Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Ultrafast optical currents in gapped graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single-cycle x-polarized pulse drives a purely interband transverse current in gapped graphene.

desk verdict A clean new prediction—transverse interband current in gapped graphene under a linear pulse—supported by the numerics but with the key phase-cancellation proof deferred. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09019 v1 pith:NOXRIJ5V submitted 2019-08-23 cond-mat.mes-hall

S. Azar Oliaei Motlagh , Fatemeh Nematollahi , Aranyo Mitra , Ahmal Jawad Zafar , Vadym Apalkov , Mark I. Stockman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords gappedgrapheneultrafastopticalpulseinterbandcurrentintrabandtransverseBerryconnectiontwo-bandtight-bindingmodelrectified
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies what happens when a few-femtosecond, linearly polarized pulse hits gapped graphene, in which a staggered on-site energy opens a bandgap and breaks inversion symmetry. It argues that when the pulse is polarized along the x-axis, which is not a symmetry axis of the crystal, the rectified current flows in the transverse y direction. More specifically, the transverse current has purely interband origin: the intraband contribution is exactly zero because the conduction-band population stays symmetric under $k_y \to -k_y$. If true, this gives a clean symmetry-based mechanism for generating ultrafast currents perpendicular to the field, with the sign of the transverse current set by the sublattice asymmetry rather than by the pulse direction.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-band tight-binding Hamiltonian of gapped graphene, with sublattice on-site energies $\pm\Delta/2$ and hopping amplitude $\gamma f(k)$, evolved through the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in a Houston-function basis. The load-bearing identity is the cancellation between the geometric phase $\varphi^{(B)}_{cv}$ and the phase of the non-Abelian Berry connection $A_{cv}$, which makes the interband coupling effectively symmetric under $k_y \to -k_y$. That symmetry enforces a conduction-band population symmetric about the x-axis, which in turn kills the intraband contribution to $J_y$ and leaves the transverse current as a purely interband observable.

What would settle it

Include a third band in the same Houston-function calculation and check whether the residual conduction-band population becomes asymmetric under $k_y \to -k_y$; a nonzero asymmetry would directly produce an intraband contribution to $J_y$. Experimentally, time-resolved ARPES imaging of the residual population after an x-polarized pulse could detect such an asymmetry and settle whether the intraband component is truly zero.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that in a two-band tight-binding model of gapped graphene with nearest-neighbor hopping and sublattice asymmetry $\Delta$, an x-polarized single-cycle pulse produces a residual conduction-band population $N_{\rm CB}(k_x,k_y)$ that is symmetric about the x-axis both during and after the pulse. Because the intraband transverse current is an odd function of $k_y$ weighted by this symmetric population, its contribution to $J_y$ vanishes, leaving the transverse current entirely interband. The paper attributes this population symmetry to an exact cancellation, within the two-band model, between the geometric (Berry) phase and the phase of the interband dipole matrix element. The same calculation yields the magnitude, sign, and time dependence of both current components as functions of bandgap and field amplitude, including the result that reversing the field maximum flips $J_x$ but not $J_y$, while reversing the sublattice asymmetry flips $J_y$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire result rests on an exact cancellation, inside the two-band model, between the geometric phase and the phase of the interband dipole matrix element, a property the paper states but does not prove here. If the two phases do not cancel exactly, electrons above and below the K point evolve differently, the conduction-band population becomes asymmetric, and an intraband transverse current appears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single x-polarized pulse transfers charge perpendicular to the field in gapped graphene, with the sign of the transverse charge set by the sign of the sublattice asymmetry rather than by the pulse direction.
  • The transverse current grows and oscillates with a bandgap-dependent frequency, making bandgap a tunable knob for all-optical current generation.
  • Because flipping the pulse maximum reverses the longitudinal current but leaves the transverse current unchanged, the two orthogonal currents can be controlled independently.
  • For pristine graphene ($\Delta=0$) the transverse current and transverse transferred charge vanish, so the effect is a direct signature of broken inversion symmetry.
  • Since the transverse current is purely interband, it samples the Berry connection directly and can serve as a probe of geometric-phase structure in two-dimensional semiconductors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry argument likely extends beyond graphene's specific parameters: any two-band honeycomb or hexagonal semiconductor with one mirror axis should show the same purely interband transverse current for an x-polarized pulse, including monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides.
  • If the two-band cancellation is exact, an experimental measurement of $J_y$ separates interband from intraband dynamics; any deviation from the predicted purely interband scaling with bandgap would quantify the multi-band topological-phase contributions the paper itself anticipates.
  • Applying the same Houston-function calculation to circularly polarized pulses would separate the valley-dependent geometric phase from the population-symmetry effect, isolating the topological part of the ultrafast current.
  • The deferred proof of the geometric-phase cancellation is the natural next target: if it fails at next order in the field, the intraband correction should appear first as a small asymmetry in tr-ARPES images of the residual population.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates coherent two-band electron dynamics in gapped graphene driven by a single-cycle, linearly x-polarized optical pulse. Starting from the tight-binding Hamiltonian in Eq. (3), the authors solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in the Houston basis, compute conduction-band population distributions and total currents, and decompose the current into intraband and interband contributions. The central claim is that the rectified current generated by an x-polarized pulse flows along y, that the conduction-band population remains symmetric under k_y -> -k_y, and that consequently the intraband contribution to the transverse current is exactly zero within the two-band model. The paper also reports how the currents and transferred charges depend on bandgap and field amplitude.

Significance. If the central claim is fully established, the paper provides a clean symmetry-based selection rule for light-field-driven currents in gapped graphene and a concrete experimental signature, namely a transverse rectified current for linear polarization along the non-symmetry axis. The work is a direct numerical solution of a standard model with no fitted parameters, and it makes falsifiable predictions for the dependence of the transferred charge on bandgap and amplitude. The main weakness is that the key analytical ingredient, the exact cancellation of the geometric phase and the interband dipole phase, is asserted but not proved, and one passage in the Results section contradicts the symmetry requirement stated in the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV (Conclusion), with Eqs. (19)–(24)] The exact cancellation of the geometric phase (11) and the phase of the interband Berry connection (23)–(24) is asserted in the Conclusion and deferred with the sentence 'This is the property of the two-band model of gapped graphene which will be discussed somewhere else.' This cancellation is load-bearing: without it, the conduction-band population need not be symmetric under k_y -> -k_y, and the intraband transverse current in Eq. (25) need not vanish. Please provide a self-contained proof, either in the main text or in an appendix, using the explicit expressions (12)–(13) and (23)–(24), and discuss whether the cancellation is gauge-invariant for the physical current. As written, the central claim rests on an unproved assertion.
  2. [Section III, paragraph beginning 'Redistribution of electrons between the VB and CB...'] The sentence 'Since the CB population distribution is symmetric with respect to the y-axis both during the pulse and after the pulse, the intraband transverse current, Jy, is zero' uses the wrong symmetry axis. The group velocity V_y^c in Eq. (27) is odd in k_y, so the vanishing intraband current requires symmetry about the x-axis, i.e., k_y -> -k_y, as stated in the abstract and conclusion. The same section also describes the population as symmetric about both axes. Please correct the axis identification and make the symmetry argument internally consistent.
  3. [Section III, Figs. 2–6 and Eq. (25)] Because the central claim is quantitative and no code or data are supplied, please add a direct numerical check from the TDSE data: compute the asymmetry integral S(t) = (e g_s / a^2) sum_q [N_CB(q,t) - N_CB(k_x, -k_y, t)] V_y^c(k(q,t)) and show that it vanishes to numerical precision during and after the pulse. This would substantiate the 'exactly zero' claim independently of the deferred phase-cancellation proof. The current figures are visual evidence; a computed zero of this asymmetry integral would be a much stronger and more reproducible check.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] There are several typographical errors, including 'nontrivital', 'scaterring', 'does not depends', and 'As the results'; these should be corrected during revision.
  2. [References] References 39 and 40 cite the same Houston paper; please consolidate them into a single reference.
  3. [Eq. (24)] The notation 'i3∆/2 Ec' should be written as 'i 3∆/(2 E_c)' for clarity, since the current formatting is ambiguous.
  4. [Section II (numerical implementation)] Please add numerical convergence details, including the sampling of the Brillouin zone, the time step, and the convergence criteria for the TDSE solutions, so that the reported currents and populations can be reproduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all central quantities are computed from the stated TDSE, with no fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central results—the residual conduction-band population, the intraband and interband current components, and the transferred charges—are computed by direct numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (1) with the stated tight-binding Hamiltonian (3) and pulse (31). No parameter is fitted to the target outcomes: the bandgap, hopping integral, lattice constant, and pulse amplitude are fixed inputs, and the reported currents and populations are printed outputs of the calculation. The claim that the transverse rectified current is purely interband rests on the numerical observation, shown in Figs. 2 and 3, that the CB population is symmetric under k_y -> -k_y, which makes the intraband transverse current vanish by Eq. (25) because the group velocity V_y in Eq. (27) is odd in k_y. The explanatory mechanism for this symmetry—exact cancellation of the geometric phase and the phase of the non-Abelian Berry connection—is stated in the Conclusion and deferred to future work, but it is an interpretation of the computed result rather than an input assumption. The absence of a proof of this cancellation is a completeness or reproducibility concern, not circularity, especially because the symmetry itself is directly visible in the reported population distributions. Self-citations appear for background, prior methods, and the previously predicted topological resonance, but none of these are used as the sole justification for the present paper's central claim. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, and no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses standard tight-binding, Houston functions, and non-Abelian Berry connections. There are no fitted free parameters and no invented physical entities. The bandgap and pulse parameters are swept input conditions, not fitted values. The only ad hoc premise is the phase-cancellation property, which is asserted rather than derived. The coherent limit and the pulse waveform are domain assumptions rather than free parameters.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Two-band nearest-neighbor tight-binding model of gapped graphene (Hamiltonian Eq. 3) with only conduction and valence bands.
    All results are computed in this model. The paper itself notes that including more bands would break the symmetry argument and introduce an intraband contribution to the transverse current.
  • domain assumption Coherent electron dynamics without scattering (scattering time longer than 10 fs, stated in Sec. II).
    Justifies solving the TDSE without relaxation, but also causes the post-pulse interband current to oscillate indefinitely, making the infinite-time integral in Eq. (32) ill-defined.
  • domain assumption The single-cycle pulse waveform F0 (1-2u^2) e^{-u^2} in Eq. (31).
    A modeling choice. Quantitative results such as the oscillations of Q_y versus F0 depend on this specific shape and on the choice tau = 1 fs.
  • ad hoc to paper Exact cancellation of the geometric phase and the interband dipole phase in the two-band model.
    Asserted in the Conclusion and deferred to a future publication. This is the load-bearing premise for the symmetric CB population and the zero intraband transverse current.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrafast optical currents in gapped graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NOXRIJ5V

@misc{pith2026190809019,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrafast optical currents in gapped graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NOXRIJ5V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09019}
}
abstract

We study theoretically the interaction of ultrashort optical pulses with gapped graphene. Such strong pulse results in finite conduction band population and corresponding electric current both during and after the pulse. Since gapped graphene has broken inversion symmetry, it has an axial symmetry about the $y$-axis but not about the $x$-axis. We show that, in this case, if the linear pulse is polarized along the $x$-axis, the rectified electric current is generated in the $y$ direction. At the same time, the conduction band population distribution in the reciprocal space is symmetric about the $x$-axis. Thus, the rectified current in gapped graphene has inter-band origin, while the intra-band contribution to the rectified current is zero.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09019 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) (a) The honeycomb lattice structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) The residual CB population [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Thus, if the linear optical pulse is polarized along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) The CB population [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The current densities in gapped graphene are shown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The transferred charge densities are shown as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Schiffrin , author T

    author author A. Schiffrin , author T. Paasch-Colberg , author N. Karpowicz , author V. Apalkov , author D. Gerster , author S. Muhlbrandt , author M. Korbman , author J. Reichert , author M. Schultze , author S. Holzner , author J. V. \ Barth , author R. Kienberger , author R. Ernstorfer , author V. S. \ Yakovlev , author M. I. \ Stockman , \ and\ author...

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Apalkov \ and\ author M

    author author V. Apalkov \ and\ author M. I. \ Stockman ,\ title title Theory of dielectric nanofilms in strong ultrafast optical fields , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 165118--1--13 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Higuchi , author C

    author author T. Higuchi , author C. Heide , author K. Ullmann , author H. B. \ Weber , \ and\ author P. Hommelhoff ,\ title title Light-field-driven currents in graphene , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 550 ,\ pages 224--228 ( year 2017 a ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    \ Wilhelm , author Rémi \ Pétuya , author Valerie \ Smejkal , author Roland \ Kozubek , author Anke \ Hierzenberger , author Bernhard C

    author author Elisabeth \ Gruber , author Richard A. \ Wilhelm , author Rémi \ Pétuya , author Valerie \ Smejkal , author Roland \ Kozubek , author Anke \ Hierzenberger , author Bernhard C. \ Bayer , author Iñigo \ Aldazabal , author Andrey K. \ Kazansky , author Florian \ Libisch , author Arkady V. \ Krasheninnikov , author Marika \ Schleberger , author ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    author author S. A. Oliaei \ Motlagh , author V. Apalkov , \ and\ author M. I. \ Stockman ,\ title title Interaction of crystalline topological insulator with an ultrashort laser pulse , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 085438--1--8 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    author author S. A. O. \ Motlagh , author J. S. \ Wu , author V. Apalkov , \ and\ author M. I. \ Stockman ,\ title title Fundamentally fastest optical processes at the surface of a topological insulator , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.125410 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 98 ,\ pages 125410--1--11 ( year 2018 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.125410

  7. [7]

    Nematollahi , author S

    author author F. Nematollahi , author S. A. O. \ Motlagh , author V. Apalkov , \ and\ author M. I. \ Stockman ,\ title title Weyl semimetals in ultrafast laser fields , \ ARTN 245409 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.245409 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 245409--1--9 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.245409

  8. [8]

    Heide , author T

    author author C. Heide , author T. Higuchi , author H. B. \ Weber , \ and\ author P. Hommelhoff ,\ title title Coherent electron trajectory control in graphene , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 207401--1--5 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    author author Yong Sing \ You , author Yanchun \ Yin , author Yi Wu , author Andrew \ Chew , author Xiaoming \ Ren , author Fengjiang \ Zhuang , author Shima \ Gholam-Mirzaei , author Michael \ Chini , author Zenghu \ Chang , \ and\ author Shambhu \ Ghimire ,\ title title High...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author H. Z. \ Liu , author Y. L. \ Li , author Y. S. \ You , author S. Ghimire , author T. F. \ Heinz , \ and\ author D. A. \ Reis ,\ title title High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 26...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Kaiser , author B

    author author A. Kaiser , author B. Rethfeld , author M. Vicanek , \ and\ author G. Simon ,\ title title Microscopic processes in dielectrics under irradiation by subpicosecond laser pulses , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 61 ,\ pages 11437--11450 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  4. [12]

    author author Christian \ Heide , author Tobias \ Boolakee , author Takuya \ Higuchi , author Heiko B. \ Weber , \ and\ author Peter \ Hommelhoff ,\ title title Interaction of carrier envelope phase-stable laser pulses with graphene: the transition from the weak-field to the s...

    1903 arXiv

  5. [13]

    \ Jones , author Jason S

    author author Dong \ Sun , author Grant \ Aivazian , author Aaron M. \ Jones , author Jason S. \ Ross , author Wang \ Yao , author David \ Cobden , \ and\ author Xiaodong \ Xu ,\ title title Ultrafast hot-carrier-dominated photocurrent in graphene , \ 10.1038/nnano.2011.243 ht...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author Hiroki \ Mashiko , author Yuta \ Chisuga , author Ikufumi \ Katayama , author Katsuya \ Oguri , author Hiroyuki \ Masuda , author Jun \ Takeda , \ and\ author Hideki \ Gotoh ,\ title title Multi-petahertz electron interference in cr:al2o3 solid-state material , \...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author Hee Jun \ Shin , author Van Luan \ Nguyen , author Seong Chu \ Lim , \ and\ author Joo-Hiuk \ Son ,\ title title Ultrafast nonlinear travel of hot carriers driven by high-field terahertz pulse , \ 10.1088/1361-6455/aac59a journal journal Journal of Physics B: Ato...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author Takuya \ Higuchi , author Christian \ Heide , author Konrad \ Ullmann , author Heiko B. \ Weber , \ and\ author Peter \ Hommelhoff ,\ title title Light-field-driven currents in graphene , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 550 ,\ pages 224--228 ( year 2017 b...

    2017

  9. [17]

    Trushin , author A

    author author M. Trushin , author A. Grupp , author G. Soavi , author A. Budweg , author D. De \ Fazio , author U. Sassi , author A. Lombardo , author A. C. \ Ferrari , author W. Belzig , author A. Leitenstorfer , \ and\ author D. Brida ,\ title title Ultrafast pseudospin dyna...

    2015

  10. [18]

    Koochaki \ Kelardeh , author V

    author author H. Koochaki \ Kelardeh , author V. Apalkov , \ and\ author M. I. \ Stockman ,\ title title Graphene superlattices in strong circularly polarized fields: Chirality, Berry phase, and attosecond dynamics , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 07...

    2017

  11. [19]

    author author S. A. Oliaei \ Motlagh , author J.-S. \ Wu , author V. Apalkov , \ and\ author M. I. \ Stockman ,\ title title Femtosecond valley polarization and topological resonances in transition metal dichalcogenides , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 98 ,\ pag...

    2018

  12. [20]

    Sun , author J

    author author D. Sun , author J. W. \ Lai , author J. C. \ Ma , author Q. S. \ Wang , \ and\ author J. Liu ,\ title title Review of ultrafast spectroscopy studies of valley carrier dynamics in two-dimensional semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides , \ Artn 037801 10.1...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author Jun \ Zhang , author Hao \ Ouyang , author Xin \ Zheng , author Jie \ You , author Runze \ Chen , author Tong \ Zhou , author Yizhen \ Sui , author Yu Liu , author Xiang'ai \ Cheng , \ and\ author Tian \ Jiang ,\ title title Ultrafast saturable absorption of mos2...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author S. Z. \ Butler , author S. M. \ Hollen , author L. Y. \ Cao , author Y. Cui , author J. A. \ Gupta , author H. R. \ Gutierrez , author T. F. \ Heinz , author S. S. \ Hong , author J. X. \ Huang , author A. F. \ Ismach , author E. Johnston-Halperin , author M. Kun...

  15. [23]

    author author A. K. \ Geim \ and\ author K. S. \ Novoselov ,\ title title The rise of graphene , \ @noop journal journal Nat Mater \ volume 6 ,\ pages 183--191 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  16. [24]

    author author A. H. Castro \ Neto , author F. Guinea , author N. M. R. \ Peres , author K. S. \ Novoselov , \ and\ author A. K. \ Geim ,\ title title The electronic properties of graphene , \ @noop journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 109--162 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  17. [25]

    author author K. S. \ Novoselov , author A. K. \ Geim , author S. V. \ Morozov , author D. Jiang , author M. I. \ Katsnelson , author I. V. \ Grigorieva , author S. V. \ Dubonos , \ and\ author A. A. \ Firsov ,\ title title Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in gra...

    2005

  18. [26]

    Kormanyos , author G

    author author A. Kormanyos , author G. Burkard , author M. Gmitra , author J. Fabian , author V. Zolyomi , author N. D. \ Drummond , \ and\ author V. Fal'ko ,\ title title k.p theory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors (vol 2, 022001, 2015) , \ @...

    2015

  19. [27]

    author author J. W. \ Jiang ,\ title title Graphene versus MoS _2 : A short review , \ @noop journal journal Frontiers of Physics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 287--302 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  20. [28]

    Ye , author J

    author author Y. Ye , author J. Xiao , author H. L. \ Wang , author Z. L. \ Ye , author H. Y. \ Zhu , author M. Zhao , author Y. Wang , author J. H. \ Zhao , author X. B. \ Yin , \ and\ author X. Zhang ,\ title title Electrical generation and control of the valley carriers in ...

    2016

  21. [29]

    Jariwala , author V

    author author D. Jariwala , author V. K. \ Sangwan , author L. J. \ Lauhon , author T. J. \ Marks , \ and\ author M. C. \ Hersam ,\ title title Emerging device applications for semiconducting two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides , \ @noop journal journal Acs Nano \...

    2014

  22. [30]

    author author M. S. \ Nevius , author M. Conrad , author F. Wang , author A. Celis , author M. N. \ Nair , author A. Taleb-Ibrahimi , author A. Tejeda , \ and\ author E. H. \ Conrad ,\ title title Semiconducting graphene from highly ordered substrate interactions , \ @noop jou...

    2015

  23. [31]

    Jariwala , author A

    author author D. Jariwala , author A. Srivastava , \ and\ author P. M. \ Ajayan ,\ title title Graphene synthesis and band gap opening , \ @noop journal journal J. Nanosci. Nanotechno. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 6621--6641 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  24. [32]

    author author E. H. \ Hwang \ and\ author S. Das \ Sarma ,\ title title Single-particle relaxation time versus transport scattering time in a two-dimensional graphene layer , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 77 ,\ pages 195412--1--6 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  25. [33]

    Breusing , author S

    author author M. Breusing , author S. Kuehn , author T. Winzer , author E. Malic , author F. Milde , author N. Severin , author J. P. \ Rabe , author C. Ropers , author A. Knorr , \ and\ author T. Elsaesser ,\ title title Ultrafast nonequilibrium carrier dynamics in a single g...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author Ermin \ Malic , author Torben \ Winzer , author Evgeny \ Bobkin , \ and\ author Andreas \ Knorr ,\ title title Microscopic theory of absorption and ultrafast many-particle kinetics in graphene , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 84 ,\ pages 205406 ( y...

    2011

  27. [35]

    Brida , author A

    author author D. Brida , author A. Tomadin , author C. Manzoni , author Y. J. \ Kim , author A. Lombardo , author S. Milana , author R. R. \ Nair , author K. S. \ Novoselov , author A. C. \ Ferrari , author G. Cerullo , \ and\ author M. Polini ,\ title title Ultrafast collinea...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Gierz , author J

    author author I. Gierz , author J. C. \ Petersen , author M. Mitrano , author C. Cacho , author I. C. \ Turcu , author E. Springate , author A. Stohr , author A. Kohler , author U. Starke , \ and\ author A. Cavalleri ,\ title title Snapshots of non-equilibrium Dirac carrier di...

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author Andrea \ Tomadin , author Daniele \ Brida , author Giulio \ Cerullo , author Andrea C. \ Ferrari , \ and\ author Marco \ Polini ,\ title title Nonequilibrium dynamics of photoexcited electrons in graphene: Collinear scattering, Auger processes, and the impact of ...

    2013

  30. [38]

    author author Thomas G. \ Pedersen , author Antti-Pekka \ Jauho , \ and\ author Kjeld \ Pedersen ,\ title title Optical response and excitons in gapped graphene , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.113406 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 79 ,\ pages 113406 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author W. V. \ Houston ,\ title title Acceleration of electrons in a crystal lattice , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 57 ,\ pages 184--186 ( year 1940 a ) NoStop

    1940

  32. [40]

    author author W. V. \ Houston ,\ title title Acceleration of electrons in a crystal lattice , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 57 ,\ pages 184--186 ( year 1940 b ) NoStop

    1940

  33. [41]

    Wilczek \ and\ author A

    author author F. Wilczek \ and\ author A. Zee ,\ title title Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 2111--2114 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  34. [42]

    Xiao , author M.-C

    author author D. Xiao , author M.-C. \ Chang , \ and\ author Q. Niu ,\ title title Berry phase effects on electronic properties , \ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 82 ,\ pages 1959--2007 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    1959

  35. [43]

    Yang \ and\ author R

    author author F. Yang \ and\ author R. B. \ Liu ,\ title title Nonlinear optical response induced by non- Abelian Berry curvature in time-reversal-invariant insulators , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 245205 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  36. [44]

    author author H. K. \ Kelardeh , author V. Apalkov , \ and\ author M. I. \ Stockman ,\ title title Graphene in ultrafast and superstrong laser fields , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 045439--1--8 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  37. [45]

    Liu , author G

    author author Y. Liu , author G. Bian , author T. Miller , \ and\ author T. C. \ Chiang ,\ title title Visualizing electronic chirality and Berry phases in graphene systems using photoemission with circularly polarized light , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume ...

    2011

  38. [46]

    author author A. F. \ Kemper , author M. A. \ Sentef , author B. Moritz , author T. P. \ Devereaux , \ and\ author J. K. \ Freericks ,\ title title Review of the theoretical description of time-resolved angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy in electron-phonon mediated supe...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.