REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 34 references
Hole superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates
T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The new nickelate superconductor may be powered by oxygen pπ hole pairs
desk verdict Short, honest speculative note applying the authors' hole superconductivity model to infinite-layer nickelates; the strain prediction is the one new testable claim, and the O pπ premise is asserted by analogy, not shown. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the correlated hopping term in an effective single-band Hamiltonian for oxygen pπ holes: the amplitude for a hole to hop depends on whether the destination site is occupied, because an oxygen ion's orbitals expand when it gains a negative charge and contract when it loses one. This occupation-dependent hopping lowers the quantum kinetic energy in the paired state and drives superconductivity without phonons or spin fluctuations. The supporting mechanism is orbital relaxation: the pπ orbitals of the O2- anion are argued to sit at the Fermi level even though standard band-structure calculations place them lower, and this energy-level shift is what puts the doped holes into the pπ band.
What would settle it
If angle-resolved photoemission on Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 shows that the Fermi surface is made only of Ni-O bonding states, with no oxygen pπ hole pocket, the central claim is refuted; a low-temperature Hall coefficient that turns negative at other hole concentrations would also count against it.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On the paper's own terms, superconductivity in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 comes from the same carriers and mechanism proposed for both hole-doped and electron-doped cuprates: hole carriers in oxygen pπ orbitals, paired because a correlated hopping term in the effective Hamiltonian lowers the kinetic energy. Doped holes go directly into the O-pπ band rather than into the Ni-O pσ band, because adding them to a cation would cost a large Hubbard $U$, and orbital relaxation of the highly charged oxygen anion lifts the pπ orbitals to the Fermi level. The parent compound is metallic because the Ni+ oxidation state and the lack of apical oxygens lower the electrostatic potential, making hole doping natural and electron doping costly. The model's generic prediction is a dome-shaped $T_c$ versus hole concentration whose height rises sharply as the in-plane atomic distance shrinks, which leads the authors to predict a large strain-induced increase in $T_c$.
Load-bearing premise
The whole mechanism depends on the doped holes ending up in oxygen pπ orbitals rather than in the nickel-oxygen bonding band, an assumption carried over from cuprates without a nickelate-specific calculation of the orbital energy levels.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Compressive epitaxial strain, by reducing the in-plane Ni-O distance, should substantially raise $T_c$ at every hole concentration because the correlated hopping parameter increases exponentially as the distance decreases.
- At low temperatures the Hall coefficient should be positive, reflecting hole conduction in a single nearly full oxygen pπ band.
- Electron doping of these nickelates should be much harder than hole doping, so the observed doping asymmetry is itself a signature of the model.
- Magnetism, Zhang-Rice singlets, and spin fluctuations are not needed for pairing; the nickelates would sit closer to the bismuthate family than to the standard cuprate picture.
- Measuring $T_c$ and the Hall coefficient at other hole concentrations, together with the pressure dependence of $T_c$ and tunneling asymmetry, would directly test the model.
Reading between the lines
- If the orbital-relaxation argument transfers to other reduced nickelates, hole-doped RNiO2 compounds with other rare earths may superconduct with $T_c$ set by the in-plane lattice constant; a systematic substrate-mismatch study is a natural extension the paper does not report.
- A sharper discriminator than the Hall sign may be tunneling asymmetry, which hole superconductivity predicts but conventional BCS pairing in a hole band does not; the paper mentions the measurement but does not develop it.
- The model's strain prediction can be made quantitative by fitting the correlated-hopping parameter to the 9-15 K $T_c$ of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 and then checking whether the same parameter reproduces the dome shape of $T_c$ versus doping.
- Since the orbital-relaxation premise is carried over from the cuprates, a nickelate-specific first-principles calculation of the oxygen pπ level position would either ground the mechanism or redirect attention to the Ni-O pσ band.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proposes that the recently discovered superconductivity in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 with Tc = 9-15 K results from the same carriers and mechanism as the authors' 'hole superconductivity' theory for cuprates: holes in oxygen pπ orbitals paired via a correlated-hopping term that lowers kinetic energy. The argument proceeds by analogy from earlier cuprate and MgB2 work: orbital relaxation of the oxygen anion lifts the O-pπ orbitals to the Fermi level, 'clearly' also in the nickelates. The paper predicts a positive low-temperature Hall coefficient and a large increase in Tc under compressive epitaxial strain, and it cites the reported Hall data as qualitative support.
Significance. If the central premise were established, the paper would unify nickelates and cuprates under one pairing mechanism and would make a falsifiable strain prediction. The authors state their prediction clearly and explicitly point to experiments (doping dependence, pressure, tunneling asymmetry) that could test it. However, the manuscript contains no nickelate-specific calculation: no band-structure, tight-binding, or orbital-relaxation estimate for the NiO2 plane, no fit to the observed Tc range, and no quantitative transport analysis. As it stands, the paper is a hypothesis-motivated proposal rather than a demonstrated explanation. The qualitative nature of the support would be acceptable for a speculative letter, but the central carrier identification is pivotal and currently rests on an unexamined analogy.
major comments (4)
- [Section I, paragraph after Fig. 1 and around Fig. 2] The load-bearing premise is that oxygen pπ orbitals are at the Fermi level in hole-doped nickelates, yet the only nickelate-specific justification is the sentence 'Clearly the same argument applies here' referring to the cuprate orbital-relaxation argument of Ref. 8. No calculation for NdNiO2 is given: the Ni 3d9 configuration, the absence of apical oxygens, the metallic parent compound, and the different Madelung potential compared with cuprates are not addressed. If a nickelate-specific calculation placed the O 2pπ manifold below the Ni 3d/O 2pσ states at the relevant doping, the proposed pairing channel would not be available. A concrete estimate (e.g., using the method of Ref. 8 adapted to the NiO2 plane) is needed to support the central claim.
- [Fig. 3 and surrounding text] Figure 3 is reproduced from the authors' earlier MgB2 paper, with parameters D = 5 eV, Δt = 0.3725 eV, U = 5 eV, and V = 0, and with no justification for transferring these values to nickelates. No attempt is made to reproduce the experimentally observed Tc range of 9-15 K. The strain prediction ('large enhancement') is qualitative and is not tied to any nickelate-specific input. Without at least a rough estimate of the relevant parameters for the NiO2 plane, the quantitative content of the paper is limited to a generic statement of the model's behavior.
- [Fig. 4 and the paragraph discussing the Hall coefficient] The positive low-temperature Hall coefficient is offered as corroboration, but it does not discriminate among candidate carrier types. In a multiband metal, a positive RH can be produced by a minority holelike pocket of any orbital character, and the paper itself invokes two-band conduction with different mobilities as an explanation of the high-temperature negative sign. Without a two-band or Hall-coefficient analysis that extracts the orbital character and carrier densities, the Hall data provide at most weak support for the O-pπ picture.
- [Throughout] The argument is largely self-referential: the nickelates are claimed to follow the same mechanism because the authors' model already applies to cuprates and other materials, and the model parameters are imported unchanged. No independent test is performed that could distinguish this mechanism from, e.g., multiband pairing in a Ni-d/O-pσ band or conventional electron-phonon pairing. A falsifiable quantitative prediction, such as a specific doping dependence of Tc or a Hall-coefficient magnitude, would convert the proposal into a testable theory.
minor comments (4)
- [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a duplicated word: 'the same as for for both hole- and electron-doped cuprates' should read 'the same as for both hole- and electron-doped cuprates.'
- [Fig. 3] The reproduced figure retains internal text from the original MgB2 paper ('x,y holes per boron atom', 'V alues for the bandwidth...', 'with the parameter /Delta1t increased to 0 375 eV'), which is confusing and contains an obvious typo ('0 375 eV' for '0.375 eV'). The figure should be redrawn with nickelate-relevant notation.
- [Abstract and Introduction] The Tc range '9 K to 15 K' is repeated without comment on sample dependence or measurement uncertainty; a brief citation to the experimental paper's spread would help the reader assess the quantity being predicted.
- [Title page] The line 'PACS numbers:' is followed by no entries; this should either be completed or removed.
Circularity Check
Nickelate O-pπ assignment is imported from the authors' own cuprate orbital-relaxation argument with 'Clearly the same argument applies here,' making the central premise self-referential rather than independently derived.
-
self citation load bearing
[Section I, paragraph introducing Fig. 2 (page 2)]
"We have argued that for both hole- and electron-doped cuprates orbital relaxation of the highly negatively charged oxygen anion lifts the O-pπ orbitals to the Fermi level [8], contrary to what band structure calculations predict. Clearly the same argument applies here."
The paper's central new claim is that in Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 the superconducting carriers are O-pπ holes paired by correlated hopping. The only nickelate-specific justification for placing O-pπ at the Fermi level is the quoted sentence, which transfers the authors' earlier cuprate orbital-relaxation argument [8] to nickelates by assertion ('Clearly the same argument applies here'). No nickelate band-structure, orbital-relaxation, or doping-dependent calculation is presented. Since Ref. [8] is the authors' own contested theory of cuprates, and the nickelate conclusion depends entirely on extending it, the 'same carriers and same mechanism' conclusion is not independently derived: it is the input assumption restated as the finding.
full rationale
There is no equation-level circularity: the Tc-versus-hole-concentration curve in Fig. 3 is a generic model result from Ref. [5] with stated parameters (D = 5 eV, t = 0.3725 eV, U = 5 eV, V = 0), not a fit to nickelate data, and the compressive-strain prediction follows from the model's distance dependence of the correlated-hopping parameter. The paper also cites external experimental data, such as the positive low-temperature Hall coefficient from Ref. [1], as independent corroboration. However, that evidence only indicates hole-like carriers, not their O-pπ orbital character, so it does not independently establish the central premise. The load-bearing step is the transfer of the authors' own cuprate orbital-relaxation argument to nickelates via 'Clearly the same argument applies here'; this is a self-citation used to justify the very premise on which the nickelate-specific proposal rests. Because the premise is not derived from nickelate-specific calculations or from external benchmarks in this paper, the central claim is self-referential rather than formally circular. Score 4 reflects one significant load-bearing self-citation while acknowledging that the strain prediction and the model curve retain independent content.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (4)
- Bandwidth D =
5 eV
- Correlated hopping Delta t =
0.3725 eV (0.375 eV for strained dashed curve)
- On-site repulsion U =
5 eV
- Nearest-neighbor repulsion V =
0
assumptions (3)
- ad hoc to paper Oxygen pπ orbitals are lifted to the Fermi level by orbital relaxation in both cuprates and nickelates.
- domain assumption Holes added to Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 go into oxygen pπ orbitals rather than the Ni-O pσ band because adding to the cation costs a large Hubbard U.
- ad hoc to paper The correlated hopping model and parameter values from earlier cuprate and MgB2 work transfer unchanged to nickelates.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Hole superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PJP2DP3D
@misc{pith2026190900509,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Hole superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PJP2DP3D}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00509}
}
abstract
We propose that the superconductivity recently observed in Nd$_{0.8}$Sr$_{0.2}$NiO$_2$ with critical temperature in the range $9$ K to $15$ K results from the same charge carriers and the same mechanism that we have proposed give rise to superconductivity in both hole-doped and electron-doped cuprates: pairing of hole carriers in oxygen $p\pi$ orbitals, driven by a correlated hopping term in the effective Hamiltonian that lowers the kinetic energy, as described by the theory of hole superconductivity. We predict a large increase in $T_c$ with compressive epitaxial strain.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Danfeng Li et al, ‘Superconductivity in an infinite-laye r nickelate’,Nature 572, 624 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[2]
Fournier, ‘T ′ and infinite-layer electron-doped cuprates’, Physica C 514, 314-338 (2015)
P. Fournier, ‘T ′ and infinite-layer electron-doped cuprates’, Physica C 514, 314-338 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[3]
Effect of pressure Within our theory a decreasing B–B intraplane dis- tance should increase [5], as seen in Fig. 3. Simi- larly we have argued that in high oxides the intrinsic effect of increase of with pressure is caused by de- creasing intraplane O–O distance [25]. This is because superconductivity is driven by the correlated hopping parameter /Delta1t...
-
[4]
How to achieve higher ’s in the diborides V arious calculations of band structures in diborides suggest that a rigid band picture works reasonably well [18–21,26]. In the transition metal diborides it is found that the Fermi level states are dominantly of metal 3 character [26], in contrast to the main group diborides where the boron 2 x,y orbitals domina...
-
[5]
M. Azuma et al, ‘Superconductivity at 110 K in the infinite-layer compound ( Sr1−xCa x)1−yCuO2’, Nature 356, 775-776 (1992)
work page 1992
-
[6]
C. W. Chu, L. Z. Deng and B. Lv, ‘Hole- doped cuprate high temperature superconductors’, Physica C 514, 290-313 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[7]
J.E. Hirsch and F. Marsiglio, ‘Supercon- ducting state in an oxygen hole metal’, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11515-11525 (1989) ; F. Marsiglio and J.E. Hirsch, ‘Hole Superconductivity and the High-Tc Oxides’, Phys. Rev. B41, 6435-6456 (1990)
work page 1989
-
[8]
J.E. Hirsch and F. Marsiglio, ‘On the depen- dence of superconducting Tc on carrier concentration’ Phys. Lett. A 140, 122 (1989)
work page 1989
Show all 34 references
-
[9]
J. E. Hirsch and F. Marsiglio, ‘Understanding electron- doped cuprate superconductors as hole superconductors’, Physica C 564, 29 (2019) and references therein
2019
-
[10]
J. E. Hirsch, ‘Effect of orbital relaxation on the band structure of cuprate superconductors and im- plications for the superconductivity mechanism’, Phys. Rev. B 90, 184515 (2014)
2014
-
[11]
Z. Z. Wang et al, ‘Positive Hall coefficient observed in single-crystal Nd 2−xCexCuO4−δ at low temperatures’, Phys. Rev. B 43, 3020 (1991)
1991
-
[12]
M. A. Crusellas et al, ‘Two-band conduction in the nor- mal state of a superconducting Sm 1. 85Ce0. 15CuO4 single crystal’, Physica C 210, I221 (1993)
1993
-
[13]
Wu Jiang et al ‘Anomalous Transport Proper- ties in Superconducting Nd 1. 85Ce0. 15CuO4±δ ’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1291 (1994)
1994
-
[14]
Fournier et al, ‘Thermomagnetic transport properti es of Nd 1
P. Fournier et al, ‘Thermomagnetic transport properti es of Nd 1. 85Ce0. 15CuO4+δ films: Evidence for two types of charge carriers’, Phys.Rev. B 56, 14149 (1997)
1997
-
[15]
P. Li, F. F. Balakirev, and R. L. Greene, ‘High-Field Hal l Resistivity and Magnetoresistance of Electron-Doped Pr2−xCexCuO4’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 047003 (2007)
2007
-
[16]
Dagan and R.L
Y. Dagan and R.L. Greene, ‘Hole superconductivity in the electron-doped superconductor Pr 2−xCexCuO4, Phys. Rev. B 76, 024506 (2007)
2007
-
[17]
Tabis, Y
Yangmu Li, W. Tabis, Y. Tang, G. Yu, J. Jaroszynski, N. Barisic and M. Greven, ‘Hole-pocket-driven supercon- ductivity and its universal features in the electron-doped cuprates’, Science Advances 5, eaap7349 (2019)
2019
-
[18]
J. E. Hirsch, ‘Dynamic Hubbard Model’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206402 (2001)
2001
-
[19]
Hole superconductivity in arsenic-iron compounds
F. Marsiglio and J.E. Hirsch, “Hole superconductivity in arsenic-iron compounds”, Physica C 468, 1047 (2008)
2008
-
[20]
Hole superconductivity in MgB 2: a high Tc cuprate without Cu
J. E. Hirsch, “Hole superconductivity in MgB 2: a high Tc cuprate without Cu”, Phys. Lett. A 282, 392 (2001)
2001
-
[21]
Electron- 4 phonon or hole superconductivity in MgB 2?
J.E. Hirsch and F. Marsiglio, “Electron- 4 phonon or hole superconductivity in MgB 2?”, Phys. Rev. B 64, 144523 (2001)
2001
-
[22]
Hole superconductiv- ity in H 2S and other sulfides under high pressure
J.E. Hirsch and F. Marsiglio, “Hole superconductiv- ity in H 2S and other sulfides under high pressure”, Physica C 511, 45 (2015)
2015
-
[23]
Hirsch, ‘Materials and mechanisms of hole super- conductivity’, Physica C 472, 78 (2012) and references therein
J.E. Hirsch, ‘Materials and mechanisms of hole super- conductivity’, Physica C 472, 78 (2012) and references therein
2012
-
[24]
Walet, ‘Electrostatic ef - fects, band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bilayers’, PNAS 115, 13174-13179 (2018)
Francisco Guinea and Niels R. Walet, ‘Electrostatic ef - fects, band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bilayers’, PNAS 115, 13174-13179 (2018)
2018
-
[25]
Maria Eckholt and Juan Jos´ e Garcia-Ripoll, ‘Correlat ed hopping of bosonic atoms induced by optical lattices’, New J. Phys. 11, 093028 (2009)
2009
-
[26]
Maik et al, ‘Density-dependent tunnel- ing in the extended Bose-Hubbard model’, New J
M. Maik et al, ‘Density-dependent tunnel- ing in the extended Bose-Hubbard model’, New J. Phys. 15, 113041 (2013)
2013
-
[27]
G. A. Sawatzky, ‘Superconductivity seen in a non-magnetic nickel oxide’, Nature News and Views, Vol. 572 (2019)
2019
-
[28]
A. W. Sleight, ‘Bismuthates: BaBiO 3 and related super- conducting phases’, Physica C 514, 152-165 (2015)
2015
-
[29]
T. M. Rice and L. Sneddon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 689 (1981)
1981
-
[30]
C. H. P. Wen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 117002 (2018)
2018
-
[31]
T. H. Geballe, R. H. Hammond and P. M. Wu, ‘What Tc tells,’ Physica C 514, 9-16 (2015)
2015
-
[32]
A. S. Botana and M. R. Norman, ‘Similarities and differences between infinite-layer nickelates and cuprates and implications for superconductivity’, arXiv:1908.10946 (2019)
2019 arXiv
-
[33]
Hirsch, M.B
See the various articles in the Special Issue of Physica C, ‘Superconducting Materials: Conventional, Unconven- tional and Undetermined’, edited by J.E. Hirsch, M.B. Maple, and F. Marsiglio, Physica C 514, 1-444 (2015)
2015
-
[34]
Hirsch, M.B
J.E. Hirsch, M.B. Maple, and F. Marsiglio, ‘Supercon- ducting materials classes: Introduction and overview’, Physica C 514, 1-8 (2015)
2015
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.