REVIEW 1 cited by
Does BERT agree? Evaluating knowledge of structure dependence through agreement relations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Learning representations that accurately model semantics is an important goal of natural language processing research. Many semantic phenomena depend on syntactic structure. Recent work examines the extent to which state-of-the-art models for pre-training representations, such as BERT, capture such structure-dependent phenomena, but is largely restricted to one phenomenon in English: number agreement between subjects and verbs. We evaluate BERT's sensitivity to four types of structure-dependent agreement relations in a new semi-automatically curated dataset across 26 languages. We show that both the single-language and multilingual BERT models capture syntax-sensitive agreement patterns well in general, but we also highlight the specific linguistic contexts in which their performance degrades.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models
A systematic review of 337 articles shows Transformers handle formal syntax well but perform worse and more variably at the syntax-semantics interface, with the field over-reliant on English and BERT.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.