efremidis, Suzanne Sears, Demetrios N

    Nikos K. Efremidis, Suzanne Sears, Demetrios N. Christodoulide s, Jason W. Fleischer, and Mordechai Segev, Discrete solitons in photorefractive optically induced photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002), 046602

    2002

  10. [17]

    Iryna Egorova, Elena Kopylova, and Gerald Teschl, Dispersion estimates for one-dimensional discrete Schr¨ odingerand wave equations, J. Spectr. Theory 5 (2015), no. 4, 663–696

    2015

  11. [18]

    Gorbach, Discrete breathers advances in theory and applications, Physics Reports 467 (2008), no

    Sergej Flach and Andrey V. Gorbach, Discrete breathers advances in theory and applications, Physics Reports 467 (2008), no. 1, 1 – 116

    2008

  12. [19]

    Flach and C

    S. Flach and C. R. Willis, Discrete breathers, Phys. Rep. 295 (1998), no. 5, 181–264

    1998

  13. [20]

    H. S. Eisenberg, R. Morandotti, Y. Silberberg, J. M. Arnold, G. Pennelli, and J. S. Aitchison, Optical discrete solitons in waveguide arrays. i. soliton formation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19 (2002), no. 12, 2938–2944

    2002

  14. [21]

    1, 111–128

    Reika Fukuizumi and Masahito Ohta, Stability of standing waves for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with potentials, Differential Integral Equations 16 (2003), no. 1, 111–128

    2003

  15. [22]

    Weinstein, Equipartition of mass in nonlinear Schr¨ odinger/Gross-Pitaevskiiequations, Appl

    Zhou Gang and Michael I. Weinstein, Equipartition of mass in nonlinear Schr¨ odinger/Gross-Pitaevskiiequations, Appl. Math. Res. Express. AMRX (2011), no. 2, 123–181

    2011

  16. [23]

    Stephen Gustafson, Kenji Nakanishi, and Tai-Peng Tsai, Asymptotic stability and completeness in the energy space for nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequations with small solitary waves, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2004), no. 66, 3559–3584

    2004

  17. [24]

    Khanikaev, and Andrea Al` u, Self-induced topological transitions and edge states supported by nonlinear staggered potentials, Phys

    Yakir Hadad, Alexander B. Khanikaev, and Andrea Al` u, Self-induced topological transitions and edge states supported by nonlinear staggered potentials, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016), 155112

    2016

  18. [25]

    P. G. Kevrekidis, D. E. Pelinovsky, and A. Stefanov, Asymptotic stability of small bound states in the discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009), no. 5, 2010– 2030

    2009

  19. [26]

    Kevrekidis, D.E

    P.G. Kevrekidis, D.E. Pelinovsky, and A. Saxena, When linear stability does not exclude nonlinear instability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015), 214101

    2015

  20. [27]

    A. I. Komech, E. A. Kopylova, and M. Kunze, Dispersive estimates for 1D discrete Schr¨ odinger and Klein-Gordon equations, Appl. Anal. 85 (2006), no. 12, 1487–1508. 31

    2006

  21. [28]

    7-8, 731–756

    Masaya Maeda and Satoshi Masaki, An example of stable excited state on nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with nonlocal nonlinearity, Differential Integral Equations 26 (2013), no. 7-8, 731–756

    2013

  22. [30]

    Mandelik, Y

    D. Mandelik, Y. Lahini, and Y. Silberberg, Nonlinearly induced relaxation to the ground state in a two-level system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005), 073902

    2005

  23. [31]

    Alexander Mielke and Carsten Patz, Dispersive stability of infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems on lattices, Appl. Anal. 89 (2010), no. 9, 1493–1512

    2010

  24. [32]

    Tetsu Mizumachi, Asymptotic stability of small solitons for 2D nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequations with potential, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 47 (2007), no. 3, 599–620

    2007

  25. [33]

    Differential Equations 12 (2007), no

    Tetsu Mizumachi, Instability of vortex solitons for 2D focusing NLS, Adv. Differential Equations 12 (2007), no. 3, 241–264

    2007

  26. [34]

    Tetsu Mizumachi, Asymptotic stability of small solitary waves to 1D nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with potential, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 48 (2008), no. 3, 471–497

    2008

  27. [35]

    Tetsu Mizumachi and Dmitry Pelinovsky, On the asymptotic stability of localized modes in the discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 5 (2012), no. 5, 971–987

    2012

  28. [36]

    Arnold, J

    Ulf Peschel, Roberto Morandotti, John M. Arnold, J. Stewart A itchison, Hagai S. Eisenberg, Yaron Silberberg, Thomas Pertsch, and Falk Lederer, Optical discrete solitons in waveguide arrays. 2. dynamic properties, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19 (2002), no. 11, 2637–2644

    2002

  29. [37]

    D. E. Pelinovsky and A. Stefanov, On the spectral theory and dispersive estimates for a discrete Schr¨ odingerequation in one dimension, J. Math. Phys. 49 (2008), no. 11, 113501, 17

    2008

  30. [38]

    Pelinovsky and Atanas Stefanov, Asymptotic stability of small gap solitons in nonlinear dirac equations, Journal of Mathematical Physics 53 (2012), no

    Dmitry E. Pelinovsky and Atanas Stefanov, Asymptotic stability of small gap solitons in nonlinear dirac equations, Journal of Mathematical Physics 53 (2012), no. 7, 073705

    2012

  31. [39]

    Eugene Wayne, Invariant manifolds for a class of dispersive, Hamiltonian, partial differential equations, J

    Claude-Alain Pillet and C. Eugene Wayne, Invariant manifolds for a class of dispersive, Hamiltonian, partial differential equations, J. Differential Equations 141 (1997), no. 2, 310– 326

    1997

  32. [40]

    Rose and Michael I

    Harvey A. Rose and Michael I. Weinstein, On the bound states of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with a linear potential, Phys. D 30 (1988), no. 1-2, 207–218

    1988

  33. [41]

    Soffer and M

    A. Soffer and M. I. Weinstein, Multichannel nonlinear scattering for nonintegrable equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 133 (1990), no. 1, 119–146

    1990

  34. [42]

    Soffer and M

    A. Soffer and M. I. Weinstein, Selection of the ground state for nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequations, Rev. Math. Phys. 16 (2004), no. 8, 977–1071

    2004

  35. [43]

    Kevrekidis, Asymptotic behaviour of small solutions for the discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odingerand Klein-Gordon equations, Nonlinearity 18 (2005), no

    Atanas Stefanov and Panayotis G. Kevrekidis, Asymptotic behaviour of small solutions for the discrete nonlinear Schr¨ odingerand Klein-Gordon equations, Nonlinearity 18 (2005), no. 4, 1841–1857

    2005

  36. [44]

    A. A. Sukhorukov, Y. S. Kivshar, H. S. Eisenberg, and Y. Silber berg, Spatial optical solitons in waveguide arrays, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 39 (2003), no. 1, 31–50. 32

    2003

  37. [45]

    Tai-Peng Tsai and Horng-Tzer Yau, Classification of asymptotic profiles for nonlinear Schr¨ odingerequations with small initial data, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6 (2002), no. 1, 107–139

    2002

  38. [46]

    41–79 inside the volume ”Dynamics of Partial Differen tial Equations”, Frontiers in Applied Dynamics: Reviews and Tutorials, Volume 3 (Springer, 2015)

    M.I.Weinstein, Localized States and Dynamics in the Nonlinear Schroedinger / Gross-Pitaevskii Equations, pp. 41–79 inside the volume ”Dynamics of Partial Differen tial Equations”, Frontiers in Applied Dynamics: Reviews and Tutorials, Volume 3 (Springer, 2015) . Department of Ma...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.