Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 44 references

Universal Force Correlations in an RNA-DNA Unzipping Experiment

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Force fluctuations during RNA-DNA unzipping match the universal prediction of a particle dragged through a random landscape.

desk verdict New experimental measurement of the depinning force correlator in RNA-DNA unzipping; the Gumbell shape fits nicely, but only after fitted scales and a factor-two miss on the predicted length scale. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01319 v2 pith:AANSCNTX submitted 2019-09-03 cond-mat.dis-nn physics.bio-phq-bio.BMq-bio.QM

Kay Joerg Wiese , Mathilde Bercy , Lena Melkonyan , Thierry Bizebard This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.bio-phq-bio.BMq-bio.QM
keywords RNA-DNAunzippingforce-forcecorrelationsdepinningtransitiondisorderedelasticsystemsfunctionalrenormalizationgroupGumbelluniversalityclasssingle-moleculeforcespectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Force fluctuations on the plateau of an RNA-DNA unzipping curve, extracted from 163 experimental force-extension measurements, match the exact prediction of a one-dimensional toy model—a particle pulled through a Gaussian random force landscape—better than they match a pure exponential or the leading-order field-theory curve. The paper identifies this signal as the renormalized disorder correlator of the depinning transition, the central object of the functional renormalization group for disordered elastic systems. Because the molecule's sequence is specific biological RNA, the agreement implies that the macroscopic force-force correlations are sequence-independent and universal. This matters because it connects a biologically inspired single-molecule experiment to a broad class of disordered systems, and because the correlation length of about 186 base pairs sets the resolution limit for reading biological information out of unzipping curves.

What carries the argument

The central object is the force-force correlator $\Delta(w)=\langle F(w)F(w')\rangle_c$, which on the unzipping plateau measures how force fluctuations at two trap separations are correlated. The load-bearing theoretical input is the exact solution of a one-dimensional toy model: a particle dragged through a random force landscape, whose Gaussian forces place it in the Gumbell universality class of extreme-value statistics, with correlator $\Delta_{\text{Gumbell}}(x)=x^2/2+\operatorname{Li}_2(1-e^{|x|})+\pi^2/6$. The argument is that the experiment measures this same universal object—the renormalized disorder correlator of the field theory of disordered elastic manifolds, here in internal dimension $d=0$. The matching of the shape of $\Delta(w)$, not just an overall amplitude, is what establishes the universality claim.

What would settle it

Measure $\Delta(w)$ on a construct with a substantially stiffer or softer trap: the Gumbell prediction fixes the correlation length as $\rho_m=(1/m^2)\sqrt{2\ln(m^{-2})}$ and the shape of $\Delta(w)$, so a measured shape that deviates from Eq. (3) beyond the stated error bars, or a correlation length that does not scale with $m^2$ as predicted, would falsify the universality claim. Alternatively, vary temperature over a range where $p_T$ changes by orders of magnitude: if the cusp of $\Delta(w)$ rounds when more bonds can be thermally opened, the zero-temperature assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the measured connected force-force correlator $\Delta(w)=\langle F(w)F(w')\rangle_c$ on the unzipping plateau is given, up to two non-universal scales, by the Gumbell form $\Delta_{\text{Gumbell}}(x)=x^2/2+\operatorname{Li}_2(1-e^{|x|})+\pi^2/6$, the exact solution of a particle driven through a random force landscape with Gaussian-distributed disorder. The data from 163 force-extension curves favor this curve over the leading-order FRG fixed-point function $\Delta_{\text{FT}}(x)=-W(-e^{-x^2/2-1})$ and over an exponential decay, after rescaling all curves to the same slope at the origin. The paper argues that the plateau forces fluctuate around a critical value $F_c\approx60\,\text{pN}$ and that the measured $\Delta(w)$ is the renormalized disorder correlator of the depinning transition for an elastic object of internal dimension $d=0$. It further interprets the slope at the origin through the relation $|\Delta'(0^+)|=m^2\delta F_m$, yielding a mean force drop $\delta F_m=0.43\pm0.05\,\text{pN}$ and a correlation length $\xi\approx186$ base pairs, consistent with the force drops visible in single curves. The paper concludes that universal physics emerges from a specific, non-random biological sequence.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the unzipping plateau is in the zero-temperature depinning regime, so the zero-temperature correlator shapes apply without thermal rounding of the cusp; the paper supports this with the small probability $p_T=e^{-\delta G/k_BT}$ that a bond is thermally broken, but thermal noise is present in the data and the argument is not a quantitative derivation of the absence of rounding.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The plateau of an RNA-DNA unzipping curve is a macroscopic realization of the depinning transition of a disordered elastic system with internal dimension $d=0$; the measured correlator is the renormalized disorder correlator of that theory.
  • Force-force correlations decay over roughly 186 base pairs, so sequence-specific biological events in unzipping experiments can only be resolved at that scale; increasing trap stiffness $m^2$ shortens the correlation length and improves resolution.
  • The same universal signal should be recoverable from other peeling or unzipping experiments on random or biological sequences, while hairpin unzipping is predicted to fall in a different universality class with correlation length scaling as $\rho_m\sim m^{-4/3}$.
  • Because the sequence used is a real ribosomal RNA sequence, the result implies that universal, sequence-independent physics can coexist with and be extracted from a specific biological molecule, providing a benchmark for single-molecule force spectroscopy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The agreement with the toy model suggests that at the scale of the measurement the microscopic disorder is effectively Gaussian; if so, other observables of the same universality class—such as record statistics of force maxima or avalanche size distributions in the plateau—should also match the toy-model predictions, an extension the paper does not test.
  • If the zero-temperature cusp of $\Delta(w)$ is truly unrounded by temperature, a systematic temperature-dependence study should show no change in the shape of $\Delta(w)$; such a study could also test the paper's estimate that thermal bond-breaking is negligible for most base pairs.
  • The paper's resolution argument implies a design principle: stiffer, well-aligned optical traps should yield sharper force-drop features in unzipping curves, and re-analysis of datasets with different nominal stiffness could confirm the predicted $\rho_m\sim(1/m^2)\sqrt{2\ln(m^{-2})}$ scaling.
  • One might expect the same universal correlator to appear in other driven biophysical systems with quenched disorder, such as protein unfolding or nanopore translocation, where the control parameter plays the role of trap distance; this is an extrapolation beyond the paper's data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports measurements of force-force correlations in the plateau region of RNA-DNA unzipping force-extension curves, comparing the measured correlator Δ(w) with three theoretical forms: an exact 1-d toy-model solution in the Gumbell universality class (Eqs. 3–5), the leading-order functional renormalization group result (Eqs. 9–10), and a purely exponential decay. After rescaling each theoretical curve to match the measured slope at the origin and visually adjusting the large-w scale (Sec. III, Fig. 5), the authors conclude that the Gumbell form agrees best with the data, and they interpret this as evidence for universal, sequence-independent force correlations characteristic of the depinning transition. They also extract a correlation length of about 186 base pairs and discuss implications for the resolution of unzipping experiments and for comparisons with hairpin unzipping data.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the experiment would provide a rare experimental test of functional renormalization group predictions for disordered elastic systems, here in dimension d=0, using a biologically relevant single-molecule system. The paper includes a careful data-analysis protocol with resampling error estimates (Appendix A) and a positive control on synthetic exponential data (Appendix B), both of which are strengths. However, the significance is tempered by the absence of a quantitative model-selection test and by the factor-of-two failure of the parameter-free prediction for the correlation length (Eq. 5 in Sec. IV), so the present evidence supports a functional-form coincidence more strongly than a quantitative confirmation of the theory.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 5] The central claim that the measured Δ(w) favors the Gumbell prediction over the exponential and FRG forms is established only by visual inspection: each curve is rescaled to the measured slope at the origin and the remaining large-w scale is 'adjusted visually' (footnote 37). No chi-square, likelihood, or any other model-selection statistic is reported, and the green error band in Fig. 5 is obtained after removing amplitude fluctuations (Appendix A) and does not incorporate the uncertainty in the visually chosen length scale. As a result, the paper does not quantitatively demonstrate that the three candidate functional forms are distinguishable at the actual noise level over the finite range w ∈ [0, 0.3] µm. Please provide a quantitative comparison, such as a reduced chi-square or likelihood ratio, that accounts for the uncertainty in both fitted scales, and report the resulting confidence in the preference for the Gumbell form.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (5)] The parameter-free prediction for the correlation length is not confirmed by the experiment: using the observed ξ = 0.055 µm in Eq. (5) leads to a predicted force fluctuation dF ≈ 2.6 pN, about a factor of two larger than the measured dF = 1.14 pN. Since the shape comparison in Sec. III is performed only after treating the length scale as a free fit parameter, the agreement demonstrates a match of the scaling function but not the quantitative predictive content of the toy model. The manuscript acknowledges this discrepancy in qualitative terms, but the abstract and Sec. III present the agreement as 'excellent' without clearly separating the shape test from the failed scale prediction. Please state explicitly that the confirmed content is the functional form only, and discuss whether the factor-of-two discrepancy in the scale affects the claimed universality.
  3. [Sec. I and Sec. IV] The claim that the measured correlations are sequence-independent or universal rests on data from a single RNA sequence (23S ribosomal RNA). The argument that this sequence is 'not random' yet yields agreement with the random-sequence toy model is suggestive, but no test with a different sequence is presented, and no quantitative self-averaging argument is given to show that the 186-base-pair correlation length is sufficient to erase sequence-specific features. Without such a test or argument, the title's 'universal' claim is not directly demonstrated by the data; the paper should either add a second sequence or substantially soften the universality claim and frame the result as evidence for the relevant universality class in this particular system.
  4. [Sec. IV] The justification for applying zero-temperature depinning correlators (Eqs. 3 and 10) despite observable thermal fluctuations relies on the estimate pT = e^{-δG/kBT}, but the authors themselves state that pT ranges from 8×10^-3 to 0.7, i.e., it is not uniformly small; thermal noise is also visibly present as white noise in the data. Since the distinguishing feature of the theoretical curves is their cusp at the origin, and thermal fluctuations are expected to round this cusp, the absence of visible rounding should be supported by a quantitative estimate rather than by the order-of-magnitude argument given. Please provide a quantitative bound on the expected cusp rounding from the thermal bond-breaking rate and from the white-noise amplitude, and show that the observable w-range is insensitive to it.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The last sentence contains a grammatical error: 'a biologically inspired experiments' should be 'a biologically inspired experiment'.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The notation for the connected expectation could be made explicit by defining ⟨F(w)F(w')⟩_c as the cumulant, since some readers may not be familiar with the subscript 'c'.
  3. [Footnotes 27 and Sec. IV] The effective stiffness m^2 is stated as 55 ± 5 pN/µm, and Eq. (5) uses ln(m^{-2}); please clarify the units of m inside the logarithm, since m has dimension pN/µm while m^{-2} is used as a dimensionless quantity.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A9)] The definition N_p := ΣΠ_i (A9) is confusing: the text first sets N_p = 100 in practice, then defines N_p as the number of partitions. Please rename one of these or explain the relation between the two uses.
  5. [Fig. 4 and Fig. 5] The color coding of the three theoretical curves is described in the text, but the figures would be easier to read if the legend appeared directly on each panel; in Fig. 4 the grey solid line (the mean) and the grey dotted error estimate have similar shades, which may be hard to distinguish in print.
  6. [Appendix B] The positive control shows that the analysis pipeline can recover an exponential correlator from synthetic exponential data, which is valuable. However, it would be even more informative to report synthetic tests for the Gumbell and FRG forms as well, showing that the pipeline can distinguish them at the actual noise level.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: theory curves are independent mathematical results; the fitted scales reduce the claim to a shape test but do not make the prediction equivalent to the input.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, I find no step in which the experimental prediction is equivalent to its inputs by construction. Equation (3) and Eq. (10) are mathematical results derived in prior work (Refs. 28-31) from stated assumptions (Gaussian random forces, overdamped dynamics, central-limit theorem), and these assumptions do not include the RNA-DNA data. The comparison in Sec. III rescales two non-universal scales and visually adjusts the large-w width, so the agreement tests the predicted functional form rather than the parameter-free scale relation Eq. (5); this weakens the strength of the word 'prediction' but does not make the shape itself an input. Equation (5) is an independent quantitative prediction, and the paper explicitly reports that it misses the measured correlation length by about a factor of two, so the failure is disclosed rather than hidden by a fit. The cited self-papers provide the theoretical correlators and avalanche relations; they are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or as substitutes for the experimental comparison, and Appendix B is a positive control that generates exponential data and recovers an exponential. Thus the central claim has independent content; the residual concerns are statistical/model-selection weaknesses, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four domain assumptions: Gaussian disorder, zero-temperature depinning, the mapping to a d=0 manifold, and the treatment of a non-random biological sequence as random disorder. No new entities are invented. The two scale parameters used to compare theory with data are fitted, reducing the predictive content to a shape test.

free parameters (3)
  • Amplitude scale of Δ(w) (A in Eq. (9), m^4 ρ_m^2 in Eq. (3)) = Rescaled to match the slope at the origin
    Sec. III: 'we rescale all theoretical functions to have the same slope'; the absolute amplitude is not predicted.
  • Correlation length scale (ρ or ρ_m) = Visually adjusted; quoted ξ ≈ 0.055 µm ≈ 186 bp
    Sec. III: 'The remaining parameter is the behavior of Δ(0)-Δ(w) for large w, which is adjusted visually.'
  • Effective stiffness m^2 = 55 ± 5 pN/µm
    Estimated from the slope of the force-extension curve at the plateau start (Fig. 2); used in Eq. (11) and Sec. IV. It is a measured input, not fitted to the correlator, but the quantitative prediction Eq. (5) does not reproduce the observed dF.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The random forces acting on the unzipping fork are Gaussian-distributed, based on the central-limit theorem over neighboring monomers.
    Sec. II, paragraph before Eq. (3): 'forces are Gauss-distributed'. This selects the Gumbell universality class for the toy model.
  • domain assumption Zero-temperature depinning theory applies; thermal fluctuations do not round the cusp of Δ(w).
    Sec. IV: 'using Eqs. (3) and (10) based on zero-temperature depinning is justified' via the small probability pT that a bond is thermally opened.
  • domain assumption The peeling geometry maps to a d=0 elastic manifold with overdamped dynamics and harmonic trap stiffness m^2.
    Sec. I-II: the experiment is identified with the depinning transition minimal ingredients; the measured force is F = m^2(w-u) (Eq. 1).
  • domain assumption The specific RNA sequence, though non-random (E. coli 23S ribosomal RNA), can be treated as quenched random disorder.
    Sec. IV: 'the sequence used in the experiments is extracted from ribosomal RNA, thus is not random' yet the measured Δ(w) is compared to random-sequence predictions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Force Correlations in an RNA-DNA Unzipping Experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AANSCNTX

@misc{pith2026190901319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Force Correlations in an RNA-DNA Unzipping Experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AANSCNTX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01319}
}
read the original abstract

We study unzipping of a complementary RNA-DNA helix applied to an external force, focusing on the force-force correlations. While at the microscopic level these are given by the sequence, the experiment measures effective, macroscopic correlations. The latter are sequence-independent, i.e. universal, and constitute the central object of the underlying field theory of disordered systems. Comparing field-theory predictions and the exact solution of a 1-d toy model with the experiment, we find an excellent agreement, confirming fundamental theoretical concepts via a biologically inspired experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01319 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A sample force-extension curve. For the data analysis we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Force-extension curves restricted to the plateau region for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. Measurements of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Stephens, S

    Z. Stephens, S. Lee, F. Faghri, R. Campbell, C. Zhai, M. Efron, R. Iyer, M. Schatz, S. Sinha, and G. Robinson, Big data: Astro- nomical or genomical?, PLOS Biology 13, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    In the literature, the word peeling is used for the setup of Fig. 1, where forces act along the helical axis from opposite extremi- ties of a duplex, and one of the two strands peels off.Unzipping denotes an alternative setup where the right bead of Fig. 1 is attached to the free end of the upper strand

    work page

  3. [3]

    Ashkin, Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure, Phys

    A. Ashkin, Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 156 (1970)

    work page 1970

  4. [4]

    Bercy, Structures secondaires dans l’ARN: une ´etude par mesure de forces sur mol´ecules uniques, Ph.D

    M. Bercy, Structures secondaires dans l’ARN: une ´etude par mesure de forces sur mol´ecules uniques, Ph.D. thesis, PSL Re- search University (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Melkonyan, Early stages of ribosome assembly, studied by single-molecule force measurements , Ph.D

    L. Melkonyan, Early stages of ribosome assembly, studied by single-molecule force measurements , Ph.D. thesis, PSL Re- search University (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Gotta, O

    S. Gotta, O. Miller, and S. French, rRNA transcription rate in escherichia coli, J. Bacteriol. 173, 6647 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    Melkonyan, M

    L. Melkonyan, M. Bercy, T. Bizebard, and U. Bockelmann, Overstretching double-stranded RNA, double-stranded DNA, and RNA-DNA duplexes, Biophys. J. 117, 509 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    J. F. L ´eger, G. Romano, A. Sarkar, J. Robert, L. Bourdieu, D. Chatenay, and J. F. Marko, Structural transitions of a twisted and stretched dna molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1066 (1999)

    work page 1999

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Strick, J.-F

    T. Strick, J.-F. Allemand, D. Bensimon, A. Bensimon, and V . Croquette, The elasticity of a single supercoiled dna molecule, Science 271, 1835 (1996)

    1996

  2. [10]

    De Vlaminck and C

    I. De Vlaminck and C. Dekker, Recent advances in mag- netic tweezers, Ann. Rev. Biophys. 41, 453 (2012), pMID: 22443989. 6

    2012

  3. [11]

    Nelson, Statistical physics of unzipping DNA, in Forces, Growth and Form in Soft Condensed Matter: At the Interface between Physics and Biology , edited by A

    D. Nelson, Statistical physics of unzipping DNA, in Forces, Growth and Form in Soft Condensed Matter: At the Interface between Physics and Biology , edited by A. T. Skjeltorp and A. V . Belushkin (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2005) pp. 65–92

    2005

  4. [12]

    Barkhausen, Zwei mit Hilfe der neuen Verst ¨arker entdeckte Erscheinungen, Phys

    H. Barkhausen, Zwei mit Hilfe der neuen Verst ¨arker entdeckte Erscheinungen, Phys. Z. 20, 401 (1919)

    1919

  5. [13]

    Sethna, K.A

    J.P. Sethna, K.A. Dahmen and C.R. Myers, Crackling noise, Nature 410, 242–250 (2001)

    2001

  6. [14]

    P. L. Doussal, K. Wiese, S. Moulinet, and E. Rolley, Height fluctuations of a contact line: A direct measurement of the renormalized disorder correlator, EPL 87, 56001 (2009), arXiv:0904.4156

    2009 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gutenberg and C

    B. Gutenberg and C. Richter, Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 46, 105 (1956)

    1956

  8. [16]

    Blatter, M

    G. Blatter, M. Feigel’man, V . Geshkenbein, A. Larkin, and V . Vinokur, V ortices in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125 (1994)

    1994

  9. [17]

    Burridge and L

    R. Burridge and L. Knopoff, Model and theoretical seismic- ity, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 57, 341 (1967)

    1967

  10. [18]

    Alessandro, C

    B. Alessandro, C. Beatrice, G. Bertotti, and A. Montorsi, Domain-wall dynamics and Barkhausen effect in metallic fer- romagnetic materials. I. Theory, J. Appl. Phys.68, 2901 (1990)

    1990

  11. [19]

    Alessandro, C

    B. Alessandro, C. Beatrice, G. Bertotti, and A. Montorsi, Domain-wall dynamics and Barkhausen effect in metallic fer- romagnetic materials. II. Experiments, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2908 (1990)

    1990

  12. [20]

    Nattermann, S

    T. Nattermann, S. Stepanow, L.-H. Tang, and H. Leschhorn, Dynamics of interface depinning in a disordered medium, J. Phys. II (France) 2, 1483 (1992)

    1992

  13. [21]

    Narayan and D

    O. Narayan and D. Fisher, Threshold critical dynamics of driven interfaces in random media, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7030 (1993)

    1993

  14. [22]

    Bucheli, O

    H. Bucheli, O. Wagner, V . Geshkenbein, A. Larkin, and G. Blat- ter, (4 +N)-dimensional elastic manifolds in random media: a renormalization-group analysis, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7642 (1998)

    1998

  15. [23]

    Chauve, P

    P. Chauve, P. L. Doussal, and K. Wiese, Renormalization of pinned elastic systems: How does it work beyond one loop?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1785 (2001), cond-mat/0006056

    2001 arXiv

  16. [24]

    P. L. Doussal, K. Wiese, and P. Chauve, 2-loop functional renor- malization group analysis of the depinning transition, Phys. Rev. B 66, 174201 (2002), cond-mat/0205108

    2002 arXiv

  17. [25]

    P. L. Doussal, K. Wiese, and P. Chauve, Functional renormal- ization group and the field theory of disordered elastic systems, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026112 (2004), cond-mat/0304614

    2004 arXiv

  18. [26]

    (7) is the same as that obtained by supposing a random force

    We show below that the signal specified in Eq. (7) is the same as that obtained by supposing a random force

  19. [27]

    At the plateau start, the strands reduce this tom2 = 55 ± 5pN/µm, see Fig

    The stiffness per trap is about 250pN/µm [4], leading to half this value for the two traps. At the plateau start, the strands reduce this tom2 = 55 ± 5pN/µm, see Fig. 1

  20. [28]

    P. L. Doussal and K. Wiese, Driven particle in a random land- scape: disorder correlator, avalanche distribution and extreme value statistics of records, Phys. Rev. E 79, 051105 (2009), arXiv:0808.3217

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Le Doussal, Finite temperature Functional RG, droplets and decaying Burgers turbulence, Europhys

    P. Le Doussal, Finite temperature Functional RG, droplets and decaying Burgers turbulence, Europhys. Lett. 76, 457 (2006), cond-mat/0605490

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Le Doussal and K

    P. Le Doussal and K. Wiese, How to measure Functional RG fixed-point functions for dynamics and at depinning, EPL 77, 66001 (2007), cond-mat/0610525

    2007 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Wiese and P

    K.J. Wiese and P. Le Doussal, Functional renormalization for disordered systems: Basic recipes and gourmet dishes, Markov Processes Relat. Fields 13, 777–818 (2007), cond- mat/0611346

    2007

  24. [32]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989)

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989)

    1989

  25. [33]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , V ol

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , V ol. 1-3 (Cam- bridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  26. [34]

    C. Domb, M. Green, and J. Lebowitz, eds., Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, V ol. 1-19 (Academic Press, London, 1972-2001)

    1972

  27. [35]

    Middleton, P

    A. Middleton, P. Le Doussal, and K. Wiese, Measuring functional renormalization group fixed-point functions for pinned manifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 155701 (2007), cond- mat/0606160

    2007

  28. [36]

    Rosso, P

    A. Rosso, P. Le Doussal, and K. Wiese, Numerical calculation of the functional renormalization group fixed-point functions at the depinning transition, Phys. Rev. B75, 220201 (2007), cond- mat/0610821

    2007

  29. [37]

    [14, 35, 36], where ∆(w) was rescaled to have integral 1

    For the noisy data at hand, this procedure is more stable than the one used in Refs. [14, 35, 36], where ∆(w) was rescaled to have integral 1

  30. [38]

    Le Doussal and K

    P. Le Doussal and K. Wiese, Size distributions of shocks and static avalanches from the functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. E 79, 051106 (2009), arXiv:0812.1893

    2009 arXiv

  31. [39]

    K. J. Breslauer, R. Frank, H. Bl¨ocker, and L. A. Marky, Predict- ing DNA duplex stability from the base sequence, PNAS 83, 3746 (1986)

    1986

  32. [40]

    Sugimoto, S

    N. Sugimoto, S. Nakano, M. Katoh, A. Matsumura, H. Naka- muta, T. Ohmichi, M. Yoneyama, and M. Sasaki, Thermody- namic parameters to predict stability of RNA/DNA hybrid du- plexes, Biochemistry, Biochemistry 34, 11211 (1995)

    1995

  33. [41]

    [38] drops in positionu of sizeS are considered, related via Eq

    In Ref. [38] drops in positionu of sizeS are considered, related via Eq. (1) to force drops asδF =m2S

  34. [42]

    Chauve, T

    P. Chauve, T. Giamarchi, and P. L. Doussal, Creep and depin- ning in disordered media, Phys. Rev. B 62, 6241 (2000), cond- mat/0002299

    2000

  35. [43]

    Huguet, N

    J. Huguet, N. Forns, and F. Ritort, Statistical properties of metastable intermediates in DNA unzipping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 248106 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    [43], and ρm here equals nc there

    Note that m2 here equals k in Ref. [43], and ρm here equals nc there. The theory for the exponent 4/3 is given in Ref. [25], Eq. (4.22), settingd = 0, i.e.ε = 4 there

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.