Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Rank shift conditions and reductions of 2d-Toda theory

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rank-one and rank-two shift conditions on the moment matrix reduce the 2d-Toda hierarchy to the C-Toda and B-Toda hierarchies, giving explicit Lax matrices and spectral problems.

desk verdict A substantial rank-shift derivation of C-Toda and B-Toda with explicit Lax matrices, but the claimed Pfaff-large-BKP equivalence rests on an unjustified step at (4.18) and needs a real fix. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08725 v2 pith:MDXLTTVF submitted 2019-08-23 nlin.SI math-phmath.MP

Shi-Hao Li , Guo-Fu Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.MP MSC 37K1015A23
keywords 2d-TodahierarchymomentmatrixrankoneshiftconditiontwoC-TodaB-TodaPfafflatticelargeBKP
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that two concrete algebraic constraints on the moment matrix of the 2d-Toda hierarchy recover two named integrable hierarchies: the C-Toda hierarchy from a rank-one shift condition in the symmetric case, and the B-Toda hierarchy from a rank-two shift condition in the skew-symmetric case. These constraints are not ad hoc; they are the moment-matrix translations of the Cauchy two-matrix model and the Bures ensemble from random matrix theory. The payoff is explicit Lax matrices and local spectral problems for both hierarchies, plus a proof that the Pfaff lattice hierarchy and the large BKP hierarchy coincide once odd-indexed Pfaffian tau functions are included.

What carries the argument

The central object is the semi-infinite moment matrix $m_\infty$ with its Gauss–Borel (symmetric case) and skew-Borel (skew-symmetric case) decompositions. The load-bearing identities are the rank-one shift condition $\Lambda m_\infty + m_\infty\Lambda^\top = \alpha\alpha^\top$ and the rank-two shift condition $\Lambda m_\infty + m_\infty\Lambda^\top = \Lambda\alpha\alpha^\top - \alpha\alpha^\top\Lambda^\top$; after dressing, the second reads $Lh + hL^\top = \rho\sigma^\top - \sigma\rho^\top$. These conditions convert the nonlocal Hessenberg Lax operator into a local four-term ($3\times3$-type) spectral problem and yield explicit Lax matrices, given in Propositions 3.12 and 4.14.

What would settle it

Take a symmetric weight that satisfies the rank-one shift condition but whose restricted tau functions fail the modified KP bilinear identity, and compute the first two C-Toda equations; if (3.14b) fails while (3.14a) holds, the reduction depends essentially on the external mKP input. For the rank-two case, verify whether the B-Toda bilinear equation $D_{t_1}^2\tau_n\cdot\tau_n = 2D_{t_1}\tau_{n-1}\cdot\tau_{n+1}$ follows from the rank-two shift alone; a counterexample would falsify the claimed reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the rank of the shift of the moment matrix governs the reduction of the 2d-Toda hierarchy. For a symmetric moment matrix satisfying $\Lambda m_\infty + m_\infty\Lambda^\top = \alpha\alpha^\top$, the Lax operator becomes a four-term recurrence and the symmetric tau functions satisfy the C-Toda lattice, equations (3.14). For a skew-symmetric moment matrix satisfying $\Lambda m_\infty + m_\infty\Lambda^\top = \Lambda\alpha\alpha^\top - \alpha\alpha^\top\Lambda^\top$, the Pfaffian tau functions satisfy the B-Toda lattice $D_{t_1}^2 \tau_n\cdot\tau_n = 2D_{t_1}\tau_{n-1}\cdot\tau_{n+1}$. The paper writes explicit Lax matrices for both hierarchies (Propositions 3.12 and 4.14) and proves that the Pfaff lattice hierarchy coincides with the large BKP hierarchy once odd-indexed Pfaffian tau functions are included (Proposition 4.6).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the restricted tau functions $\{\tau_n(t,-t)\}$ satisfy the modified KP hierarchy, an external result cited without proof; the second C-Toda equation cancels the $t_2$-flow with this identity, and if the restricted tau functions are not in that class, the C-Toda hierarchy does not follow from the rank-one reduction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • C-Toda and B-Toda are reductions of the single 2d-Toda theory, so construction of tau functions and wave functions for 2d-Toda restricts directly to both hierarchies.
  • The rank-one shift gives a local $3\times3$ spectral problem and a four-term recurrence for symmetric Cauchy biorthogonal polynomials, opening the hierarchy to orthogonal-polynomial methods.
  • The rank-two shift yields an explicit Lax matrix for the B-Toda hierarchy, whose first equations were previously known mainly through the B-Toda lattice.
  • With odd-indexed Pfaffian tau functions included, the Pfaff lattice hierarchy and the large BKP hierarchy share the same wave functions and bilinear identities.
  • Odd-indexed tau functions in the B-Toda case are true BKP-type tau functions, not auxiliary variables; equivalently $\sigma$ and $\rho$ become tau functions themselves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The rank-shift mechanism suggests a general family of higher-rank conditions: a rank-$k$ shift should produce a $(k+2)$-term recurrence and a $(k+1)\times(k+1)$ spectral problem, with the C-Toda and B-Toda cases at $k=1,2$. This is a conjecture about how the present construction extends, not a claim of the paper.
  • Because the C-Toda and B-Toda moment matrices arise from the Cauchy two-matrix model and the Bures ensemble, the explicit Lax pairs may open a route to Virasoro constraints and gap probabilities for those random-matrix ensembles; the authors list this as an open direction.
  • The Pfaff lattice / large BKP equivalence could transfer results in either direction; for instance, BKP-type derivative laws for odd-indexed tau functions become available to the Pfaff lattice under the rank-two condition, which is precisely the B-type feature the paper identifies as missing without it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a moment-matrix approach to reductions of the 2d-Toda hierarchy. For symmetric moment matrices it shows that the rank-one shift condition Λm∞ + m∞Λ^T = αα^T leads to the C-Toda hierarchy, with explicit Lax matrix, a local spectral problem, and bilinear equations (Propositions 3.7 and 3.12). For skew-symmetric moment matrices it studies the Pfaff lattice hierarchy, introduces odd-indexed Pfaffian tau functions, and claims that the Pfaff lattice hierarchy coincides with the large BKP hierarchy (Proposition 4.6). It then imposes the rank-two shift condition Λm∞ + m∞Λ^T = Λαα^T − αα^TΛ^T and derives the B-Toda hierarchy with an explicit Lax matrix and recurrence relations (Propositions 4.12 and 4.14). The paper is framed as a unification of integrable structures behind the Cauchy two-matrix model and the Bures ensemble.

Significance. If the proof gaps identified below are filled, the paper would be a useful contribution: it connects two concrete random-matrix models to explicit discrete integrable hierarchies, provides explicit Lax matrices and four-term recurrences that are checkable, and addresses an open comparison between the Pfaff lattice and the large BKP hierarchy. The rank shift conditions are a genuinely structural input, and the derivations are mostly carried out with explicit contour-integral and Pfaffian machinery. The paper also gives several falsifiable concrete equations, such as the C-Toda lattice (3.14) and the B-Toda lattice (4.29), which are valuable even if the full hierarchy equivalence needs further justification.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (4.18)] The passage from the bilinear identity for Φ_{1,2n+1} and Φ_{2,2m} to Eq. (4.18) is not justified as written. The preceding display yields a single linear relation of the form τ_{2n}(t) I_1(n,m) − τ_{2n+2}(t) I_2(n,m) = 0, where I_1 and I_2 are two different contour integrals. The text then states that, by 'symmetry invariance,' this implies τ_{2n}(t)τ_{2m+1}(t') = I_2(n,m). This does not follow from the displayed relation alone: a linear combination with independent coefficients does not determine either integral separately. Equation (4.18) is exactly the even-odd case of the large BKP bilinear identity used in Proposition 4.6, and later Lemma 4.13 and Proposition 4.12 also rely on the large BKP identity (4.19), so the gap propagates to the B-Toda derivation as well. The authors should supply an independent derivation of Eq. (4.18), for example by deriving a second independent relation that permits elimination of I_1, or by a direct residue/Pfaffian argument.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (3.15)] The derivation of the second C-Toda equation (3.14b) uses the statement that {τ_n(t,−t)} satisfies the modified KP hierarchy, cited to [28] without proof in this setting. This is a load-bearing input: the cancellation of the t2-flow in the computation leading to Eq. (3.15) depends on it, and if the restricted tau functions did not satisfy the mKP property, the C-Toda hierarchy would not follow from the stated reductions. The gap is local and fixable: substituting s = −t and s′ = −t′ into the 2d-Toda bilinear identity (2.7), together with the symmetry τ_n(−s,−t) = τ_n(t,s), yields the needed mKP bilinear identity. The paper should include this derivation as a lemma or explicitly state and prove the required form of the mKP property.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] The phrase 'Gauu-Borel decomposition' should be corrected to 'Gauss-Borel decomposition'.
  2. [§3.2 and §4.3] In the display after Eq. (3.15) and again in §4.3, the term written as (∂²_{t1}τ_{2n}(t,s)|_{s=−t})² appears to be a typo for (∂_{t1}τ_{2n}(t,s)|_{s=−t})²; the current display makes the subsequent algebra hard to follow.
  3. [§4.2] The sentence describing the large BKP hierarchy as 'the same with' the Pfaff lattice hierarchy should read 'the same as'.
  4. [§2.3 and later] The Schur functions p_k and the notation p_k(∂̃_t) are used extensively after Eq. (2.7) but are not defined; a short definition or an explicit reference would improve readability.
  5. [§4.2, Eq. (4.11)] The block matrix displayed for h̃ is not fully explained; the 2×2 block structure and the pattern of the entries should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: C-Toda and B-Toda are derived from rank-shift moment-matrix inputs; the problematic Eq. (4.18) step is a proof gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The main reductions are genuinely input-to-output. Section 3 takes the rank-one shift condition Λm∞+m∞Λ^T=αα^T (3.8), converts it via the Borel/Cholesky decomposition to L1h+hL1^T=σσ^T (3.10), reads off the relations (3.11), and then derives the C-Toda bilinear equations (3.14) using the symmetric-tau relations (3.3)-(3.5) and, for the t2-flow cancellation, the independent modified-KP property from [28]; substituting s=-t into the 2d-Toda bilinear identity (2.7) would also produce that mKP input, so it is not an imported conclusion. Section 4 similarly takes the rank-two condition Λm∞+m∞Λ^T=Λαα^T-αα^TΛ^T (4.21), rewrites it as Lh+hL^T=ρσ^T-σρ^T, and derives the B-Toda equations (4.29) and the explicit Lax matrix (Prop. 4.14). The self-citations ([15], [31], etc.) supply parameter-free lemmas and nomenclature, but the target hierarchies are not assumed among their hypotheses; [15] is used for the partial-skew-orthogonal-polynomial machinery and Lemma 4.11, which are consequences of the stated rank-shift assumptions rather than restatements of the B-Toda or large-BKP conclusions. The one genuinely delicate spot is the derivation of (4.18): the text obtains τ_{2n}(t)I1 - τ_{2n+2}(t)I2 = 0 and then asserts 'with n and m being symmetry invariant' that τ_{2n}(t)τ_{2m+1}(t') = I2. That inference is not exhibited and may be invalid, and since (4.18) is exactly the even-odd case of the target large-BKP identity (4.19), Proposition 4.6 is not rigorously established as written. But a non sequitur is a correctness problem, not a circular reduction: the paper does not define the rank-shift input in terms of the hierarchy it claims to derive, and no fitted parameter or definitional tautology is present. Score 2 reflects the presence of repeated author self-citations without load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard 2d-Toda bilinear formalism, the s=-t commuting-flow reduction, and the two rank shift conditions. The rank shift conditions are imposed as reductions and are motivated by the Cauchy two-matrix model and Bures ensemble; they are not fitted to data and introduce no numerical free parameters. The mKP property and the large BKP bilinear identity are imported from the literature.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Gauss-Borel (or skew Borel) decomposition exists for all relevant times
    The paper assumes all principal minors of the moment matrix are nonzero (Section 2.1, Eq. (2.1)) so that S1 and S2 (or S,h) exist at every t,s.
  • standard math Time evolutions ∂tn m∞ = Λ^n m∞ and ∂sn m∞ = -m∞ Λ^{T n} for 2d-Toda
    This is the starting point of the 2d-Toda theory reviewed in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption s = -t constraint and commuting flows ∂tn m∞ = Λ^n m∞ + m∞ Λ^{T n}
    This is the reduction that makes the tau functions depend on t only; introduced in Sections 3.1.2 and 4.1.
  • domain assumption Rank one shift condition (3.8) Λm∞ + m∞Λ^T = αα^T with ∂tn α = Λ^n α
    This is the core new reduction condition, motivated by the Cauchy two-matrix model; introduced in Section 3.2.
  • domain assumption Rank two shift condition (4.21) Λm∞ + m∞Λ^T = Λαα^T - αα^TΛ^T
    Core reduction for the skew-symmetric case, motivated by the Bures ensemble; introduced in Section 4.3.
  • standard math The tau functions {τ_n(t,-t)} satisfy the modified KP hierarchy (used to cancel t2-flow)
    Invoked in the proof of Proposition 3.7, citing [28]; not re-derived for this reduction.
  • standard math The bilinear identity (4.19) characterizes the large BKP hierarchy
    The paper relies on the characterization of the large BKP hierarchy from [42] to identify (4.19) with it in Proposition 4.6.
  • standard math Derivative formula ∂t1 Pf(i,j) = Pf(d0,d1,i,j) for Gram-type Pfaffians
    Imported from Hirota [24, §3.3] in Section 4.3 to connect the rank two shift condition with BKP tau functions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rank shift conditions and reductions of 2d-Toda theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MDXLTTVF

@misc{pith2026190808725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rank shift conditions and reductions of 2d-Toda theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MDXLTTVF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08725}
}
read the original abstract

This paper focuses on different reductions of 2-dimensional (2d-)Toda hierarchy. Symmetric and skew symmetric moment matrices are firstly considered, resulting in the differential relations between symmetric/skew symmetric tau functions and 2d-Toda's tau functions, respectively. Furthermore, motivated by the Cauchy two-matrix model and Bures ensemble from random matrix theory, we study the rank one shift condition in symmetric case and rank two shift condition in skew symmetric case, from which the C-Toda hierarchy and B-Toda hierarchy are found respectively, together with their special Lax matrices and integrable structures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa. Solitons and infinite dimensional L ie algebras. Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. , 19: 943-1001, 1983

    work page 1983

  2. [1]

    Adler, E

    M. Adler, E. Horozov, and P. van Moerbeke. The Pfaff lattic e and skew-orthogonal polynomials. Int. Math. Res. Notices, 11: 569–588, 1999

    work page 1999

  3. [2]

    Adler and P

    M. Adler and P. van Moerbeke. Group factorization, momen t matrices, and Toda lattices. Int. Math. Res. Notices, 12: 555-572, 1997

    work page 1997

  4. [3]

    Adler and P

    M. Adler and P. van Moerbeke. The spectrum of coupled rand om matrices. Ann. of Math (2) , 149: 921-976, 1999

    work page 1999

  5. [4]

    Adler and P

    M. Adler and P. van Moerbeke. Hermitian, symmetric and sy mplectic random ensembles: PDEs for the distri- bution of the spectrum. Ann. of Math (2) , 153: 149-189, 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    Adler and P

    M. Adler and P. van Moerbeke. Toda versus Pfaff lattice and related polynomials. Duke Math J. , 112: 1-58, 2002

    work page 2002

  7. [6]

    Adler and P

    M. Adler and P. van Moerbeke. Recursion relations for uni tary integrals, combinatorics and the Toeplitz lattice. Comm. Math. Phys. , 237: 397-440, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [7]

    Adler, T

    M. Adler, T. Shiota, and P. van Moerbeke. Pfaff τ-functions. Math. Ann. , 322(3): 423–476, 2002

    work page 2002

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Adler and P

    M. Adler and P. van Moerbeke. The AKS theorem, A.C.I. syst ems and random matrix theory. J. Phys. A , 51: 423001, 2018

    2018

  2. [9]

    Bertola, M

    M. Bertola, M. Gekhtman, and J. Szmigielski. The Cauchy t wo-matrix model. Commun. Math. Phys. , 287(3): 983–1014, 2009

    2009

  3. [10]

    Bertola, M

    M. Bertola, M. Gekhtman and J. Szmigielski. Cauchy bior thogonal polynomials. J. Approx. Theory , 162: 832- 867, 2010

    2010

  4. [11]

    Bertola, M

    M. Bertola, M. Gekhtman and J. Szmigielski. Cauchy-Lag uerre two-matrix model and the Meijer-G random point field. Commum. Math. Phys. , 326: 111-144, 2014

    2014

  5. [12]

    Brini, G

    A. Brini, G. Carlet, S. Romano and P. Rossi. Rational red uctions of the 2D-Toda hierarchy and mirror sym- metry. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 19: 835-880, 2017

    2017

  6. [13]

    D. Bures. An extension of Kakutani’s thoerem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite w*-algebras. Trans. of the AMS , 135: 199-212, 1969. RANK SHIFT CONDITIONS AND REDUCTIONS OF 2D-TODA THEORY 33

    1969

  7. [14]

    Chang and C

    L. Chang and C. W u. Tau function of the CKP hierarchy and n on-linearizable Virasoro symmetries. Nonlin- earity, 26: 2577, 2013

    2013

  8. [15]

    Chang, Y

    X. Chang, Y. He, X. Hu and S. Li. Partial-skew-orthogona l polynomials and related integrable lattices with Pfaffian tau-functions. Comm. Math. Phys. , 364: 1069-1119, 2018

    2018

  9. [16]

    Chang, X

    X. Chang, X. Hu and S. Li. Degasperis-Procesi peakon dyn amical system and finite Toda lattice of CKP type. Nonlinearity, 31: 4746, 2018

    2018

  10. [17]

    P. Deift. Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann-Hilbert Approach. Courant Lecture Notes 3, American Mathematical Society, 2000

    2000

  11. [18]

    Faybusovich and M

    L. Faybusovich and M. Gekhtman. On Schur flows. J. Phys. A , 32: 4671, 1999

    1999

  12. [19]

    Forrester and M

    P. Forrester and M. Kieburg. Relating the Bures measure to the Cauchy two-matrix model. Commun. Math. Phys., 342: 151-187, 2016

    2016

  13. [20]

    Forrester and S

    P. Forrester and S. Li. Fox H-kernel and θ-deformation of the Cauchy two-matrix model and Bures ensem ble. Int. Mat. Res. Not. , rnz028, 2019

    2019

  14. [21]

    Forrester and S

    P. Forrester and S. Li. Classical discrete symplectic e nsembles on the linear and exponential lattice: skew orthogonal polynomials and correlation functions. arXiv: 1902.09042, accepted by Trans. of AMS, 2019

    1902 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Forrester and N

    P. Forrester and N. Witte. Bi-orthogonal polynomials o n the unit circle, regular semi-classical weights and integrable systems. Constr. Approx., 24: 201-237, 2006

    2006

  16. [23]

    Gerasimov, A

    A. Gerasimov, A. Marshakov, A. Mironov, A. Morozov and A . Orlov. Matrix models of two-dimensional gravity and Toda theory. Nucl. Phys. B , 357: 565-618, 1990

    1990

  17. [24]

    Hirota (Translated by A

    R. Hirota (Translated by A. Nagai, J. Nimmo and C. Gilson ). The direct method in soliton theory. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  18. [25]

    Hirota, M

    R. Hirota, M. Iwao and S. Tsujimoto. Soliton equations e xhibiting Pfaffian solutions. Glasgow Math. J. , 43A: 33-41, 2001

    2001

  19. [26]

    X. Hu, J. Zhao and C. Li. Matrix integrals and several int egrable differential-difference systems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 75: 054003, 2006

    2006

  20. [27]

    Hu and S

    X. Hu and S. Li. The partition function of Bures ensemble as the τ-function of BKP and DKP hierarchies: continuous and discrete. J. Phys. A , 50: 285201, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Kac and J

    V. Kac and J. van de Leur. The geometry of spinors and the m ulticomponent BKP and DKP hierarchies. CRM Proc. Lecture notes 14 , AMS, Providence, 159-202, 1998

    1998

  22. [30]

    Kodama and V

    Y. Kodama and V. Pierce. The Pfaff lattice on symplectic m atrices. J. Phys. A , 43: 055206, 2010

    2010

  23. [31]

    Li and S

    C. Li and S. Li. The Cauchy Two-Matrix Model, C-Toda Latt ice and CKP Hierarchy. J. Nonlinear Sci. , 29: 3-27, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    I. Loris. On reduced CKP equations. Inverse Problems , 15: 1099-1109, 1999

    1999

  25. [33]

    Loris and R

    I. Loris and R. Willox. Symmetry reductions of the BKP hi erarchy. J. Math. Phys. , 40: 1420-1431, 1999

    1999

  26. [34]

    Lundmark and J

    H. Lundmark and J. Szmigielski. Degasperis-Procesi pe akons and the discrete cubic string. Int. Math. Res. Pap., 2005(2): 53–116, 2005

    2005

  27. [35]

    M. Ma ˜nas. Revisiting biorthogonal polynomials. An LU factorizat ion discussion. arXiv: 1907.04280v1, 2019

    1907 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mukaihira and Y

    A. Mukaihira and Y. Nakamura. Schur flow for orthogonal p olynomials on the unit circle and its integrable discretization. J. Comp. Appl. Math., 139: 75-94, 2002

    2002

  29. [37]

    Orlov, T

    A. Orlov, T. Shiota and K. Takasaki. Pfaffian structures a nd certain solutions to BKP hierarchies II. Multiple integrals. arXiv: 1611.02244, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Sommers and K

    H. Sommers and K. Zyczkowski. Bures volume of the set of m ixed quantum states. J. Phys. A , 36: 10083-10100, 2003

    2003

  31. [39]

    Takasaki

    K. Takasaki. Toda hierarchies and their applications. J. Phys. A , 51: 203001, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Ueno and K

    K. Ueno and K. Takasaki. Toda lattice hierarchy. Adv. Studies Pure Math. , 4: 1-95, 1984

    1984

  33. [41]

    van de Leur

    J. van de Leur. The Adler-Shiota-van Moerbeke formula f or the BKP hierarchy. J. Math. Phys. , 36: 4940, 1995

    1995

  34. [42]

    van de Leur

    J. van de Leur. Matrix integrals and the geometry of spin ors. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. , 8: 288-310, 2001

    2001

  35. [43]

    van de Leur and A

    J. van de Leur and A. Orlov. Pfaffian and determinantal tau functions. Lett. Math. Phys. , 105: 1499-1531, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    W ang and S

    Z. W ang and S. Li. BKP hierarchy and Pfaffian point process . Nucl. Phys. B , 939: 447-464, 2019. 34 SHI-HAO LI AND GUO-FU YU

    2019

  37. [45]

    D. Zuo. Frobenius manifolds and a new class of extended a ffine W eyl groups ˜W (k,k+1)(Al). arXiv: 1905.09470, 2019. School of Mathematical and Statistics, ARC Centre of Excell ence for Mathematical and Sta- tistical Frontiers, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Austra...

    1905 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.