Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.08960 v1 pith:XJDSB4RX submitted 2019-08-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords datasetsevaluationcurrentimportantmodelsresearchsummarizationtext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text summarization aims at compressing long documents into a shorter form that conveys the most important parts of the original document. Despite increased interest in the community and notable research effort, progress on benchmark datasets has stagnated. We critically evaluate key ingredients of the current research setup: datasets, evaluation metrics, and models, and highlight three primary shortcomings: 1) automatically collected datasets leave the task underconstrained and may contain noise detrimental to training and evaluation, 2) current evaluation protocol is weakly correlated with human judgment and does not account for important characteristics such as factual correctness, 3) models overfit to layout biases of current datasets and offer limited diversity in their outputs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Evaluation of Large Language Models on Text Summarization Tasks Using Prompt Engineering Techniques

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad benchmark of six open-weights LLMs shows prompt design and chunking affect summarization quality more than model size alone.

Pith tools