Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 158 references

Scattering of electronic waves in square and triangular lattice half-planes with monoatomic step

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A bulk electron wave scattered by a single monoatomic step on square and triangular lattice half-planes is solved exactly by a closed contour integral, with a far-field approximation that matches numerics.

desk verdict The square-lattice step solution is a credible, checkable extension of the author's Wiener-Hopf framework, but the triangular-lattice part has a load-bearing internal inconsistency in the energy ranges that undermines the advertised far-field comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00129 v1 pith:KULWYI23 submitted 2019-08-31 cond-mat.mes-hall

Basant Lal Sharma This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords tight-bindingmodelWiener-Hopfmethodelectronscatteringmonoatomicsteplatticehalf-planefar-fieldasymptoticssurfacediffraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that scattering of a bulk electron plane wave by a single monoatomic step on a square or triangular lattice half-plane has an exact solution in the nearest-neighbour tight-binding model. The model treats the surface as an infinitely high barrier, so the wavefunction is exactly zero at the step-adjacent sites. A standard complex-variable technique for half-plane difference equations, the discrete Wiener–Hopf method, reduces the scattered wave to a contour integral, and its far-field approximation to a saddle-point sum plus reflected waves; both are checked against a numerical simulation on a finite grid. If correct, the paper supplies an analytic foundation for computing how conduction electrons scatter off atomic steps, the microscopic input that phenomenological transport models compress into a single specularity parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the discrete Wiener–Hopf equation for the one-sided Fourier transform of the scattered field, with kernel $L(z)=\frac{1}{2}(1+rh/Q)$ for the square lattice and its analogue for the triangular lattice, where $Q$ carries the band structure, $h=\sqrt{Q-2}$, and $r=\sqrt{Q+2}$. The kernel is multiplicatively factorized as $L=L_+L_-$, splitting the equation into functions analytic inside and outside a common annulus; Liouville's theorem then fixes the unknown half-range transforms. The scattered field is recovered from the general modal solution $\psi_y^F=c_1\lambda^y+c_2\lambda^{-y}$ with $\lambda=(r-h)/(r+h)$, and the far field follows by stationary-phase analysis of the resulting diffraction integral. The same machinery handles both lattices, with the triangular case obtained by embedding two copies of the lattice into a rectangular grid.

What would settle it

An independent, high-resolution numerical solution of the Dirichlet lattice problem (1.6a)–(1.6b) with a different absorbing-boundary scheme can check the Wiener–Hopf formulas (3.1)–(3.2); a separate finite-barrier simulation, comparing $|\psi_{0,1}|$ versus $\Theta$ with Figs. 9–11, would test whether the infinite-barrier premise describes real surfaces.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the scattered wavefunction $\psi^s$ at any lattice site is given exactly by the contour integral (3.2), whose integrand is assembled from the factorized Wiener–Hopf kernel and two pole terms; with $\tau=0$ for the square lattice and $\tau=1$ for the triangular lattice, the same closed-form expression (3.1) covers both geometries. The far-field approximation (4.2) represents the result as the sum of saddle-point contributions, the diffracted cylindrical wave, plus two reflected plane-wave terms that switch on and off at a critical angle $\theta_r$, and this asymptotic formula is shown to match the numerical solution on a finite grid with absorbing boundaries. The paper maintains that the solution is exact within the tight-binding model, and that the only essential physical idealisation is the Dirichlet boundary condition at the step.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the electron wavefunction vanishes exactly on the step-adjacent sites, modelling the surface as an infinitely high potential barrier; if a real surface has a finite barrier, the computed scattering amplitudes do not describe it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The exact contour-integral formula (3.2) gives the scattered wavefunction at every lattice site, so no uncontrolled truncation is needed for a single step under the Dirichlet condition.
  • The far-field formula (4.2) provides explicit angle- and energy-dependent scattering amplitudes, which can be inserted into convolution schemes for rough surfaces to replace the single specularity parameter $p$.
  • For low incident energies the kernel $L$ approaches 1, and the step effectively acts as a flat geometric mirror; the numerically observed deviations are attributed to imperfect absorbing boundaries rather than model error.
  • The same Wiener–Hopf construction extends to honeycomb lattices and to lattice waveguides with steps, as the paper states for future work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The factorization of the solution into a lattice-dependent factor $K(z)$ and two pole terms suggests that a step-scattering amplitude could be defined as a measurable quantity, giving an angle- and energy-resolved specularity parameter that interpolates between $p=1$ and $p=0$.
  • A finite-barrier version of the problem would differ from this solution near the step; since the paper identifies the infinite barrier as essential, a perturbative expansion around the Dirichlet solution is the natural next test of how much the hard-wall idealisation matters.
  • For a periodic array of identical steps, the single-step scattering phase could be combined with Bloch conditions to predict coherent interference features, such as minigaps, in the surface conductance of vicinal surfaces.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies scattering of an electronic plane wave by a monoatomic step in a square lattice half-plane and a triangular lattice half-plane, using the nearest-neighbour tight-binding model with Dirichlet boundary conditions on the missing sites. The author formulates the problem as a discrete Wiener-Hopf equation, obtains an exact representation of the scattered wavefunction in (3.1)-(3.2), derives a far-field asymptotic approximation in (4.2), and presents graphical comparisons with a PML-based numerical solution in Figs. 13 and 15. The paper also gives explicit formulas for the step-site wavefunction ψ0,1 for the square lattice and ψ1,1 for the triangular lattice and discusses applications to surface scattering and STM interference patterns.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, the paper provides a useful exact integral-representation solution and a far-field formula for a textbook tight-binding scattering geometry, extending the author's prior Wiener-Hopf analyses of semi-infinite cracks and rigid constraints to the monoatomic step. The main strengths are that no parameter is fitted to the numerics, the numerical solution is an independent check rather than an input, and the unified treatment of square and triangular lattices through the τ parameter is economical. The exact step-site expression (3.3) is an explicit, easily testable result. However, two load-bearing parts of the validation are currently not fully checkable from the manuscript: the derivation of the pole-residue terms in the far-field formula is omitted, and the stated validity interval for that formula is internally contradictory. These issues do not obviously affect the exact integral representation, but they do affect the advertised far-field asymptotics and its numerical verification.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.1) and Appendix E.2] The validity interval for the far-field approximation in the triangular case is stated inconsistently. Equation (4.1) restricts the analysis to β⁻¹Eκ ∈ (−3, 7/3) ∪ (7/3, 3), while Appendix E.2 says the asymptotic analysis follows for β⁻¹Eκ ∈ (−3, 7/3) ∪ (16/3, 6). Since β⁻¹Eκ for the triangular band lies in (−3, 3), the second interval cannot be correct as written. If (16/3, 6) is a typo for (7/3, 3), the error should be corrected; if it is the interval claimed by the supporting analysis in [112], then (4.2) is unsupported in the upper-band interval used in Fig. 7(iv) and Fig. 15(iv), where β⁻¹Eκ = 2.52. Please reconcile the two statements and explicitly confirm that (4.2) is applied only where it is valid.
  2. [§4, footnote 3 and Eq. (4.2c)] The residue contribution ψ^s_{x,y}|_{Ps} is stated in footnote 3 to be 'obtained after several manipulations which are omitted,' and the functions ψrA_{x,y}, ψrB_{x,y}, and the angle θr in (4.2c) are not defined explicitly in the main text (Appendix C identifies ψ^s_{x,y}|_{Ps} with the geometric field ψg only indirectly). Because these terms are part of the total formula (4.2) used in the numerical comparisons in Figs. 13 and 15, the claim that the asymptotic formula matches the numerics cannot be verified from the manuscript. Please provide the derivation of the pole-residue terms, explicit expressions for ψrA, ψrB and θr, and a clear statement of how (4.2c) relates to the geometric solution (C.3).
  3. [§5, Figs. 13 and 15] The agreement between the numerical solution and the far-field asymptotic approximation is only documented graphically. No error norm, convergence with increasing contour radius R∞, or sensitivity to the PML parameters is reported. To substantiate the central claim of a validated far-field approximation, please include a quantitative error measure (for example, the relative L² or L∞ difference along the discrete contours) and show its behaviour with R∞ for at least the four parameter sets displayed in Figs. 13 and 15.
  4. [§3 and Appendix B, Eqs. (3.1), (B.1b)] The multiplicative factors L+(z) and L−(z) are defined only through contour integrals, so (3.1)-(3.2) is an exact integral representation whose practical evaluation still requires further computation. This is not a correctness defect, but the abstract's phrase 'exact solution' should be qualified, and the paper should either outline a numerical strategy for evaluating L± and the outer contour integral in (3.2) or state explicitly that the evaluation follows the procedures of [107,112] with the concrete details needed for reproducibility.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, Eq. (1.8)] The one-sided transform notation ψs_{1;−}, ψs_{0;+} is used in (1.8) before the definitions in (A.1) are recalled; consider introducing the notation earlier or adding a pointer.
  2. [§1 and Appendix D, Eqs. (1.10b), (1.11a), (D.1a)] The expressions 'e−e' and 'e+e' are confusing; they should be written as e^{-ε} and e^{+ε} throughout.
  3. [§1, Eq. (1.6a)] The Heaviside function H(x) in the boundary-condition discussion is first used without a definition; please specify the convention for H(0), e.g., H(0)=1 if the step site is included.
  4. [§2, after Eq. (2.1)] The sentence 'Because T•• and T••R are "uncoupled"' is ambiguous, since the replicated-lattice construction places the two sublattices on a common rectangular grid; please clarify in what sense the two triangular lattices are decoupled in the hopping model.
  5. [Appendix E, Eqs. (E.2)-(E.5)] The strip S is written in terms of ξ1 and ξ2 but these components are not defined; adding ξ = ξ1 + iξ2 with ξ1, ξ2 ∈ R would remove ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the Wiener-Hopf solution is derived from the stated lattice model and the numerical comparisons are independent checks.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained: the tight-binding model (1.2)-(1.4), the boundary condition (1.6b), the Wiener-Hopf equations (1.11a) and (2.5), and the exact solution (3.1)-(3.2) are connected by explicit manipulations in Appendices A-D, with no fitted parameter inserted between them. The numerical results in Section 5 solve the same algebraic system (1.6a)-(1.6b)/(2.3) with PML and are used only as an independent comparison, not as an input to the Wiener-Hopf factorization. The author's self-citations to [107,108,112,113,116] supply the standard discrete Wiener-Hopf factorization, saddle-point analysis, and absence-of-surface-wave lemmas; these are prior mathematical techniques rather than a restatement of the step-scattering result. Footnote 3 admits omitted residue manipulations for the pole contributions, and the validity range for the triangular lattice stated in (4.1) differs from the range quoted in Appendix E.2; these are verification and correctness concerns, not circularity. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted quantity or to a definition of the target quantity, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the nearest-neighbor tight-binding Hamiltonian with constant hopping, Dirichlet boundary conditions at the step, the absence of localized surface waves (cited to prior work), and standard Wiener-Hopf factorization. No free parameters are fitted; beta is a model input, and the incident wave parameters are specified by the problem.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Nearest-neighbor tight-binding model with a single hopping integral beta, ignoring lattice spacing and transfer integral modifications near the surface.
    Stated in Footnote 2 and used throughout; the Hamiltonian (1.2) and band structures (1.3), (2.2) depend on this.
  • domain assumption The electron wavefunction vanishes at the lattice sites adjacent to the step (Dirichlet boundary condition).
    Enforced in (1.6b) and discussed in Section 6 as an essential assumption.
  • domain assumption No localized surface waves exist on the semi-infinite square/triangular lattice with Dirichlet boundary.
    Stated in Section 1 (square) and Section 2 (triangular), cited to [97,115]. Used to justify that only bulk scattering need be considered.
  • standard math The Wiener-Hopf kernel L admits the multiplicative factorization L = L+ L- with the stated analyticity (L+ and L- have neither poles nor zeros in their half-planes).
    Appendix B; standard result for the Wiener-Hopf technique [84].
  • standard math Radiation condition via the limiting absorption principle E_kappa tending to E_kappa + i0 selects the outgoing (decaying) solution.
    Stated in Section 1; standard in scattering theory.
  • standard math The classical saddle-point method and Liouville's theorem apply to the integral representations.
    Used in Sections 4 and Appendices D and E.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering of electronic waves in square and triangular lattice half-planes with monoatomic step." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KULWYI23

@misc{pith2026190900129,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering of electronic waves in square and triangular lattice half-planes with monoatomic step},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KULWYI23}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00129}
}
read the original abstract

Scattering of electronic waves in square and triangular lattice half-planes by a step on the surface is analyzed using the nearest-neighbour tight binding approximation. The changes in lattice spacing and the transfer integral between nearest-neighbor sites near the surface are ignored. A standard application of the discrete Wiener-Hopf method leads to an exact solution of the scattering problem associated with incidence from the `bulk'. A far-field approximation of electronic wavefunction, as well as its graphical comparison with a numerical solution, are also provided. Natural applications and possible extensions are based on the bulk Brillouin zone for two dimensional lattice planes as well as surface energy bands for fcc crystals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00129 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Semi-infinite half space with step. Incident bulk (conduction) electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of square and triangular lattice structures with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Energy bands Eκ(κx, κy) in the bulk for (a) S•• and (b) T••. between neighboring sites in the potential and an on-site interaction term (assumed to be zero as it appears as an offset only). 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Semi-infinite square and triangular lattice structure with step (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: | ψ | 2 for S••. (i) β −1Eκ = −3.38, κ inc = 0.81, Θ = 65.8 deg, (ii) β −1Eκ = −2.56, κ inc = 1.27, Θ = 71.5 deg, (iii) β −1Eκ = 0.84, κ inc = 2.8, Θ = 50.7 deg, and (iv) β −1Eκ = 1.52, κ inc = 2.57, Θ = 54.33 deg. A = 1, E2 = 10−3 , Ngrid = 71, Npml = 58. Let a semi-i…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: | ψ − ψ g | for S••. The details correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: | ψ | 2 for T••. (i) β −1Eκ = −2.75, κ inc = 0.5, Θ = 65.8 deg, (ii) β −1Eκ = −0.75, κ inc = 1.63, Θ = 72.6 deg, (iii) β −1Eκ = 1.84, κ inc = 2.88, Θ = 78.3 deg, and (iv) β −1Eκ = 2.52, κ inc = 3.4, Θ = 48.5 deg. A = 1, E2 = 10−3 , Ngrid = 101, Npml = 82 [PITH_FULL_IM…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: | ψ − ψ g | for T••. The details correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Re ψ0,1 (blue), Im ψ0,1 (red), and |ψ0,1 | (black) vs Θ ∈ (0, π) for four choices of β −1Eκ = (i) −3.38, (ii) −2.56, (iii) 0.84, (iv) 1.52. Ngrid = 71, Npml = 58 for S••. where C is a rectifiable, closed, counterclockwise contour in the annulus A . These expressions ca…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Re ψ1,1 (blue), Im ψ1,1 (red), and |ψ1,1 | (black) vs Θ ∈ (0, π) for four choices of β −1Eκ = (i) −2.75, (ii) −0.75, (iii) 1.84, (iv) 2.52. Ngrid = 101, Npml = 82 for T••. the author [107, 108, 112]. The benefit of this choice appears below, in the form of direct appl…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Re ψ0,1 (blue), Im ψ0,1 (red), and |ψ0,1 | (black) vs β −1Eκ ∈ (−4, 4) for (left) given Θ (right) Θ on S••. The darker shades correspond to larger Θ ∈ {71.52, 65.79, 54.33, 50.73} (deg) on left and correspond to smaller Θ ∈ {108.48, 114.21, 125.67, 129.27} on righ…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Incident Reψinc (left), scattered |ψ s | (center), and Reψ (right) wave￾function for the semi-infinite square lattice structure with step S••. The details correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: | ψ s | and | ψ | (left) and arg ψ s and arg ψ (right) on a discrete semi￾circular contour as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Incident Reψinc (left), scattered |ψ s | (center), and Reψ (right) wave￾function for the semi-infinite triangular lattice structure with step T••. ticipated to be crucial in a theoretical framework for rough surfaces containing either a random distribution of steps or…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: | ψ s | and | ψ | (left) and arg ψ s and arg ψ (right) on a discrete semi-circular contour as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Semi-infinite half space with step [124]. Incident surface state elec￾tron schematically shown. The evolution of wave packets across steps on surfaces also involves inher￾ently several challenges in a more general framework [78, 21]. For surface elec￾18 [PITH_FULL_IM…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [112]

    Diffraction of waves on triangular lattice by a semi- infinite rigid constraint and crack

    B. L. Sharma. “Diffraction of waves on triangular lattice by a semi- infinite rigid constraint and crack”. In: International Journal of Solids and Structures 80 (2016), pp. 465–485. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.10.008 . url: http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0020768315004242

    2016

  2. [1]

    Charge transfer on the nanoscale: current status

    D. M. Adams et al. “Charge transfer on the nanoscale: current status”. In: The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 107.28 (2003), pp. 6668–6697

    2003

  3. [2]

    Interaction of conduction electrons with a metal sur- face

    A. F. Andreev. “Interaction of conduction electrons with a metal sur- face”. In: Soviet Physics Uspekhi 14.5 (1972), p. 609. url: http : / / stacks.iop.org/0038-5670/14/i=5/a=R04

    1972

  4. [3]

    The Size-Variation of Resistivity for Mercury and Tin

    E. R. Andrew. “The Size-Variation of Resistivity for Mercury and Tin”. In: Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A62.2 (1949), p. 77. url: http://stacks.iop.org/0370-1298/62/i=2/a=301

    1949

  5. [4]

    Electronic bound states at the surface of a metal

    G. R. Baldock. “Electronic bound states at the surface of a metal”. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 48.3 (1952), 457?469. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100027870

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100027870 1952

  6. [5]

    Electron Scattering and the Conductivity of a Film with Surface Defects

    E. Baskin and M. Entin. “Electron Scattering and the Conductivity of a Film with Surface Defects”. In: Soviet Physics JETP 30.2 (1970), p. 252

    1970

  7. [6]

    Nanoscale electron transport at the surface of a topological insulator

    S. Bauer and C. A. Bobisch. “Nanoscale electron transport at the surface of a topological insulator”. In: Nature communications 7 (2016)

    2016

  8. [7]

    Quantum transport in semiconductor nanostructures

    C. Beenakker and H. van Houten. “Quantum transport in semiconductor nanostructures”. In: Solid state physics 44 (1991), pp. 1–228

    1991

Show all 158 references
  1. [8]

    A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electro- magnetic waves

    J.-P. Berenger. “A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electro- magnetic waves”. In: J. Comp. Phys. 114 (1994), pp. 185–200

    1994

  2. [9]

    Analysis of all-frequency variational behavior of the Kirchhoff approximation for a classic surface-scattering model

    J. F. Bird. “Analysis of all-frequency variational behavior of the Kirchhoff approximation for a classic surface-scattering model”. In: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2.6 (June 1985), pp. 945–953. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.2.000945 . url: http://josaa.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-2-6-945

    1985 doi

  3. [10]

    Scattering from surface step edges in strong topological insulators

    R. R. Biswas and A. V. Balatsky. “Scattering from surface step edges in strong topological insulators”. In: Physical Review B 83.7 (2011), p. 075439

    2011

  4. [11]

    ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern

    F. Bloch. “ ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern”. In: Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei 52.7 (1929), pp. 555– 600

    1929

  5. [12]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf. Principles of Optics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1999

    1999

  6. [13]

    The discretized Schr¨ odinger equation and simple models for semiconductor quantum wells

    T. B. Boykin and G. Klimeck. “The discretized Schr¨ odinger equation and simple models for semiconductor quantum wells”. In: European Journal of Physics 25.4 (2004), p. 503. url: http://stacks.iop.org/0143- 0807/25/i=4/a=006

    2004

  7. [14]

    Brillouin

    L. Brillouin. Wave propagation in periodic structures; electric filters and crystal lattices. New York: Dover Publications, 1953. 20

    1953

  8. [15]

    Confinement of Surface State Electrons in Fabry-P´ erot Resonators

    L. B¨ urgi et al. “Confinement of Surface State Electrons in Fabry-P´ erot Resonators”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (24 Dec. 1998), pp. 5370–5373. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5370. url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.81.5370

    1998 doi

  9. [16]

    Atomic Layer Growth on Al(111) by Ion Bombard- ment

    C. Busse et al. “Atomic Layer Growth on Al(111) by Ion Bombard- ment”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2 July 2000), pp. 326–329. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 85 . 326. url: http : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103/PhysRevLett.85.326

    2000

  10. [17]

    Callaway

    J. Callaway. Energy band theory . Pure and applied physics. New York: Academic Press, 1964

    1964

  11. [18]

    The Conductivity of Thin Wires in a Magnetic Field

    R. G. Chambers. “The Conductivity of Thin Wires in a Magnetic Field”. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 202.1070 (1950), pp. 378–394. doi: 10.1098/ rspa.1950.0107 . url: http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/ con...

    1950

  12. [19]

    Theory of Electronic Properties of Thin Films of d-Band Metals

    B. R. Cooper and A. J. Bennett. “Theory of Electronic Properties of Thin Films of d-Band Metals”. In: Phys. Rev. B 1 (12 June 1970), pp. 4654–

    1970

  13. [20]

    Imaging standing waves in a two- dimensional electron gas

    M. Crommie, C. Lutz, and D. Eigler. “Imaging standing waves in a two- dimensional electron gas”. In: Nature 363.6429 (1993), pp. 524–527

    1993

  14. [21]

    Spread of highly localized wave- packet in the tight-binding lattice: Entropic and information-theoretical characterization

    F. Cuevas, S. Curilef, and A. Plastino. “Spread of highly localized wave- packet in the tight-binding lattice: Entropic and information-theoretical characterization”. In: Annals of Physics 326.10 (2011), pp. 2834–2844

    2011

  15. [22]

    Surface States

    S. Davison and J. Levine. “Surface States”. In: Solid State Physics 25 (1970), pp. 1–149. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0081-1947(08) 60008- 9. url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0081194708600089

    1970 doi

  16. [23]

    Analytical Techniques for Multiple Scattering from Rough Surfaces

    J. A. Desanto and G. S. Brown. “Analytical Techniques for Multiple Scattering from Rough Surfaces”. In: Progress in Optics 23 (1986), pp. 1– 62

    1986

  17. [24]

    Edge scattering of electrons in graphene: Boltzmann equation approach to the transport in graphene nanoribbons and nanodisks

    V. K. Dugaev and M. I. Katsnelson. “Edge scattering of electrons in graphene: Boltzmann equation approach to the transport in graphene nanoribbons and nanodisks”. In:Phys. Rev. B 88 (23 Dec. 2013), p. 235432. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.235432. url: http://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.11...

    2013 doi

  18. [25]

    E. N. Economou. Green’s functions in quantum physics . second. Berlin: Springer, 1983

    1983

  19. [26]

    Discrete spatial optical solitons in waveguide arrays

    H. Eisenberg et al. “Discrete spatial optical solitons in waveguide arrays”. In: Physical Review Letters 81.16 (1998), p. 3383

    1998

  20. [27]

    Asymptotic representations of Fourier integrals and the method of stationary phase

    A. Erd´ elyi. “Asymptotic representations of Fourier integrals and the method of stationary phase”. In: Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 3.1 (1955), pp. 17–27. 21

    1955

  21. [28]

    I. M. F. F. G. Bass and D. ter Haar (Auth.) Wave Scattering from Sta- tistically Rough Surfaces. 0th ed. Pergamon Press, 1979

    1979

  22. [29]

    L. B. Felsen and N. Marcuvitz. Radiation and Scattering of Waves . En- glewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice–Halls, 1973

    1973

  23. [30]

    Influence of surface roughness on the con- ductivity of metallic and semiconducting quasi-two-dimensional struc- tures

    G. Fishman and D. Calecki. “Influence of surface roughness on the con- ductivity of metallic and semiconducting quasi-two-dimensional struc- tures”. In: Phys. Rev. B 43 (14 May 1991), pp. 11581–11585. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevB.43.11581. url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRe...

    1991

  24. [31]

    The conductivity of thin metallic films according to the elec- tron theory of metals

    K. Fuchs. “The conductivity of thin metallic films according to the elec- tron theory of metals”. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 34.1 (Jan. 1938), pp. 100–108. doi: 10 . 1017 / S0305004100019952. url: https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/ ...

    1938

  25. [32]

    Application of the z-transform to composite materials

    Y. Q. Gao and R. Marcus. “Application of the z-transform to composite materials”. In: The Journal of Chemical Physics 115.21 (2001), pp. 9929– 9934

    2001

  26. [33]

    Exact multiple scattering of waves from random rough surfaces

    N. Garcia, V. Celli, and M. Nieto-Vesperinas. “Exact multiple scattering of waves from random rough surfaces”. In: Optics Communications 30.3 (1979), pp. 279–281

    1979

  27. [34]

    Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals. I. The approximation of nearly free electrons

    E. T. Goodwin. “Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals. I. The approximation of nearly free electrons”. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 35.02 (1939), pp. 205–220

    1939

  28. [35]

    Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals. II. The approximation of tight binding: finite linear chain of atoms

    E. T. Goodwin. “Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals. II. The approximation of tight binding: finite linear chain of atoms”. In: Mathe- matical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 35.2 (1939), pp. 221–231

    1939

  29. [36]

    Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals: III. The approximation of tight binding: further extensions

    E. T. Goodwin. “Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals: III. The approximation of tight binding: further extensions”. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 35.2 (1939), pp. 232– 241

    1939

  30. [37]

    Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals: IV. The ac- tivation of adsorbed atoms by surface electrons

    E. T. Goodwin. “Electronic states at the surfaces of crystals: IV. The ac- tivation of adsorbed atoms by surface electrons”. In: Mathematical Pro- ceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 35.3 (1939), pp. 474– 484

    1939

  31. [38]

    Resistivity dominated by surface scattering in sub- 50 nm Cu wires

    R. L. Graham et al. “Resistivity dominated by surface scattering in sub- 50 nm Cu wires”. In: Applied Physics Letters 96.4 (2010), p. 042116. doi: 10.1063/1.3292022. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3292022

    2010 doi

  32. [39]

    Angular Dependence of Surface Scattering and Surface Mobility Cusp

    R. F. Greene. “Angular Dependence of Surface Scattering and Surface Mobility Cusp”. In: Phys. Rev. 141 (2 Jan. 1966), pp. 690–692. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRev . 141 . 690. url: http : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103/PhysRev.141.690. 22

    1966

  33. [40]

    Boundary Conditions for Electron Distributions at Crys- tal Surfaces

    R. F. Greene. “Boundary Conditions for Electron Distributions at Crys- tal Surfaces”. In: Phys. Rev. 141 (2 Jan. 1966), pp. 687–689. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRev.141.687 . url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.141.687

    1966

  34. [41]

    Scattering of Conduction Electrons by Localized Surface Charges

    R. F. Greene and R. W. O’Donnell. “Scattering of Conduction Electrons by Localized Surface Charges”. In: Phys. Rev. 147 (2 July 1966), pp. 599–

    1966

  35. [42]

    Surface transport

    R. Greene. “Surface transport”. In: Surface Science 2 (1964), pp. 101–

    1964

  36. [44]

    Electron scattering at surfaces and grain bound- aries in thin Au films

    R. Henriquez et al. “Electron scattering at surfaces and grain bound- aries in thin Au films”. In: Applied Surface Science 273 (2013), pp. 315–

    2013

  37. [45]

    Specular Boundary Scattering and Electrical Trans- port in Single-Crystal Thin Films of CoSi 2

    J. C. Hensel et al. “Specular Boundary Scattering and Electrical Trans- port in Single-Crystal Thin Films of CoSi 2”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (16 Apr. 1985), pp. 1840–1843. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1840 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1840

    1985 doi

  38. [46]

    sciencedirect

    url: http : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science / article / pii / 0039602864900482

  39. [47]

    Lattice Green’s functions for the triangular and honey- comb lattices

    T. Horiguchi. “Lattice Green’s functions for the triangular and honey- comb lattices”. In: J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972), pp. 1411–1419

    1972

  40. [48]

    Zur Quantentheorie der Doppelbindung

    E. H¨ uckel. “Zur Quantentheorie der Doppelbindung”. In: Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 60.7 (1930). On the quantum theory of double bonding, pp. 423–

    1930

  41. [49]

    E. I. Jury. Theory and application of the z-transform method . New York: John Wiley, 1964

    1964

  42. [50]

    url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0169433213003450

  43. [53]

    Geometrical Theory of Diffraction

    J. B. Keller. “Geometrical Theory of Diffraction”. In: J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52.2 (Feb. 1962), pp. 116–130. doi: 10 . 1364 / JOSA . 52 . 000116. url: http://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-52-2-116

    1962

  44. [54]

    Rays, Waves and Asymptotics

    J. B. Keller. “Rays, Waves and Asymptotics”. In: Classical and Modern Diffraction Theory (2016), p. 67

    2016

  45. [55]

    Diffraction by an Aperture. II

    J. B. Keller, R. M. Lewis, and B. D. Seckler. “Diffraction by an Aperture. II”. In: Journal of Applied Physics 28.5 (1957), pp. 570–579. doi: 10. 1063/1.1722805. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1722805

    1957 doi

  46. [56]

    Surface Scattering via Bulk Continuum States in the 3D Topological Insulator Bi 2Se3

    S. Kim et al. “Surface Scattering via Bulk Continuum States in the 3D Topological Insulator Bi 2Se3”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (5 July 2011), p. 056803. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 107 . 056803. url: http : / / link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056803

    2011 doi

  47. [57]

    E. Kaxiras. Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids . Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2003. 23

    2003

  48. [59]

    Diffraction by an Aperture

    J. B. Keller. “Diffraction by an Aperture”. In: Journal of Applied Physics 28.4 (1957), pp. 426–444. doi: 10.1063/1.1722767 . url: http://dx. doi.org/10.1063/1.1722767

    1957 doi

  49. [60]

    On the calculation of the energy of a Bloch wave in a metal

    J. Korringa. “On the calculation of the energy of a Bloch wave in a metal”. In: Physica 13.6-7 (1947), pp. 392–400. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0031- 8914(47)90013- X . url: //www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/003189144790013X

    1947

  50. [61]

    Wave functions for impurity levels

    G. F. Koster and J. Slater. “Wave functions for impurity levels”. In: Physical Review 95.5 (1954), p. 1167

    1954

  51. [62]

    Quantum Chemistry of Crystal Surfaces

    J. Koutecky. “Quantum Chemistry of Crystal Surfaces”. In: Advances in Chemical Physics . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007, pp. 85–168. doi: 10.1002/9780470143551.ch2 . url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ 9780470143551.ch2

    2007 doi

  52. [63]

    Contribution to the Theory of the Surface Electronic States in the One-Electron Approximation

    J. Kouteck´ y. “Contribution to the Theory of the Surface Electronic States in the One-Electron Approximation”. In: Phys. Rev. 108 (1 Oct. 1957), pp. 13–18. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.108.13. url: https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.108.13. 24

    1957 doi

  53. [64]

    C. Kittel. Introduction to solid state physics . Wiley, 1971. url: https: //books.google.co.in/books?id=-wBRAAAAMAAJ

    1971

  54. [65]

    Berechnung von oberfl¨ achenzust¨ anden f¨ ur einige kristalltypen nach der tight binding methode

    L. K¨ unne. “Berechnung von oberfl¨ achenzust¨ anden f¨ ur einige kristalltypen nach der tight binding methode”. In: Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B 17.10 (Oct. 1967), pp. 894–905. doi: 10.1007/BF01691641. url: https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01691641

    1967 doi

  55. [66]

    Electron Scattering at a Rough Surface

    J. F. Koch and T. E. Murray. “Electron Scattering at a Rough Surface”. In: Phys. Rev. 186 (3 Oct. 1969), pp. 722–727. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev. 186.722. url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.186.722

    1969 doi

  56. [67]

    Size dependent electrical conduction in thin metal films and wires

    D. C. Larson. “Size dependent electrical conduction in thin metal films and wires”. In: Physics of Thin Films: Advances in Research and Devel- opment. Ed. by M. H. Francombe and R. W. Hoffman. Physics of Thin Films 6. Academic Press, 1971, pp. -

    1971

  57. [68]

    The roughness-induced classical size effect in thin films

    R. Lenk and A. Knabchen. “The roughness-induced classical size effect in thin films”. In: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 5.36 (1993), p. 6563. url: http://stacks.iop.org/0953-8984/5/i=36/a=011

    1993

  58. [69]

    Multiple scattering of conduction electrons at disordered metal surfaces

    D. Lessie. “Multiple scattering of conduction electrons at disordered metal surfaces”. In: Phys. Rev. B 20 (6 Sept. 1979), pp. 2491–2505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.20.2491 . url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.20.2491

    1979 doi

  59. [70]

    Exact Normal Modes of Oscillation of a Linear Chain of Identical Particles

    J. D. Louck. “Exact Normal Modes of Oscillation of a Linear Chain of Identical Particles”. In: American Journal of Physics 30.8 (1962), pp. 585–590. doi: http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1119 / 1 . 1942116. url: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/30/8/10. 1119/1.1942116

    1962

  60. [71]

    Quantum mechanics of electrons in crystal lattices

    R. d. L. Kronig and W. Penney. “Quantum mechanics of electrons in crystal lattices”. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Math- ematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 130.814 (1931), pp. 499–513

    1931

  61. [72]

    Scattering and absorption of elec- tromagnetic radiation by a semi-infinite medium in the presence of sur- face roughness

    A. A. Maradudin and D. L. Mills. “Scattering and absorption of elec- tromagnetic radiation by a semi-infinite medium in the presence of sur- face roughness”. In: Phys. Rev. B 11 (4 Feb. 1975), pp. 1392–1415. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.1392 . url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/...

    1975 doi

  62. [73]

    Long-Range Electron Interferences at a Metal Sur- face Induced by Buried Nanocavities

    O. Kurnosikov et al. “Long-Range Electron Interferences at a Metal Sur- face Induced by Buried Nanocavities”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (6 Feb. 2009), p. 066101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.066101. url: http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.066101

    2009 doi

  63. [74]

    The effect of surface roughness on the resistivity increase in nanometric dimensions

    H. Marom and M. Eizenberg. “The effect of surface roughness on the resistivity increase in nanometric dimensions”. In: Journal of Applied Physics 99.12 (2006), p. 123705. doi: 10.1063/1.2204349. url: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2204349. 25

    2006 doi

  64. [75]

    Electrical resistance of a monatomic step on a crystal surface

    I. Matsuda et al. “Electrical resistance of a monatomic step on a crystal surface”. In: Physical review letters 93.23 (2004), p. 236801

    2004

  65. [77]

    Surface roughness and size effects in quantized films

    A. E. Meyerovich and I. V. Ponomarev. “Surface roughness and size effects in quantized films”. In:Phys. Rev. B 65 (15 Mar. 2002), p. 155413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.155413. url: http://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.155413

    2002 doi

  66. [79]

    Specular Reflection of Conduction Electrons at a Metal Surface

    R. M. More and D. Lessie. “Specular Reflection of Conduction Electrons at a Metal Surface”. In: Phys. Rev. B 8 (6 Sept. 1973), pp. 2527–2535. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.8.2527. url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.8.2527

    1973 doi

  67. [80]

    Tight-binding approximation for semi-infinite solids. Appli- cation of a transform method and of delta function normalization

    R. Marcus. “Tight-binding approximation for semi-infinite solids. Appli- cation of a transform method and of delta function normalization”. In: The Journal of chemical physics 98.7 (1993), pp. 5604–5611

    1993

  68. [81]

    Electron Conductance and Lifetimes in a Bal- listic Electron Waveguide

    K. Na and L. E. Reichl. “Electron Conductance and Lifetimes in a Bal- listic Electron Waveguide”. In: Journal of Statistical Physics 92.3 (Aug. 1998), pp. 519–542. doi: 10.1023/A:1023032420009 . url: https:// doi.org/10.1023/A:1023032420009

    1998 doi

  69. [82]

    Resistivity and Temperature Coefficient of Thin Metal Films with Rough Surface

    Y. Namba. “Resistivity and Temperature Coefficient of Thin Metal Films with Rough Surface”. In:Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 9.11 (1970), p. 1326. url: http://stacks.iop.org/1347-4065/9/i=11/a=1326

    1970

  70. [83]

    Bloch-wave scattering by crystal defects

    R. G. Newton. “Bloch-wave scattering by crystal defects”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics 32.2 (1991), pp. 551–560. doi: 10.1063/1.529392. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.529392

    1991 doi

  71. [84]

    B. Noble. Methods based on the Wiener–Hopf technique . London: Perga- mon Press, 1958

    1958

  72. [85]

    Fano resonances in nanoscale structures

    A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar. “Fano resonances in nanoscale structures”. In: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (3 Aug. 2010), pp. 2257–

    2010

  73. [86]

    Quantum coherence of bulk electrons on metals re- vealed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy

    R. Ohmann et al. “Quantum coherence of bulk electrons on metals re- vealed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy”. In: Phys. Rev. B 89 (20 May 2014), p. 205433. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.205433. url: http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.205433

    2014 doi

  74. [87]

    Oura et al

    K. Oura et al. Surface Science: An Introduction. 1st ed. Advanced Texts in Physics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. 26

    2003

  75. [88]

    Bloch waves and scattering by impurities

    G. J. Morgan. “Bloch waves and scattering by impurities”. In: Proceed- ings of the Physical Society 89.2 (1966), p. 365. url: http://stacks. iop.org/0370-1328/89/i=2/a=316

    1966

  76. [90]

    Quantum oscillations in surface properties

    A. V. de Parga et al. “Quantum oscillations in surface properties”. In: Surface Science 603.10 12 (2009). Special Issue of Surface Science dedi- cated to Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Gerhard Ertl, Nobel-Laureate in Chem- istry 2007, pp. 1389–1396. doi: http : / / dx . doi . org / ...

    2009

  77. [91]

    A new theory of the size effect in electrical conduction

    J. E. Parrott. “A new theory of the size effect in electrical conduction”. In: Proceedings of the Physical Society 85.6 (1965), p. 1143. url: http: //stacks.iop.org/0370-1328/85/i=6/a=312

    1965

  78. [92]

    Bulk Electronic Structure of Metals Resolved with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

    J. I. Pascual et al. “Bulk Electronic Structure of Metals Resolved with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (4 Feb. 2006), p. 046801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.046801. url: http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.046801

    2006 doi

  79. [93]

    Theory of wave scattering from random rough surfaces

    J. A. Ogilvy and H. M. Merklinger. “Theory of wave scattering from random rough surfaces”. In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90.6 (1991), pp. 3382–3382

    1991

  80. [94]

    Screening waves from steps and defects on Cu(111) and Au(111) imaged with STM: Contribution from bulk electrons

    L. Petersen et al. “Screening waves from steps and defects on Cu(111) and Au(111) imaged with STM: Contribution from bulk electrons”. In: Phys. Rev. B 58 (11 Sept. 1998), pp. 7361–7366. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58

    1998 doi

  81. [95]

    D. G. Pettifor. Bonding and Structure of Molecules and Solids . Oxford University Press, USA, 1995

    1995

  82. [96]

    Plasmonics: merging photonics and electronics at nanoscale dimensions

    E. Ozbay. “Plasmonics: merging photonics and electronics at nanoscale dimensions”. In: science 311.5758 (2006), pp. 189–193

    2006

  83. [97]

    On the electronic structure of semiconductor surfaces, in- terfaces and defects at surfaces or interfaces

    J. Pollmann. “On the electronic structure of semiconductor surfaces, in- terfaces and defects at surfaces or interfaces”. In: Festk¨ orperprobleme 20. Springer, 1979, pp. 117–175

    1979

  84. [98]

    Alteration of Cu conductivity in the size effect regime

    S. M. Rossnagel and T. S. Kuan. “Alteration of Cu conductivity in the size effect regime”. In: Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Mi- croelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 22.1 (2004), pp. 240–247. doi: 10.1116/1.1642639 . url: ht...

    2004 doi

  85. [99]

    Colloquium: Structural, electronic, and transport properties of silicon nanowires

    R. Rurali. “Colloquium: Structural, electronic, and transport properties of silicon nanowires”. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 82.1 (2010), p. 427. 27

    2010

  86. [100]

    Scattering and Interference in Epitaxial Graphene

    G. M. Rutter et al. “Scattering and Interference in Epitaxial Graphene”. In: Science 317.5835 (2007), pp. 219–222. doi: 10 . 1126 / science . 1142882. url: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/317/5835/ 219

    2007

  87. [101]

    Anomalous refraction and diffraction in discrete optical systems

    T. Pertsch et al. “Anomalous refraction and diffraction in discrete optical systems”. In: Physical review letters 88.9 (2002), p. 093901

    2002

  88. [102]

    Lateral confinement of surface states on stepped Cu(111)

    O. S´ anchez et al. “Lateral confinement of surface states on stepped Cu(111)”. In: Phys. Rev. B 52 (11 Sept. 1995), pp. 7894–7897. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 52 . 7894. url: http : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.7894

    1995 doi

  89. [103]

    Scattering-theoretical method for relaxed and reconstructed surfaces with applications to GaAs(110) and Si(100)-(2×1)

    M. Schmeits, A. Mazur, and J. Pollmann. “Scattering-theoretical method for relaxed and reconstructed surfaces with applications to GaAs(110) and Si(100)-(2×1)”. In: Phys. Rev. B 27 (8 Apr. 1983), pp. 5012–5031. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.5012 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10....

    1983 doi

  90. [104]

    {STM} and {STS} of bulk electron scattering by subsurface objects

    M. Schmid, S. Crampin, and P. Varga. “ {STM} and {STS} of bulk electron scattering by subsurface objects”. In: Journal of Electron Spec- troscopy and Related Phenomena 109.1 2 (2000), pp. 71–84. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0368-2048(00)00108-0 . url: http://www. sciencedi...

    2000 doi

  91. [105]

    Defects at surfaces and interfaces: A scattering theoretical approach

    J. Pollmann. “Defects at surfaces and interfaces: A scattering theoretical approach”. In: Solid State Communications 34.7 (1980), pp. 587–590

    1980

  92. [106]

    Radiation conditions for the difference Schr¨ odinger operators

    W. Shaban and B. Vainberg. “Radiation conditions for the difference Schr¨ odinger operators”. In:Applicable Analysis 80 (2001), pp. 525–556

    2001

  93. [107]

    Diffraction of waves on square lattice by semi-infinite crack

    B. L. Sharma. “Diffraction of waves on square lattice by semi-infinite crack”. In: SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 75.3 (2015), pp. 1171–

    2015

  94. [108]

    Diffraction of waves on square lattice by semi-infinite rigid constraint

    B. L. Sharma. “Diffraction of waves on square lattice by semi-infinite rigid constraint”. In: Wave Motion 59 (2015), pp. 52–68. doi: http : //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2015.07.008. url: http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165212515001146

    2015 doi

  95. [109]

    Discrete Sommerfeld diffraction problems on hexago- nal lattice with a zigzag semi-infinite crack and rigid constraint

    B. L. Sharma. “Discrete Sommerfeld diffraction problems on hexago- nal lattice with a zigzag semi-infinite crack and rigid constraint”. In: Zeitschrift f¨ ur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik66.6 (2015), pp. 3591–

    2015

  96. [110]

    The resistivity of thin metal films — Some critical re- marks

    J. Sambles. “The resistivity of thin metal films — Some critical re- marks”. In: Thin Solid Films 106.4 (1983), pp. 321–331. doi: http : //dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(83)90344-9 . url: http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0040609083903449

    1983

  97. [111]

    Near-tip field for diffraction on square lattice by rigid constraint

    B. L. Sharma. “Near-tip field for diffraction on square lattice by rigid constraint”. In: Zeitschrift f¨ ur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik66.5 (2015), pp. 2719–2740. doi: 10.1007/s00033-015-0508-z . url: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00033-015-0508-z

    2015 doi

  98. [113]

    doi: http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1016 / 0039 - 6028(64 ) 90048 -

  99. [114]

    Fourier-transform scanning tunneling microscopy investigation of the energy versus wave vector dispersion of electrons at the Au(111) surface

    K. Schouteden, P. Lievens, and C. Van Haesendonck. “Fourier-transform scanning tunneling microscopy investigation of the energy versus wave vector dispersion of electrons at the Au(111) surface”. In: Phys. Rev. B 79 (19 May 2009), p. 195409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.195409. ur...

    2009 doi

  100. [115]

    On linear waveguides of square and triangular lattice strips: an application of Chebyshev polynomials

    B. L. Sharma. “On linear waveguides of square and triangular lattice strips: an application of Chebyshev polynomials”. In:S¯ adhan¯ a42.6 (June 2017), pp. 901–927. doi: 10.1007/s12046- 017- 0646- 4 . url: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0646-4

    2017 doi

  101. [116]

    On scattering of waves on square lattice half-plane with mixed boundary condition

    B. L. Sharma. “On scattering of waves on square lattice half-plane with mixed boundary condition”. In: Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik 68.5 (Oct. 2017), p. 120. doi: 10.1007/s00033-017-0854-0 . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-017-0854-0

    2017 doi

  102. [117]

    Multiple scattering of waves from random rough surfaces

    J. Shen and A. A. Maradudin. “Multiple scattering of waves from random rough surfaces”. In: Phys. Rev. B 22 (9 Nov. 1980), pp. 4234–4240. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.4234 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.22.4234

    1980 doi

  103. [118]

    X-ray and neutron scattering from rough surfaces

    S. K. Sinha et al. “X-ray and neutron scattering from rough surfaces”. In: Phys. Rev. B 38 (4 Aug. 1988), pp. 2297–2311. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 38.2297. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.38. 2297

    1988 doi

  104. [119]

    Self-consistent Green’s-function technique for surfaces and interfaces

    H. L. Skriver and N. M. Rosengaard. “Self-consistent Green’s-function technique for surfaces and interfaces”. In: Phys. Rev. B 43 (12 Apr. 1991), pp. 9538–9549. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.9538 . url: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.9538. 29

    1991 doi

  105. [120]

    Simplified LCAO Method for the Periodic Potential Problem

    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster. “Simplified LCAO Method for the Periodic Potential Problem”. In: Phys. Rev. 94 (6 June 1954), pp. 1498–1524. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRev . 94 . 1498. url: http : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103/PhysRev.94.1498

    1954

  106. [121]

    Near-tip field for diffraction on square lattice by crack

    B. L. Sharma. “Near-tip field for diffraction on square lattice by crack”. In: SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 75.4 (2015), pp. 1915–1940. doi: 10 . 1137 / 15M1010646. url: http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1137 / 15M1010646

    2015

  107. [122]

    Statistical Model for the Size Effect in Electrical Conduc- tion

    S. B. Soffer. “Statistical Model for the Size Effect in Electrical Conduc- tion”. In: Journal of Applied Physics 38.4 (1967), pp. 1710–1715. doi: 10.1063/1.1709746. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1709746

    1967 doi

  108. [123]

    Effect of Weak Surface Autocorrelation on the Size Effect in Electrical Conduction

    S. B. Soffer. “Effect of Weak Surface Autocorrelation on the Size Effect in Electrical Conduction”. In: Phys. Rev. B 2 (10 Nov. 1970), pp. 3894–

    1970

  109. [124]

    Edge diffraction on triangular and hexagonal lattices: Existence, uniqueness, and finite section

    B. L. Sharma. “Edge diffraction on triangular and hexagonal lattices: Existence, uniqueness, and finite section”. In: Wave Motion 65 (2016), pp. 55–78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2016.04

    2016 doi

  110. [125]

    url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0165212516300105

  111. [126]

    Wave Propagation in Bifurcated Waveguides of Square Lattice Strips

    B. L. Sharma. “Wave Propagation in Bifurcated Waveguides of Square Lattice Strips”. In: SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 76.4 (2016), pp. 1355–1381. doi: 10.1137/15M1051464. url: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1137/15M1051464

    2016 doi

  112. [127]

    A Markovian approach to atomic scat- tering from rough surfaces

    R. Spadacini and G. Tommei. “A Markovian approach to atomic scat- tering from rough surfaces”. In: Surface Science 133.1 (1983), pp. 216–

    1983

  113. [128]

    Three types of bulk impurity in- duced interference patterns on the (100) and (111) faces of Ne- and Ar-doped silver

    C. Sprodowski and K. Morgenstern. “Three types of bulk impurity in- duced interference patterns on the (100) and (111) faces of Ne- and Ar-doped silver”. In: Phys. Rev. B 82 (16 Oct. 2010), p. 165444. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.165444 . url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/Phys...

    2010 doi

  114. [129]

    Localized states in a simple cubic crystal via the next-nearest neighbor approximation

    M. Steslicka and B. Stankiewicz. “Localized states in a simple cubic crystal via the next-nearest neighbor approximation”. In: International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 12.3 (1977), pp. 433–441. doi: 10.1002/ qua.560120302. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qua.560120302

    1977 doi

  115. [130]

    Surface and grain-boundary scattering in nanometric Cu films

    T. Sun et al. “Surface and grain-boundary scattering in nanometric Cu films”. In: Phys. Rev. B 81 (15 Apr. 2010), p. 155454. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevB . 81 . 155454. url: http : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB.81.155454

    2010

  116. [131]

    P. R. Surjan. Second Quantized Approach to Quantum Chemistry: An Elementary Introduction. 1st ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1989. 30

    1989

  117. [132]

    Electron transport in molecular junctions

    N. Tao. “Electron transport in molecular junctions”. In: Nature nan- otechnology 1.3 (2006), pp. 173–181

    2006

  118. [133]

    L. I. Slepyan. Models and phenomena in fracture mechanics . New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2002

    2002

  119. [134]

    Modified tight-binding equations for wave functions of semi-infinite crystals and interfaces

    V. M. Tapilin. “Modified tight-binding equations for wave functions of semi-infinite crystals and interfaces”. In: Phys. Rev. B 52 (19 Nov. 1995), pp. 14198–14205. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 52 . 14198. url: http : / / link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.14198

    1995 doi

  120. [135]

    Size Effects In Electrical Conductiv- ity

    C. R. Tellier and A. J. Tosser. “Size Effects In Electrical Conductiv- ity”. In: Size Effects in Thin Films . Ed. by C. Tellier and A. Tosser. Thin Films Science and Technology. Oxford: Elsevier, 1982, pp. 1–151. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978- 0- 444- 42106- 7.50005- X. ur...

    1982 doi

  121. [136]

    On the theory of electric conduction through thin metallic films

    J. Thomson. “On the theory of electric conduction through thin metallic films”. In: Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 11 (1901), p. 120

    1901

  122. [137]

    G. A. Somorjai and Y. Li. Introduction to surface chemistry and catalysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2010

    2010

  123. [138]

    The Theory of the Transport Phenomena in Metals

    E. H. Sondheimer. “The Theory of the Transport Phenomena in Metals”. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 203.1072 (1950), pp. 75–98. doi: 10 . 1098 / rspa.1950.0127 . url: http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/ con...

    1950

  124. [139]

    The mean free path of electrons in metals

    E. Sondheimer. “The mean free path of electrons in metals”. In: Advances in Physics 1.1 (1952), pp. 1–42. doi: 10.1080/00018735200101151. url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00018735200101151

    1952 doi

  125. [140]

    Dynamic Elastic Electron Scattering I: Bloch Wave The- ory

    Z. L. Wang. “Dynamic Elastic Electron Scattering I: Bloch Wave The- ory”. In: Elastic and Inelastic Scattering in Electron Diffraction and Imaging. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1995, pp. 23–60. doi: 10.1007/978- 1-4899-1579-5_2 . url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899- 1579-5_2

    1995 doi

  126. [141]

    Elastic scattering of the conduction electrons by adsorbed hydrogen

    M. Watanabe. “Elastic scattering of the conduction electrons by adsorbed hydrogen”. In: Surface Science 34.3 (1973), pp. 759–772. doi: http : //dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(73)90042-3 . url: http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0039602873900423

    1973

  127. [142]

    sciencedirect

    url: http : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science / article / pii / 0039602883904922

  128. [143]

    Interaction between adsorbed atoms and conduction elec- trons of thin evaporated films

    M. Watanabe. “Interaction between adsorbed atoms and conduction elec- trons of thin evaporated films”. In: Thin Solid Films 36.1 (1976), pp. 65–

    1976

  129. [144]

    Wißmann and H.-U

    P. Wißmann and H.-U. Finzel. Electrical Resistivity of Thin Metal Films. 1st ed. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics 223. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007

    2007

  130. [145]

    Surface properties of solids using a semi-infinite approach and the tight-binding approximation

    H. Ou-Yang, B. K¨ allebring, and R. Marcus. “Surface properties of solids using a semi-infinite approach and the tight-binding approximation”. In: The Journal of chemical physics 98.9 (1993), pp. 7405–7411

    1993

  131. [146]

    J. Ziman. Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids . International series of monographs on physics. OUP Oxford, 1960

    1960

  132. [147]

    The calculation of Bloch functions

    J. Ziman. “The calculation of Bloch functions”. In: Solid State Physics 26 (1971), pp. 1–101. A Auxiliary expressions A.1 Following [107], the discrete Fourier transform [49] ψF y : C→ C of{ψx,y}x∈Z (along the x axis) is defined by ψF y =ψy;+ +ψy;−, where ψy;+(z) = +∞∑ x=0 ψx,y...

    1971

  133. [148]

    On the calculation of the electronic structure of a semi- infinite crystal in the LMTO-tight-binding approximation

    V. M. Tapilin. “On the calculation of the electronic structure of a semi- infinite crystal in the LMTO-tight-binding approximation”. In: Surface Science 206 (1988), pp. 405–412

    1988

  134. [152]

    Quantum size effects in transport prop- erties of metallic films

    N. Trivedi and N. W. Ashcroft. “Quantum size effects in transport prop- erties of metallic films”. In: Phys. Rev. B 38 (17 Dec. 1988), pp. 12298– 12309. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.12298 . url: http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.38.12298

    1988 doi

  135. [153]

    Quantum Coherence of Image-Potential States

    P. Wahl et al. “Quantum Coherence of Image-Potential States”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (10 Sept. 2003), p. 106802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 91.106802. url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 91.106802

    2003 doi

  136. [154]

    Effect of Free Ends on the Vibration Frequencies of One- Dimensional Lattices

    R. F. Wallis. “Effect of Free Ends on the Vibration Frequencies of One- Dimensional Lattices”. In: Physical Review 105 (2 Jan. 1957), pp. 540–

    1957

  137. [158]

    The Elastic Scattering of the Conduction Electrons by Oxygen Adsorbed on Pt Wire

    M. Watanabe. “The Elastic Scattering of the Conduction Electrons by Oxygen Adsorbed on Pt Wire”. In: Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 13.S2 (1974), p. 149. url: http://stacks.iop.org/1347-4065/13/i= S2/a=149. 31

    1974

  138. [160]

    doi: http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1016 / 0040 - 6090(76 ) 90403 - X. url: http : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science / article / pii / 004060907690403X

  139. [165]

    Let ξi f =∓π

    of the scattered wavefunction in far field follows [112]. Let ξi f =∓π. Using z =e−iξ and the polar coordinates (E.4), the solution (3.2) is rewritten as (E.2) where φ(ξ) = 2( 1√ 3 η(ξ) sinθ− ξ cosθ), (E.5) η is given by (E.3)2 andCξ is a contour, traversed fromξi to ξf, in the...

  140. [232]

    doi: http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1016 / 0039 - 6028(83 ) 90492 -

  141. [323]

    doi: http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . apsusc . 2013 . 02

    2013

  142. [456]

    url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF01341254

    doi: 10.1007/BF01341254 . url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF01341254

    doi

  143. [545]

    url: http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.105.540

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.105.540 . url: http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.105.540

    doi

  144. [602]

    url: http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.147.599

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.147.599 . url: http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.147.599

    doi

  145. [1192]

    url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/ 140985093

    doi: 10.1137/140985093 . url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/ 140985093

    doi

  146. [2298]

    url: https://link.aps

    doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2257 . url: https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2257

    doi

  147. [3625]

    url: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00033-015-0574-2

    doi: 10.1007/s00033-015-0574-2 . url: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00033-015-0574-2 . 28

    doi

  148. [3898]

    url: https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.2.3894

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.2.3894 . url: https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.2.3894

    doi

  149. [4667]

    url: https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.1.4654

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.4654 . url: https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.1.4654

    doi

  150. [7361]

    url: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.7361

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.