Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 34 references

High Harmonic Generation with Twisted Electrons

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Twisted electron wavepackets with one unit of orbital angular momentum convert linearly polarized laser light into circularly polarized high harmonics.

desk verdict A clean microscopic derivation of circularly polarized HHG from twisted electrons, with a robust central-collision claim and a quantitatively unverified impact-parameter crossover. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00728 v1 pith:L4Y3GG6X submitted 2019-09-02 physics.atom-ph

Sebastian Gemsheim , Jan-Michael Rost This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph PACS 42.65.Ky
keywords highharmonicgenerationtwistedelectronsorbitalangularmomentumcircularpolarizationattosecondpulsesLaguerre-GaussianwavepacketsVolkovstateslaser-assistedrecombination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to high-harmonic generation when the vortex character is carried by the electron instead of the driving light. It argues that a twisted electron wavepacket with one unit of orbital angular momentum, colliding centrally with a hydrogen-like ion under linearly polarized light, recombines through a dipole that rotates in the transverse plane, so the emitted harmonic radiation is circularly polarized. The harmonic cutoff and spectral envelope remain the same as in ordinary high-harmonic generation, but the emission direction is along the laser polarization axis rather than along the laser propagation axis. For off-center collisions the rotational symmetry is broken, and the emission crosses over from circular to linear polarization as the impact parameter grows toward the ring radius of the twisted wavepacket. This offers a microscopic route to circularly polarized attosecond pulses with a helicity tied to the electron vortex charge, without requiring elliptically polarized driving fields.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the twisted Volkov wavepacket, a Laguerre-Gaussian electron wavepacket dressed by the laser field and carrying vortex charge $s$ through the azimuthal phase $e^{is\varphi}$, with a transverse ring maximum at $\rho_{\max}(t)$. The argument uses this wavepacket as the continuum state in a low-frequency radiative recombination matrix element with the unperturbed hydrogen ground state (Eq. 4), treating the ion only through the ground-state wavefunction. Because the laser field conserves the vortex charge in this geometry, the azimuthal phase survives into the recombination matrix element, and for central collisions the dipole selection rules force the $x$ and $y$ components into equal amplitude with a $\pi/2$ phase difference. The same transverse ring topology controls the off-center behavior: breaking the rotational symmetry activates the $z$-component near the ring radius and changes the balance of transverse components as the impact parameter increases.

What would settle it

Compute the full Stokes parameters or the polarization ellipse of the cutoff harmonic for $b=0$: if the $x$ and $y$ components are not equal in amplitude and $90^\circ$ out of phase, or if the $z$ component is not negligible for all $b$ up to the ring radius, the central claim fails. A time-dependent Schrödinger calculation with the true Coulomb potential, reporting all three polarization components rather than only $S_x$, would settle the prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a central collision $b=0$, a twisted electron wavepacket with vortex charge $s=1$ recombining with a hydrogen-like ion in a linearly polarized laser field has recombination matrix element $M_{b=0}^{(1)}(t)\propto (1,i,0)^{\mathsf T}$ times a scalar amplitude (Eq. 6): the transverse components are equal in magnitude and $\pi/2$ out of phase, so the effective dipole rotates and the emitted high harmonics are circularly polarized, with maximum emission along the laser polarization axis. Dipole selection rules suppress central recombination for $|s|>1$, so the single-vortex case is the one that produces circularly polarized ground-state harmonics. For non-central collisions $b>0$, the $z$-component of the harmonic intensity becomes nonzero and peaks near the wavepacket ring radius $b\approx\beta$, where the overlap with the bound state samples unequal azimuthal phases, producing a crossover from a rotating circular dipole near $b=0$, through a dominant linear dipole around the ring radius, to emission without resolved internal structure for large $b$. Throughout, the spectral cutoff remains the standard $\omega_{\max}=I_p+2U_p$, with low-frequency cutoff $\omega_{\min}=I_p$, unchanged by the electron orbital angular momentum.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the returning twisted electron feels only the laser field, not the ion's electric pull, while it travels and recombines, with the ion entering only through the unperturbed ground-state wavefunction; the paper's own time-dependent simulation shows the ion's pull concentrating the wavepacket at low frequencies, and if that distortion changes the helical phase near the nucleus, the predicted circular polarization and its impact-parameter dependence would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $s=1$ central collisions the highest harmonics are circularly polarized with the helicity set by the vortex charge, and the radiation is emitted along the laser polarization axis, perpendicular to the driving laser propagation direction.
  • The harmonic spectrum keeps the standard plateau with cutoff $\omega_{\max}=I_p+2U_p$, so twisted-electron harmonics extend no further in photon energy than ordinary HHG but differ in polarization and emission geometry.
  • In the constant-width approximation the spectral peaks appear at $\omega_{\text{peaks}}=I_p+U_p+2\omega_0 j$ for integer $j$ with $|j|\le U_p/(2\omega_0)$, giving the analytical envelope Eq. (7).
  • For off-center collisions the $z$-component of the harmonic intensity grows and peaks around the impact parameter $b\approx\beta$, so the ellipticity of the emitted harmonics is tunable by the collision geometry.
  • Higher vortex charges $|s|>1$ cannot recombine to the ground state in central collisions, and competing recombination channels are at least an order of magnitude weaker, so the single-vortex ground-state channel dominates the circularly polarized signal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Switching the vortex charge from $s=1$ to $s=-1$ should flip the helicity of the emitted harmonics, giving a switchable source of circularly polarized attosecond pulses; this follows directly from the $e^{is\varphi}$ dependence of the wavepacket and is not tested in the paper.
  • A controlled collision experiment scanning the impact parameter $b$ across the ring radius should see a sharp transition in the harmonic polarization ellipse, so the ellipticity-versus-$b$ curve could serve as a direct observable signature of the mechanism.
  • The Coulomb focusing visible in the low-frequency region of the numerics suggests that a Coulomb-corrected version of the calculation would make the ring-radius peak position and the exact polarization ellipse sensitive probes of continuum wavefunction phases near the ion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies high-harmonic generation from a single emitter when the continuum electron, rather than the driving laser, carries orbital angular momentum. The authors model a twisted electron wavepacket of vortex charge s=1 with a Laguerre-Gaussian transverse profile colliding with a hydrogen ion in a linearly polarized laser field. For central collisions they derive an analytic recombination matrix element M(t) proportional to (1,i,0) for recombination into the ground state (Eq. (6)), implying circularly polarized harmonic emission with the standard cutoff Ip+2Up; the analytic spectrum is compared with a soft-core TDSE simulation (Fig. 3). For non-central impacts they compute the impact-parameter dependence of the three polarization components, finding a nonzero z-component peaked near the initial ring radius and a crossover from circular to linear polarization (Fig. 4). The paper closes with an experimental proposal based on preparing an m=1 p-state and ionizing with a linearly polarized pulse, plus an illustrative TDSE spectrum (Fig. 6).

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a conceptually clean new pathway to circularly polarized attosecond pulses with uniform helicity across the harmonic spectrum. The b=0 result is strong: it follows from conservation of L_z plus dipole selection rules, and the explicit analytic matrix element compares favorably with full TDSE in the high-frequency plateau. I find the central claim free of fitted parameters; the only adjustable quantities are illustrative wavepacket widths and plotting normalizations. However, the quantitative predictions for non-central collisions, which are central to the abstract's crossover claim, are not supported by a full simulation and are subject to Coulomb distortion of the continuum wavepacket.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III B, Fig. 4] The off-center crossover is computed entirely within the Coulomb-free twisted Volkov description, with no TDSE cross-check for b>0. For b != 0, the ionic potential V_b(r) breaks cylindrical symmetry and L_z is no longer conserved, so the azimuthal phase content of the recombining wavepacket can be modified by the Coulomb field; the symmetry argument that protects the b=0 circular polarization does not apply. Moreover, Fig. 9 shows that the Coulomb potential pulls the transverse density maximum inward relative to Eq. (3a), so the effective impact parameter at the recombination time is not equal to b. The peak of S_z near b approximately equal to rho_max(0) and the detailed b-dependence in Fig. 4 are therefore quantitatively unreliable, and the paper provides no numerical evidence that the ring-to-linear crossover survives in the full Hamiltonian. A dedicated full-TDSE calculation for several b values is needed to support the crossover claim.
  2. [Section III A, Eq. (6), Fig. 3, Appendix C] The analytic approximation explicitly neglects the Coulomb potential in the continuum, using the Volkov wavepacket (3a), while the numerics use a soft-core potential and a variational ground state (Eqs. (C1)-(C2)). The authors attribute the low-frequency discrepancy in Fig. 3 to Coulomb focusing, so the approximation is not uniformly accurate. For b=0 this does not threaten the polarization prediction, because the full Hamiltonian commutes with L_z and the (1,i,0) structure is selection-rule protected, but it does mean that the quantitative spectral envelope, not just the cutoff, is approximate. The short-time justification for neglecting V_b should be quantified, for example by estimating the accumulated Coulomb phase during the recollision window or by extending the full-TDSE comparison over a wider parameter range.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] There are typographical errors such as "theoretial" in the first paragraph; the manuscript should be proofread.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption and Section III B] The text describes the results of Fig. 4 as "numerical," but the curves appear to be evaluations of the approximate transition element (4), not solutions of the full TDSE; the caption and text should state this explicitly to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Fig. 3(b)] The blue curve and its stationary-phase scaling are multiplied by a numerical constant to match peak values; the value of that constant should be reported for reproducibility.
  4. [Section IV A] The statement that the linearly polarized ionizing pulse "cannot induce angular momentum transfer" should be made precise: for b=0 it conserves L_z, but a realistic beam samples a range of impact parameters, and the condition that the impact parameter is "close to zero" should be quantified in relation to the transverse beam size.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central (1,i,0) polarization result is an explicit matrix-element calculation from the stated twisted Volkov ansatz, with no parameter fitted to the predicted quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Eq. (6), is obtained by direct evaluation of the recombination matrix element M_b=0^(1)(t)=<ψ100,b=0|p|ψs=1(t)> using the explicitly constructed twisted Volkov wavepacket (3a) and the hydrogen ground state. The transverse (1,i,0) structure and the vanishing z-component follow from the azimuthal phase e^{iφ} of the input wavepacket and the spherical symmetry of the bound state, i.e., from the same dipole selection rules the paper cites; this is a derivation, not a reduction of the output to the input by definition. No parameter is fitted to the polarization prediction: the only numerical constant mentioned is a plotting normalization in Fig. 3(b) used to compare envelope shapes, and the wavepacket parameters β, E0, ω0 are illustrative inputs, not fitted to the circular-polarization claim. The numerical TDSE comparison uses the full Hamiltonian (1) for propagation and the same recombination formula (4), so it tests the Volkov-propagation approximation rather than independently establishing the selection-rule part, but this shared assumption is a limitation of the numerical check, not circularity. The low-frequency discrepancy attributed to Coulomb focusing (Fig. 3, Appendix C) is acknowledged by the authors and does not affect the b=0 polarization structure, which is protected by L_z conservation. The off-center crossover (Fig. 4) is computed within the same Coulomb-free model and is quantitatively less certain, but the paper does not present it as fitted or as derived from a self-citation. Self-citations ([11,12,13,19]) concern the analytical collision method and semiclassical peak positions; they are methodological and not load-bearing for the central claim. Overall, the derivation is self-contained and the paper is honest about the approximation's limits.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fundamentally new entities are postulated. The central prediction uses standard quantum mechanics and the input wavepacket parameter beta; the main assumptions are the Volkov/Coulomb approximations and ground-state dominance. The experiment proposal adds one unproven assumption about phase-preserving ionization.

free parameters (1)
  • beta (twisted wavepacket width) = 25 a.u. for Fig. 3; not stated for Fig. 4
    Initial transverse width of the twisted electron wavepacket. It is a physical beam parameter chosen for the demonstrations, not fitted to a target. It controls the ring radius and the spectral slope in Eq. (7) but does not determine the circular polarization result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dipole approximation for the laser-electron interaction (length gauge) and non-relativistic treatment.
    Invoked in Eq. (1); standard for IR-driven HHG.
  • domain assumption The continuum electron is described as a superposition of Volkov states; the ion Coulomb potential is neglected in the continuum.
    Used in Section II to construct Eq. (3a); load-bearing for the analytical matrix element.
  • domain assumption Radiative recombination is described by the low-frequency, quasi-static matrix element M = <psi_100|p|psi_s> at the instantaneous field.
    Eq. (4) after Ref. [17]; central approximation for the spectrum.
  • domain assumption Recombination to the ground state dominates the harmonic yield.
    Justified in Appendix A, Fig. 7; used to restrict Eq. (5) to one channel.
  • ad hoc to paper The proposed experiment's strong-field ionization transfers the azimuthal phase e^{i phi} of a prepared m=1 state to the continuum wavepacket.
    Stated in Section IV A without derivation; load-bearing for the experimental proposal only.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High Harmonic Generation with Twisted Electrons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L4Y3GG6X

@misc{pith2026190900728,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High Harmonic Generation with Twisted Electrons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L4Y3GG6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00728}
}
read the original abstract

We present analytically and numerically the spectrum of high harmonic emission generated by twisted electrons in the presence of linearly polarized light. Ensuing transitions from electronic continuum states with orbital angular momentum to bound states give rise to circularly polarized attosecond pulses. For central collisions with twisted wavepackets continuum-bound transitions are subject to dipole selection rules. For non-central collisions a crossover from circularly to linearly polarized emission occurs for increasing impact parameter, due to the transverse topology of twisted wavepackets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00728 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Laser assisted scattering of a singly charged positive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Transverse topology of a twisted Volkov wavepacket [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: for ground state recombination. Due to the broken symmetry, the z-component of the spectral intensity S (1) z,b becomes non-zero and exhibits a peak at b ≈ ρ (s=1) max (0) for ω ≈ ωmax. The reasons are an increased wavefunction overlap in the transverse plane and unequ…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Transverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Envelope function used for all Fourier transformations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Longitudinal cross-section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    High Harmonic Generation with Twisted Electrons

    The time-dependent Hamiltonian for the electron reads (atomic units are used throughout unless noted otherwise) Hb,A(t) =−1 2∇2 r +Vb(r) +VA(t,z ), (1) where the light-matter coupling VA(t,z ) = −z·∂tA(t) is expressed in length gauge. We take the twisted electron wavepacket initially at t = 0 localized at the quiver distance dω0 ≫ 1 away from the nu- cleu...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1909

  2. [2]

    Grid parameters for numerical simulation of scat- tering scenario

    Scattering scenario For the scattering scenario, the initial wavefunction is taken to be the analytical form (3a) of the twisted elec- tron at time t = 0 and is time-iterated under a laser pulse with electric field strengthE0 = 0.05835, frequency TABLE I. Grid parameters for numerical simulation of scat- tering scenario. Direction Grid Points Min Max Resol...

    work page

  3. [3]

    To emulate the widely available Ti:Sa laser, we use the optical frequency ω0 = 0.057 and the electric field strength E0 = 0.1026

    Experimental scenario with ionization process Assuming that a neutral hydrogen atom has been pre- pared in a superposition of the ground state with the ex- cited state ψnlm,b(r) = ψ311,0(r), we numerically evolve the initial state ψ0(r) = √ 0.1ψ100,0 + √ 0.9ψ311,0(r) un- der a laser pulse of the formE(t) =E0g(t) sin(ω0t +ϕ0) with the envelope g(t) =  ...

    work page 1920

  4. [4]

    V. Y. Bazhenov, M. Vasnetsov, and M. S. Soskin, Laser- beams with screw dislocations in their wave-fronts, JETP Letters 52, 429 (1990)

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    Uchida and A

    M. Uchida and A. Tonomura, Generation of electron beams carrying orbital angular momentum, Nature 464, 737 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Verbeeck, H

    J. Verbeeck, H. Tian, and P. Schattschneider, Production and application of electron vortex beams, Nature 467, 301 EP (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    R. L. Cappelletti, T. Jach, and J. Vinson, Intrinsic orbital angular momentum states of neutrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 090402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    C. W. Clark, R. Barankov, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, and D. A. Pushin, Controlling neutron orbital an- gular momentum, Nature 525, 504 EP (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, A

    C. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, A. Pic´ on, J. San Rom´ an, and L. Plaja, Attosecond extreme ultraviolet vortices from high-order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 083602 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Paufler, B

    W. Paufler, B. B¨ oning, and S. Fritzsche, Tailored orbital angular momentum in high-order harmonic generation with bicircular laguerre-gaussian beams, Phys. Rev. A 98, 011401(R) (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and J. L. Krause, Dy- namics of short-pulse excitation, ionization and harmonic conversion, in Super-Intense Laser-Atom Physics, edited by B. Piraux, A. L’Huillier, and K. Rzazewski (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1993) pp. 95–110

    1993

  4. [12]

    K. Y. Bliokh, Y. P. Bliokh, S. Savel’ev, and F. Nori, Semiclassical Dynamics of Electron Wave Packet States with Phase Vortices, Physical Review Letters 99, 10.1103/physrevlett.99.190404 (2007)

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    Bliokh, I

    K. Bliokh, I. Ivanov, G. Guzzinati, L. Clark, R. V. Boxem, A. B´ ech´ e, R. Juchtmans, M. Alonso, P. Schattschneider, F. Nori, and J. Verbeeck, Theory and Applications of Free-Electron Vortex States, Physics Re- ports 690, 1 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    van de Sand and J

    G. van de Sand and J. M. Rost, Irregular orbits generate higher harmonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 524 (1999)

    1999

  7. [15]

    Zagoya, C.-M

    C. Zagoya, C.-M. Goletz, F. Grossmann, and J.- M. Rost, Dominant-Interaction Hamiltonians for High- Order-Harmonic Generation in Laser-Assisted Collisions, Physical Review A 85, 10.1103/physreva.85.041401 (2012)

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    Zagoya, C.-M

    C. Zagoya, C.-M. Goletz, F. Grossmann, and J.-M. Rost, An analytical approach to high harmonic generation, New Journal of Physics 14, 093050 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    C. J. Joachain, N. J. Kylstra, and R. M. Potvliege,Atoms in Intense Laser Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  10. [19]

    Brennecke and M

    S. Brennecke and M. Lein, High-Order Above-Threshold Ionization Beyond the Electric Dipole Approximation, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 51, 094005 (2018)

    2018

  11. [20]

    Bivona, R

    S. Bivona, R. Burlon, G. Ferrante, and C. Leone, Radia- tive recombination in a strong laser field: low-frequency approximation, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 22, 2076 (2005)

    2005

  12. [21]

    Fowles, Introduction to Modern Optics , Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, New York, 1989)

    G. Fowles, Introduction to Modern Optics , Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, New York, 1989)

    1989

  13. [22]

    van de Sand and J

    G. van de Sand and J. M. Rost, Semiclassical descrip- tion of multiphoton processes, Physical Review A 62, 10.1103/physreva.62.053403 (2000)

    2000 doi

  14. [23]

    X. Xie, A. Scrinzi, M. Wickenhauser, A. Baltuˇ ska, I. Barth, and M. Kitzler, Internal momentum state map- ping using high harmonic radiation, Physical Review Let- ters 101, 10.1103/physrevlett.101.033901 (2008)

    2008 doi

  15. [24]

    Popmintchev, M.-C

    T. Popmintchev, M.-C. Chen, D. Popmintchev, P. Arpin, S. Brown, S. Alisauskas, G. Andriukaitis, T. Balciu- nas, O. D. Mucke, A. Pugzlys, A. Baltuska, B. Shim, S. E. Schrauth, A. Gaeta, C. Hernandez-Garcia, L. Plaja, A. Becker, A. Jaron-Becker, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn,...

    2012

  16. [26]

    D. B. Miloˇ sevi´ c, W. Becker, and R. Kopold, Gener- ation of circularly polarized high-order harmonics by two-color coplanar field mixing, Physical Review A 61, 10.1103/physreva.61.063403 (2000)

    2000 doi

  17. [27]

    Mediˇ sauskas, J

    L. Mediˇ sauskas, J. Wragg, H. van der Hart, and M. Y. Ivanov, Generating isolated elliptically polarized at- tosecond pulses using bichromatic counterrotating circu- larly polarized laser fields, Physical Review Letters 115, 10.1103/physrevlett.115.153001 (2015)

    2015 doi

  18. [28]

    K. M. Dorney, J. L. Ellis, C. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, D. D. Hickstein, C. A. Mancuso, N. Brooks, T. Fan, G. Fan, D. Zusin, C. Gentry, P. Grychtol, H. C. Kapteyn, and M. M. Murnane, Helicity-selective enhancement and polarization control of attosecond high harmonic waveforms driv...

    2017 doi

  19. [29]

    Ferr´ e, C

    A. Ferr´ e, C. Handschin, M. Dumergue, F. Burgy, A. Comby, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, G. A. Garcia, R. G´ eneaux, L. Merceron, E. M´ evel, L. Nahon, S. Petit, B. Pons, D. Staedter, S. Weber, T. Ruchon, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse, A table-top ultrashort light source in the extrem...

    2014

  20. [30]

    Fleischer, O

    A. Fleischer, O. Kfir, T. Diskin, P. Sidorenko, and O. Co- hen, Spin angular momentum and tunable polarization in high-harmonic generation, Nature Photonics 8, 543 (2014)

    2014

  21. [31]

    O. Kfir, P. Grychtol, E. Turgut, R. Knut, D. Zusin, D. Popmintchev, T. Popmintchev, H. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, A. Fleischer, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, and O. Co- hen, Generation of bright phase-matched circularly- polarized extreme ultraviolet high harmonics, Nature Photonics 9, 99 (2014)

    2014

  22. [32]

    Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, C

    C. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, C. G. Durfee, D. D. Hickstein, T. Popmintchev, A. Meier, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, I. J. Sola, A. Jaron-Becker, and A. Becker, Schemes for generation of isolated attosecond pulses of pure circular polarization, Physical Review A 93, 10.1103/physrev...

    2016 doi

  23. [33]

    Yuan and A

    K.-J. Yuan and A. D. Bandrauk, Generation of circularly polarized attosecond pulses by intense ultrashort laser pulses from extended asymmetric molecular ions, Physi- cal Review A 84, 10.1103/physreva.84.023410 (2011)

    2011 doi

  24. [34]

    Harris, On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform, Proceedings of the IEEE 66, 51 (1978)

    F. Harris, On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform, Proceedings of the IEEE 66, 51 (1978)

    1978

  25. [35]

    Grossmann, Theoretical Femtosecond Physics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2013)

    F. Grossmann, Theoretical Femtosecond Physics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2013)

    2013

  26. [36]

    Program Generation, Optimization, and Platform Adaptation

    M. Frigo and S. G. Johnson, The design and implementa- tion of FFTW3, Proceedings of the IEEE 93, 216 (2005), special issue on “Program Generation, Optimization, and Platform Adaptation”

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.