Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 54 references

p-type codoping effect in (Ga,Mn)As: Mn lattice location versus magnetic properties

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Zinc co-doping in (Ga,Mn)As raises the hole density but lowers the Curie temperature and magnetization, because zinc acceptors drive manganese atoms from substitutional to interstitial sites.

desk verdict Solid systematic study with a real confound: the mechanistic claim is plausible but not established because the Zn series is not fluence-matched. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09509 v1 pith:EX37SUTY submitted 2019-08-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chi Xu , Chenhui Zhang , Mao Wang , Yufang Xie , René Hübner , René Heller , Ye Yuan , Manfred Helm
show 2 more authors
Xixiang Zhang Shengqiang Zhou
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords (GaMn)Asdiluteferromagneticsemiconductorzincco-dopingMninterstitialsCurietemperatureionimplantationandpulsedlasermeltingchannelingPIXEdensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that adding zinc acceptors to the ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As raises the hole concentration but lowers the Curie temperature and magnetization, eventually switching the material from ferromagnetic to paramagnetic with an antiferromagnetic signature in between. The authors set out to test the p-d Zener expectation that more holes should strengthen ferromagnetism; instead they find the opposite. Using channeling Rutherford backscattering and particle-induced X-ray emission, they show that zinc doping drives manganese atoms from substitutional gallium sites to interstitial positions, and density-functional calculations give the substitutional-zinc/interstitial-manganese complex a formation energy about 0.7 eV lower than the alternative. If correct, the work establishes that simply increasing the hole density by acceptor co-doping is self-defeating in this material class unless the interstitialization can be suppressed.

What carries the argument

The central object is the lattice-site competition between Mn and Zn in zinc-blende GaAs, quantified by channeling Rutherford backscattering/PIXE and by density-functional total energies. The load-bearing quantity is the interstitial Mn fraction $f_{\mathrm{int}} = 1 - \frac{1-\chi_{\mathrm{min}}(\mathrm{Mn})}{1-\chi_{\mathrm{min}}(\mathrm{Ga})}$, obtained from the [011] channeling yield, together with the DFT result that the Zn$_{\mathrm{Ga}}$+Mn$_{\mathrm{int}}$ complex lies about 0.7 eV below the Zn$_{\mathrm{int}}$+Mn$_{\mathrm{Ga}}$ arrangement. This energy ordering is what converts extra p-type doping into a source of Mn interstitials that act as double donors and antiferromagnetic coupling centers.

What would settle it

Grow a set of (Ga,Mn)As samples in which the Mn fluence is fixed and the Zn fluence is replaced by the same fluence of an electrically neutral or non-acceptor species while keeping implantation energy and pulsed-laser-melting conditions identical; if those samples show the same increase in the Mn interstitial fraction and the same drop in $T_C$, the proposed Zn-chemistry mechanism would be falsified. A second check would be atomistic imaging or extended X-ray absorption fine structure to detect Zn$_{\mathrm{Ga}}$–Mn$_{\mathrm{int}}$ nearest-neighbor pairs directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In (Ga,Mn)As co-doped with Zn by ion implantation and pulsed laser melting, the hole concentration rises from $1.6\times10^{20}$ to $9.6\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-3}$ as the Zn fluence increases from 0 to $8\times10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$, yet the Curie temperature and saturation magnetization fall monotonically. The fraction of Mn atoms on interstitial sites, measured by channeling PIXE, grows from 7% to 35%, and the total Mn retained in the lattice drops by about 36%. First-principles calculations show that a Zn atom on a Ga site next to an Mn interstitial is about 0.7 eV per cell lower in energy than the reverse arrangement, so substitutional Zn acceptors thermodynamically favor kicking Mn off substitutional sites. The paper concludes that the reduced ferromagnetism and the ferromagnet-to-antiferromagnet-to-paramagnet transition are caused by this Zn-driven interstitialization, not by the increased hole density itself.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the magnetic degradation and rising Mn-interstitial fraction are caused by the chemical presence of zinc acceptors, rather than by the extra ion-beam damage that comes with the higher total implantation fluence, since no control sample with a matched fluence of an electrically inactive species was measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism is right, acceptor co-doping cannot be used as a simple route to higher $T_C$ in (Ga,Mn)As; any co-dopant that lowers the formation energy of Mn interstitials will self-compensate.
  • The observed ferromagnet–antiferromagnet–paramagnet sequence means the Mn interstitial fraction can be used as a continuous tuning knob for the magnetic phase, not just a defect to be avoided.
  • Ion implantation plus pulsed laser melting is shown to be a viable route for introducing controlled acceptor co-doping while preserving epitaxial quality, extending the preparation toolbox beyond low-temperature molecular-beam epitaxy.
  • Hole concentration saturates near $10^{21}$ cm$^{-3}$ because interstitial Mn acts as a double donor, which sets an upper bound on the hole density achievable by acceptor co-doping in this system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same energetic driving force should operate for other shallow acceptors in III-Mn-V compounds, so Be or Mg co-doping in (Ga,Mn)As and related materials may show analogous interstitialization; comparing with published Be-doped samples could test this without new growths.
  • A practical workaround suggested by the paper's logic is to suppress Mn interstitials after co-doping by low-temperature annealing or by placing the Zn profile away from the Mn-rich region; the present experiment did not test these.
  • Because the DFT energy drops sharply below about 5 Å separation, Zn–Mn dimers should form at higher Zn fluence, and those dimers could be detected as a nonmagnetic or weakly magnetic contribution in magnetization measurements.
  • The measured loss of roughly 36% of Mn to a surface oxide implies that the effective Mn concentration in the active layer is lower in Zn-rich samples, which by itself would lower $T_C$ even without interstitialization; separating these two contributions would require depth-resolved magnetic profiling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports a systematic study of Zn co-doping in (Ga,Mn)As films prepared by Mn and Zn co-implantation followed by pulsed laser melting. Hall measurements show that the hole concentration increases monotonically with Zn fluence (from 1.6e20 to 9.6e20 cm^-3), yet both the Curie temperature and the saturation magnetization decrease. Channeling PIXE is used to extract the Mn interstitial fraction, which rises from 7% to 35% across the series, while the total Mn concentration falls from 2.5% to 1.6%. DFT calculations are presented to show that a substitutional-Zn/interstitial-Mn complex is about 0.7 eV lower in energy than the interstitial-Zn/substitutional-Mn complex. The authors conclude that substitutional Zn doping energetically drives Mn atoms from substitutional to interstitial sites, explaining the reduced ferromagnetism and the apparent transition from ferromagnetism to antiferromagnetism and then paramagnetism.

Significance. If the causal mechanism is established, the result is significant because it demonstrates a failure mode of the standard p-type co-doping strategy for raising TC in dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors and provides a microscopic picture based on lattice-location measurements and first-principles energetics. The paper combines several independent experimental probes (transport, SQUID magnetometry, channeling RBS/PIXE, TEM) with DFT, and no parameters are fitted to the magnetic data, which strengthens the internal consistency of the reported trends. The quantitative PIXE determination of Mnint/Mntotal as a function of Zn fluence is a valuable dataset. However, the central causal attribution currently rests on an uncontrolled sample-series design, as detailed below, so the significance is conditional on resolving that issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [II.A and III.D/Fig. 7] The sample series varies the Zn fluence and the total implantation fluence simultaneously: Mn is fixed at 8e15 cm^-2 while the Zn fluence rises from 0 to 8e15 cm^-2, so Zn-8 receives twice the total ion dose of Zn-0. The central conclusion that substitutional Zn chemically drives Mn atoms into interstitial sites therefore rests on an uncontrolled variable. The paper includes no control sample co-implanted with an electrically inactive species at matched fluence, so the monotonic increase in Mnint/Mntotal from 7% to 35% and the decrease in total Mn content could be caused by implantation damage, altered melt depth, or Mn outdiffusion during PLM rather than by Zn acceptor chemistry. A dose-matched inert-ion control, or an equivalent deconvolution of the fluence effect, is required before the chemical mechanism can be regarded as established.
  2. [III.D, Fig. 7(c)] Even if the PIXE data are accepted at face value, the magnetic degradation is not uniquely attributable to the increased Mnint fraction. The total Mn concentration falls from 2.5% (Zn-0) to 1.6% (Zn-8), and the substitutional fraction falls from 93% to 65%; the product, i.e., the actual substitutional Mn concentration, drops from about 2.3% to about 1.0%. Given the Zener-model relation TC ∝ Mneff p^1/3, this loss of substitutional Mn can by itself account for a large part of the observed decrease in TC and MS. The paper should separate the contribution of the reduced effective Mn concentration from the additional antiferromagnetic coupling of Mnint before concluding that the interstitial fraction alone drives the magnetic collapse.
  3. [III.E, Fig. 8] The DFT comparison addresses only specific defect complexes (Mnint-Znsub versus Znint-Mnsub) in a fixed 2x2x3 supercell. It does not provide formation energies as a function of the Zn chemical potential or the Fermi level, and it does not model the implantation-damage or recrystallization kinetics. The 0.7 eV energy difference therefore shows a thermodynamic preference for one complex over another, but it cannot by itself distinguish the chemical doping effect from a fluence-or damage-driven Mn interstitialization. The text should present the DFT as supporting, rather than confirming, the proposed mechanism and should state this limitation explicitly.
minor comments (7)
  1. [II.B] The sentence beginning 'The random spectra were' is incomplete; it appears to merge with the following TEM sentence. This should be corrected.
  2. [III.E, Fig. 8(j)] The text says the energy is 'constant' for all four situations at distances above 6 Å, but then states that the As-near case is about 0.1 eV lower than the Ga-near case for both Mn and Zn. This wording is contradictory; 'constant' should mean distance-independent, not equal among the four configurations.
  3. [III.C, Fig. 5(d)] The claimed antiferromagnetic signature in Zn-4 is based on a broad maximum around 10-15 K in the ZFC/FC curves. No Néel temperature, exchange-bias measurement, or field-dependent cusp analysis is provided, so the evidence for true antiferromagnetic ordering is currently weak. The text should either add supporting data or describe the feature as a possible AFM correlation rather than a confirmed antiferromagnetic phase.
  4. [VI] The section numbering jumps from III to VI; the conclusions should be renumbered consistently (IV or V).
  5. [References] Reference [39], a CeSbTe paper, does not appear to be directly relevant to the antiferromagnetic signature criterion used here; consider replacing it with a standard (Ga,Mn)As or dilute-magnetic-semiconductor reference on AFM correlations, or justify the citation.
  6. [III.D, Eq. (1)] The paper quotes Mnint/Mntotal values (7%, 15%, 20%, 29%, 35%) without uncertainties, although error bars are mentioned for other results. Adding uncertainties from the PIXE peak fitting and from the χmin determination would strengthen the quantitative claim.
  7. [III.B, Fig. 3(c)] At the highest hole concentrations (near 1e21 cm^-3), the hole density derived from the Hall slope may be affected by the Hall factor or by mixed-conduction contributions; a brief statement on the reliability of the Hall analysis at these doping levels would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim rests on independent measurements and first-principles calculations, not on fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that substitutional Zn doping energetically drives Mn atoms from substitutional to interstitial sites, thereby lowering TC and magnetization despite increased hole concentration. The three load-bearing pieces of evidence are independent: (i) Hall measurements give the hole concentration; (ii) channeling PIXE gives the Mnint fraction via Eq. (1), a standard reduction formula that is not fitted to the magnetic data; and (iii) DFT formation energies are computed from first principles with stated supercell and functional choices. The Mnint/Mntotal trend from 7% to 35% is measured directly and is not derived from the magnetic properties it is used to explain. The DFT calculation showing Znsub+Mnint lower by about 0.7 eV than Znint+Mnsub is an independent energetic comparison, not a fit to the observed magnetization. The only self-citations are to the group's prior PLM preparation work and prior (Ga,Mn)As studies, and these are used for experimental context or comparison, not to justify the central mechanism. A legitimate experimental concern is that total implantation fluence increases with Zn fluence without an inert co-implant control, which could confound the causal attribution to Zn chemistry; however, that is a correctness risk about experimental design, not a circularity in the derivation chain. No equation is defined in terms of its own output, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing result is imported from the authors' own prior work as an unverified uniqueness theorem. The paper is therefore self-contained against circularity, and the honest finding is a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on three pillars: channeling PIXE quantification of Mnint, Hall-derived hole concentrations, and DFT formation energies. The most load-bearing assumptions are the SRIM-based Mn calibration, the [011]-visibility rule for Mnint, the DFT supercell representativeness, and the untested assumption that the Zn dose effect is chemical rather than damage-related. No numbers are fitted to the magnetic data.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The p-d Zener model, with TC proportional to Mneff times p^(1/3), is the accepted description of ferromagnetism in (Ga,Mn)As.
    Invoked in the Introduction to set the expectation that more holes should raise TC; the paper interprets its result as a failure of the implicit assumption that Mneff remains constant. See Section I.
  • domain assumption Mn interstitials at tetrahedral sites are detectable in [011] channeling PIXE but not in [001] channeling.
    Taken from refs [31,33]; the quantitative fint values in Section III.D and Eq. (1) depend on this visibility rule.
  • domain assumption The as-implanted sample has the SRIM-predicted Mn concentration of 4.7% and is used as the PIXE calibration reference.
    Section III.D: 'The as-implanted sample is placed as reference to calibrate the Mn concentration, where the Mn concentration is considered to be the same (4.7%), as estimated by SRIM.'
  • domain assumption The DFT 2x2x3 supercell with one Mn and one Zn atom represents the dilute doping limit relevant to the experimental films.
    Section II.C; the supercell corresponds to roughly 2% dopants while the films have about 4.7% Mn by SRIM. GGA-PBE without Hubbard U is used, and the 0.7 eV energy difference supports the mechanism.
  • domain assumption The measured decrease in total Mn concentration with Zn fluence (2.5% to 1.6%) is caused by out-diffusion and oxide formation, not by a PIXE measurement artifact.
    Section III.D attributes the loss to Mn escaping to the surface and forming an oxide capping layer during PLM; no independent depth profile is shown to confirm this.
  • ad hoc to paper The magnetic degradation is due to the chemical effect of substitutional Zn, not to the increased total implantation fluence and damage.
    The Zn fluence series also increases total ion dose; no fixed-fluence control with an electrically neutral species is provided. The causal role of Zn chemistry is therefore assumed and supported only by DFT.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of p-type codoping effect in (Ga,Mn)As: Mn lattice location versus magnetic properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EX37SUTY

@misc{pith2026190809509,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: p-type codoping effect in (Ga,Mn)As: Mn lattice location versus magnetic properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EX37SUTY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09509}
}
read the original abstract

In the present work, we perform a systematic investigation on p-type codoping in (Ga,Mn)As. Through gradually increasing Zn doping concentration, the hole concentration increases, which should theoretically lead to an increase of the Curie temperature (TC) according to the p-d Zener model. Unexpectedly, although the film keeps its epitaxial structure, both TC and the magnetization decrease. The samples present a phase transition from ferromagnetism to paramagnetism upon increasing hole concentration. In the intermediate regime, we observe a signature of antiferromagnetism. By using channeling Rutherford backscattering spectrometry and particle-induced x-ray emission, the substitutional Mn atoms are observed to shift to interstitial sites, while more Zn atoms occupy Ga sites, which explains the observed behavior. This is also consistent with first-principles calculations, showing that the complex of substitutional Zn and interstitial Mn has the lowest formation energy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    6 (j) - (n)

    direction, as shown in Figs. 6 (j) - (n). It is worthy to mention that the secondary absorption and emission were not considered in the PIXE analysis. 15 FIG. 7 (Color online) Zn fluence dependence of (a) hole concentration, (b) Curie temperature TC and saturation magnetization MS and (c) substitutional fraction χsub and the estimated total Mn concentrati...

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Ohno, Making nonmagnetic semiconductors ferromagnetic, Science 281, 951 (1998)

    H. Ohno, Making nonmagnetic semiconductors ferromagnetic, Science 281, 951 (1998)

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Dietl, H

    T. Dietl, H. Ohno, F. Matsukura, J. Cibert, and D. Ferrand, Zener model description of ferromagnetism in zinc-blende magnetic semiconductors, Science 287, 1019 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    H. Ohno, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Omiya, E. Abe, T. Dietl, Y . Ohno, and K. Ohtani, Electric-field control of ferromagnetism, Nature 408, 944 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Dietl, and H

    T. Dietl, and H. Ohno, Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: Physics and spintronic structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 187 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Chiba, M

    D. Chiba, M. Yamanouchi, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Electrical manipulation of magnetization reversal in a ferromagnetic semiconductor, Science 301, 943 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Dietl, H

    T. Dietl, H. Ohno, and F. Matsukura, Hole -mediated ferromagnetism in tetrahedrally coordinated semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 63, 195205 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    The microstructure of the Mn- and Zn-co-doped samples was investigated by cross- sectional high-resolution TEM

    The sample surface is exemplarily marked by a dashed line in (a). The microstructure of the Mn- and Zn-co-doped samples was investigated by cross- sectional high-resolution TEM . Representative micrographs covering the whole implanted layer thickness of 62 nm (as calculated by SRIM) are displayed in Fig. 1. For all PLM-treated (Ga,Mn)As:Zn samples, epitax...

    work page

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Chiba, M

    D. Chiba, M. Sawicki, Y . Nishitani, Y . Nakatani, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Magnetization vector manipulation by electric fields, Nature 455, 515 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Ferrand, J

    D. Ferrand, J. Cibert, C. Bourgognon, S. Tatarenko, A. Wasiela, G. Fishman, A. Bonanni, H. Sitter, S. Kolesnik, J. Jaroszyski, A. Barcz, and T. Dietl, Carrier -induced ferromagnetic interactions in p-doped Zn1-xMnxTe epilayers, J. Cryst. Growth 214, 387 (2000)

    2000

  3. [11]

    and [001] directions, respectively, as shown in Fig. 6. Full PIXE spectra at random and channeling conditions are displayed in Figs. 6(a) and (b). The obvious difference 14 between the yield of the random and channeling spectra demonstrate s again the epitaxial relation of the...

  4. [12]

    Sawicki, D

    M. Sawicki, D. Chiba, A. Korbecka, Y . Nishitani, J.A. Majewski, F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, and H. Ohno, Experimental probing of the interplay between ferromagnetism and localization in (Ga, Mn)As, Nat. Phys. 6, 22 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Dietl, Interplay between Carrier Localization an d magnetism in diluted magnetic and ferromagnetic semiconductors, J

    T. Dietl, Interplay between Carrier Localization an d magnetism in diluted magnetic and ferromagnetic semiconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 031005 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Chiba, F

    D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Electric -field control of ferromagnetism in (Ga,Mn)As, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 162505 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Ferrand, J

    D. Ferrand, J. Cibert, A. Wasiela, C. Bourgognon, S. Tatarenko, G. Fishman, T. Andrearczyk, J. Jaroszyński, S. Koleśnik, T. Dietl, B. Barbara, and D. Dufeu, Carrier-induced ferromagnetism in p-Zn1-xMnxTe, Phys. Rev. B 63, 085201 (2001). 19

    2001

  8. [16]

    L. Chen, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Electric -field modulation of damping constant in a ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 057204 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Y . Ohno, D. Young, B.a. Beschoten, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, and D. Awschalom, Electrical spin injection in a ferromagnetic semiconductor heterostructure, Nature 402, 790 (1999)

    1999

  10. [18]

    Ziegler, M.D

    J.F. Ziegler, M.D. Ziegler, and J.P. Biersack, SRIM – The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 268, 1818 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Chiba, A

    D. Chiba, A. Werpachowska, M. Endo, Y . Nishitani, F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, and H. Ohno, Anomalous Hall effect in field -effect structures of (Ga,Mn)As, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 106601 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, J. Mašek, J. Kučera, and A.H. MacDonald, Theory of ferromagnetic (III,Mn)V semiconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 809 (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    Devillers, M

    T. Devillers, M. Rovezzi, N.G. Szwacki, S. Dobkowska, W. Stefanowicz, D. Sztenkiel, A. Grois, J. Suffczynski, A. Navarro-Quezada, B. Faina, T. Li, P. Glatzel, F. d'Acapito, R. Jakiela, M. Sawicki, J.A. Majewski, T. Dietl, and A. Bonanni, Manipulating Mn-Mgk cation complexes to...

    2012

  14. [22]

    Danilov, H

    Y .A. Danilov, H. Boudinov, O. Vikhrova, A. Zdoroveyshchev, A. Kudrin, S. Pavlov, A. Parafin, E. Pitirimova, and R. Yakubov, Formation of the single -phase ferromagnetic semiconductor (Ga,Mn)As by pulsed laser annealing, Phys. Solid Status+ 58, 2218-2222 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Y . Yuan, R. Hubner, F. Liu, M. Sawicki, O. Gordan, G. Salvan, D.R. Zahn, D. Banerjee, C. Baehtz, M. Helm, and S. Zhou, Ferromagnetic Mn-implanted GaP: Microstructures vs magnetic properties, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 3912 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Limmer, A

    W. Limmer, A. Koeder, S. Frank, V . Avrutin, W. Schoch, R. Sauer, K. Zuern, J. Eisenmenger, P. Ziemann, and E. Peiner, Effect of annealing on the depth profile of hole concentration in (Ga,Mn)As, Phys. Rev. B 71, 205213 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Scarpulla, U

    M. Scarpulla, U. Daud, K. Y u, O. Monteiro, Z. Liliental -Weber, D. Zakharov, W. Walukiewicz, and O. Dubon, Diluted magnetic semiconductors formed by ion implantation and pulsed-laser melting, Physica B 340, 908 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Kresse, and J

    G. Kresse, and J. Furthmuller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    Gan’shina, L

    E. Gan’shina, L. Golik, Z. Kun ’kova, G. Zykov, Y .V . Markin, Y .A. Danilov, and B. Zvonkov, Phase Separation in (Ga,Mn)As Layers Obtained by Ion Implantation and Subsequent Laser Annealing, Phys. Solid Status+ 61, 332 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Dubon, M

    O. Dubon, M. Scarpulla, R. Far shchi, and K. Yu, Doping and defect control of ferromagnetic semiconductors formed by ion implantation and pulsed-laser melting, Physica B 376, 630 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    C. Chen, H. Niu, H. Hsieh, C. Cheng, D. Yan, C. Chi, J. Kai, and S. Wu, Fabrication of ferromagnetic (Ga,Mn)As by ion irradiation, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 1130 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    Rushforth, N.R.S

    A.W. Rushforth, N.R.S. Farley, R.P. Campion, K.W. Edmonds, C.R. Staddon, C.T. Foxon, B.L. Gallagher, and K.M. Y u, Compositional dependence of ferromagnetism in (Al,Ga,Mn)As magnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 78, 085209 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    Blochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys

    P.E. Blochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  24. [32]

    Perdew, K

    J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  25. [33]

    Rushforth, M

    A. Rushforth, M. Wang, N. Farley, R. Campion, K. Edmonds, C. Staddon, C. Foxon, and B. Gallagher, Molecular beam epitaxy grown (Ga,Mn)(As,P) with perpendicular to plane 20 magnetic easy axis, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 073908 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    Benzeggouta, K

    D. Benzeggouta, K. Khazen, I. Vickridge, H. von Bardeleben, L. Chen, X. Yu, and J. Zhao, Quantitative determination of the Mn site distribution in ultrathin Ga 0.80Mn0.20As layers with high critical temperatures: A Rutherford backscattering channeling investigation, Phys. Rev....

    2014

  27. [35]

    K.M. Yu, W. Walukiewicz, T. Wojtowicz, W.L. Lim, X. Liu, U. Bindley, M. Dobrowolska, and J.K. Furdyna, Curie temperature limit in ferromagnetic Ga1-xMnxAs, Phys. Rev. B 68, 041308 (2003)

    2003

  28. [36]

    Feldman, J.W

    L.C. Feldman, J.W. Mayer, and S.T. Picraux, Materials analysis by ion channeling: submicron crystallography, Academic Press, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    K.M. Y u, W. Walukiewicz, T. Wojtowicz, I. Kuryliszyn, X. Liu, Y . Sasaki, and J.K. Furdyna, Effect of the location of Mn sites in ferromagnetic Ga1-xMnxAs on its Curie temperature, Phys. Rev. B 65, 201303 (2002)

    2002

  30. [38]

    Matsukura, H

    F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, A. Shen, and Y . Sugawara, Transport properties and origin of ferromagnetism in (Ga,Mn)As, Phys. Rev. B 57, R2037 (1998)

    1998

  31. [39]

    Asubar, S

    J.T. Asubar, S. Sato, Y . Jinbo, and N. Uchitomi, MBE growth and properties of GaMnAs with high level of Zn acceptor incorporation, Phys. Status Solidi A 203, 2778-2782 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    Weiss, and A

    R. Weiss, and A. Marotta, Spin-dependence of the resistivity of magnetic metals, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 9, 302 (1959)

    1959

  33. [41]

    Nakagawa, J.T

    H. Nakagawa, J.T. Asubar, Y . Jinbo, and N. Uchitomi, Comparison of annealing effects on Zn-doped GaMnAs and undoped GaMnAs epilayers, Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 6648 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Blinowski, and P

    J. Blinowski, and P. Kacman, Spin interactions of interstitial Mn ions in ferromagnetic GaMnAs, Phys. Rev. B 67, 121204 (2003)

    2003

  35. [43]

    Schoop, A

    L.M. Schoop, A. Topp, J. Lippmann, F. Orlandi, L. Müchler, M.G. Vergniory, Y . Sun, A.W. Rost, V . Duppel, and M. Krivenkov, Tunable Weyl and Dirac states in the nonsymmorphic compound CeSbTe, Sci. Adv. 4, eaar2317 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Y . Yuan, C. Xu, R. Hubner, R. Jakiela, R. Bottger, M. Helm, M. Sawicki, T. Dietl, and S. Zhou, Interplay between localization and magnetism in (Ga,Mn) As and (In,Mn)As, Phys. Rev. Materials 1, 054401 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    S. Zhou, L. Li, Y . Yuan, A.W. Rushforth, L. Chen, Y . Wang, R. Böttger, R. Heller, J. Zhao, K.W. Edmonds, R.P. Campion, B.L. Gallagher, C. Timm, and M. Helm, Precise tuning of the Curie temperature of (Ga,Mn)As -based magnetic semiconductors by hole com pensation: Support for...

    2016

  38. [46]

    Mašek, and F

    J. Mašek, and F. Máca, Self-compensating incorporation of Mn in Ga1-xMnxAs, Acta Phys. Pol. A 100, 315 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    Los, A.N

    A.V . Los, A.N. Timoshevskii, V .F. Los, and S.A. Kalkuta, Ab initio studies of magnetism in transition-metal-doped silicon carbide, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165204 (2007)

    2007

  40. [48]

    K. Yu, W. Walukiewicz, T. Wojtowicz, W. Lim, X. Liu, Y . Sasaki, M. Dobrowolska, and J. Furdyna, Determination of free hole concentration in ferromagnetic Ga1-xMnxAs using electrochemical capacitance-voltage profiling, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 844 (2002)

    2002

  41. [49]

    Scarpulla, B.L

    M.A. Scarpulla, B.L. Cardozo, R. Farshchi, W.M. Oo, M.D. McCluskey, K.M. Yu, and O.D. Dubon, Ferromagnetism in Ga1-xMnxP: evidence for inter -Mn exchange mediated by localized holes within a detached impurity band, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 207204 (2005). 21

    2005

  42. [50]

    Pereira, U

    L. Pereira, U. Wahl, S. Decoster, J. Correia, M. da Silva, A. Vantomme, and J. Araújo, Direct identification of interstitial Mn in heavily p-type doped GaAs and evidence of its high thermal stability, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 201905 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Ashen, P

    D. Ashen, P. Dean, D. Hurle, J. Mullin, A. White, and P. Greene, The incorporation and characterisation of acceptors in epitaxial GaAs, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 36, 1041 (1975)

    1975

  44. [52]

    Linnarsson, E

    M. Linnarsson, E. Janzén, B. Monemar, M. Kleverman, and A. Thilderkvist , Electronic structure of the GaAs: MnGa scenter, Phys. Rev. B 55, 6938 (1997)

    1997

  45. [53]

    F. Glas, G. Patriarche, L. Largeau, and A. Lemaître, Determination of the local concentrations of Mn interstitials and antisite defects in GaMnAs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 086107 (2004)

    2004

  46. [110]

    direction which is the magnetic easy axis for (Ga,Mn)As. The magneto-transport measurements for all samples were performed with a magnetic field applied perpendicularly to the film plane in a Lake Shore Hall Measurement System using the van-der-Pauw geometry. The electrical co...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.