Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 113 references

Water vapor detection in the transmission spectra of HD 209458 b with the CARMENES NIR channel

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Water vapor is detected in the hot Jupiter HD 209458 b by extracting thousands of Doppler-shifted spectral lines, giving a signal-to-noise ratio of 6.4 and a significance of 8.1 sigma.

desk verdict First individual 1.0 micron water vapor detection in HD 209458 b is plausible but the significance is optimistically reported, mainly due to SYSREM iteration tuning on 5x injected signals and no grid-wide false-alarm correction. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08754 v1 pith:2RVMQETB submitted 2019-08-23 astro-ph.EP

A. Sánchez-López , F. J. Alonso-Floriano , M. López-Puertas , I. A. G. Snellen , B. Funke , E. Nagel , F. F. Bauer , P. J. Amado
show 26 more authors
J. A. Caballero S. Czesla L. Nortmann E. Pallé M. Salz A. Reiners I. Ribas A. Quirrenbach G. Anglada-Escudé V. J. S. Béjar N. Casasayas-Barris D. Galadí-Enríquez E. W. Guenther Th. Henning A. Kaminski M. Kürster M. Lampón L. M. Lara D. Montes J. C. Morales M. Stangret L. Tal-Or J. Sanz-Forcada J. H. M. M. Schmitt M. R. Zapatero Osorio M. Zechmeister
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords hotJupitertransmissionspectroscopywatervaporHD209458bcross-correlationSYSREMnear-infraredexoplanetatmospheres
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that water vapor exists in the atmosphere of the hot Jupiter HD 209458 b by recovering the faint Doppler-shifted absorption of thousands of water lines from ground-based near-infrared transit spectra. It reports a detection with signal-to-noise ratio 6.4 and significance 8.1$\sigma$, and claims this is the first time water is detected from the 1.0 $\mu$m band alone in any exoplanet. If correct, the result places water vapor at the planet's terminator and yields a wind measurement from the signal's blueshift. Multi-band water measurements of this type allow a direct comparison of aerosol extinction and atmospheric dynamics between well-studied hot Jupiters.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is cross-correlating high-resolution residual spectra with a synthetic transmission model after removing telluric and stellar lines with SYSREM, a principal component analysis algorithm. During transit the planet's orbital motion Doppler-shifts its absorption lines by tens of km s$^{-1}$, while telluric and stellar features stay nearly fixed, so the static components can be subtracted and the planetary signal, spread over thousands of weak lines, is accumulated into a single cross-correlation function. The number of SYSREM iterations per spectral order is chosen by injecting a model planetary signal at five times (in some orders ten to twelve times) nominal strength and keeping the iteration count that maximizes the recovered cross-correlation peak. The transmission templates are line-by-line models computed with a radiative transfer code using a previously retrieved pressure-temperature profile and assumed molecular abundances.

What would settle it

Re-observe a transit of HD 209458 b with the same instrument under stable, dry conditions; if the detection is real, the 1.15 and 1.4 $\mu$m bands should reproduce the water signal at the same $K_\mathrm{P}$ and blueshift, and injection-recovery tests at one times the nominal planetary strength should recover the signal at the chosen SYSREM iteration without being absorbed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors detect H$_2$O in the transmission spectrum of HD 209458 b with a maximum S/N of 6.4 and a $\sigma$-value of 8.1 when all useful NIR spectral orders are combined. The cross-correlation peak appears at a planetary orbital velocity amplitude $K_\mathrm{P} = 150^{+28}_{-25}$ km s$^{-1}$, consistent with the expected value, and is blueshifted by $-5.2^{+2.6}_{-1.3}$ km s$^{-1}$, which they interpret as day-to-night winds at the terminator. In the multi-band analysis, the 1.0 $\mu$m band alone gives S/N 5.8, the 1.15 $\mu$m band gives only a hint at S/N 2.8, and the 1.4 $\mu$m band yields no conclusive signal. The authors argue that the weaker-than-expected signals from the two stronger bands reflect unfavorable observing conditions, including a sudden drop in precipitable water vapor, high airmass, and falling per-pixel S/N, rather than the absence of water. They also reanalyze CARMENES data of HD 189733 b with the same procedure and find water there mainly in the 1.15 and 1.4 $\mu$m bands, which supports the picture of stronger aerosol extinction in HD 189733 b.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the real, much weaker planetary water signal survives the SYSREM telluric and stellar subtraction at the same iteration counts that maximize recovery of an artificially injected signal five to twelve times stronger.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the detection is correct, water vapor is present in the terminator atmosphere of HD 209458 b, adding a high-resolution near-infrared confirmation to previous space-based measurements.
  • The 1.0 $\mu$m band is demonstrated as a usable ground-based window for detecting water in hot Jupiters, the bluest such band detected individually to date.
  • The $-5.2$ km s$^{-1}$ blueshift of the combined signal indicates day-to-night winds at the terminator, consistent with global circulation model predictions for this highly irradiated planet.
  • The different band-by-band behavior of HD 209458 b and HD 189733 b supports the interpretation that HD 189733 b has stronger aerosol or haze extinction near 1 $\mu$m.
  • The non-detections in the stronger 1.15 and 1.4 $\mu$m bands are attributed to the unstable observing conditions of that night, implying that stable, higher-S/N re-observations should recover water in those bands as well.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the detection would be a second transit observation under stable and dry conditions; the 1.15 and 1.4 $\mu$m bands should then show independent water signals at the same $K_\mathrm{P}$ and blueshift if the interpretation is right.
  • The same iteration-optimization and cross-correlation pipeline could be applied to archived spectra of other hot Jupiters to see whether the 1.0 $\mu$m band routinely detects water, turning the relative strength of the 1.0 and 1.4 $\mu$m bands into a haze diagnostic.
  • Because the iteration count is tuned on an injected signal several times stronger than the real one, a cross-check with injections at one times the nominal strength, or with an independent telluric-removal method, would clarify whether the reported significance depends on that assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes CARMENES near-infrared high-resolution transit spectroscopy of HD 209458 b, searching for water vapor by removing telluric and stellar lines with SYSREM and cross-correlating the residuals with atmospheric transmission models. It reports an H2O detection with maximum S/N of 6.4 and a Welch t-test sigma of 8.1, a net blueshift of -5.2 km/s interpreted as day-to-night winds, and a multi-band analysis claiming a S/N of 5.8 detection from the 1.0 micron band individually, hints from the 1.15 micron band, and no conclusive signal from the nominally stronger 1.4 micron band. The paper also reanalyzes CARMENES data of HD 189733 b with the same pipeline to support a qualitative comparison of haze levels.

Significance. If the detection holds, this would be the first individual detection of H2O from the 1.0 micron band in an exoplanet and would extend the high-resolution cross-correlation technique to a bluer spectral region. The consistent reanalysis of the HD 189733 b dataset is a useful comparative element, and the paper is otherwise careful about data reduction, masking, and the variable precipitable water vapor conditions. However, the central claim is currently not fully established because the SYSREM iteration count is optimized on injected signals without verifying survival of the real 1x signal, and because the reported significance is the maximum of a two-dimensional search without a trial correction. These issues are fixable and do not by themselves invalidate the interpretation, but they require additional analysis before the detection claim is secure.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Fig. 4] The number of SYSREM iterations per spectral order is chosen by maximizing the recovered S/N of an injected model at 5 times the nominal planetary strength (10-12 times in orders 60, 49, and 38), but the paper does not show that the real, 1x signal survives at those same iteration counts. A 5x-stronger injection can persist at iteration counts where the real signal is already partially fitted and removed by SYSREM, and the iteration count maximizing an injected signal need not coincide with the optimum for the real signal; this is load-bearing because the claim that the CCF peak is not a telluric artifact depends on the adopted iterations. Please add injection-recovery tests at 1x nominal strength for each order, or demonstrate that the recovered CCF significance is stable over a range of iteration counts, and report the fraction of the injected signal recovered at the adopted iterations.
  2. [Section 4.3, Fig. 6] The quoted S/N of 6.4 and sigma of 8.1 are maxima of a two-dimensional map in KP and vwind, but no correction is made for the number of independent trials in that search. The paper should state the effective number of independent resolution elements in the KP-vwind grid and provide a false-alarm probability, for example from a bootstrap or permutation test that randomizes the in-trail/out-of-trail assignment or uses the negative-KP region as a null distribution. This need is reinforced by the authors' own statement that the Welch t-test may overestimate significance relative to the S/N calculation.
  3. [Section 5.1, Table 2] The band-by-band pattern - a S/N of 5.8 in the weakest 1.0 micron band, a hint at S/N of 2.8 in the 1.15 micron band, and no conclusive signal in the nominally strongest 1.4 micron band - is the opposite of the expectation stated in the paper and is currently explained only qualitatively by observing conditions. Because the SYSREM iteration counts are tuned on injected signals, this pattern could in part be a selection effect of the iteration tuning. Please demonstrate, via per-band injection-recovery at 1x strength at the adopted iteration counts or an equivalent sensitivity calculation, that the pipeline would have detected a real signal in the 1.15 and 1.4 micron bands at the level expected from the model, or quantify how much systematic removal suppresses those bands.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Equation (1), Table 1] The symbol for radial velocity is rendered as '3' in several places (e.g., '3sys', '3wind'); please use a standard v symbol and define it in the text.
  2. [Abstract and Section 5.2] The abstract calls the blueshift a 'firm indication' of day-to-night winds, while Section 5.2 states that the large error bars make the wind measurements fully compatible with previous values; please align the wording with the actual uncertainties.
  3. [Section 4.2] The CCF velocity step of 1.3 km/s is described as 'calculated by averaging the velocity step-size of the pixels' but it is not stated whether this is the mean over spectral orders or between pixel centers; please specify the exact computation, since it determines the effective number of independent trials discussed in the major comments.
  4. [Section 4.1] The template is computed with a single P-T profile and a single set of volume mixing ratios from Brogi et al. (2017); because the multi-band interpretation compares observed and expected band strengths, please state whether the main conclusions are robust to plausible variations in these model inputs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: template is external and cross-correlation detection is not forced by construction.

full rationale

The detection chain is self-contained against external inputs: the transmission template is computed with KOPRA from HITEMP 2010 line data and the Brogi et al. (2017) P-T profile and VMRs, none of which are fitted to the HD 209458 b CARMENES data presented here. The planetary signal is extracted by cross-correlating SYSREM residuals with this fixed template and assessed with S/N maps and a Welch t-test; a null dataset would not produce the reported CCF peak, and the authors report no CCF peak with CH4, NH3, HCN, or CO templates or with an alternative Molecfit telluric correction, which supports the specificity of the H2O claim. The only model-dependent tuning is the number of SYSREM iterations per order, selected by injecting the model at 5x nominal strength (10-12x in some orders) and keeping the iteration count maximizing the recovered injected CCF. This is a standard pipeline optimization and does not by construction set the amplitude or position of the real-data CCF; it does raise a correctness risk, namely that the 1x real signal might be partially removed at the chosen iteration counts, especially given the surprising band pattern (weakest 1.0 micron band showing the largest signal). That concern belongs to statistical robustness, not circularity. Self-citations to Alonso-Floriano et al. (2019) are methodological or comparative and are not load-bearing for the central detection.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The paper adopts a PT profile and abundances from prior retrieval work, and the only author-chosen processing parameter is the number of SYSREM iterations per order, tuned via injected signals. No free physical parameters are fitted.

free parameters (1)
  • SYSREM iteration count per order = varies per order (e.g., order 63: 3, order 62: 5, order 61: 4, order 60: 8, etc., selected from peaks in Fig. 4)
    Chosen by maximizing the recovered cross-correlation signal from an injected model planet; these choices affect the residual spectra and the resulting CCF significance.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The cross-correlation template computed with KOPRA, using Voigt line shapes and HITEMP/HITRAN line lists, is sufficiently accurate for detection.
    Section 4.1; if the template line positions or relative strengths are wrong, the CCF peak could be weakened or spurious.
  • domain assumption The PT profile and VMRs from Brogi et al. (2017) are representative of the planet's atmosphere.
    Section 4.1; the model template is built from these values, and no retrieval is performed in this paper.
  • domain assumption SYSREM removes telluric and stellar features without significantly removing the planetary signal at the chosen iteration counts.
    Section 3.1; validated only via injection tests, not on the real signal.
  • domain assumption The orbital parameters (KP = 140 km/s from Snellen et al. 2010, ephemeris from Knutson et al. 2007) are correct.
    Section 4.2; the expected planetary trace and the KP grid search rely on these values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Water vapor detection in the transmission spectra of HD 209458 b with the CARMENES NIR channel." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RVMQETB

@misc{pith2026190808754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Water vapor detection in the transmission spectra of HD 209458 b with the CARMENES NIR channel},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RVMQETB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08754}
}
abstract

Aims: We aim at detecting H$_2$O in the atmosphere of the hot Jupiter HD 209458 b and perform a multi-band study in the near infrared with CARMENES. Methods: The H$_2$O absorption lines from the planet's atmosphere are Doppler-shifted due to the large change in its radial velocity during transit. This shift is of the order of tens of km s$^{-1}$, whilst the Earth's telluric and the stellar lines can be considered quasi-static. We took advantage of this to remove the telluric and stellar lines using SYSREM, a principal component analysis algorithm. The residual spectra contain the signal from thousands of planetary molecular lines well below the noise level. We retrieve this information by cross-correlating the spectra with models of the atmospheric absorption. Results: We find evidence of H$_2$O in HD 209458 b with a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 6.4. The signal is blueshifted by --5.2 $^{+2.6}_{-1.3}$ km s$^{-1}$, which, despite the error bars, is a firm indication of day-to-night winds at the terminator of this hot Jupiter. Additionally, we performed a multi-band study for the detection of H$_2$O individually from the three NIR bands covered by CARMENES. We detect H$_2$O from its 1.0 $\mu$m band with a S/N of 5.8, and also find hints from the 1.15 $\mu$m band, with a low S/N of 2.8. No clear planetary signal is found from the 1.4 $\mu$m band. Conclusions: Our significant signal from the 1.0 $\mu$m band in HD 209458 b represents the first detection of H$_2$O from this band, the bluest one to date. The unfavorable observational conditions might be the reason for the inconclusive detection from the stronger 1.15 and 1.4 $\mu$m bands. H$_2$O is detected from the 1.0 $\mu$m band in HD 209458 b, but hardly in HD 189733 b, which supports a stronger aerosol extinction in the latter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08754 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Column depth of precipitable water vapor in the Earth’s atmo￾sphere (top panel), airmass (middle panel), and mean S/N of the raw spectra for the three covered H2O bands (bottom panel) as a function of the orbital phase. Open circles represent spectra not included in the analysis (see text). The transit occurred at the orbital phases between the vertical dashed lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. S/N of spectra taken at the beginning (black) and near the end (red) of the observations. A strong spectral dependence of the S/N is observed in the latter. towards the target, which dropped from 10.3 mm to 3.8 mm dur￾ing the observations (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Water vapor model transmission spectra computed for the best￾fitting p-T profile in Brogi et al. (2017) and an H2O volume mixing ratio of 10−5 . The model is shown at the same wavelengths of the data. The CARMENES line spread function for the NIR channel has been applied. The 1.0 µm, 1.15 µm and 1.4 µm bands are shown in blue, green, and red, respectively. The orders in dark gray represent the a priori masks. The or… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the retrieved S/N of the injected signal with the number of Sysrem iterations for the 1.0 µm band (left), 1.15 µm band (middle), and 1.4 µm band (right). The model is injected at 5× the nominal strength. For the spectral orders where a very small signal is…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cross-correlation values as a function of the orbital phase and planet orbital velocity in the Earth’s rest-frame. The results were ob￾tained from 18 useful NIR orders. The orbital phase of the first and last in-transit spectra are indicated by horizontal dashed red li…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: S/N map (top) and σ map (bottom) obtained after the cross￾correlation of the residual spectral matrices with the atmospheric trans￾mission template. All useful NIR orders were included. A dashed white line marks the KP = 0 km s−1value. Both maps show the region of maxi…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: CCFs with the largest significance obtained for the 1.0 µm band (green), 1.15 µm band (blue), and including all useful NIR orders (black). Also, the CCF for the 1.4 µm band with the largest significance peak in the positive KP space is shown (orange). The vertical dash…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: S/N maps obtained for HD 209458 b after the cross-correlation of the residual spectral matrices with the atmospheric transmission template for the 1.0 µm band (left), 1.15 µm band (middle) and for the 1.4 µm band (right). A dashed white line marks the KP = 0 km s−1 val…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: S/N maps obtained for CARMENES observations of HD 189733 b for the 1.0 µm band (left panel), for the 1.15 µm band (middle panel) and for the 1.4 µm band (right panel). A dashed white line marks the KP = 0 km s−1 value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    J., S\'anchez-L\'opez, A., Snellen, I

    Alonso-Floriano, F. J., S\'anchez-L\'opez, A., Snellen, I. A. G., L\'opez-Puertas, M., et al.\ 2019, , 621, A74

    2019

  4. [4]

    B., Knutson, H

    Agol, E., Cowan, N. B., Knutson, H. A., et al.\ 2010, , 721, 1861

    2010

  5. [5]

    S., Mayne, N

    Amundsen, D. S., Mayne, N. J., Baraffe, I., Manners, J., et al.\ 2016, , 595, A36

    2016

  6. [6]

    L., de Kok, R

    Birkby, J. L., de Kok, R. J., Brogi, M., et al.\ 2013, , 436, L35

    2013

  7. [7]

    L., de Kok, R

    Birkby, J. L., de Kok, R. J., Brogi, M., Schwarz, H., & Snellen, I. A. G.\ 2017, , 153, 138

    2017

  8. [8]

    Blecic, J., Dobbs-Dixon, I., & Greene, T.\ 2017, , 848, 127

    2017

Show all 113 references
  1. [9]

    2002, , 390, 779

    Borysow, A. 2002, , 390, 779

    2002

  2. [10]

    & Frommhold , L

    Borysow , A. & Frommhold , L. 1989, , 341, 549

    1989

  3. [11]

    1989, , 336, 495

    Borysow, A., Frommhold, L., & Moraldi, M. 1989, , 336, 495

    1989

  4. [12]

    Bouchy, F., Udry, S., Mayor, M., et al.\ 2005, , 444, L15

    2005

  5. [13]

    Bourrier, V., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Dupuy, H., et al.\ 2013, , 551, A63

    2013

  6. [14]

    Brogi, M., Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., et al.\ 2012, , 486, 502

    2012

  7. [15]

    Brogi, M., Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., et al.\ 2013, , 767, 27

    2013

  8. [16]

    J., Birkby, J

    Brogi, M., de Kok, R. J., Birkby, J. L., Schwarz, H., & Snellen, I. A. G.\ 2014, , 565, A124

    2014

  9. [17]

    J., Albrecht, S., et al.\ 2016, , 817, 106

    Brogi, M., de Kok, R. J., Albrecht, S., et al.\ 2016, , 817, 106

    2016

  10. [18]

    Brogi, M., Line, M., Bean, J., D \'e sert, J.-M., & Schwarz, H.\ 2017, , 839, L2

    2017

  11. [19]

    Brogi, M., Giacobbe, P., Guilluy, G., et al.\ 2018, , 615, A16

    2018

  12. [20]

    M.\ 2001, , 553, 1006

    Brown, T. M.\ 2001, , 553, 1006

    2001

  13. [21]

    A., Gu \`a rdia, J., L \'o pez del Fresno, M., et al.\ 2016, , 9910, 0E

    Caballero, J. A., Gu \`a rdia, J., L \'o pez del Fresno, M., et al.\ 2016, , 9910, 0E

    2016

  14. [22]

    Cabot, S. H. C., Madhusudhan, N., Hawker, G. A., Gandhi, S.,\ 2019, , 482, 4422

    2019

  15. [23]

    W., Korzennik, S

    Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R. W., Korzennik, S. G., et al.\ 1999, , 522, L145

    1999

  16. [24]

    M., Latham, D

    Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M.\ 2000, , 529, 45

    2000

  17. [25]

    M., Noyes, R

    Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., & Gilliland, R. L.\ 2002, , 568, 377

    2002

  18. [26]

    E., Megeath, S

    Charbonneau, D., Allen, L. E., Megeath, S. T., et al.\ 2005, , 626, 523

    2005

  19. [27]

    A., Barman, T., et al.\ 2008, , 686, 1341

    Charbonneau, D., Knutson, H. A., Barman, T., et al.\ 2008, , 686, 1341

    2008

  20. [28]

    M., Knutson, H

    Crossfield, J. M., Knutson, H. A., Fortney, J., Showman, A. P., Cowan, N. B, Deming, D.\ 2012, , 752, 81

    2012

  21. [29]

    Collier Cameron, A., Horne, K., Penny, A., & James, D.\ 1999, , 402, 751

    1999

  22. [30]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al.\ 2003, yCat, 2246

    2003

  23. [31]

    M., Charbonneau, D., Harrington, J., & Richardson, L

    Deming, D., Brown, T. M., Charbonneau, D., Harrington, J., & Richardson, L. J.\ 2005, , 622, 1149

    2005

  24. [32]

    J., & Harrington, J.\ 2005, , 434, 740

    Deming, D., Seager, S., Richardson, L. J., & Harrington, J.\ 2005, , 434, 740

    2005

  25. [33]

    J.\ 2006, , 644, 560

    Deming, D., Harrington, J., Seager, S., & Richardson, L. J.\ 2006, , 644, 560

    2006

  26. [34]

    Deming, D., Wilkins, A., McCullough, P., et al.\ 2013, , 774, 95

    2013

  27. [35]

    J., Brogi, M., Snellen, I

    de Kok, R. J., Brogi, M., Snellen, I. A. G., et al.\ 2013, , 554, A82

    2013

  28. [36]

    J., Oliva, E., et al.\ 2014, , 9147, 914719

    Follert, R., Dorn, R. J., Oliva, E., et al.\ 2014, , 9147, 914719

    2014

  29. [37]

    Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al.\ 2018, , 616, A1

    2018

  30. [38]

    2011, Icarus, 214, 571

    Garc \'i a-Comas, M., L \'o pez-Puertas, M., Funke, B., et al. 2011, Icarus, 214, 571

    2011

  31. [39]

    E., Rothman, L

    Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hill, C., et al.\ 2017, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 203, 3

    2017

  32. [40]

    P., Aigrain, S., Pont, F., et al.\ 2012, , 422, 753

    Gibson, N. P., Aigrain, S., Pont, F., et al.\ 2012, , 422, 753

    2012

  33. [41]

    J., Burrows, A., Charbonneau, D., et al.\ 2008, , 456, 767

    Grillmair, C. J., Burrows, A., Charbonneau, D., et al.\ 2008, , 456, 767

    2008

  34. [42]

    A., Madhusudhan, N., Cabot, S

    Hawker, G. A., Madhusudhan, N., Cabot, S. H. C., & Gandhi, S.\ 2018, , 863, L11

    2018

  35. [43]

    Heng, K., & Kitzmann, D.\ 2017, , 470, 2972

    2017

  36. [44]

    W., Marcy, G

    Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, P. R., & Vogt, S. S.\ 2000, , 529, 41

    2000

  37. [45]

    W., & Joshua, N

    Henry, G. W., & Joshua, N. W.\ 2007, , 135, 1

    2007

  38. [46]

    J., Ehrenreich, D., Heng, K., et al.\ 2018, , 560, 453

    Hoeijmakers, H. J., Ehrenreich, D., Heng, K., et al.\ 2018, , 560, 453

    2018

  39. [47]

    B., Fortney, J

    Hubbard, W. B., Fortney, J. J., Lunine, J. I., et al.\ 2001, , 560, 413

    2001

  40. [48]

    Kaeufl, H.-U., Ballester, P., Biereichel, P., et al.\ 2004, , 5492, 1218

    2004

  41. [49]

    A., Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R

    Knutson, H. A., Charbonneau, D., Noyes, R. W., Brown, T. M., & Gilliland, R. L.\ 2007, , 655, 564

    2007

  42. [50]

    Koen, C., Kilkenny, D., van Wyk, F., Marang, F., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1949

    2010

  43. [51]

    Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Pont, F., Vidal-Madjar, A., & Sing, D.\ 2008, , 481, L83

    2008

  44. [52]

    Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., Ehrenreich, D., Vidal-Madjar, A., et al.\ 2010, , 514, A72

    2010

  45. [53]

    J., et al.\ 2012, , 543, L4

    Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Bourrier, V., Wheatley, P. J., et al.\ 2012, , 543, L4

    2012

  46. [54]

    N., & Irwin, P

    Lee, J.-M., Fletcher, L. N., & Irwin, P. G. J.\ 2012, , 420, 170

    2012

  47. [55]

    L., Yang, H., France, K., et al.\ 2010, , 717, 1291

    Linsky, J. L., Yang, H., France, K., et al.\ 2010, , 717, 1291

    2010

  48. [56]

    R., Stevenson, K

    Line, M. R., Stevenson, K. B., Bean, J., et al.\ 2016, , 152, 203

    2016

  49. [57]

    C., Johnson, J

    Lockwood, A. C., Johnson, J. A., Bender, C. F., et al.\ 2014, , 783, L29

    2014

  50. [58]

    L \'o pez-Puertas M., Monta \ n \'e s-Rodr \' guez, P., Pall\'e, E., et al.\ 2018, , 156, 13

    2018

  51. [59]

    J.\ 2015, , 814, L24

    Louden, T., & Wheatley, P. J.\ 2015, , 814, L24

    2015

  52. [60]

    J., & Madhusudhan, N.\ 2017, , 469, 1979

    MacDonald, R. J., & Madhusudhan, N.\ 2017, , 469, 1979

    2017

  53. [61]

    R., Deming, D., & Hedges, C.\ 2014, , 791, L9

    Madhusudhan, N., Crouzet, N., McCullough, P. R., Deming, D., & Hedges, C.\ 2014, , 791, L9

    2014

  54. [62]

    A., & Kennedy, G

    Madhusudhan, N., Amin, M. A., & Kennedy, G. M.\ 2014, , 794, L12

    2014

  55. [63]

    W., et al.\ 2000, , 532, L55--L58

    Mazeh, T., Naef, D., Torres, G., Latham, D. W., et al.\ 2000, , 532, L55--L58

    2000

  56. [64]

    Mazeh, T., Tamuz, O., & Zucker, S.\ 2007, Transiting Extrasolar Planets Workshop, 366, 119

    2007

  57. [65]

    Mayor, M., & Queloz, D.\ 1995, , 378, 355

    1995

  58. [66]

    Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al.\ 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20

    2003

  59. [67]

    R., Crouzet, N., Deming, D., & Madhusudhan, N.\ 2014, , 791, 55

    McCullough, P. R., Crouzet, N., Deming, D., & Madhusudhan, N.\ 2014, , 791, 55

    2014

  60. [68]

    K., Kawahara, H., Masuda, K., et al.\ 2017, , 154, 221

    Nugroho, S. K., Kawahara, H., Masuda, K., et al.\ 2017, , 154, 221

    2017

  61. [69]

    Pino, L., Ehrenreich, D., Wyttenbach, A., et al.\ 2018, , 612, A53

    2018

  62. [70]

    Pino, L., Ehrenreich, D., Allart, R., et al.\ 2018, , 619, A3

    2018

  63. [71]

    R., et al.\ 2016, , 832, 131

    Piskorz, D., Benneke, B., Crockett, N. R., et al.\ 2016, , 832, 131

    2016

  64. [72]

    R., et al.\ 2017, , 154, 78

    Piskorz, D., Benneke, B., Crockett, N. R., et al.\ 2017, , 154, 78

    2017

  65. [73]

    L., Moutou, C., & Charbonneau, D.\ 2008, , 385, 109

    Pont, F., Knutson, H., Gilliland, R. L., Moutou, C., & Charbonneau, D.\ 2008, , 385, 109

    2008

  66. [74]

    K., Gibson, N

    Pont, F., Sing, D. K., Gibson, N. P., et al.\ 2013, , 432, 2917

    2013

  67. [75]

    J., Caballero, J

    Quirrenbach, A., Amado, P. J., Caballero, J. A., et al.\ 2016, , 9908, 12

    2016

  68. [76]

    J., Ribas, I., et al.\ 2018, , 10702, 0W

    Quirrenbach, A., Amado, P. J., Ribas, I., et al.\ 2018, , 10702, 0W

    2018

  69. [77]

    Rauscher, E., & Menou, K.\ 2012, , 750, 96

    2012

  70. [78]

    Rauscher, E., & Menou, K.\ 2013, , 764, 103

    2013

  71. [79]

    D., & Koesterke, L.\ 2008, , 673, L87

    Redfield, S., Endl, M., Cochran, W. D., & Koesterke, L.\ 2008, , 673, L87

    2008

  72. [80]

    A., et al.\ 2018, , 612, A49

    Reiners, A., Zechmeister, M., Caballero, J. A., et al.\ 2018, , 612, A49

    2018

  73. [81]

    Rodler, F., K \"u rster, M., & Henning, T.\ 2008, , 485, 859

    2008

  74. [82]

    Rodler, F., K \"u rster, M., & Henning, T.\ 2010, , 514, A23

    2010

  75. [83]

    Rodler, F., L \'o pez-Morales, M., & Ribas, I.\ 2012, , 753, L25

    2012

  76. [84]

    S., Gordon, I

    Rothman, L. S., Gordon, I. E., Barber, R. J., et al. 2010, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 111, 2139

    2010

  77. [85]

    S., Gordon, I

    Rothman, L. S., Gordon, I. E., Babikov, Y., et al. 2013, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 130, 4

    2013

  78. [86]

    C., Nagel, E., et al.\ 2018, , 620, A97

    Salz, M., Czesla, S., Schneider, P. C., Nagel, E., et al.\ 2018, , 620, A97

    2018

  79. [87]

    Schwarz, H., Brogi, M., de Kok, R., Birkby, J., & Snellen, I.\ 2015, , 576, A111

    2015

  80. [88]

    J., et al.\ 2016, , 593, A74

    Schwarz, H., Ginski, C., de Kok, R. J., et al.\ 2016, , 593, A74

    2016

  81. [89]

    D.\ 2000, , 537, 916

    Seager, S., & Sasselov, D. D.\ 2000, , 537, 916

    2000

  82. [90]

    A., Xu, W., et al.\ 2012, , 8446, 33

    Seifert, W., S \'a nchez Carrasco, M. A., Xu, W., et al.\ 2012, , 8446, 33

    2012

  83. [91]

    P., Fortney, J

    Showman, A. P., Fortney, J. J., Lewis, N. K., & Shabram, M. 2013, , 762, 1

    2013

  84. [92]

    K., Pont, F., Aigrain, S., et al.\ 2011, , 416, 1443

    Sing, D. K., Pont, F., Aigrain, S., et al.\ 2011, , 416, 1443

    2011

  85. [93]

    K., Fortney, J

    Sing, D. K., Fortney, J. J., Nikolov, N., et al.\ 2016, , 529, 59

    2016

  86. [94]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al.\ 2006, , 131, 1163

    2006

  87. [95]

    2015, , 576, A77

    Smette, A., Sana, H., Noll, S., et al. 2015, , 576, A77

    2015

  88. [96]

    Snellen, I. A. G., Albrecht, S., de Mooij, E. J. W., & Le Poole, R. S.\ 2008, , 487, 357

    2008

  89. [97]

    Snellen, I. A. G., de Kok, R. J., de Mooij, E. J. W., & Albrecht, S.\ 2010, , 465, 1049

    2010

  90. [98]

    Southworth, J.\ 2008, , 386, 1644–1666

    2008

  91. [99]

    B.\ 2016, , 817, L16

    Stevenson, K. B.\ 2016, , 817, L16

    2016

  92. [100]

    P., von Clarmann, T., Funke, B., et al

    Stiller, G. P., von Clarmann, T., Funke, B., et al. 2002, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 72, 249

    2002

  93. [101]

    St \"u rmer, J., Stahl, O., Schwab, C., et al.\ 2014, , 9151, 52

    2014

  94. [102]

    R., Deroo, P., Griffith, C

    Swain, M. R., Deroo, P., Griffith, C. A., et al.\ 2010, , 463, 637

    2010

  95. [103]

    Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., & Zucker, S.\ 2005, , 356, 1466

    2005

  96. [104]

    O., Deming, D., Burrows, A., & Grillmair, C

    Todorov, K. O., Deming, D., Burrows, A., & Grillmair, C. J.\ 2014, , 796, 100

    2014

  97. [105]

    N., & Holman, M

    Torres, G., Winn, J. N., & Holman, M. J.\ 2008, , 677, 1324

    2008

  98. [106]

    Triaud, A. H. M. J., Queloz, D., Bouchy, F., et al.\ 2009, , 506, 377

    2009

  99. [107]

    J., Santos, N

    Ulmer-Moll, S., Figueira, P., Neal, J. J., Santos, N. C., & Bonnefoy, M.\ 2019, , 621, A79

    2019

  100. [108]

    E., et al.\ 2003, , 422, 143

    Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., D\'esert, J.-M., Ballester, G. E., et al.\ 2003, , 422, 143

    2003

  101. [109]

    Vidal-Madjar, A., D\'esert, J.-M., Lecavelier Des Etangs, A., et al.\ 2004, , 604, L69

    2004

  102. [110]

    L.\ 1947, Biometrika, 34, 1-2, 28

    Welch, B. L.\ 1947, Biometrika, 34, 1-2, 28

    1947

  103. [111]

    Wyttenbach, A., Ehrenreich, D., Lovis, C., Udry, S., & Pepe, F.\ 2015, , 577, A62

    2015

  104. [112]

    Yan, F., & Henning, T.\ 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 714

    2018

  105. [113]

    Zechmeister, M., Anglada-Escud \'e , G., & Reiners, A.\ 2014, , 561, A59

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.