Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

H\"older regularity for the spectrum of translation flows

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that for almost every translation flow on a flat surface of any genus at least two, spectral measures of Lipschitz functions satisfy a power-law upper bound, uniformly on compact frequency intervals.

desk verdict A genuine, clean generalization of Hölder spectrum regularity to all genera via a vector-form Erdős–Kahane argument, with the main caveat being a heavy but legitimate reliance on a then-unpublished recognizability theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09347 v3 pith:N4OUMOPQ submitted 2019-08-25 math.DS

Alexander I. Bufetov , Boris Solomyak This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DS MSC 37A3037A2537E3537B10
keywords HölderregularityspectralmeasurestranslationflowsAbeliandifferentialsMarkovcompactaS-adicsystemsErdős–Kahaneargumentweakmixing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that generic translation flows on flat surfaces of any genus $g\ge 2$ have spectrally regular behavior: for Masur–Veech almost every Abelian differential, the spectral measure of every Lipschitz function assigns mass to a small frequency interval that decays like a power of the interval length, uniformly over compact frequency ranges. Such power-law control is the natural quantitative form of weak mixing, going beyond the earlier qualitative theorem that almost every translation flow is weakly mixing. The argument upgrades a symbolic method previously used in genus 2 by running the Erdős–Kahane Diophantine approximation argument in vector form, and thereby covers all genera at once. If correct, the result closes the gap between low-genus estimates and arbitrary genus, and also yields uniform sub-polynomial growth bounds on twisted Birkhoff integrals.

What carries the argument

The engine is a vector-valued Erdős–Kahane Diophantine argument applied to the renormalization cocycle $A(n,a)$. Writing $A(n,a)(\omega\vec s)=\vec K_n+\vec\varepsilon_n$ with $\vec K_n\in\mathbb Z^m$ and $\|\vec\varepsilon_n\|$ the distance to the lattice, the paper counts possible successors of $\vec K_n$: there are at most exponentially many choices when a remainder is large, and the successor is forced when two successive remainders are both small. Feeding this counting into a covering argument gives the Hausdorff dimension bound for the exceptional set $E(\varrho,\delta,B)$ of height vectors for which the good-return times are too sparse. A quantitative weak-mixing criterion then converts density of good returns into the Hölder bound. A key supporting object is the family of good return words for a substitution $\zeta$ whose population vectors generate $\mathbb Z^m$, which equates the distance of the scalar products to the lattice distance.

What would settle it

Look for a positive-measure family of coded flows within the random S-adic ensemble for which the decomposition into blocks is not unique at some level, or find in a single stratum a positive-measure set of surfaces whose conditional measures on cohomology fibres have Hausdorff dimension at most $2g-\kappa$; either finding would invalidate the dimension bound on the exceptional set and hence the almost-everywhere power-law conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1: there is a universal $\gamma>0$ such that for $\mu_H$-almost every Abelian differential $(M,\omega)$ in any stratum $H$ of genus $g\ge2$, for every $B>1$, one has $\sigma_f([\lambda-r,\lambda+r])\le C(\omega,B)\|f\|_L r^\gamma$ for all Lipschitz $f$, all $\lambda\in[B^{-1},B]$, and all small $r>0$. The equivalent Theorem 1.3 asserts that the twisted Birkhoff integrals $S_R^{(x)}(f,\lambda)=\int_0^R e^{-2\pi i\lambda\tau} f(h_\tau x)\,d\tau$ satisfy $|S_R^{(x)}(f,\lambda)|\le C'R^\alpha$ with $\alpha<1$, uniformly in $x$ and in $\lambda$ on compact frequency intervals. The proof derives the spectral measure bound from the Birkhoff integral bound by a standard Fourier argument, and derives the Birkhoff bound from a quantified weak-mixing criterion: if the cocycle orbit $A(n,a)(\omega\vec s)$ is often at distance at least $\varrho$ from the integer lattice, uniformly in frequency, then the Hölder exponent is explicit in the density $\delta$ of such good times. The main work is to show that, for Lebesgue-almost every height vector in any Oseledets subspace containing the unstable subspace, this quantified criterion holds; the complementary exceptional set has Hausdorff dimension strictly less than the ambient dimension, by a vector version of the Erdős–Kahane counting argument.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on every coded flow having a unique decomposition into basic blocks at every refinement level; if even a small measure of coded flows lacked this uniqueness, the approximation argument would break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every stratum of genus $g\ge2$, Masur–Veech almost every vertical translation flow has spectral measures with a uniform power-law upper bound on compact frequency intervals, quantifying weak mixing with an explicit rate.
  • Twisted Birkhoff integrals of Lipschitz observables grow sublinearly, uniformly in the starting point, for almost every translation flow; this uniformity is stronger than the $L^2$ estimate needed for the spectral measure conclusion.
  • The same Hölder conclusion holds under the more general invariant measures described in Remark 1.2, provided the conditional measures on the cohomology fibres have Hausdorff dimension at least $2g-\kappa+\delta$; for the Masur–Veech measure this condition holds with $\kappa=g$ and any $\delta<1$.
  • The symbolic theorem applies to any random S-adic system satisfying the stated conditions, so Hölder spectral regularity follows from the positive Lyapunov spectrum of the renormalization cocycle rather than from flat geometry alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit formula for the Hölder exponent in terms of the density $\delta$, the threshold $\varrho$, and the top Lyapunov exponent suggests that numerical values of Lyapunov exponents for specific strata could be converted into explicit power-law exponents; the paper does not compute these constants.
  • Because the argument needs only at least two positive Lyapunov exponents and simplicity of the top exponent, one could test the same mechanism on other parabolic or partially hyperbolic flows carrying a cocycle over a hyperbolic base, where the analogous exceptional-set dimension bound should hold.
  • The all-level recognizability input is imported from a preprint; a natural stress test is to look for minimal S-adic systems satisfying conditions (A1)–(A2) that fail recognizability at some level, since the Kakutani–Rokhlin partitions and the approximation of weakly Lipschitz functions by cylindrical functions would break for such systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proves Hölder regularity of spectral measures for generic translation flows on flat surfaces of genus g≥2 (Theorems 1.1 and 1.3). The proof works through a symbolic S-adic representation: for a random S-adic system satisfying conditions (C1)-(C2) and (a)-(d), the authors establish quantitative bounds for twisted Birkhoff integrals with exponent 1-γ/2 and spectral-measure bounds with exponent γ, outside a small exceptional set of roof vectors (Theorem 3.2). The new technical core is a vector form of the Erdős-Kahane Diophantine argument (Sections 5-6), which replaces the scalar estimates of [10] and yields Proposition 5.4 on the Hausdorff dimension of the exceptional set; a quantitative Veech criterion (Proposition 5.2) converts this into the Hölder bounds. The final section verifies the hypotheses for the Masur-Veech measure using Veech's zippered-rectangle construction, Forni's Lyapunov spectrum, and imported results from [10] and [4].

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.1 resolves the higher-genus case of Sinai's question on local spectral asymptotics for translation flows, matching Forni's independent result and generalizing the genus-2 work. The paper's main contribution is a simpler, symbolic proof that reduces the problem to a quantitative Veech criterion and a vector Diophantine approximation, with an explicit mechanism for the Hölder exponent γ in (5.4). Strengths include the clean Lemma 5.1 passing from scalar to vector Diophantine approximation, the sound entropy estimate in Proposition 5.4 with the factor δ log(1/δ)→0, and the transparent derivation of Theorem 1.1 from Theorem 3.2. The heavy reliance on imported results, especially [4, Theorem 3.1], is the main risk.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (2.6)] The unique representation (2.6), the Kakutani-Rokhlin partitions (2.7), the level-ℓ cylindrical functions (2.5), and the measure relations (2.8)-(2.10) all rest on the all-level recognizability theorem [4, Theorem 3.1], which is imported from a preprint and is neither stated nor proved in this manuscript. The text justifies the application only by saying that (A1) implies minimality, but the reader cannot verify that [4]'s hypotheses are satisfied by the S-adic systems arising in Sections 3 and 7, nor that its notion of recognizability coincides with the uniqueness in (2.6). Since Lemma 4.5 and hence Theorem 3.2 use these level-ℓ cylindrical functions as the approximation class for arbitrary weakly Lipschitz functions, a failure of recognizability on a positive-measure set of sequences would invalidate the symbolic model and the main theorem. Please state the precise form of [4, Theorem 3.1] used, verify its hypotheses, or give a self-contained proof.
  2. [§7, condition (3.3)] Condition (d) of Theorem 3.2, the exponential return-time estimate (3.3), is verified only by a reference to [10, Prop. 11.3]. This estimate is needed for Proposition 4.2, hence for the covering argument in Proposition 5.4; it is therefore load-bearing. After the induction to Ω_q in Section 4.1, the relevant system is the induced system on [q.q] with a different cocycle, and the conditional distributions change; the manuscript should explain why [10, Prop. 11.3] applies verbatim to this induced system, or provide the necessary verification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Proposition 5.4] The statement says 'There exist ρ>0' before δ is chosen, but the proof defines ρ as a function of δ in (6.5); the quantifier order should be corrected.
  2. [§5, Eq. (5.6)] The inequality reducing δN−ℓ−2 to δ logR/(8θ1) silently assumes R is sufficiently large (roughly R ≥ exp(48θ1/δ)); this should be stated explicitly.
  3. [§6, final paragraph] The expression 'exp[(θκ−ε)Nβ]' should read 'exp[β(θκ−ε)N]' for the claimed covering count.
  4. [Theorem 3.2] The term 'admissible word' is used in condition (b) but is defined only in Section 7; the definition should be moved before Theorem 3.2.
  5. [§7, verification of condition (a)] Theorem 3.2(a) requires simplicity of the top Lyapunov exponent, but the verification in Section 7 cites Forni [16] only for the number of positive Lyapunov exponents; an explicit reference or proof for simplicity should be added.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Hölder exponent and spectral bounds are derived from the quantitative Veech criterion; imported estimates are prior published theorems, not fitted inputs or conclusion-equivalent assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation is structurally non-circular. The Hölder exponent is not chosen to match the conclusion: in Proposition 5.2 it is explicitly produced as gamma = min{delta/16, -delta log(1 - c1 rho^2)/(8 theta1)} from the quantitative Veech criterion (5.3), and Proposition 5.4 then bounds the Hausdorff dimension of the exceptional set from which that criterion is obtained. The passage from bounds on twisted Birkhoff integrals to spectral measure estimates is made through the standard Fourier-analytic Lemma 2.3, which is quoted from the authors' earlier publication [9] but is an independent, published standard lemma, not a restatement of the target Theorem 1.1. The paper does import several substantial results from the authors' prior work, notably Proposition 4.2 (Prop. 6.1 in [10]), Proposition 4.4 (Prop. 7.1 in [10]), and the exponential return-time estimate (3.3) from [10, Prop. 11.3]. These are cited as established theorems with their own assumptions and proofs, not as fitting procedures or as renaming the conclusion; they concern tail estimates and twisted Birkhoff sums in the symbolic setting, not the all-genus spectral Hölder regularity that is derived here. The recognizability theorem [4, Theorem 3.1] is external to the authors and is used to justify the symbolic representation (2.6) and cylindrical functions (2.5); if that theorem failed or had additional hypotheses, the symbolic reduction would indeed break, but that is a correctness risk or an incompleteness in verification, not a circularity. None of the seven circularity patterns is exhibited: there is no definition of an input in terms of the output, no fitted parameter later called a prediction, no load-bearing self-citation that itself asserts the target result, and no renaming of a known result as a new derivation. The paper is not fully self-contained because it relies on prior work, but reliance on independent published theorems does not amount to circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard ergodic-theoretic tools (Oseledets theorem, Stirling estimates), on established results about translation flows (Veech, Zorich, Forni, Hubbard-Masur), and on the authors' own earlier published work [6,10] for the symbolic coding, twisted Birkhoff estimates, exponential tails, and return-time estimates. The only non-peer-reviewed input is the recognizability theorem of Berthé et al. [4], cited from an arXiv preprint. There are no free parameters fitted to data and no invented entities beyond the mathematical objects constructed in the proof.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Oseledets multiplicative ergodic theorem for the renormalization cocycle A(n,a): existence of Lyapunov exponents θ1>θ2>...>θr and of the measurable Oseledets decomposition (3.2), with uniform convergence on unit spheres.
    Invoked in Section 3 to define strong unstable and stable subspaces and Oseledets subspaces H_J_a, and used in Section 6 to control the contraction of stable projections in (6.2).
  • domain assumption Forni's theorem [16]: under the Masur-Veech measure the Kontsevich-Zorich cocycle has exactly g positive Lyapunov exponents, with a simple top exponent.
    Section 7 uses this to verify condition (a) of Theorem 3.2 (κ=g≥2) and to obtain dim(Eu_a)=g in Proposition 5.4.
  • domain assumption Zorich's theorem [33]: the functions a↦log(1+‖A^{±1}(a)‖) are integrable for the Masur-Veech measure.
    Section 7: 'Condition (C2) holds by a theorem of Zorich'; needed to apply the Oseledets theorem.
  • domain assumption Veech's zippered-rectangle construction and Bufetov's symbolic coding Ξ_R from [6, Section 4] realize almost every translation flow as a special flow over an S-adic system.
    Section 2.1 and Section 7 use this to pass from the surface flow to the symbolic model required by Theorem 3.2.
  • domain assumption Berthé, Steiner, Thuswaldner and Yassawi [4, Theorem 3.1]: under conditions (A1)-(A2) the S-adic system is recognizable at all levels, giving the unique representation (2.6) and the Kakutani-Rokhlin partitions (2.7).
    Section 2.3: 'by [4, Theorem 3.1]... recognizable at all levels'; this is the basis for level-ℓ cylindrical functions and Lemma 4.5.
  • domain assumption Twisted Birkhoff integral estimates for cylindrical functions via matrix Riesz products, from [10, Prop. 7.1], stated as Proposition 4.4.
    Section 4.3: 'The proposition was proved in [10, Prop. 7.1]... we do not repeat it here'; it yields the product estimate (5.5).
  • domain assumption Exponential tails for large renormalization steps from [10, Prop. 6.1] (Proposition 4.2) and the return-time moment estimate from [10, Prop. 11.3] (condition (3.3)).
    Section 4.2 and Section 7: Corollary 4.3 controls the number of large W_{n+1}, and (3.3) is verified by [10, Prop. 11.3]; both underpin the exceptional-set dimension bound in Proposition 5.4.
  • domain assumption Hubbard-Masur theorem on cohomological coordinates, giving the fibration F of fibre dimension 2g-1 over the stratum.
    Remark 1.2: needed to formulate the conditional-measure Hausdorff dimension condition (2g-κ+δ) under which Theorem 1.1 extends to other measures.
  • standard math Standard entropy estimate for binomial coefficients (Stirling), used to bound ∑_{i<δN} binom(N,i) by exp(L2 log(1/δ) δN).
    Section 6, proof of Proposition 5.4, around (6.10); requires the fact δ log(1/δ)→0 as δ→0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of H\"older regularity for the spectrum of translation flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N4OUMOPQ

@misc{pith2026190809347,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: H\"older regularity for the spectrum of translation flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N4OUMOPQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09347}
}
abstract

The paper is devoted to generic translation flows corresponding to Abelian differentials on flat surfaces of arbitrary genus $g\ge 2$. These flows are weakly mixing by the Avila-Forni theorem. In genus 2, the H\"older property for the spectral measures of these flows was established in our papers [10,12]. Recently Forni [17], motivated by [10], obtained H\"older estimates for spectral measures in the case of surfaces of arbitrary genus. Here we combine Forni's idea with the symbolic approach of [10] and prove H\"older regularity for spectral measures of flows on random Markov compacta, in particular, for translation flows in all genera.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Twisted Translation Flows and Effective Weak Mixing

    math.DS 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For almost all translation flows in every stratum of Abelian differentials, the paper proves power-law bounds on twisted ergodic integrals, Hölder regularity of spectral measures, and effective weak mixing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [10]

    Bufetov and Boris Solomyak, The H¨ older pr operty for the spectrum of translation flows in genus two, Israel J

    Alexander I. Bufetov and Boris Solomyak, The H¨ older pr operty for the spectrum of translation flows in genus two, Israel J. Math. 223 (2018), no. 1, 205–259

    work page 2018

  2. [4]

    Recognizability for sequences of morphisms

    V. Berth´ e, W. Steiner, J. Thuswaldner, and R. Yassawi, R ecognizability for sequences of morphisms, Preprint arXiv:1705.00167

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [1]

    Weak mixing for interval exchange transformations and translation flows

    Avila, Artur; Forni, Giovanni. Weak mixing for interval exchange transformations and translation flows. Annals of Mathematics 165 (2007), 637–664

    work page 2007

  4. [2]

    Nonuniform hyperbolicit y

    Barreira, Luis; Pesin, Yakov. Nonuniform hyperbolicit y. Dynamics of systems with nonzero Lyapunov expo- nents. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications , 115. Cambridge University Press 2007

    work page 2007

  5. [3]

    Numeration and substitution 2012, 81–123, RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu,B46, Res

    Berth´ e, Valerie and Vincent Delecroix, Beyond substitutive dynamical systems: S-adic expansions. Numeration and substitution 2012, 81–123, RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu,B46, Res. Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [5]

    Bufetov, Alexander I. Decay of correlations for the Rauz y–Veech–Zorich induction map on the space of interval exchange transformations and the Central Limit Theorem for the Teichm¨ uller Flow on the moduli space of Abelian differentials. Journal of the American Mathematical Society 19 (2006), no. 3, 579–623

    work page 2006

  7. [6]

    Limit theorems for special flows ov er Vershik’s automorphisms

    Bufetov, Alexander I. Limit theorems for special flows ov er Vershik’s automorphisms. Russian Mathematical Surveys 68 (2013), no. 5, 789–860

    work page 2013

  8. [7]

    Limit theorems for translation flo ws

    Bufetov, Alexander I. Limit theorems for translation flo ws. Annals of Mathematics 179 (2014), no. 2, 431–499

    work page 2014

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    Bufetov and B

    A. Bufetov and B. M. Gurevich. Existence and uniqueness o f the measure of maximal entropy for the Te- ichm¨ uller flow on the moduli space of Abelian differentials. Sbornik: Mathematics 202 (2011), no. 7, 935–970

    2011

  2. [9]

    On the modulus o f continuity for spectral measures in substitution dynamics

    Bufetov, Alexander I.; Solomyak, Boris. On the modulus o f continuity for spectral measures in substitution dynamics. Advances in Mathematics 260 (2014), 84–129

    2014

  3. [11]

    Bufetov and Boris Solomyak, On ergodic ave rages for parabolic product flows, Bull

    Alexander I. Bufetov and Boris Solomyak, On ergodic ave rages for parabolic product flows, Bull. Soc. Math. France 146 (2018), no. 4, 613–628

    2018

  4. [12]

    Bufetov and Boris Solomyak, A spectral coc ycle for substitution systems and translation flows

    Alexander I. Bufetov and Boris Solomyak, A spectral coc ycle for substitution systems and translation flows. Preprint arXiv: 1802.04783

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    On the smoothness properties of Bernoull i convolutions

    Erd˝ os, Paul. On the smoothness properties of Bernoull i convolutions. Amer. J. Math. 62 (1940), 180–186

    1940

  6. [14]

    Techniques in fractal geometry , John Wiley & Sons, 1997

    Falconer, Kenneth J. Techniques in fractal geometry , John Wiley & Sons, 1997

    1997

  7. [15]

    Fogg, Substitutions in dynamics, arithmetics and combinatorics , Edited by V

    Pytheas N. Fogg, Substitutions in dynamics, arithmetics and combinatorics , Edited by V. Berth´ e, S. Ferenczi, C. Mauduit and A. Siegel. Lecture Notes in Math., 1794, Sprin ger, Berlin, 2002

    2002

  8. [16]

    Deviation of ergodic averages for are a-preserving flows on surfaces of higher genus

    Forni, Giovanni. Deviation of ergodic averages for are a-preserving flows on surfaces of higher genus. Annals of Mathematics (2) 155 (2002), no. 1, 1–103

    2002

  9. [17]

    Twisted translation flows and effectiv e weak mixing

    Forni, Giovanni. Twisted translation flows and effectiv e weak mixing. Preprint (2019). H ¨OLDER REGULARITY FOR THE SPECTRUM OF TRANSLATION FLOWS 25

    2019

  10. [18]

    Sur la distribution de certaines s´ eries al´ eatoires.Colloque Th

    Kahane, Jean-Pierre. Sur la distribution de certaines s´ eries al´ eatoires.Colloque Th. Nombres [1969, Bordeaux], Bull. Soc. math. France , M´ emoire 25 (1971), 119–122

    1971

  11. [19]

    Interval exchange transformations an d some special flows are not mixing

    Katok, Anatole. Interval exchange transformations an d some special flows are not mixing. Israel Journal of Mathematics 35 (1980), no. 4, 301–310

    1980

  12. [20]

    Interval exchange transformations and measu red foliations

    Masur, H. Interval exchange transformations and measu red foliations. Annals of Mathematics 115 (1982), 1, 169–200

    1982

  13. [21]

    Moss´ e, Puissances de mots et reconnaissabilit´ e de s points fixes d’une substitution, Theoret

    B. Moss´ e, Puissances de mots et reconnaissabilit´ e de s points fixes d’une substitution, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 99 (1992), no. 2, 327–334

    1992

  14. [22]

    Oseledets, V. I. A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Cha racteristic Lyapunov exponents of dynamical systems. Trudy Mosk. Mat. Obs./Proceedings of the Moscow Mathematic al Society 19 (1968), 179–210

    1968

  15. [23]

    Peres, W

    Y. Peres, W. Schlag, B. Solomyak, Sixty years of Bernoul li convolutions, Fractal Geometry and Stochastics II, C. Bandt, S. Graf, and M. Z¨ ahle (editors), Progress in Proba bility Vol. 46, 39–65, Birkh¨ auser, 2000

    2000

  16. [24]

    Queffelec, Substitution Dynamical Systems - Spectral Analysis

    M. Queffelec, Substitution Dynamical Systems - Spectral Analysis . LNM., vol. 1294, Springer, 2010

    2010

  17. [25]

    On the spectral theory of adic transfo rmations

    Solomyak, Boris. On the spectral theory of adic transfo rmations. Representation theory and dynamical systems, 217–230, Adv. Soviet Math. 9, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992

    1992

  18. [26]

    Gauss measures for transformations o n the space of interval exchange maps

    Veech, William A. Gauss measures for transformations o n the space of interval exchange maps. Annals of Mathematics (2) 115 (1982), no. 1, 201–242

    1982

  19. [27]

    The metric theory of interval exchang e transformations

    Veech, William A. The metric theory of interval exchang e transformations. I. Generic spectral properties. Amer. J. Math. 106 (1984), no. 6, 1331–1359

    1984

  20. [28]

    Vershik, A. M. A theorem on Markov periodic approximati on in ergodic theory. (Russian) Boundary value problems of mathematical physics and related questions in t he theory of functions, 14. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. St.-Peterb. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov . (LOMI) 115 (1982), 72–82, 306

    1982

  21. [29]

    Vershik, A. M. The adic realizations of the ergodic acti ons with the homeomorphisms of the Markov compact and the ordered Bratteli diagrams. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. ( POMI) 223 (1995), Teor. Predstav. Din. Sistemy, Kombin. i Algoritm. M etod...

    1995

  22. [30]

    M.; Livshits, A

    Vershik, A. M.; Livshits, A. N. Adic models of ergodic tr ansformations, spectral theory, substitutions, and related topics. Representation theory and dynamical syste ms, 185–204. Adv. Soviet Math. 9, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1992

    1992

  23. [31]

    Lyapunov exponents of Teichm¨ uller flow s, Preprint IMPA, 2006

    Viana Marcelo. Lyapunov exponents of Teichm¨ uller flow s, Preprint IMPA, 2006

    2006

  24. [32]

    Lectures on Interval Exchange Transfor mations and Teichm¨ uller Flows,Preprint IMPA, 2008

    Viana Marcelo. Lectures on Interval Exchange Transfor mations and Teichm¨ uller Flows,Preprint IMPA, 2008

    2008

  25. [33]

    Finite Gauss measure on the space of inte rval exchange transformations

    Zorich, Anton. Finite Gauss measure on the space of inte rval exchange transformations. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 46 (1996), 325–370. Alexander I. Bufetov, Aix-Marseille Universit ´e, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, I2M, UMR 7373, 39 rue F. Joliot Curie Marseille France Steklov ...

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.