Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Studying black holes on horizon scales with space-VLBI

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding a single 3.5-meter telescope in low Earth orbit to the ground array that first imaged a black hole would make it possible to film the Milky Way's central black hole and resolve more than 20 black hole shadows.

desk verdict A useful, honest space-VLBI mission white paper whose 'dozens of shadows' headline rests on an unquantified 690 GHz sensitivity upgrade that the paper's own noise numbers contradict. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01405 v1 pith:XBUDHPHM submitted 2019-09-03 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE

Kari Haworth , Michael D. Johnson , Dominic W. Pesce , Daniel C. M. Palumbo , Lindy Blackburn , Kazunori Akiyama , Don Boroson , Katherine L. Bouman
show 20 more authors
Joseph R. Farah Vincent L. Fish Mareki Honma Tomohisa Kawashima Motoki Kino Alexander Raymond Mark Silver Jonathan Weintroub Maciek Wielgus Sheperd S. Doeleman Jose L. Gomez Jens Kauffmann Garrett K. Keating Thomas P. Krichbaum Laurent Loinard Gopal Narayanan Akihiro Doi David J. James Daniel P. Marrone Yosuke Mizuno Hiroshi Nagai
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.HE
keywords spaceVLBIblackholeimagingeventhorizonscalesubmillimeterastronomySagittariusA*supermassiveholeslowEarthorbittelescopeinterferometric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This white paper argues that a single modest 3.5-meter radio telescope in low Earth orbit, working with the most sensitive ground stations at 230–690 GHz, removes the two main constraints on current black-hole imaging: sparse baseline coverage on short timescales and limited angular resolution. The fast motion of the orbiter fills the interferometer's spatial-frequency plane quickly enough to reconstruct movies of the Milky Way's central black hole on its roughly ten-minute dynamical timescale. Observing at 690 GHz sharpens the resolution to about 7 microarcseconds, raising the number of black holes whose shadows could be spatially resolved from roughly two to more than twenty. If these projections hold, horizon-scale studies would expand from one static image of a black hole to time-resolved movies of many systems, with consequences for tests of general relativity, black hole mass measurements, and the physics of accreting plasma.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is rapid (u,v)-plane filling: the (u,v)-plane is the map of projected baseline vectors an interferometer samples, and a low-Earth-orbit telescope sweeps across it quickly as it moves. In 45 minutes the orbiter accumulates coverage comparable to a full night of ground-only observing, which is what makes sub-hour dynamical imaging of Sgr A* possible. A second mechanism is sensitivity anchoring: pairing the small 3.5-meter space aperture with very sensitive ground stations keeps the baseline signal-to-noise high enough despite the small collecting area. The resolution gain comes from extending the observing frequency to 690 GHz, which shrinks the diffraction limit to ~7 microarcseconds; the paper demonstrates both mechanisms with synthetic-image reconstructions from GRMHD simulations.

What would settle it

Two concrete checks would settle the central claim: first, build and characterize the two critical subsystems—a 3.5-meter antenna with less than 20 micron RMS surface error and a 690 GHz cryogenic HEMT amplifier with noise temperature near 600 K—because the promised resolution and sensitivity stand on those numbers; second, run the same synthetic dynamical-imaging pipeline on simulated half-orbit data and verify that the input GRMHD movie is recovered to a normalized root-mean-square error comparable to the paper's, which would directly test whether the movie claim holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that one space-based element—a 3.5-meter-class telescope in low Earth orbit, recording two 8 GHz bands at 230, 345, or 690 GHz—co-observing with large ground antennas can overcome both limits of the current ground-only array. In a single 45-minute half-orbit, the orbiter adds as much spatial-frequency coverage as a full night with the planned expanded ground array, enough to form static images and dynamical movies of Sgr A* on its ~10-minute variability timescale. At 690 GHz, Earth-diameter baselines yield roughly 7 microarcsecond resolution, and the paper estimates the number of supermassive black holes with spatially resolvable shadows grows from roughly two (Sgr A* and M87) to more than twenty. Synthetic observations of GRMHD simulations, blurred by the measured interstellar scattering kernel, support the claim: reconstructions including the orbiter show substantially lower normalized root-mean-square error than ground-only arrays.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the engineering pieces—a 3.5-meter dish whose surface stays accurate to tens of microns at submillimeter wavelengths, a space-qualified 690 GHz receiver near 600 K noise temperature, and a laser downlink above 64 Gbps—can be brought to flight readiness on a near-term timeline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Movies of Sgr A* on its ~10-minute dynamical timescale would become feasible, letting observers track hotspots and flares and separate orbital motion from turbulent variability.
  • The sample of directly resolved black hole shadows would grow from two to more than twenty, yielding many independent mass measurements and spin constraints.
  • At 690 GHz the photon ring can be measured with higher precision, providing sharper tests of general relativity near the horizon.
  • Fine-resolution imaging of the inner accretion flow would test predictions of magnetorotational-instability-driven turbulence and angular momentum transport.
  • Because interstellar scattering falls with frequency, Sgr A* images at 345 and 690 GHz would be cleaner than at 230 GHz.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same rapid (u,v)-filling argument should apply to imaging other time-variable compact sources, such as flaring active galactic nuclei, even if their shadows are not resolved; the time-resolution gain is generic to the low-Earth-orbit geometry.
  • The stated ~20 resolvable shadows is a lower limit that assumes known masses only; a systematic census of nearby galaxy centers with measured distances and expected submillimeter fluxes would sharpen this prediction into a falsifiable target list.
  • If the 690 GHz receiver cannot be space-qualified at the assumed noise temperature, the resolution jump might be partially recovered by using a larger orbiter at 345 GHz, a trade the paper does not explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Astro2020 white paper proposes a space-VLBI concept consisting of a single 3–4 m telescope in low Earth orbit co-observing with the Event Horizon Telescope at 230–690 GHz. The paper argues that the rapid (u,v)-plane filling from a LEO orbiter enables reconstructed movies of Sgr A* on its dynamical timescale, that observing at 690 GHz improves angular resolution to ~7 μas and increases the number of resolvable black hole shadows from N≈2 to N≳20, and that all required subsystems (antenna, receiver, digital backend, timing, downlink) are on a near-term technology path. The technical case is made through the standard VLBI sensitivity equation, a table of anchor-station SEFDs, synthetic imaging experiments using GRMHD simulations, and subsystem-by-subsystem readiness assessments.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the mission concept would open a genuinely new observational window: time-resolved imaging of Sgr A* on its ~1-hour dynamical timescale, a factor-of-three resolution gain over ground-based 230 GHz VLBI, and a correspondingly larger sample of horizon-resolved black holes. The paper is transparent in its sensitivity framework: Eq. (1), Table 1, and the stated SEFD and bandwidth assumptions allow a reader to reproduce the key noise estimates. The use of synthetic observations from GRMHD simulations and the explicit citation of companion papers for imaging metrics are appropriate for a white paper, and the engineering discussion is concrete about TRL levels. However, the paper's headline 690 GHz science projections are not supported by its own sensitivity numbers: at 690 GHz the nominal design gives S/N≈1.8 on Sgr A* in one coherence time, below the paper's stated S/N=4 threshold. This internal inconsistency affects the central '7 μas / dozens of shadows' claim and requires a substantive revision rather than a purely editorial one.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Fig. 4; §3, Eq. (1), Fig. 5] This is the load-bearing issue: the 690 GHz path delivers the 7 μas resolution and the N≳20 shadow count, and those numbers are not supported by the paper's own sensitivity model.
  2. [§3, Fig. 5] This is closely tied to the previous comment but deserves separate attention because a different coherence time would change the S/N estimate and hence the source-count projection.
  3. [§5, first paragraph] This is a downstream consequence of the same issue, but it matters because the abstract and introduction also bundle the 230–690 GHz range as a single capability.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (1)] There is a typo in the sentence defining the RMS noise: 'SEFD1 and SEFD1' should read 'SEFD1 and SEFD2.'
  2. [Fig. 4, right panel] The right panel plots total flux densities against shadow diameter, but resolvability of a shadow also requires sufficient correlated flux on baselines of order the shadow diameter; the caption should explicitly state that no sensitivity cut or resolution-dependent flux filter has been applied.
  3. [§4.1] The paragraph on the rigid dish says a 2-m prototype was tested in a balloon launch and that 'extending to 3.5 meters will require retooling,' while the preceding sentence cites the Herschel 3.5-m antenna with <6 μm surface accuracy; it would be clearer to separate the heritage of the 3.5-m fixed dish from the development status of the deployable option.
  4. [Figs. 2 and 3] The dynamical imaging results are based on one GRMHD realization and one reconstruction pipeline (Starwarps, as cited in Fig. 3); the NRMSE values should be presented as illustrative of that configuration rather than as a general performance guarantee for all Sgr A* accretion states.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: performance claims follow from standard interferometric scaling, published sensitivity formulas, and synthetic-observation experiments; the 690 GHz sensitivity shortfall is an internal consistency issue, not a definitional or fitted circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not equivalent to their inputs by construction. The angular-resolution improvement from 230 to 690 GHz is the standard diffraction limit lambda/D scaled to Earth-diameter baselines, with no fitted parameter. The N>20 resolvable-shadow count is a geometric extrapolation from the known SMBH mass sample and the chosen resolution, not a quantity derived from the mission's fitted values; it is admittedly a rough lower limit that ignores sensitivity at 690 GHz, which is a correctness gap rather than circularity. The sensitivity requirements in Section 3 use the textbook VLBI RMS-noise formula with externally grounded inputs (Sgr A* correlated flux from EHT measurements, station SEFDs from Table 1, coherence times from atmospheric phase arguments); the orbiter SEFD is an assumed instrument parameter, not fitted to the predicted science output. The movie-reconstruction demonstrations are synthetic-observation experiments: the GRMHD simulation and scattering kernel are fixed inputs, the imaging algorithms are published methods, and the added LEO baseline coverage is the independent variable being tested, so the improvement in NRMSE is not guaranteed by construction. Citations to companion and prior papers by overlapping authors (e.g., Palumbo et al. 2019, Johnson et al. 2017) are self-referential but not load-bearing, because the white paper itself displays the coverage plots and reconstructions that support the claims, and the cited imaging methods are peer-reviewed and externally applicable. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or renamed empirical result is smuggled in via self-citation. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained for the purpose of circularity analysis, with the noted 690 GHz sensitivity tension belonging to scientific consistency rather than circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a mission concept; its only invented entity is the proposed satellite, which is a hardware design proposal rather than a new physical object. The axioms are the engineering feasibility assumptions and the fidelity of simulations used to predict performance. No free parameters are fitted to data; engineering assumptions are design choices.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A 3.5-m space telescope can achieve and maintain the required surface accuracy (less than 6 micron for a rigid dish, less than 20 micron for a deployable dish) at observing frequencies above 200 GHz.
    Section 4.1 asserts this based on Herschel heritage and High-Strain Composite technology, but the deployable option is at TRL 4 and unproven at these frequencies.
  • domain assumption The GRMHD simulations used for synthetic observations are representative of Sgr A*'s accretion flow and emission.
    Section 2.1 uses a ray-traced GRMHD simulation from Chael et al. (2018) as ground truth for reconstruction tests; if the true source differs, the claimed imaging timescales may not hold.
  • domain assumption The interstellar scattering kernel used to blur synthetic images is correct at 230 and 345 GHz.
    Used in Figures 2 and 3, based on Johnson et al. (2018).
  • domain assumption The number of resolvable black holes scales as the cube of maximum baseline, and the van den Bosch (2016) mass catalog is representative.
    Section 2.2 uses N ~ b_max^3 and the [36] sample to estimate N > 20, but this ignores synchrotron opacity and selection effects, as the footnote admits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Studying black holes on horizon scales with space-VLBI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XBUDHPHM

@misc{pith2026190901405,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Studying black holes on horizon scales with space-VLBI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XBUDHPHM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01405}
}
read the original abstract

The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) recently produced the first horizon-scale image of a supermassive black hole. Expanding the array to include a 3-meter space telescope operating at >200 GHz enables mass measurements of many black holes, movies of black hole accretion flows, and new tests of general relativity that are impossible from the ground.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01405 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: 230 GHz baseline coverage of Sgr A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left column: a ray-traced snapshot from a 40 degree inclined GRMHD simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 345 GHz Starwarps reconstructions of an ensemble-average scattered [22] GRMHD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Sgr A∗ baseline coverage of the ALMA-SPT-LEO subarray at 690 GHz, with points shown every minute over the course of 24 hours. Right: 230–690 GHz flux versus black hole shadow size for SMBHs with known masses; fluxes have been taken from the NASA/IPAC Extragalacti…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sensitivity for a single LEO satellite on a baseline to ALMA as a function of the orbiter SEFD and aggre￾gate bandwidth. Colored regions show ex￾pected sensitivity requirements for fringe detections for Sgr A∗ and M87 (see §3 for details). With the current bandwidth of…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Space-VLBI instrument for a LEO orbiter with a summary of component devel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dark matter environments and safeguards for spacetime inference from horizon scale interferometry

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using public 2017 M87* closure data, a frozen Kerr source fails an absolute adequacy test and the differential tidal-charge response fails numerical convergence, so no posterior or bound is reported.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Instability, turbulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks

    S. A. Balbus and J. F. Hawley. “Instability, turbulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks”. In:Reviews of Modern Physics70 (Jan. 1998), pp. 1–53.doi: 10. 1103/RevModPhys.70.1

    1998

  2. [2]

    Development of the active space hydrogen maser for the ACES space experiment of ESA

    P. Berthoud et al. “Development of the active space hydrogen maser for the ACES space experiment of ESA”. In:Proceedings of the 20th European Frequency and Time Forum. IEEE. 2006, pp. 379–383

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Reconstructing Video of Time-Varying Sources from Radio Interfer- ometric Measurements

    K. Bouman et al. “Reconstructing Video of Time-Varying Sources from Radio Interfer- ometric Measurements”. In:IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging4.4 (2018), pp. 512–527.issn: 2333-9403. doi: 10.1109/TCI.2018.2838452

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Imaging optically-thin hotspots near the black hole horizonofSgrA*atradioandnear-infraredwavelengths

    A. E. Broderick and A. Loeb. “Imaging optically-thin hotspots near the black hole horizonofSgrA*atradioandnear-infraredwavelengths”.In: MNRAS367(Apr.2006), pp. 905–916.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10152.x. eprint: astro-ph/0509237

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    The ACES Mission: Scientific Objectives and Present Status

    L. Cacciapuoti. “The ACES Mission: Scientific Objectives and Present Status”. In:ESA Special Publication. Vol. 621. ESA Special Publication. June 2006, p. 164

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    High-resolution Linear Polarimetric Imaging for the Event Horizon Telescope

    A. A. Chael et al. “High-resolution Linear Polarimetric Imaging for the Event Horizon Telescope”. In: ApJ 829, 11 (Sept. 2016), p. 11.doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/11. arXiv: 1605.06156

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Interferometric Imaging Directly with Closure Phases and Closure Amplitudes

    A. A. Chael et al. “Interferometric Imaging Directly with Closure Phases and Closure Amplitudes”. In: ApJ 857, 23 (Apr. 2018), p. 23.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6a8 . arXiv: 1803.07088

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    The role of electron heating physics in images and variability of the Galactic Centre black hole Sagittarius A*

    A. Chael et al. “The role of electron heating physics in images and variability of the Galactic Centre black hole Sagittarius A*”. In: MNRAS 478 (Aug. 2018), pp. 5209–

    work page 2018

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    A 340 GHz cryogenic amplifier based spectrometer for space based atmospheric science applications

    Goutam Chattopadhyay et al. “A 340 GHz cryogenic amplifier based spectrometer for space based atmospheric science applications”. In:International Conference on In- frared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, IRMMW-THz(2017),pp.1–2. issn:21622035. doi: 10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2017.8066901

    2017

  2. [10]

    Recent Developments in Precision High Strain Composite Hinges for Deployable Space Telescopes

    Michael A Echter et al. “Recent Developments in Precision High Strain Composite Hinges for Deployable Space Telescopes”. In:2018 AIAA Spacecraft Structures Con- ference. 2018, p. 0939

    2018

  3. [11]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole”. In: ApJ 875.1, L1 (Apr. 2019), p. L1.doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation”. In: ApJ 875.1, L2 (Apr. 2019), p. L2.doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c96

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration”. In: ApJ 875.1, L3 (Apr. 2019), p. L3. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c57. 11

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole”. In: ApJ 875.1, L4 (Apr. 2019), p. L4.doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring”. In: ApJ 875.1, L5 (Apr. 2019), p. L5. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole”. In: ApJ 875.1, L6 (Apr. 2019), p. L6.doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Imaging Black Holes and Jets with a VLBI Array Including Multiple Space-Based Telescopes

    Vincent L. Fish, Maura Shea, and Kazunori Akiyama. “Imaging Black Holes and Jets with a VLBI Array Including Multiple Space-Based Telescopes”. In:arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.09539 (Mar. 2019), arXiv:1903.09539. arXiv:1903.09539 [astro-ph.IM]

    1903 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Detection of orbital motions near the last stable cir- cular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*

    GRAVITY Collaboration et al. “Detection of orbital motions near the last stable cir- cular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*”. In: A&A 618, L10 (Oct. 2018), p. L10. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834294. arXiv: 1810.12641

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole

    Gravity Collaboration et al. “Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole”. In: A&A 615, L15 (July 2018), p. L15. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833718. arXiv: 1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Locality of MHD Turbulence in Isothermal Disks

    Xiaoyue Guan et al. “Locality of MHD Turbulence in Isothermal Disks”. In: ApJ 694.2 (Apr. 2009), pp. 1010–1018.doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1010. arXiv:0901.0273 [astro-ph.GA]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dynamical Imaging with Interferometry

    M. D. Johnson et al. “Dynamical Imaging with Interferometry”. In: ApJ 850, 172 (Dec. 2017), p. 172.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa97dd. arXiv: 1711.01286

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    The Scattering and Intrinsic Structure of Sagittarius A* at Radio Wavelengths

    M. D. Johnson et al. “The Scattering and Intrinsic Structure of Sagittarius A* at Radio Wavelengths”. In: ApJ 865, 104 (Oct. 2018), p. 104.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadcff. arXiv: 1808.08966

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Detection of Intrinsic Source Structure at∼3 Schwarzschild Radii with Millimeter VLBI Observations of Sagittarius A*

    R.-S. Lu et al. “Detection of Intrinsic Source Structure at∼3 Schwarzschild Radii with Millimeter VLBI Observations of Sagittarius A*”. In: ApJ 859, 60 (May 2018), p. 60. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe2e. arXiv: 1805.09223

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    An X-Ray, Infrared, and Submillimeter Flare of Sagittarius A*

    D. P. Marrone et al. “An X-Ray, Infrared, and Submillimeter Flare of Sagittarius A*”. In: ApJ 682 (July 2008), pp. 373–383.doi: 10.1086/588806. arXiv: 0712.2877

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The [ITAL]Submillimeter Wave Astronomy Satellite[/ITAL]: Science Objectives and Instrument Description

    Gary J. Melnick et al. “The [ITAL]Submillimeter Wave Astronomy Satellite[/ITAL]: Science Objectives and Instrument Description”. In:The Astrophysical Journal539.2 (Aug. 2000), pp. L77–L85.doi: 10.1086/312856. url: https://doi.org/10.1086% 5C%2F312856

    doi

  18. [26]

    Historical perspectives on the development of deployable reflec- tors

    Thomas Murphey. “Historical perspectives on the development of deployable reflec- tors”. In:50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 17th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 11th AIAA No. 2009, p. 2605. 12

    2009

  19. [27]

    Metrics and Motivations for Earth-Space VLBI: Time- Resolving Sgr A* with the Event Horizon Telescope

    D. C. M. Palumbo et al. “Metrics and Motivations for Earth-Space VLBI: Time- Resolving Sgr A* with the Event Horizon Telescope”. In:arXiv e-prints (June 2019). arXiv: 1906.08828 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Herschel Space Observatory. An ESA facility for far-infrared and submillimetre astronomy

    G. L. Pilbratt et al. “Herschel Space Observatory. An ESA facility for far-infrared and submillimetre astronomy”. In: A&A 518, L1 (July 2010), p. L1.doi: 10.1051/0004- 6361/201014759. arXiv: 1005.5331 [astro-ph.IM]

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A General Relativistic Null Hypothesis Test with Event Horizon Tele- scope Observations of the Black Hole Shadow in Sgr A*

    D. Psaltis et al. “A General Relativistic Null Hypothesis Test with Event Horizon Tele- scope Observations of the Black Hole Shadow in Sgr A*”. In: ApJ 814, 115 (Dec. 2015), p. 115. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/115. arXiv: 1411.1454 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Cryogenic performance of HEMT amplifiers at 340GHz and 670GHz

    Theodore J. Reck, William Deal, and Goutam Chattopadhyay. “Cryogenic performance of HEMT amplifiers at 340GHz and 670GHz”. In:IEEE MTT-S International Mi- crowave Symposium Digest (2014), pp. 1–3.issn: 0149645X. doi: 10.1109/MWSYM. 2014.6848250

    2014

  23. [31]

    A 230 GHz MMIC-Based Sideband Separating Receiver

    Theodore Reck et al. “A 230 GHz MMIC-Based Sideband Separating Receiver”. In: IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology6.1 (2016), pp. 141–147.issn: 2156342X. doi: 10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2506552

    2016

  24. [32]

    TeraByte InfraRed Delivery (TBIRD): a demonstration of large- volume direct-to-Earth data transfer from low-Earth orbit

    B. S Robinson et al. “TeraByte InfraRed Delivery (TBIRD): a demonstration of large- volume direct-to-Earth data transfer from low-Earth orbit”. eng. In: vol. 10524. SPIE, 2018, pp. 105240V–105240V-6.isbn: 9781510615335

    2018

  25. [33]

    Simulations of imaging the event horizon of Sagittarius A* from space

    Freek Roelofs et al. “Simulations of imaging the event horizon of Sagittarius A* from space”. In: A&A 625, A124 (May 2019), A124.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732423. arXiv: 1904.04934 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    The ngVLA Reference Design

    R. J. Selina et al. “The ngVLA Reference Design”. In:Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array517 (Dec. 2018), p. 15

    2018

  27. [35]

    A. R. Thompson, J. M. Moran, and G. W. Swenson Jr.Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, 3rd Edition. Springer, 2017.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44431-4

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    Unification of the fundamental plane and Super Massive Black Hole Masses

    Remco C. E. van den Bosch. “Unification of the fundamental plane and Super Massive Black Hole Masses”. In: ApJ 831.2, 134 (Nov. 2016), p. 134.doi: 10 . 3847 / 0004 - 637X/831/2/134. arXiv: 1606.01246 [astro-ph.GA]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    R2DBE: A Wideband Digital Backend for the Event Horizon Telescope

    L. Vertatschitsch et al. “R2DBE: A Wideband Digital Backend for the Event Horizon Telescope”. In: PASP 127 (Dec. 2015), p. 1226.doi: 10.1086/684513

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    On the nature of magnetic turbulence in rotating, shearing flows

    Justin Walker, Geoffroy Lesur, and Stanislav Boldyrev. “On the nature of magnetic turbulence in rotating, shearing flows”. In: MNRAS 457.1 (Mar. 2016), pp. L39–L43. doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv200. arXiv: 1512.03739 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Simultaneous Multi-Wavelength Observations of Sgr A* During 2007 April 1-11

    F. Yusef-Zadeh et al. “Simultaneous Multi-Wavelength Observations of Sgr A* During 2007 April 1-11”. In: ApJ 706 (Nov. 2009), pp. 348–375.doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/ 706/1/348. arXiv: 0907.3786

    2007 arXiv

  32. [40]

    RadioAstron orbit determination and evaluation of its results using correlation of space-VLBI observations

    M. V. Zakhvatkin et al. “RadioAstron orbit determination and evaluation of its results using correlation of space-VLBI observations”. In:arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1812.01623 (Dec. 2018), arXiv:1812.01623. arXiv:1812.01623 [astro-ph.IM]. 13

    2018 arXiv

  33. [5229]

    arXiv: 1804.06416 [astro-ph.HE]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1261. arXiv: 1804.06416 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.