Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Center in Your Neighborhood: Fairness in Facility Location

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.09041 v2 pith:C7V2EA5X submitted 2019-08-23 cs.DS cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.DScs.LGstat.ML
keywords facilitiesfactorneighborhoodradiusalgorithmalgorithmsclusteringfacility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

When selecting locations for a set of facilities, standard clustering algorithms may place unfair burden on some individuals and neighborhoods. We formulate a fairness concept that takes local population densities into account. In particular, given $k$ facilities to locate and a population of size $n$, we define the "neighborhood radius" of an individual $i$ as the minimum radius of a ball centered at $i$ that contains at least $n/k$ individuals. Our objective is to ensure that each individual has a facility within at most a small constant factor of her neighborhood radius. We present several theoretical results: We show that optimizing this factor is NP-hard; we give an approximation algorithm that guarantees a factor of at most 2 in all metric spaces; and we prove matching lower bounds in some metric spaces. We apply a variant of this algorithm to real-world address data, showing that it is quite different from standard clustering algorithms and outperforms them on our objective function and balances the load between facilities more evenly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Fair Epsilon Net and Geometric Hitting Set

    cs.DS 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Fair epsilon-nets and fair geometric hitting sets can be computed with provable size overhead, while some custom-ratio fair epsilon-samples are impossible.

  2. Welfare-Centric Clustering

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Formalizes Rawlsian and Utilitarian welfare-centric clustering objectives and claims new algorithms that outperform existing fair clustering baselines.

Pith tools