Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progenitors. I. Explosion mechanisms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.01105 v2 pith:MGO7R4P3 submitted 2019-09-03 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords explosionexplosionsadvectionapproximatecollapsedifferentfieldsgain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the explosion of stars with zero-age main-sequence masses between 20 and 35 solar masses and varying degrees of rotation and magnetic fields including ones commonly considered progenitors of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The simulations, combining special relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, a general relativistic approximate gravitational potential, and two-moment neutrino transport, demonstrate the viability of different scenarios for the post-bounce evolution. Having formed a highly massive proto-neutron star (PNS), several models launch successful explosions, either by the standard supernova mechanism based on neutrino heating and hydrodynamic instabilities or by magnetorotational processes. It is, however, quite common for the PNS to collapse to a black hole (BH) within a few seconds. Others might produce proto-magnetar-driven explosions. We explore several ways to describe the different explosion mechanisms. The competition between the timescales for advection of gas through the gain layer and heating by neutrinos provides an approximate explanation for models with insignificant magnetic fields. The fidelity of this explosion criterion in the case of rapid rotation can be improved by accounting for the strong deviations from spherical symmetry and mixing between pole and equator. We furthermore study an alternative description including the ram pressure of the gas falling through the shock. Magnetically driven explosions tend to arise from a strongly magnetised region around the polar axis. In these cases, the onset of the explosion corresponds to the equality between the advection timescale and the timescale for the propagation of Alfv\'en waves through the gain layer.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 3D simulations of a complete convective silicon shell burning phase

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 3D simulation of a convective silicon-burning shell in a 14 solar mass star burns out about 800 s earlier than a 1D MESA model, suggesting weaker convective boundary mixing and a convective-reactive energy profile.

  2. Effects of Rotation on 3D Core-Collapse Supernova Models for Low-Mass Progenitors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For a low-mass CCSN progenitor, rotation alone weakly and non-monotonically affects explosion energy and observables; only the fastest spin yields T/|W| spiral modes and spin-kick alignment, with core spin amplified by ~4000.

  3. Impact of rotation on the accretion of entropy perturbations in collapsing massive stars

    astro-ph.SR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Rotation has little effect on entropy perturbations falling onto a supernova shock: the sound and vortex waves they create stay below about 1% of the local sound speed, and convective eddies dominate for the modes tha...

  4. Toward More Realistic Machine-Learning Inference of the Dense-Matter Equation of State from Supernova Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Using a linear SVM, EOS classification from bounce gravitational waves remains robust to real noise, progenitor diversity, and bounce-time uncertainty in the frequency domain, but collapses in the time domain under ti...

  5. Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with a Network of Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CNN can recover supernova peak frequency out to about 30 kpc and rotation/amplitude out to 200-250 kpc with current networks, extending to roughly 300 kpc and 2-2.5 Mpc with third-generation detectors.

Pith tools