Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 49 references

Design of Ambient Backscatter Training for Wireless Power Transfer

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A backscatter tag that switches its reflection coefficient twice per ambient symbol cancels the ambient signal at the energy transmitter, so retrodirective beamforming can charge IoT devices without channel estimation.

desk verdict A correct, well-scoped balanced-sequence design for cancelling direct-link ambient interference in retrodirective WPT, undermined mainly by an overbroad abstract and an unstated dependence on constant-envelope ambient symbols. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00631 v2 pith:N7YZVQ6U submitted 2019-09-02 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Sahar Idrees , Xiangyun Zhou , Salman Durrani , Dusit Niyato This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords ambientbackscatterretrodirectivewirelesspowertransfertrainingsequencedesigndirect-linkinterferencecancellationenergyharvestingmassiveMIMOdirectspreadspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a backscatter tag can help a retrodirective wireless power transmitter aim its beam at the tag rather than at the ambient source, without any channel estimation, by switching its reflection coefficient according to a carefully chosen training sequence. The central design rule is that each ambient symbol must be multiplied by equal numbers of +1 and -1 chips; then the direct ambient signal cancels at the transmitter's correlator. If true, a low-power IoT receiver can harvest tens to hundreds of microwatts from a retrodirective energy beam pointed at it, even though its only transmission is passive reflection of ambient signals. The paper also claims that the scheme tolerates small timing offsets but degrades severely when the ambient symbol duration is unknown.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is the backscatter training sequence $c(t)$, a train of rectangular chips with $c_n = \pm 1$ that the ER applies by switching its reflection coefficient. At the ET, the received composite signal is correlated with a local copy of $c(t)$; the desired backscatter component $x_s$ is independent of the chip pattern, while the ambient component $x_i$ is proportional to the sum of the chips over each ambient symbol. The design criterion $N_{+1} = N_{-1}$ per ambient symbol makes that sum zero, cancelling the ambient interference exactly, and the slowest valid choice is $T_c = T_s/2$, i.e., two chips per ambient symbol.

What would settle it

Feed the ER and ET with a real ambient signal whose amplitude is not constant inside the nominal symbol period (for example an OFDM symbol or a chirp), keep equal +1 and -1 chip counts per symbol, and measure the ambient component at the correlator output; any nonzero residual that scales with the ambient power would disprove the exact-cancellation claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the direct-link ambient interference at the energy transmitter's correlator output is exactly zero when the ER's reflection coefficient is switched so that every ambient symbol carries an equal number of +1 and -1 chips, with the slowest allowable switching once per half symbol. Under this sequence, the ambient component $x_i$ in Eq. (19) vanishes and the correlator output is dominated by the backscattered signal; phase conjugation then focuses the ET's beam on the ER instead of leaking energy toward the ambient source. With a pseudo-noise sequence, the ambient component remains much stronger than the backscattered signal and harvested power stays low, so the deterministic design is the paper's proposed remedy. The paper derives a closed-form approximation for average harvested power with Nakagami-$m$ fading and a nonlinear energy harvester, and shows numerically that hundreds of $\mu$W are reachable with a strong ambient source and weak neighbouring interference.

Load-bearing premise

Cancellation requires that the ambient signal be constant over each symbol interval and that the ER's chip boundaries align with the ambient symbol boundaries; if the symbol timing drifts or the waveform varies inside a symbol, the equal-plus/minus sum no longer makes the interference integral vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Retrodirective WPT can operate without channel state information at either end: the ER never transmits actively, and the ET never estimates channels.
  • Harvested power is independent of training duration and chip count as long as the design criterion holds, so the slowest switching (two chips per ambient symbol) is enough.
  • A small timing offset at the correlator only scales down the desired component; the ambient component stays cancelled, so the system degrades gracefully rather than failing abruptly.
  • If the ambient symbol duration is unknown or changes, faster switching shrinks the uncancelled ambient fraction and should be preferred.
  • Neighbouring interference needs to be substantially weaker than the primary ambient signal for the ER to harvest tens to hundreds of microwatts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same cancellation identity could support multiple tags: assigning mutually orthogonal Walsh-Hadamard sequences to different ERs would let them train simultaneously without ambient leakage, though only the single-tag case is analyzed.
  • If the ambient source is not piecewise-constant within a symbol (e.g., OFDM or filtered modulation), exact cancellation will not hold; the paper's own mismatched-duration results suggest that many short chips per symbol would shrink the residual.
  • A practical tag oscillator will drift in phase over a backscatter phase; locking chip edges to detected ambient symbol boundaries is an implementation detail the paper does not address, and without it the +1/-1 balance per symbol can be broken.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper considers a two-phase retrodirective wireless power transfer system in which an energy receiver (ER) backscatters an ambient signal during a training phase and an energy transmitter (ET) with a large phased array then beamforms energy back to the ER. The ambient signal is modeled as a train of rectangular pulses with known symbol duration Ts. The ER multiplies the backscattered signal by a chip sequence c(t). The paper first analyzes a pseudo-noise (PN) training sequence and shows that the direct-link ambient interference dominates, yielding low harvested power. It then proposes a deterministic training design requiring an equal number of +1 and -1 chips per ambient symbol and shows in Eq. (19) that the ambient interference term at the correlator output vanishes. This yields a closed-form average harvested power expression in Eq. (20) under Nakagami-m fading and a nonlinear energy harvester. The paper also studies robustness to timing offset, unknown ambient symbol duration, and neighboring interference, reporting tens to hundreds of microwatts harvested when the interference is weak.

Significance. The central cancellation mechanism is a clean idea: with a rectangular-pulse ambient waveform and perfect symbol alignment, a zero-mean periodic chip pattern makes the correlator output contain no direct-link ambient component, so retrodirective beamforming points at the ER. The mathematical derivation of Eq. (19) from the stated model is correct, and the paper usefully contrasts this with the failure of PN sequences. The analytical formulas are validated by Monte Carlo simulations over a wide parameter range, and the harvesting-model parameters are taken from prior literature. The paper ships explicit asymptotic massive-MIMO expressions and clearly identifies the conditions under which they are derived. If the limitations discussed below are addressed, the design would be a useful low-complexity, CSI-free WPT enhancement for backscatter IoT devices.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Eq. (19); abstract and Section I-B] The statement in the abstract and Section I-B that 'when the ambient symbol duration is known, the ambient interference is fully cancelled' is only established for the piecewise-constant ambient signal in Eqs. (1)-(2). For a signal that varies within Ts, Eq. (18) cannot be reduced to s_i times the chip sum, and equal numbers of +1 and -1 chips do not guarantee a zero integral. Since the abstract presents the cancellation as a general result, either the claim should be qualified to the rectangular-pulse model or the paper should provide a robustness analysis for intra-symbol variation (e.g., OFDM, shaped pulses, or fast fading). This is load-bearing for the practical harvested-power claims in Section VII.
  2. [Section VI-A, Eqs. (21)-(25)] The offset analysis is not correct as stated. For the recommended minimum-switching design of Remark 1, c(t) is +1 on [0,Tc] and -1 on [Tc,2Tc], repeated over each ambient symbol, so the normalized correlation R(Toff)=(1/Ts)∫_0^{Ts} c(t)c(t-Toff)dt is 1-2Toff/Tc for 0≤Toff≤Tc and 2Toff/Tc-3 for Tc≤Toff≤2Tc. Eq. (23) claims 2Toff/Tc-1, which is incorrect; for example, at Toff=1.5Tc the true factor is 0, whereas Eq. (25) would give a factor of 4. Thus the claim that Eq. (25) holds for all offsets except integer multiples of Tc/2 is not correct. Please correct the formula or restrict the robustness claim to Toff<Tc, which is the regime shown in Fig. 9. In addition, Eqs. (21)-(23) assume a particular alternating chip pattern and do not apply to every sequence satisfying the Design Criterion.
  3. [Section V, Proposition 2] The proof of Proposition 2, which provides the central harvested-power formula Eq. (20), is omitted with the statement that it is similar to Appendix A. Since this is a load-bearing result, please include the derivation or at least an explicit step-by-step reduction of Eq. (16) to Eq. (20) by substituting the design criterion and setting the interference term ν to zero. As written, the main analytical result of the proposed scheme is asserted without proof.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section VII-A, Fig. 4] The caption and text refer to 'Using (14)' in the legend; this should likely be 'Using (16)', since Eq. (14) defines µ rather than the harvested-power expression.
  2. [Section VI-A, Eq. (24)] The integral notation in Eq. (24), e.g., '2Tc∫_{Tc}', is malformed in the manuscript and should be typeset with proper limits so the interval decomposition is readable.
  3. [References] References [12] and [19] appear to be the same paper ('Optimized training design for wireless energy transfer'); please merge or cite appropriately.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ambient-interference cancellation is derived from the paper's explicit signal model, and no fitted parameter or self-citation is used to force the central result.

full rationale

The central claim is the Design Criterion in Section V: choosing equal numbers of +1 and -1 chips over each ambient symbol forces the interference term in Eq. (18) to zero, since the inner sum over chips becomes (+1)N_{+1}+(-1)N_{-1}=0. This is a direct algebraic consequence of the stated rectangular-pulse ambient model in Eqs. (1)-(2), not an input disguised as a prediction. The desired component Eq. (17) is independent of the chip pattern, so the design does not trade away the backscattered signal. No parameter is fitted to make Eq. (19) hold; a0, b0 and c0 in the harvester model are cited from [48], and the massive-MIMO asymptotics are cited from [50], both independent external sources. The paper's self-citations ([1], [31]) are background or conference self-references and are not load-bearing. The reader-skeptic concern that intra-symbol fluctuations or non-rectangular pulses would break the cancellation is a legitimate model-robustness limitation, but it does not make the derivation circular: the statement 'when the ambient symbol duration is known, equal chip counts cancel the interference' is true within the model the paper explicitly defines. The robustness analysis for timing offset in Section VI-A is likewise an algebraic evaluation of the same correlator integrals, not a fitted outcome. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It uses standard channel models, a standard non-linear energy harvester model, and parameters from the cited literature. The central claim depends on the block-constant ambient model and on ER-to-ambient synchronization, both listed as axioms above.

free parameters (1)
  • Path-loss exponent alpha = not stated
    The numerical harvested-power values (tens to hundreds of microwatts) depend on alpha through gamma1, gamma2, gamma3, but the Results section does not specify it. This is a free modeling choice needed to reproduce the figures.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Ambient signal s(t) is a train of rectangular pulses with i.i.d. CN(0,1) symbols, as in Eq. (1)
    The direct-link cancellation requires s(t) to be constant over each ambient symbol; real ambient waveforms such as OFDM or WiFi violate this assumption.
  • domain assumption ER's backscatter coefficient switches in exact alignment with ambient symbol boundaries in the baseline design
    The design criterion of equal +1/-1 chips per symbol only works if each ambient symbol is fully covered by the balanced chip pattern; any ER-side phase offset reintroduces interference.
  • standard math Massive MIMO asymptotic results for Nakagami-m fading: 1/M ||f||^4 goes to M + 1/m_f, 1/M ||f||^2 goes to 1, etc.
    Used to derive closed-form QRF in Prop. 1 and Prop. 2; the extension from Rayleigh fading in [50] to Nakagami-m is stated without proof.
  • domain assumption Channel reciprocity and quasi-static block fading over Tb + Tp seconds
    Required for retrodirective WPT and standard in the cited literature [27], [29].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design of Ambient Backscatter Training for Wireless Power Transfer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N7YZVQ6U

@misc{pith2026190900631,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design of Ambient Backscatter Training for Wireless Power Transfer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N7YZVQ6U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00631}
}
abstract

Wireless power transfer (WPT) using energy beamforming is a promising solution for low power Internet of Things (IoT) devices. In this work, we consider WPT from an energy transmitter (ET) employing retrodirective WPT using a large phased antenna array to an energy receiver (ER) capable of ambient backscatter. The advantage of retrodirective WPT is that no explicit channel estimation is needed at the ET and the use of ambient backscattering eliminates the need for active transmission at the ER. We propose a training sequence design, i.e., pattern of varying the reflection coefficient at the ER, to eliminate the direct-link interference from the ambient source. We show that when the ambient symbol duration is known, the ambient interference is fully cancelled by the proposed design. We analytically model the system and find the average harvested power at the ER considering Nakagami-$m$ fading channels and non-linear energy harvesting model. Our results clearly show that the proposed solution is robust to a small timing offset mismatch at the correlator. When interference from undesired neighbouring sources in the ambient environment is not significant, the ER can successfully harvest tens to hundreds of $\mu$W of power, which is an important improvement for low-power IoT devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00631 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the system model. list of the main mathematical symbols employed in this paper is given in Table I. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II describes the system model and assumptions, along with the proposed wireless power transfer scheme and its phases. Section III presents the signal model of the system in terms of mathematical equations and defines the metric of interest. Section… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Block diagram of the energy transmitter and receiver. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In this case, the desired component at the output of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Misalignment between the backscattered signal and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: plots the average harvested power versus the duration of the backscatter phase, i.e., Tb with the ambient signal duration being Ts = 5 µs. These results are averaged over 104 Monte Carlo simulation trials. In each trial, a new pseu￾dorandom sequence is generated and us…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ratio of magnitude of ambient and backscatter signal components at the output of the correlator plotted against Tb (duration of the backscatter phase). Using (25), (12) and (13), the average harvested energy at the ER is calculated and plotted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average harvested power, Q¯, plotted against transmit power of AS, Ps. 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 M 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Average harvested Power, in W Simulation Using (20) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Average harvested power, Q¯, plotted against number of antennas at the ET M. Nc Ns = 2, 10 and 40. This system was originally designed for the following values: Tb = 200 µs, Nc = 400, Tc = 500 ns, Ts = 5 µs, Ns = 10, mg = mh = 1 and mf = 10. We plot the average harvest…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Average harvested power at the ER versus the ratio of the average received power from the direct-link ambient and the average interference power from neighbouring ambient sources. by increasing the switching rate of the backscatter coefficient and thereby decreasing t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [45]

    Symbol detection of ambient backscatter systems with manchester coding,

    Q. Tao, C. Zhong, H. Lin, and Z. Zhang, “Symbol detection of ambient backscatter systems with manchester coding,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 4028–4038, Jun. 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [1]

    Ambient backscatter training for retrodirective wireless power transfer,

    S. Idrees, X. Zhou, S. Durrani, and D. Niyato, “Ambient backscatter training for retrodirective wireless power transfer,” in Proc. IEEE ICC 2020, Dublin, Ireland

    work page 2020

  3. [2]

    [Online]

    (2019) IoT Intelligence for Smart Cities. [Online]. Available: https://www.nnnco.com.au/smart-cities/

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    [Online]

    (22nd November, 2018) World-first smart beaches platform wins $910,000 Federal grant. [Online]. Available: https://www.northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au/council/news/media-releases/ world-first-smart-beaches-platform-wins-910000-federal-grant/

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    [Online]

    (2019) Agriculture: When farms talk to their farmers. [Online]. Available: https://www.nnnco.com.au/smart-agriculture/

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    D. N. K. Jayakody, J. Thompson, S. Chatzinotas, and S. Durrani, Wireless Information and Power Transfer: A New Paradigm for Green Communications. Springer, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    Cutting the last wires for mobile communi- cations by microwave power transfer,

    K. Huang and X. Zhou, “Cutting the last wires for mobile communi- cations by microwave power transfer,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 86–93, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Wireless powered communication: opportunities and challenges,

    S. Bi, C. K. Ho, and R. Zhang, “Wireless powered communication: opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 117–125, Apr. 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    Communications and signals design for wireless power transmission,

    Y . Zeng, B. Clerckx, and R. Zhang, “Communications and signals design for wireless power transmission,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 2264–2290, May 2017

    2017

  2. [9]

    Wireless power transfer with hybrid beamforming: How many RF chains do we need?

    L. Yang, Y . Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Wireless power transfer with hybrid beamforming: How many RF chains do we need?” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 6972–6984, Oct. 2018

    2018

  3. [10]

    Beamforming in wireless energy harvesting communications systems: A survey,

    Y . Alsaba, S. K. A. Rahim, and C. Y . Leow, “Beamforming in wireless energy harvesting communications systems: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1329–1360, Secondquarter 2018

    2018

  4. [11]

    Multi-antenna wireless powered com- munication with energy beamforming,

    L. Liu, R. Zhang, and K. Chua, “Multi-antenna wireless powered com- munication with energy beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4349–4361, Dec. 2014

    2014

  5. [13]

    Optimized training for net energy maximization in multi-antenna wireless energy transfer over frequency-selective channel,

    ——, “Optimized training for net energy maximization in multi-antenna wireless energy transfer over frequency-selective channel,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2360–2373, June 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Dynamic resource allocation for multiple-antenna wireless power transfer,

    G. Yang, C. K. Ho, and Y . L. Guan, “Dynamic resource allocation for multiple-antenna wireless power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 14, pp. 3565–3577, July 2014

    2014

  7. [15]

    Wireless energy and information transfer tradeoff for limited-feedback multiantenna systems with energy beamforming,

    X. Chen, C. Yuen, and Z. Zhang, “Wireless energy and information transfer tradeoff for limited-feedback multiantenna systems with energy beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 407–412, Jan. 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    Joint beamforming design for multi-user wire- less information and power transfer,

    H. Son and B. Clerckx, “Joint beamforming design for multi-user wire- less information and power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 6397–6409, Nov. 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Joint wireless information and energy transfer with reduced feedback in MIMO interference channels,

    J. Park and B. Clerckx, “Joint wireless information and energy transfer with reduced feedback in MIMO interference channels,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1563–1577, Aug. 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    Energy beamforming with one-bit feedback,

    J. Xu and R. Zhang, “Energy beamforming with one-bit feedback,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 20, pp. 5370–5381, Oct. 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    Optimized training design for wireless energy transfer,

    Y . Zeng and R. Zhang, “Optimized training design for wireless energy transfer,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 536–550, Feb. 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Array designs for long- distance wireless power transmission: State-of-the-art and innovative solutions,

    A. Massa, G. Oliveri, F. Viani, and P. Rocca, “Array designs for long- distance wireless power transmission: State-of-the-art and innovative solutions,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1464–1481, Jun. 2013

    2013

  13. [21]

    Van atta reflector array,

    E. Sharp and M. Diab, “Van atta reflector array,” IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 436–438, Jul. 1960

    1960

  14. [22]

    Retrodirective array using the heterodyne technique,

    C. Pon, “Retrodirective array using the heterodyne technique,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 176–180, Mar. 1964

    1964

  15. [23]

    Design of retrodirective antenna arrays for short-range wireless power transmission,

    Y . Li and V . Jandhyala, “Design of retrodirective antenna arrays for short-range wireless power transmission,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 206–211, Jan. 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    A phased-array archi- tecture for retrodirective microwave power transmission from the space solar power satellite,

    C. T. Rodenbeck, Ming-yi Li, and Kai Chang, “A phased-array archi- tecture for retrodirective microwave power transmission from the space solar power satellite,” in Proc. IEEE MTT, vol. 3, Jun. 2004, pp. 1679– 1682

    2004

  17. [25]

    Development of a retrodirective wireless microwave power transmission system,

    L. H. Hsieh, B. H. Strassner, S. J. Kokel, C. T. Rodenbeck, M. Y . Li, K. Chang, F. E. Little, G. D. Arndt, and P. H. Ngo, “Development of a retrodirective wireless microwave power transmission system,” in Proc. IEEE APS, vol. 2, Jun. 2003, pp. 393–396 vol.2

    2003

  18. [26]

    A limitation on the small-scale demonstration of retrodirective microwave power transmission from the solar power satellite,

    C. T. Rodenbeck and K. Chang, “A limitation on the small-scale demonstration of retrodirective microwave power transmission from the solar power satellite,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. , vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 67–72, Aug. 2005

    2005

  19. [27]

    Retrodirective multi-user wireless power transfer with massive MIMO,

    S. Lee, Y . Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Retrodirective multi-user wireless power transfer with massive MIMO,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 54–57, Feb. 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Multi-antenna wireless energy transfer for backscatter communication systems,

    G. Yang, C. K. Ho, and Y . L. Guan, “Multi-antenna wireless energy transfer for backscatter communication systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2974–2987, Dec. 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    Retrodirective large antenna energy beamforming in backscatter multi-user networks,

    I. Krikidis, “Retrodirective large antenna energy beamforming in backscatter multi-user networks,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 678–681, Feb. 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Ambient backscatter communications: A contemporary survey,

    N. Van Huynh, D. T. Hoang, X. Lu, D. Niyato, P. Wang, and D. I. Kim, “Ambient backscatter communications: A contemporary survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2889–2922, 4th Quart. 2018. 15

    2018

  23. [31]

    Next generation backscat- ter communication: systems, techniques, and applications,

    W. Liu, K. Huang, X. Zhou, and S. Durrani, “Next generation backscat- ter communication: systems, techniques, and applications,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Commun. and Netw. , vol. 69, pp. 1–11, Mar. 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Ambient backscatter systems: Exact average bit error rate under fading channels,

    J. K. Devineni and H. S. Dhillon, “Ambient backscatter systems: Exact average bit error rate under fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–25, Mar. 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Ambient backscatter: wireless communication out of thin air,

    V . Liu, A. Parks, V . Talla, S. Gollakota, D. Wetherall, and J. R. Smith, “Ambient backscatter: wireless communication out of thin air,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, vol. 43, no. 4, Aug. 2013, pp. 39–50

    2013

  26. [34]

    Turbocharging ambient backscatter communication,

    A. N. Parks, A. Liu, S. Gollakota, and J. R. Smith, “Turbocharging ambient backscatter communication,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, vol. 44, no. 4, Aug. 2015, pp. 619–630

    2015

  27. [35]

    Increased range bistatic scatter radio,

    J. Kimionis, A. Bletsas, and J. N. Sahalos, “Increased range bistatic scatter radio,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1091–1104, Mar. 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Ambient backscatter communication systems: Detection and performance analysis,

    G. Wang, F. Gao, R. Fan, and C. Tellambura, “Ambient backscatter communication systems: Detection and performance analysis,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 4836–4846, Nov. 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Noncoherent detec- tions for ambient backscatter system,

    J. Qian, F. Gao, G. Wang, S. Jin, and H. Zhu, “Noncoherent detec- tions for ambient backscatter system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1412–1422, Mar. 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    Non-coherent detection and bit error rate for an ambient backscatter link in time-selective fading,

    J. K. Devineni and H. S. Dhillon, “Non-coherent detection and bit error rate for an ambient backscatter link in time-selective fading,” Aug. 2019, Available on arXiv preprint, arXiv:1908.05657, 2019

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Passive WI-FI: Bringing low power to wi-fi transmissions,

    B. Kellogg, V . Talla, S. Gollakota, and J. R. Smith, “Passive WI-FI: Bringing low power to wi-fi transmissions,” in Proc. 13th Symp. Netw. Syst. Design Implementation , 2016, pp. 151–164

    2016

  32. [40]

    Modulation in the air: Backscatter communication over ambient ofdm carrier,

    G. Yang, Y . Liang, R. Zhang, and Y . Pei, “Modulation in the air: Backscatter communication over ambient ofdm carrier,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1219–1233, Mar. 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    Enabling practical backscatter communication for on-body sensors,

    P. Zhang, M. Rostami, P. Hu, and D. Ganesan, “Enabling practical backscatter communication for on-body sensors,” in Proc. ACM SIG- COMM, 2016, pp. 370–383

    2016

  34. [42]

    Inter- technology backscatter: Towards internet connectivity for implanted devices,

    V . Iyer, V . Talla, B. Kellogg, S. Gollakota, and J. Smith, “Inter- technology backscatter: Towards internet connectivity for implanted devices,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM , 2016, pp. 356–369

    2016

  35. [43]

    BackFi: High throughput Wi-Fi backscatter,

    D. Bharadia, K. R. Joshi, M. Kotaru, and S. Katti, “BackFi: High throughput Wi-Fi backscatter,” ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Review, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 283–296, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    Hitchhike: Practical backscatter using commodity wifi,

    P. Zhang, D. Bharadia, K. Joshi, and S. Katti, “Hitchhike: Practical backscatter using commodity wifi,” in Proc. ACM Conf. Embedded Netw. Sensor Syst. ACM, 2016, pp. 259–271

    2016

  37. [46]

    Goldsmith, Wireless Communications

    A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  38. [47]

    Nonlinear energy harvesting models in wireless information and power transfer,

    P. N. Alevizos, G. V ougioukas, and A. Bletsas, “Nonlinear energy harvesting models in wireless information and power transfer,” in Proc. IEEE SPAWC, Jun. 2018, pp. 1–5

    2018

  39. [48]

    Robust resource allocation for MIMO wireless powered communication networks based on a non-linear eh model,

    E. Boshkovska, D. W. K. Ng, N. Zlatanov, A. Koelpin, and R. Schober, “Robust resource allocation for MIMO wireless powered communication networks based on a non-linear eh model,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1984–1999, May. 2017

    1984

  40. [49]

    Fundamentals of wireless information and power transfer: From RF energy harvester models to signal and system designs,

    B. Clerckx, R. Zhang, R. Schober, D. W. K. Ng, D. I. Kim, and H. V . Poor, “Fundamentals of wireless information and power transfer: From RF energy harvester models to signal and system designs,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas in Commun. , vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 4–33, Jan. 2019

    2019

  41. [50]

    Performance analysis of massive MIMO for cell-boundary users,

    Y . Lim, C. Chae, and G. Caire, “Performance analysis of massive MIMO for cell-boundary users,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 6827–6842, Dec. 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.