Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

CLT for Circular beta-Ensembles at High Temperature

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At high temperature, the circular beta-ensemble's linear statistics satisfy a central limit theorem with an explicit covariance that interpolates between white noise and random-matrix noise.

desk verdict First explicit CLT at the beta/N crossover for circular beta ensembles, with an honest proof chain; but the advertised W2 rate is not obtained by the argument as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01142 v2 pith:OLBURSUI submitted 2019-09-03 math.PR math-phmath.FAmath.MP

Adrien Hardy , Gaultier Lambert This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.FAmath.MP MSC 60F0560B20
keywords circularbeta-ensemblehightemperaturecentrallimittheoremlinearstatisticsGaussianfluctuationsequilibriummeasureSturm-LiouvillespectrumWassersteinmetric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a central limit theorem for the linear statistics of the circular $\beta$-ensemble when the inverse temperature is scaled as $\beta/N$, the regime where the system crosses over from independent particles to random-matrix behavior. It shows that for a smooth potential $V$ and a smooth mean-zero test function $\psi$, the normalized fluctuation $N^{-1/2}\sum_{i=1}^N \psi(x_i)$ converges in distribution to a Gaussian with variance $\langle\psi, L^{-1}\psi\rangle_H$, where $L$ is an explicit differential operator built from the equilibrium measure. The variance interpolates between the $L^2$ norm at $\beta=0$ and the Sobolev $H^{1/2}$ semi-norm at $\beta=\infty$, so one family of formulas covers both extremes. The paper also supplies a rate of convergence in the Wasserstein $W_2$ metric that improves with the smoothness of the test function. If correct, this gives a quantitative description of the full temperature crossover for fluctuations of this particle system.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the operator $L=A+2\pi\beta W$ acting on the Hilbert space $H=\{\psi\in L^2(\mathbb{T}):\psi'\in L^2(\mathbb{T}),\int\psi\,d\mu_\beta^V=0\}$ with inner product $\langle\phi,\psi\rangle_H=\int \phi'\psi'\,d\mu_\beta^V$. Here $A\phi=-\phi''-(\log\mu_\beta^V)'\phi'$ is a Sturm-Liouville operator and $W\phi=-H(\phi'\mu_\beta^V)$ involves the Hilbert transform $H$. Proposition 4.3 supplies a complete orthonormal eigenbasis $(\varphi_j)$ of $H$ with eigenvalues $\kappa_j\sim\alpha j^2$ and Lipschitz bounds $\|\varphi_j^{(k)}\|_{\mathrm{Lip}}\le C_k\kappa_j^{(k+1)/2}$. This spectral structure is what lets the proof decompose an arbitrary test function into eigenmodes, truncate the expansion with controllable error, and apply a normal-approximation theorem to the finite-dimensional projections.

What would settle it

For $V=0$, simulate the particle system at fixed $\beta$ and measure the variance of $N^{-1/2}\sum_i\cos(x_i)$; Theorem 1.2 predicts it approaches $1/(2(1+\beta))$, so a clear mismatch at large $N$ would refute the CLT. More directly, one can numerically diagonalize a discretization of $L$ for a non-constant smooth $V$ and check whether the eigenvalue ratios $\kappa_j/j^2$ converge to a positive constant and whether the stated eigenfunction Lipschitz bounds hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, in the high-temperature scaling where the inverse temperature is $2\beta/N$, the random measure $\nu_N=\sqrt{N}(\mu_N-\mu_\beta^V)$ has Gaussian macroscopic fluctuations with an explicit covariance operator. For $\beta>0$, $V\in C^{3,1}(\mathbb{T})$ and $\psi\in C^{2\gamma+1}(\mathbb{T})$, $\gamma\ge 2$, with $\int\psi\,d\mu_\beta^V=0$, Theorem 1.2 states that $\nu_N(\psi)=N^{-1/2}\sum_i\psi(x_i)$ converges in law to $\mathcal{N}(0,\sigma_\beta^V(\psi)^2)$ with $\sigma_\beta^V(\psi)^2=\langle\psi,L^{-1}\psi\rangle_H=\int \psi'(L^{-1}\psi)'\,d\mu_\beta^V$, and $W_2(\nu_N(\psi),\mathcal{N}(0,\sigma^2))\le C\sqrt{\log N}\,N^{-(\gamma-1)/(\gamma+1)}$. Here $\mu_\beta^V$ is the unique minimizer of $\beta E(\mu)+K(\mu|\mu_0^V)$, the operator $L$ is defined by $-L\phi=\phi''+2\pi\beta H(\mu_\beta^V\phi')+(\log\mu_\beta^V)'\phi'$, and $H$ is the Hilbert transform. In the unweighted case $V=0$, the variance is $\sigma_\beta^0(\psi)^2=2\sum_{k\ge1}\frac{1}{1+\beta/k}|\widehat{\psi}_k|^2$, which visibly interpolates between the $L^2$ norm and the $H^{1/2}$ semi-norm.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the operator $L$, including the Hilbert-transform part $W$, is self-adjoint on the Sobolev space $H$ and has a complete eigenbasis with eigenvalues growing like the square of their index and with derivatives of eigenfunctions controlled by powers of those eigenvalues. The rate proof depends on this spectral picture, so if any of it fails, the stated CLT and convergence rate do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At high temperature, the macroscopic fluctuations of the circular beta-ensemble are Gaussian with a covariance operator that interpolates continuously between the $L^2$ white-noise covariance at $\beta=0$ and the $H^{1/2}$ random-matrix covariance at $\beta=\infty$.
  • The rate of convergence in the Wasserstein $W_2$ metric is $O(\sqrt{\log N}\,N^{-(\gamma-1)/(\gamma+1)})$ for $\psi\in C^{2\gamma+1}$, so smoother test functions yield faster convergence; for $C^\infty$ test functions the rate is $O(\sqrt{\log N}/N)$.
  • For $V=0$, the limiting variance has the explicit Fourier formula $2\sum_{k\ge1}\frac{1}{1+\beta/k}|\widehat{\psi}_k|^2$, reducing to the classical formulas in the limits $\beta\to0$ and $\beta\to\infty$.
  • The equilibrium measure $\mu_\beta^V$ is the unique minimizer of $\beta E(\mu)+K(\mu|\mu_0^V)$, has a density bounded above and below by positive constants, and is as smooth as the potential $V$.
  • The concentration estimate of Theorem 1.4 gives exponential tail bounds for $W_1(\mu_N,\mu_\beta^V)$, which imply almost sure convergence of the empirical measure whenever $\beta\gg N^{-1}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same operator-level strategy would likely extend to Gaussian beta-ensembles on the real line and to general potentials, giving an explicit limiting variance in settings where only implicit central limit theorems were previously available.
  • The variance formula suggests a two-parameter family of Gaussian fields parametrized by $\beta$; at finite $\beta$ the fluctuations are neither pure white noise nor pure random-matrix noise, which could be tested numerically as a systematic interpolation between the two known regimes.
  • The paper leaves open whether the condition $\beta\inf\mu_\beta^V\to\infty$ can fail for some smooth non-constant potential; if it does fail, the $H^{1/2}$ universality at $\beta=\infty$ would break and the limiting variance would retain a dependence on $V$.
  • A direct numerical check of the unweighted formula $\sigma_\beta^0(\psi)^2=2\sum_{k\ge1}\frac{1}{1+\beta/k}|\widehat{\psi}_k|^2$, mode by mode, would isolate the operator's spectrum from other sources of error and sharpen confidence in the whole proof.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Circular beta-Ensemble on the torus in the high-temperature regime where the inverse temperature scales as beta/N, with an external potential V. The main object is the signed fluctuation field nu_N = sqrt(N)(mu_N - mu^V_beta) around the equilibrium measure mu^V_beta, which minimizes the functional beta E + relative entropy. Theorem 1.2 states a CLT for linear statistics nu_N(psi) with explicit variance sigma^V_beta(psi)^2 = <psi, L^{-1} psi>_H, where L is the Sturm-Liouville-type operator in (15), together with a quantitative Wasserstein-2 rate sqrt(log N) N^{-(gamma-1)/(gamma+1)}. The proof combines a concentration estimate in W1 (Theorem 1.4), obtained from a Coulomb transport inequality and an energy regularization, with the Stein-type normal approximation of Lambert-Ledoux-Webb and a spectral decomposition of L. Sections 2-8 develop the equilibrium measure properties, the concentration proof, the eigenbasis regularity, and the beta -> 0/infty behavior of the variance.

Significance. The CLT at high temperature is a natural and interesting result: it gives an explicit crossover covariance structure interpolating between the L2 noise of independent particles at beta = 0 and the H^{1/2} noise of the usual beta-ensemble at beta = infinity, and it provides quantitative convergence in W2. The overall strategy is coherent and builds on solid external tools, and the spectral analysis of the operator L is a genuine contribution. The concentration inequality of Theorem 1.4 is also of independent interest. However, the advertised W2 rate in Theorem 1.2 is not supported by the estimates as written, and there are gaps in the spectral self-adjointness argument; these affect a stated quantitative result, though the CLT itself appears salvageable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 1.2, Eqs. (58)-(60)] The stated W2 rate in Theorem 1.2 is not what the proof delivers. Taking d to be the integer part of N^{1/(4(gamma+1))}, estimate (58) gives W2(nu_N(psi), nu_N(psi[d])) <= C sqrt(log N) d^{-2(gamma-1)} = C sqrt(log N) N^{-(gamma-1)/(2(gamma+1))}. The dominant term in (60) is of the same order, or slower if the displayed Proposition 4.4 bound is used literally. Hence the proof establishes only W2 <= C sqrt(log N) N^{-(gamma-1)/(2(gamma+1))}, not the claimed N^{-(gamma-1)/(gamma+1)}. The weak convergence is unaffected, but the quantitative rate in the theorem and the related claim in Remark 1.1 must be corrected.
  2. [Section 6, Proposition 6.3] Self-adjointness of W on H is asserted without proof. The text states 'Since W is non-negative and self-adjoint on H', but only positivity of the quadratic form is shown in Lemma 6.1. Positivity of a quadratic form does not imply symmetry or self-adjointness for an unbounded operator, and this property is load-bearing for the spectral theorem and the min-max comparison that yield the eigenvalue asymptotics. Please provide a domain and a proof of self-adjointness, for instance by an integration by parts using H* = -H and the equilibrium equation, or cite a precise reference.
  3. [Section 4, Proposition 4.4 and Eq. (60)] There is an inconsistency in the d-dependence of the second error term. Proposition 4.4 states the second contribution as sqrt(log N) sqrt(sum kappa_j^2) sum kappa_j, which for kappa_j ~ alpha j^2 is of order sqrt(log N) d^{11/2}. Equation (60), however, writes sqrt(log N) d^4. The square-root of the bound in (55) naturally gives sqrt(log N) sqrt(sum kappa_j^2) sqrt(sum kappa_j), which is d^4; the displayed Proposition 4.4 is weaker. The two forms are not interchangeable as written, and this discrepancy affects the resulting rate in Theorem 1.2. Please reconcile the statement of Proposition 4.4 with its proof and with equation (60).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Proposition 4.3(c)] There is a stray period in the statement: 'kappa_j ~ alpha j^2 as j -> infinity. for every j >= 1' should be 'kappa_j ~ alpha j^2 as j -> infinity, for every j >= 1'.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] There is a typo in the abstract: 'equilibrium mesure' should be 'equilibrium measure'. Similar small typos appear elsewhere and should be cleaned up.
  3. [Remark 1.1] The remark that the rate for C^infty test functions is sqrt(log N)/N is based on the currently stated exponent; if the correct rate is the weaker one identified above, this remark must be updated accordingly.
  4. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.4] The citation to [Chafai, Hardy, Maida, Theorem 1.1] and 'the discussion below' could be made more precise by specifying the exact form of the Coulomb transport inequality used in (41).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CLT is derived from independent external tools (Sturm-Liouville theory, Lambert-Ledoux-Webb normal approximation, Chafai-Hardy-Maida transport inequality) and from internally proved spectral estimates, with no fitted parameter or target assumption smuggled into the inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The equilibrium measure mu_V_beta is defined as the minimizer of F_beta, which is an independent variational object justified by classical large-deviation and convexity results; the CLT variance is then expressed in terms of the operator L built from this equilibrium measure, but L is not defined using the target fluctuation law. The spectral Proposition 4.3 is proven, not assumed: (a)-(c) follow from Sturm-Liouville theory for A plus positivity of W (Lemma 6.1, Lemma 6.2, Proposition 6.3), and (d) follows from an internal bootstrap on the eigenfunction equation; no eigen-gap or eigenvalue-growth condition equivalent to the CLT is imposed. The concentration estimate (Theorem 1.4) is derived from the Coulomb transport inequality of Chafai-Hardy-Maida and a regularization lemma, not from the CLT being proven. The normal approximation step (Theorem 4.5) is cited to Lambert-Ledoux-Webb, an external published result whose stated assumptions do not include the high-temperature CLT; the citation is load-bearing but it is legitimate independent support, not a self-referential uniqueness or ansatz citation. The identity eta_infty = sigma_V_beta(psi)^2 is verified by the spectral computation in Proposition 6.3, so the variance formula is not assumed by construction. There are no fitted parameters, no quantity called a prediction that was used as an input, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. The advertised W2 exponent in Theorem 1.2 may or may not follow from the displayed estimates (a possible correctness concern), but that is unrelated to circularity: nothing in the proof assumes the target convergence or variance.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The paper's contribution is a derivation; the load-bearing inputs are external theorems (LDP for the Gibbs measure, the Coulomb transport inequality, the Stein normal approximation, and Sturm-Liouville spectral theory) plus standard Fourier/Hilbert transform facts. These are listed as axioms.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math The logarithmic energy E and relative entropy K have compact level sets and are strictly convex, so F^V_beta has a unique minimizer.
    Used in Proposition 2.1(a) and Theorem 1.1; standard results from Saff-Totik (1997) and Dembo-Zeitouni (2010).
  • domain assumption Large deviation principle for the empirical measure at speed beta N with rate F^V_beta - F^V_beta(mu^V_beta), as in Berman (2018) and Garcia-Zelada (2018).
    Quoted as Theorem 1.1(b); fixes the equilibrium measure mu^V_beta as the a.s. limit.
  • domain assumption Coulomb transport inequality of Chafai-Hardy-Maida (2018): W1(mu,nu)^2 <= 4 pi E(mu-nu) for probability measures with finite logarithmic energy.
    Used in Step 4 of the proof of Theorem 1.4 to turn energy estimates into W1 concentration.
  • domain assumption Stein normal approximation theorem of Lambert-Ledoux-Webb (2017), quoted as Theorem 4.5: W2(F,N(0,Id)) <= sqrt(E||F+K^{-1}LF||^2) + sqrt(E||I-K^{-1}Gamma||^2).
    Used in Proposition 4.4 to bound the Gaussian approximation error for eigenfunction statistics.
  • standard math Sturm-Liouville spectral theory and Weyl's law for A = -(phi' mu)'/mu on T: orthonormal eigenbasis of H with eigenvalues lambda_j ~ alpha j^2.
    Used in Lemma 6.2 and Proposition 6.3; cited from Brown et al. (2013).
  • standard math Hilbert transform properties: H(e^{ikx}) = i sgn(k) e^{ikx}, H* = -H, H is an isometry on L2_0(T), and (Hf)' = H(f').
    Used throughout Sections 2, 6 and 7 to compute W and the equilibrium potential.
  • standard math Sobolev embedding H^{m+1}(T) subset C^{m,1/2}(T).
    Invoked at several regularity steps, including Proposition 2.5 and Section 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CLT for Circular beta-Ensembles at High Temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OLBURSUI

@misc{pith2026190901142,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CLT for Circular beta-Ensembles at High Temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OLBURSUI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01142}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the macroscopic large N limit of the Circular beta-Ensemble at high temperature, and its weighted version as well, in the regime where the inverse temperature scales as beta/N for some parameter beta>0. More precisely, in the large N limit, the equilibrium measure of this particle system is described as the unique minimizer of a functional which interpolates between the relative entropy (beta=0) and the weighted logarithmic energy (beta=\infty). More precisely, we provide subGaussian concentration estimates in the W1 metric for the deviations of the empirical measure to this equilibrium mesure. The purpose of this work is to show that the fluctuation of the empirical measure around the equilibrium measure converges towards a Gaussian field whose covariance structure interpolates between the Lebesgue L^2 (beta=0) and the Sobolev H^{1/2} (beta=\infty) norms. We furthermore obtain a rate of convergence for the fluctuations in the W_2 metric. Our proof uses the normal approximation result of Lambert, Ledoux and Webb [2017] the Coulomb transport inequality of Chafai, Hardy, Maida [2018] and a spectral analysis for the operator associated with the limiting covariance structure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akemann and S.-S

    G. Akemann and S.-S. Byun. The high temperature crossover for general 2D C oulomb gases. J. Stat. Phys., 175 0 (6): 0 1043--1065, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Allez , J.-P

    R. Allez , J.-P. Bouchaud , and A. Guionnet . Invariant Beta Ensembles and the Gauss-Wigner Crossover . Physical Review Letters, 109 0 (9): 0 094102, Aug. 2012. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.094102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.094102 2012

  3. [3]

    G. W. Anderson, A. Guionnet, and O. Zeitouni. An Introduction to Random Matrices, volume 118. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Benaych-Georges and S

    F. Benaych-Georges and S. P \'e ch \'e . Poisson statistics for matrix ensembles at large temperature. J. Stat. Phys., 161 0 (3): 0 633--656, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    R. J. Berman. On large deviations for G ibbs measures, mean energy and gamma-convergence. Constructive Approximation, 48 0 (1): 0 3--30, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Borodin and S

    A. Borodin and S. Serfaty. Renormalized energy concentration in random matrices. Comm. Math. Phys., 320 0 (1): 0 199--244, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    B. M. Brown, M. S. P. Eastham, and K. M. Schmidt. Periodic differential operators, volume 230 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications. Birkh\" a user/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2013. ISBN 978-3-0348-0527-8; 978-3-0348-0528-5. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-0528-5. URL https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2978285

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-0528-5 2013

  8. [8]

    i , A. Hardy, and M. Ma\

    D. Chafa\" i , A. Hardy, and M. Ma\" i da. Concentration for C oulomb gases and C oulomb transport inequalities. Journal of Functional Analysis, 275 0 (6): 0 1447 -- 1483, 2018. ISSN 0022-1236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2018.06.004. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022123618302209

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2018.06.004 2018

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Chatterjee

    S. Chatterjee. Fluctuations of eigenvalues and second order P oincar \'e inequalities. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 143: 0 1--40, 2009

    2009

  2. [10]

    Deift, A

    P. Deift, A. Its, and I. Krasovsky. Toeplitz matrices and T oeplitz determinants under the impetus of the I sing model: some history and some recent results. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 66 0 (9): 0 1360--1438, 2013. ISSN 0010-3640. doi:10.1002/cpa.21467. URL https://mathscinet.ams...

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Dembo and O

    A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni. Large deviations techniques and applications, volume 38 of Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03311-7. Corrected reprint of the second (1998) edition

    1998 doi

  4. [12]

    D \"o bler and M

    C. D \"o bler and M. Stolz. Stein's method and the multivariate CLT for traces of powers on the classical compact groups. Electron. J. Probab., 16: 0 2375--2405, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    D \"o bler and M

    C. D \"o bler and M. Stolz. A quantitative central limit theorem for linear statistics of random matrix eigenvalues. J. Theor. Probab., 27: 0 945--953, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    Dumitriu and A

    I. Dumitriu and A. Edelman. Matrix models for beta ensembles. J. Math. Phy., 43 0 (11): 0 5830--5847, 2002

    2002

  7. [15]

    J. Fulman. Stein's method, heat kernel, and traces of powers of elements of compact lie groups. Electron. J. Probab., 17 0 (66): 0 16 pp., 2012

    2012

  8. [16]

    Garc \' a-Zelada

    D. Garc \' a-Zelada. A large deviation principle for empirical measures on polish spaces: Application to singular gibbs measures on manifolds. Preprint arXiv:1703.02680. To appear in Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar \'e . , 2018

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Guionnet and T

    A. Guionnet and T. Bodineau. About the stationary states of vortex systems. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e Probab. Statist., 53 0 (2): 0 205--237, 1999

    1999

  10. [18]

    Hiai and D

    F. Hiai and D. Petz. The semicircle law, free random variables and entropy, volume 77 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. 2000

    2000

  11. [19]

    Johansson

    K. Johansson. On S zeg \"o 's asymptotic formula for T oeplitz determinants and generalizations. Bull. Sci. Math., 112 0 (3): 0 257--304, 1988

    1988

  12. [20]

    T. Johnson. Exchangeable pairs, switchings, and random regular graphs. Electron. J. Combin., 22 0 (1): 0 1--33, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    T. Kato. Perturbation theory for linear operators. Reprint of the 1980 edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995

    1980

  14. [22]

    G. Lambert. Mesoscopic central limit theorem for the circular beta-ensembles and applications. Preprint arXiv:1902.06611, 2019

    1902 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Lambert, M

    G. Lambert, M. Ledoux, and C. Webb. Quantitative normal approximation of linear statistics of -ensembles. Ann. of Probab. Vol. 47, No. 5, 2619--2685, 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    Ma \" i da and \'E

    M. Ma \" i da and \'E . Maurel-Segala. Free transport-entropy inequalities for non-convex potentials and application to concentration for random matrices. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 159 0 (1-2): 0 329--356, 2014. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-013-0508-x

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    V. A. Marchenko. Sturm- L iouville operators and applications . AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, revised edition, 2011. ISBN 978-0-8218-5316-0. doi:10.1090/chel/373. URL https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2798059

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    Nakano and K

    F. Nakano and K. D. Trinh. Gaussian beta ensembles at high temperature: eigenvalue fluctuations and bulk statistics. J. Stat. Phys., 173 0 (2): 0 296--321, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Nakano and K

    F. Nakano and K. D. Trinh. Poisson statistics for beta ensembles on the real line at high temperature. Preprint arXiv:1910.00766, 2019

    1910 arXiv

  20. [28]

    C. Pakzad. Poisson statistics at the edge of gaussian beta-ensembles at high temperature. Preprint arXiv:1804.08214, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  21. [29]

    C. Pakzad. Large deviations principle for the largest eigenvalue of the gaussian --ensemble at high temperature. J. Theor. Probab., pages 1--19, 2019 a

    2019

  22. [30]

    C. Pakzad. Extremes of chi triangular array from the gaussian βββ-ensemble at high temperature. Preprint arXiv:1903.02103, 2019 b

    1903 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of modern mathematical physics, volume IV. Analysis of operators. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1978

    1978

  24. [32]

    N. Ross. Fundamentals of stein's method. Probab. Surveys, 8: 0 210--293, 2011

    2011

  25. [33]

    Rougerie and S

    N. Rougerie and S. Serfaty. Higher-dimensional C oulomb gases and renormalized energy functionals. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 69 0 (3): 0 519--605, 2016. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21570

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    E. B. Saff and V. Totik. Logarithmic potentials with external fields, volume 316 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03329-6. Appendix B by Th...

    1997 doi

  27. [35]

    B. Simon. Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. P art 1 and Part2 , volume 54 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005. ISBN 0-8218-3675-7. doi:10.1090/coll/054.2/01. URL https://mathscinet.ams.org/maths...

    2005 doi

  28. [36]

    H. Spohn. Generalized gibbs ensembles of the classical toda chain. Journal of Statistical Physics, May 2019. ISSN 1572-9613. doi:10.1007/s10955-019-02320-5. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10955-019-02320-5

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    K. D. Trinh. Global spectrum fluctuations for gaussian beta ensembles: a martingale approach. J. Theor. Probab., pages 1--18, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    C. Webb. Linear statistics of the circular -ensemble, stein's method, and circular dyson brownian motion. Electron. J. Probab., 21 0 (25): 0 16 pp., 2016

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.