Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Quantum Nature of the Hydrogen Bond from Ambient Conditions down to Ultra-low Temperatures

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At around 1 K, oxygen nuclei in small hydrogen-bonded clusters delocalize as much as—or more than—the protons they bond to, reversing the usual mass-based ordering of quantum spread.

desk verdict A careful systematic PIMD study showing oxygen delocalization can match or exceed proton delocalization in small hydrogen-bonded clusters near 1 K, absent in ice—but the finite-cluster crossover rests on fitted potentials and lacks error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11589 v2 pith:IO7ZDQGC submitted 2019-08-30 physics.chem-ph

Christoph Schran , Dominik Marx This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords hydrogenbondnuclearquantumeffectspathintegralmoleculardynamicsultra-lowtemperaturedelocalizationZundelcationwaterclustersiceIh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how the quantum fuzziness of atoms in hydrogen bonds changes when temperature drops from room temperature to about 1 K, the regime of helium-nanodroplet and tagging spectroscopies. Using path integral simulations that explicitly include nuclear quantum effects, it compares the water dimer, water hexamer, three protonated water clusters (Zundel, trimer, Eigen), and hexagonal ice. The central finding is that in the small finite clusters the quantum delocalization of the heavy oxygen nuclei, measured by the averaged radius of gyration of the path integral, approaches and in some cases exceeds that of the lighter protons as the temperature approaches 1 K. In ice, by contrast, the usual ordering is preserved at all temperatures. The paper argues that coordination—how many hydrogen bonds surround each atom—controls the effect, since stronger spatial constraints suppress the delocalization of the heavy atoms.

What carries the argument

The central object is the imaginary-time path integral representation of the quantum nuclei, and the averaged radius of gyration of the ring polymer, $r_g^2 = \frac{1}{P}\sum_{s=1}^P \langle (R_s - R_c)^2 \rangle$, which measures each nucleus's instantaneous quantum delocalization and equals the quantum contribution $\langle \Delta x^2 \rangle_q$ to the total position fluctuations. The PIGLET thermostat allows converged path integral simulations down to 1.67 K with affordable replica counts. Two potential energy surfaces carry the systems: q-TIP4P/F for neutral water clusters and ice, and a neural network potential fitted to coupled cluster reference calculations for the protonated clusters, which rules out force-field artifacts. The coordination number of each hydrogen-bonding atom is the explanatory variable that distinguishes finite clusters from the condensed phase.

What would settle it

Compute the averaged radius of gyration of oxygen and hydrogen in the Zundel cation at 1.67 K using a converged ab initio path integral simulation (for example, with a CCSD(T)-level potential energy surface or a different machine-learned potential). If the oxygen $\langle r_g \rangle$ is not larger than the proton's, the central reversal claim fails. A complementary observable test: measure the zero-point kinetic energy of oxygen versus hydrogen in cryogenic protonated water clusters via neutron Compton scattering; the predicted reversal implies an anomalously high oxygen kinetic energy at 1 K.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the spatial quantum delocalization of oxygen nuclei in hydrogen-bonded clusters can match or exceed that of the protons they bond to at temperatures near 1 K, reversing the naive $1/\sqrt{M}$ scaling of the thermal de Broglie wavelength. For the Zundel cation, whose hydrogen bond is centered and termed 'ultra-strong', the average radius of gyration of the oxygen atoms significantly exceeds that of the shared proton at 1.67 K; the water dimer and protonated trimer show near-degeneracy, while the hexamer and Eigen cation show a strongly reduced gap. In hexagonal ice Ih, the oxygen–hydrogen delocalization difference stays nearly constant down to 1 K and the reversal never occurs. The authors trace this difference to the coordination of the hydrogen-bonded atoms: increased coordination in the condensed phase constrains translational and rotational quantum delocalization and quenches the 'interaction induced localization' of the protons.

Load-bearing premise

The fitted potentials—q-TIP4P/F for neutral systems and the coupled-cluster-fitted neural network for protonated clusters—correctly describe how oxygen and hydrogen nuclei spread out at about 1 K in the finite clusters; only the ice results are checked against ab initio path integral simulation at that temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ultra-cold spectroscopic experiments on isolated water clusters probe a regime in which heavy atoms are not classical: the oxygen framework itself is quantum-delocalized on a scale comparable to the proton, so assigning spectra with fixed heavy-atom geometries may mislead.
  • For strong, centered hydrogen bonds like Zundel's, structural observables ($r_{OO}$, $\delta$, $\angle HOO$) are essentially temperature-independent from 1 K to 250 K, meaning ground-state quantum effects dominate all the way up to ambient conditions.
  • For weak hydrogen bonds (water dimer, hexamer), results at 1 K cannot be directly transferred to ambient conditions; temperature substantially weakens and bends these bonds.
  • In condensed-phase ice, nuclear quantum delocalization differences between oxygen and hydrogen remain stable down to 1 K, so models that work at ambient conditions may remain valid at ultra-low temperature, at least for this property.
  • The coordination argument predicts that any finite cluster with low coordination should show the oxygen/hydrogen delocalization crossover at sufficiently low temperature, generalizing beyond water to other hydrogen-bonded dimers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not simulate clusters inside helium nanodroplets, but its coordination argument suggests that the helium solvent, by adding an external confining potential, could quench or shift the oxygen/hydrogen crossover in the same way ice does—an experimentally testable prediction.
  • A direct test of potential dependence would be to run the same 1 K path integral protocol on the Zundel cation using a different high-level potential energy surface (for example, a CCSD(T) grid or a second machine-learned potential) and compare $\langle r_g \rangle$ for oxygen and hydrogen; the paper's neural network has coupled cluster accuracy, but only the ice results are cross-validated with a
  • Since the radius of gyration maps to the quantum kinetic energy through the virial estimator, the predicted reversal might also be observable in path-integral estimates of isotope fractionation or in neutron Compton scattering line shapes of cryogenic clusters, if such measurements become feasible.
  • The temperature at which the oxygen and hydrogen radii cross (if any) is left open for some systems; the paper speculates that the hexamer and Eigen cation might cross below 1 K. A systematic scan to 0.1 K with a converged potential would map the crossover locus as a function of coordination and hydrogen bond strength.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses path integral molecular dynamics with colored-noise (PIGLET) thermostatting to study hydrogen-bonded systems from 300 K down to 1.67 K, explicitly including nuclear quantum effects. The systems are the water dimer, water hexamer, protonated Zundel, trimer, and Eigen clusters, and hexagonal ice Ih. Structural distributions (rOO, δ, ∠HOO) and the path-integral radius of gyration (Eq. 1) are computed as a function of temperature. The central claim is that at around 1 K the quantum delocalization of oxygen atoms approaches or exceeds that of protons in finite clusters, while in ice Ih the usual ordering (H more delocalized than O) persists. The crossover is attributed to the weaker spatial constraints (lower coordination) in small clusters.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper demonstrates a qualitative breakdown of the mass-based expectation that light atoms are always more quantum-delocalized than heavy atoms in hydrogen-bonded systems, with direct relevance for interpreting ultra-cold cluster spectroscopy. The systematic temperature ladder from ambient to 1 K and the comparison across neutral, cationic, finite, and condensed systems is a valuable contribution. The ice Ih results are cross-validated with ab initio RPBE-D3 PIMD at 1.67 K, which is a concrete strength. The use of a neural-network potential fitted to CCSD(T) for the protonated clusters is also a step beyond empirical force fields. However, the central O/H crossover in finite clusters is not independently validated at the target temperature, and no statistical error bars are given, so the robustness of the headline finding remains uncertain.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 3] The central claim that oxygen delocalization approaches or exceeds proton delocalization at ~1 K in finite clusters is supported only by q-TIP4P/F (neutral clusters) and an NNP fitted to CCSD(T) (cationic clusters). The only ab initio validation, RPBE-D3 PIMD, is performed for ice Ih (triangles in the right panel of Fig. 3), where the effect is absent. At 1 K the radius of gyration is dominated by zero-point motion in low-frequency intermolecular modes, which are far from the typical fitting configurations of both potentials. A force-field error in these modes could change the O/H ordering. Please provide an explicit ab initio PIMD cross-check for at least one finite cluster (e.g., the Zundel cation or the water dimer) at 1.67 K, or alternatively quantify the expected uncertainty in the NNP and q-TIP4P/F radii of gyration for the relevant modes.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Section II] No statistical error bars are reported for the averaged radius of gyration ⟨r_g⟩. The differences between O and H shown for the dimer and the protonated trimer at 1.67 K appear to be on the order of 0.05 Å or less, comparable to typical block-averaging uncertainties for a 125 ps simulation with 256 replicas. Without error bars, the claimed crossover cannot be distinguished from statistical noise. Please report standard errors (e.g., from block averaging) and specify the number of independent samples after decorrelation.
  3. [Section II, water hexamer] The manuscript states that below 100 K the water hexamer remained in its starting isomer and that only the ordered hexagonal ring is used below 100 K, with the statement that other isomers behave similarly. This limits the generality of the finite-cluster conclusion for the hexamer. Since the 'interaction induced localization effect' is argued to depend on coordination, a single isomer is a reasonable starting point, but the claim that the crossover would also occur for other isomers should either be demonstrated or explicitly labeled as a tentative extension rather than a result of the present simulations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'neutron defraction' appears to be a typo for 'neutron diffraction'.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'seamlessly extending our insights into noncovalent interactions down to ultra-low temperatures' is vague; consider specifying what the 'seamless' extension adds beyond the temperature range studied.
  3. [Section II, binding energies] The binding energy per water monomer is estimated by dissecting protonated clusters into a hydronium core and remaining waters; this definition is a reasonable rough measure, but the caption of Fig. 2 should state explicitly that the quoted hydrogen-bond strengths are approximate and system-dependent.
  4. [Fig. 3] The horizontal dashed lines are described as 'the average values of all systems at the highest considered temperatures'; please state in the caption that these are constants for orientation only, since the individual system values scatter around them.
  5. [Section III] The statement 'it is tempting to speculate that the crossover might set in at still lower temperatures' for the hexamer and Eigen cation is a reasonable speculation, but it should be clearly separated from the directly computed results to avoid overstatement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central delocalization crossover is computed directly and independently cross-checked for the ice phase, while self-citations are methodological rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that at about 1 K oxygen delocalization approaches or exceeds proton delocalization in finite hydrogen-bonded clusters, is not derived from a fitted observable nor from a self-citation chain. The radius of gyration, Eq. (1), is a direct path-integral measure computed from the simulated ensembles, and the temperature-dependence in Fig. 3 is obtained by explicit PIMD simulation rather than by construction. The neural network potential for cationic clusters is fitted to coupled-cluster reference data (Ref. 44), an external electronic-structure benchmark, and the ice Ih result is separately validated with ab initio RPBE-D3 PIMD at 1.67 K, as stated in Section II and shown by the triangles in Fig. 3. The self-citations to Refs. 39, 40, 72, and 73 concern the thermostat, path-integral convergence, and the previously reported 'interaction induced localization effect.' These are not used as the sole evidence for the present claim: the effect is reproduced here and explicitly stated to be consistent for the Zundel cation and protonated trimer on the coupled-cluster-fitted NNP, which is independent of the earlier force-field-based studies. The lack of ab initio PIMD validation for the finite clusters at the lowest temperature is a legitimate accuracy/fidelity concern, but it is not circularity: the target observable is not a fitted parameter and the predictions are not forced by the input potentials by construction. Therefore, no specific circular reduction can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is a low circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its claims rest on the accuracy of fitted potential energy models (q-TIP4P/F and NNP), plus standard statistical mechanics assumptions of path integral sampling. The choice of hydrogen-bond criterion is a free parameter affecting all reported distributions. The most consequential assumption is that the empirical models remain accurate at 1 K in finite clusters, a regime not independently validated in this work.

free parameters (4)
  • q-TIP4P/F force field parameters = not listed (from ref 37)
    Central results for water dimer, hexamer, and ice Ih are computed with this empirical model, whose parameters were fitted to water properties including quantum effects.
  • Neural network potential weights = not listed (from ref 44)
    All protonated cluster simulations use an NNP fitted to CCSD(T) reference data; the fitted weights replace an explicit electronic-structure calculation.
  • Hydrogen-bond criterion thresholds = rOO < 3.5 Å, ∠HOO < 30°
    All structural analyses and the radius of gyration averages are conditioned on this geometric criterion from ref 63; other criteria were tested but the reported numbers depend on this choice.
  • Ice Ih lattice parameters = taken from refs 24,25
    The periodic simulation cell is set to the experimental lattice parameters for each temperature from Refs 24,25; the authors note newer data exist but expect a minor effect.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The path integral discretization is converged for all temperatures with the stated number of replicas (P = 6, 8, 16, 64, 128, 256).
    Convergence is validated in ref 40 for the Zundel cation and assumed transferable to the other systems.
  • domain assumption q-TIP4P/F accurately describes hydrogen bonding and quantum delocalization in neutral water clusters and ice from 300 K to 1.67 K.
    The model is empirical and fitted to water properties; its accuracy at 1 K for clusters is not directly validated in this paper, only ice is checked with RPBE-D3.
  • domain assumption The NNP faithfully reproduces the CCSD(T) potential energy surface in the anharmonic regions sampled at low temperature.
    The NNP is fitted to coupled cluster data, but its accuracy at 1 K for the quantum delocalization crossover is not directly validated here.
  • domain assumption RPBE-D3 ab initio PIMD is an accurate reference for ice at 1.67 K.
    The validation of ice delocalization uses this functional; DFT accuracy for such subtle quantum fluctuations is not established.
  • domain assumption The six systems are representative of weak, intermediate, and strong hydrogen-bond classes, so conclusions transfer to other hydrogen-bonded systems.
    The authors explicitly state the expectation of transferability, but it is not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Nature of the Hydrogen Bond from Ambient Conditions down to Ultra-low Temperatures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IO7ZDQGC

@misc{pith2026190811589,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Nature of the Hydrogen Bond from Ambient Conditions down to Ultra-low Temperatures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IO7ZDQGC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11589}
}
read the original abstract

Many experimental techniques such as tagging photodissociation and helium nanodroplet isolation spectroscopy operate at very low temperatures in order to investigate hydrogen bonding. To elucidate the differences between such ultra-cold and usual ambient conditions, different hydrogen bonded systems are studied systematically from 300 K down to about 1 K using path integral simulations that explicitly consider both, the quantum nature of the nuclei and thermal fluctuations. For that purpose, finite sized water clusters, specifically the water dimer and hexamer, protonated water clusters including the Zundel and Eigen complexes, as well as hexagonal ice as a condensed phase representative are compared directly as a function of temperature. While weaker hydrogen bonds, as present in the neutral systems, show distinct structural differences between ambient conditions and the ultra-cold regime, the stronger hydrogen bonds of the protonated water clusters are less perturbed by temperature compared to their quantum ground state. In all studied systems, the quantum delocalization of the nuclei is found to vary drastically with temperature. Interestingly, upon reaching temperatures of about 1 K, the spatial quantum delocalization of the heavy oxygens approaches that of the protons for relatively weak spatial constraints, and even significantly exceeds the latter in case of the centered hydrogen bond in the Zundel complex. These findings are relevant for comparisons between experiments on hydrogen bonding carried out at ultra-cold versus ambient conditions as well as to understand quantum delocalization phenomena of nuclei by seamlessly extending our insights into noncovalent interactions down to ultra-low temperatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11589 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the temperature dependent position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Normalized probability distributions of the heavy atom donor–acceptor distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the quantum delocalization of the oxygen (red) and hydrogen atoms involved in hydrogen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chakrabarty , author M

    author author S. Chakrabarty , author M. Holz , author E. K. \ Campbell , author A. Banerjee , author D. Gerlich , \ and\ author J. P. \ Maier ,\ 10.1021/jz402264n journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 4051 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/jz402264n

  2. [2]

    author author A. B. \ Wolk , author C. M. \ Leavitt , author E. Garand , \ and\ author M. A. \ Johnson ,\ 10.1021/ar400125a journal journal Acc. Chem. Res. \ volume 47 ,\ pages 202 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ar400125a 2014

  3. [3]

    Roithov \' a , author A

    author author J. Roithov \' a , author A. Gray , author E. Andris , author J. Ja s \' i k , \ and\ author D. Gerlich ,\ 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00489 journal journal Acc. Chem. Res. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 223 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00489 2016

  4. [4]

    Goyal , author D

    author author S. Goyal , author D. L. \ Schutt , \ and\ author G. Scoles ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.933 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 933 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.933 1992

  5. [5]

    author author J. P. \ Toennies \ and\ author A. F. \ Vilesov ,\ 10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.1 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.1 1998

  6. [6]

    Stienkemeier \ and\ author A

    author author F. Stienkemeier \ and\ author A. F. \ Vilesov ,\ 10.1063/1.1415433 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 10119 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1415433 2001

  7. [7]

    author author J. P. \ Toennies \ and\ author A. F. \ Vilesov ,\ 10.1002/anie.200300611 journal journal Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. \ volume 43 ,\ pages 2622 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1002/anie.200300611 2004

  8. [8]

    Stienkemeier \ and\ author K

    author author F. Stienkemeier \ and\ author K. K. \ Lehmann ,\ 10.1088/0953-4075/39/8/R01 journal journal J. Phys. B \ volume 39 ,\ pages R127 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/0953-4075/39/8/r01 2006

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Liu , author M

    author author K. Liu , author M. G. \ Brown , author C. Carter , author R. J. \ Saykally , author J. K. \ Gregory , \ and\ author D. C. \ Clary ,\ 10.1038/381501a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 381 ,\ pages 501 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  2. [10]

    author author J. D. \ Cruzan , author L. B. \ Braly , author K. Liu , author M. G. \ Brown , author J. G. \ Loeser , \ and\ author R. J. \ Saykally ,\ 10.1126/science.271.5245.59 journal journal Science \ volume 271 ,\ pages 59 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    Schwan , author M

    author author R. Schwan , author M. Kaufmann , author D. Leicht , author G. Schwaab , \ and\ author M. Havenith ,\ 10.1039/c6cp04333j journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 24063 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    Schwan , author C

    author author R. Schwan , author C. Qu , author D. Mani , author N. Pal , author L. van der Meer , author B. Redlich , author C. Leforestier , author J. M. \ Bowman , author G. Schwaab , \ and\ author M. Havenith ,\ 10.1002/anie.201906048 journal journal Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. ...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Yang , author C

    author author N. Yang , author C. H. \ Duong , author P. J. \ Kelleher , author A. B. \ McCoy , \ and\ author M. A. \ Johnson ,\ 10.1126/science.aaw4086 journal journal Science \ volume 364 ,\ pages 275 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Gutberlet , author G

    author author A. Gutberlet , author G. Schwaab , author \" O . Birer , author M. Masia , author A. Kaczmarek , author H. Forbert , author M. Havenith , \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1126/science.1171753 journal journal Science \ volume 324 ,\ pages 1545 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    Mani , author R

    author author D. Mani , author R. P. \ De Tudela , author R. Schwan , author N. Pal , author S. K \" o rning , author H. Forbert , author B. Redlich , author A. F. \ Van Der Meer , author G. Schwaab , author D. Marx , \ and\ author M. Havenith ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.aav8179 journal...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Okumura , author L

    author author M. Okumura , author L. I. \ Yeh , author J. D. \ Myers , \ and\ author Y. T. \ Lee ,\ 10.1063/1.451079 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 85 ,\ pages 2328 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986 doi

  9. [17]

    author author J. M. \ Headrick , author E. G. \ Diken , author R. S. \ Walters , author N. I. \ Hammer , author R. A. \ Christie , author J. Cui , author E. M. \ Myshakin , author M. A. \ Duncan , author M. A. \ Johnson , \ and\ author K. D. \ Jordan ,\ 10.1126/science.1113094...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Heine , author M

    author author N. Heine , author M. R. \ Fagiani , author M. Rossi , author T. Wende , author G. Berden , author V. Blum , \ and\ author K. R. \ Asmis ,\ 10.1021/ja401359t journal journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. \ volume 135 ,\ pages 8266 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author J. A. \ Fournier , author C. T. \ Wolke , author M. A. \ Johnson , author T. T. \ Odbadrakh , author K. D. \ Jordan , author S. M. \ Kathmann , \ and\ author S. S. \ Xantheas ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b04355 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 119 ,\ pages 9425 ...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author C. T. \ Wolke , author J. A. \ Fournier , author L. C. \ Dzugan , author M. R. \ Fagiani , author T. T. \ Odbadrakh , author H. Knorke , author K. D. \ Jordan , author A. B. \ McCoy , author K. R. \ Asmis , \ and\ author M. A. \ Johnson ,\ 1 journal journal Scien...

    2016

  13. [21]

    author author M. R. \ Fagiani , author H. Knorke , author T. K. \ Esser , author N. Heine , author C. T. \ Wolke , author S. Gewinner , author W. Sch \" o llkopf , author M. P. \ Gaigeot , author R. Spezia , author M. A. \ Johnson , \ and\ author K. R. \ Asmis ,\ 10.1039/c6cp0...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author A. D. \ Fortes ,\ 10.1107/S2052520618002159 journal journal Acta Cryst. B \ volume 74 ,\ pages 196 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    author author D. T. W. \ Buckingham , author J. J. \ Neumeier , author S. H. \ Masunaga , \ and\ author Y.-K. \ Yu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.185505 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 185505 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    R \" o ttger , author A

    author author K. R \" o ttger , author A. Endriss , author J. Ihringer , author S. Doyle , \ and\ author W. F. \ Kuhs ,\ 10.1107/S0108768194004933 journal journal Acta Cryst. B \ volume 50 ,\ pages 644 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  17. [25]

    R \" o ttger , author A

    author author K. R \" o ttger , author A. Endriss , author J. Ihringer , author S. Doyle , \ and\ author W. F. \ Kuhs ,\ 10.1107/S0108768111046908 journal journal Acta Cryst. B \ volume 68 ,\ pages 91 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    author author M. E. \ Tuckerman , author D. Marx , author M. L. \ Klein , \ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ 10.1126/science.275.5301.817 journal journal Science \ volume 275 ,\ pages 817 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  19. [27]

    Benoit , author D

    author author M. Benoit , author D. Marx , \ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ 10.1038/32609 journal journal Nature \ volume 392 ,\ pages 258 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  20. [28]

    Marx , author M

    author author D. Marx , author M. E. \ Tuckerman , author J. Hutter , \ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ 10.1038/17579 journal journal Nature \ volume 397 ,\ pages 601 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  21. [29]

    author author M. E. \ Tuckerman \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4946 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 4946 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    author author M. E. \ Tuckerman , author D. Marx , \ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ 10.1038/nature00797 journal journal Nature \ volume 417 ,\ pages 925 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  23. [31]

    Benoit \ and\ author D

    author author M. Benoit \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1002/cphc.200400533 journal journal ChemPhysChem \ volume 6 ,\ pages 1738 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    author author J. A. \ Morrone \ and\ author R. Car ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.017801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 101 ,\ pages 017801 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  25. [33]

    Zeidler , author P

    author author A. Zeidler , author P. S. \ Salmon , author H. E. \ Fischer , author J. C. \ Neuefeind , author J. M. \ Simonson , \ and\ author T. E. \ Markland ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/24/28/284126 journal journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter \ volume 24 ,\ pages 284126 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [34]

    Ceriotti , author J

    author author M. Ceriotti , author J. Cuny , author M. Parrinello , \ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1308560110 journal journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA \ volume 110 ,\ pages 15591 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    Wang , author M

    author author L. Wang , author M. Ceriotti , \ and\ author T. E. \ Markland ,\ 10.1063/1.4894287 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 141 ,\ pages 104502 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    Schran , author O

    author author C. Schran , author O. Marsalek , \ and\ author T. E. \ Markland ,\ 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.04.034 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 678 ,\ pages 289 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    Habershon , author T

    author author S. Habershon , author T. E. \ Markland , \ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ 10.1063/1.3167790 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 024501 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    \ Li , author B

    author author X.-Z. \ Li , author B. Walker , \ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1016653108 journal journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA \ volume 108 ,\ pages 6369 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  31. [39]

    Uhl , author D

    author author F. Uhl , author D. Marx , \ and\ author M. Ceriotti ,\ 10.1063/1.4959602 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 145 ,\ pages 054101 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    Schran , author F

    author author C. Schran , author F. Brieuc , \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00705 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 5068 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    Ceriotti , author J

    author author M. Ceriotti , author J. More , \ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.027 journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 185 ,\ pages 1019 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    @noop title CP2K, freely available at the URL https://www.cp2k.org, released under GPL license , \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  35. [43]

    Hutter , author M

    author author J. Hutter , author M. Iannuzzi , author F. Schiffmann , \ and\ author J. Vandevondele ,\ 10.1002/wcms.1159 journal journal Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 15 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    Schran , author J

    author author C. Schran , author J. Behler , \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08734 journal journal arXiv:1908.08734 [physics.chem-ph] \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1908 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Plimpton ,\ 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 journal journal J

    author author S. Plimpton ,\ 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 journal journal J. Comput. Phys. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  38. [46]

    Ram \' i rez \ and\ author C

    author author R. Ram \' i rez \ and\ author C. P. \ Herrero ,\ 10.1063/1.3503764 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 144511 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    author author C. P. \ Herrero \ and\ author R. Ram \' i rez ,\ 10.1063/1.3559466 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 094510 ( year 2011 a ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  40. [48]

    author author C. P. \ Herrero \ and\ author R. Ram \' i rez ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.224112 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 84 ,\ pages 224112 ( year 2011 b ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    Habershon \ and\ author D

    author author S. Habershon \ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ 10.1039/C1CP21520E journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 19714 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    author author T. E. \ Markland \ and\ author B. J. \ Berne ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1203365109 journal journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA \ volume 109 ,\ pages 7988 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  43. [51]

    Kapil , author A

    author author V. Kapil , author A. Cuzzocrea , \ and\ author M. Ceriotti ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b03896 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. B \ volume 122 ,\ pages 6048 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    Babin \ and\ author F

    author author V. Babin \ and\ author F. Paesani ,\ 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.06.041 journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 580 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    Ceriotti \ and\ author D

    author author M. Ceriotti \ and\ author D. E. \ Manolopoulos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.100604 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 100604 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    Drechsel-Grau \ and\ author D

    author author C. Drechsel-Grau \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.148302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 148302 ( year 2014 a ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    Drechsel-Grau \ and\ author D

    author author C. Drechsel-Grau \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1002/anie.201405989 journal journal Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. \ volume 53 ,\ pages 10937 ( year 2014 b ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  48. [56]

    VandeVondele , author M

    author author J. VandeVondele , author M. Krack , author F. Mohamed , author M. Parrinello , author T. Chassaing , \ and\ author J. Hutter ,\ 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 167 ,\ pages 103 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  49. [57]

    Hammer , author L

    author author B. Hammer , author L. B. \ Hansen , \ and\ author J. K. \ N rskov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.7413 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 59 ,\ pages 7413 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  50. [58]

    Grimme , author J

    author author S. Grimme , author J. Antony , author S. Ehrlich , \ and\ author H. Krieg ,\ 10.1063/1.3382344 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 132 ,\ pages 154104 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  51. [59]

    Goedecker , author M

    author author S. Goedecker , author M. Teter , \ and\ author J. Hutter ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 54 ,\ pages 1703 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  52. [60]

    Morawietz \ and\ author J

    author author T. Morawietz \ and\ author J. Behler ,\ 10.1021/jp401225b journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 117 ,\ pages 7356 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  53. [61]

    Forster-Tonigold \ and\ author A

    author author K. Forster-Tonigold \ and\ author A. Gro ,\ 10.1063/1.4892400 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 141 ,\ pages 064501 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  54. [62]

    Morawietz , author A

    author author T. Morawietz , author A. Singraber , author C. Dellago , \ and\ author J. Behler ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1602375113 journal journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA \ volume 113 ,\ pages 8368 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    Luzar \ and\ author D

    author author A. Luzar \ and\ author D. Chandler ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.928 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 928 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  56. [64]

    Kumar , author J

    author author R. Kumar , author J. R. \ Schmidt , \ and\ author J. L. \ Skinner ,\ 10.1063/1.2742385 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 126 ,\ pages 204107 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  57. [65]

    Weiss ,\ 10.1142/8334 title Quantum Dissipative Systems ,\ edition 4th \ ed.\ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author U. Weiss ,\ 10.1142/8334 title Quantum Dissipative Systems ,\ edition 4th \ ed.\ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  58. [66]

    Benoit , author A

    author author M. Benoit , author A. H. \ Romero , \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.145501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 145501 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  59. [67]

    Stokely , author M

    author author K. Stokely , author M. G. \ Mazza , author H. E. \ Stanley , \ and\ author G. Franzese ,\ 10.1073/pnas.0912756107 journal journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA \ volume 107 ,\ pages 1301 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  60. [68]

    author author J. M. \ Guevara-Vela , author E. Romero-Montalvo , author V. A. \ Mora G \' o mez , author R. Ch \' a vez-Calvillo , author M. Garc \' i a-Revilla , author E. Francisco , author \' A . M. \ Pend \' a s , \ and\ author T. Rocha-Rinza ,\ 10.1039/c6cp00763e journal ...

    doi

  61. [69]

    Novak ,\ in\ 10.1007/bfb0116438 booktitle Struct

    author author A. Novak ,\ in\ 10.1007/bfb0116438 booktitle Struct. Bond. Vol. 18 Large Mol. \ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Berlin, Heidelberg ,\ year 1974 )\ pp.\ pages 177--216 NoStop

    1974 doi

  62. [70]

    author author D. A. \ Schmidt \ and\ author K. Miki ,\ 10.1021/jp074737n journal journal J. Phys. Chem. A \ volume 111 ,\ pages 10119 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  63. [71]

    author author Y. A. \ Galkina , author N. A. \ Kryuchkova , author M. A. \ Vershinin , \ and\ author B. A. \ Kolesov ,\ 10.1134/s0022476617050080 journal journal J. Struct. Chem. \ volume 58 ,\ pages 911 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    Walewski , author H

    author author L. Walewski , author H. Forbert , \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1080/00268976.2013.822112 journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 2555 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  65. [73]

    Walewski , author H

    author author L. Walewski , author H. Forbert , \ and\ author D. Marx ,\ 10.1063/1.4870595 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 140 ,\ pages 144305 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.