Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Polysaccharide conformations measured by solution state x-ray scattering

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Careful synchrotron x-ray scattering can now directly reveal the helical conformation of polysaccharide chains in solution, distinguishing 2(1) from 3(1) helices by the position of a high-q peak.

desk verdict A plausible and genuinely new solution-state structural observable for polyuronates, but the intramolecular origin of the high-q peak needs a concentration-series control before I'd trust the assignment. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01673 v1 pith:V5OWSGSL submitted 2019-09-04 cond-mat.soft

Bradley W. Mansel , Timothy M. Ryan , Hsin-Lung Chen , Leif Lundin , Martin A.K. Williams This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords polysaccharideconformationsolutionx-rayscatteringwide-anglehelicalglycosidiclinkagealginatepectinBraggpeak
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that careful synchrotron x-ray scattering, extended into the wide-angle regime, can directly reveal the helical conformation of polysaccharide chains dissolved in water, something previously obtainable only from fibre diffraction or crystals. It shows that three charged sugar polymers (β-D-mannopyranuronic acid, α-L-gulopyranuronic acid, and α-D-galactopyranuronic acid) each produce a broad high-$q$ peak whose position and shape match scattering computed from rigid, energy-minimized helical chains. Matching peak position distinguishes the favoured helix (2(1) versus 3(1)) with sub-Angstrom sensitivity, and the way peak width and height change with chain length reports the length scale over which the chain stays rigid. If correct, the approach turns solution scattering into a direct structural probe for polysaccharide conformation and should extend to other stiff glycans and glycosylated proteins.

What carries the argument

The central object is the high-$q$ Bragg peak produced by the regular linear spacing of sugar residues along a helical chain. In a rigid 2(1) or 3(1) helix, consecutive monomers project onto the helix axis at a nearly constant distance $h$ (about 4.25–4.42 Å for 2-fold, about 5.06–5.14 Å for 3-fold), and this one-dimensional repeat acts like a diffraction grating giving a peak near $q = 2\pi/h$. The paper builds real-space oligomer structures with a carbohydrate builder using dihedral angles from an external molecular-mechanics calculation, computes their solution scattering with a program that accounts for the boundary water layer and excluded solvent volume, and independently checks the in-vacuo scattering with the Debye equation using atomic form factors accurate to 6 Å$^{-1}$. Matching the measured peak position, height, and width to these calculations is what identifies the solution-state helix and the chain's rigidity length.

What would settle it

Re-measure one oligomer series at several concentrations spanning at least a factor of ten. If the high-$q$ peak is an intramolecular monomer-repeat reflection, its position $q$ will stay fixed while its scattered intensity scales linearly with concentration; a peak that shifts in $q$ or grows superlinearly is interchain in origin. Repeating in D2O gives a second check, since a true intramolecular repeat is insensitive to the changed water background while a subtraction artifact would move.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By measuring synchrotron small- and wide-angle scattering from oligomers of β-D-mannopyranuronic acid, α-L-gulopyranuronic acid, and α-D-galactopyranuronic acid, the paper finds a broad Bragg-like peak at $q \approx 1$–$2$ Å$^{-1}$ for every species. The peak position and shape match scattering curves computed with solution-scattering software that includes hydration and excluded-volume terms, and independently with the Debye equation, from rigid chains built at the molecular-mechanics free-energy minima. Because the 2(1) and 3(1) helices differ in their linear monomer repeat $h$ (about 4.25–4.42 Å for 2-fold versus 5.06–5.14 Å for 3-fold), their predicted peaks are displaced by 0.1–0.2 Å$^{-1}$, and the measured positions select the most-populated conformation for each sugar. At degrees of polymerisation 5–6 the rigid-chain calculation matches the measured peak height and width; at dp 10 and above the β-D-mannuronate peak shows little change, consistent with a flexible di-equatorial linkage, while the other two chains show peak sharpening that saturates. The paper concludes that the technique resolves atomistic helical conformation in solution to sub-Angstrom accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the high-$q$ peak is an intramolecular Bragg reflection from the regular sugar-to-sugar repeat along single chains; if interchain packing or imperfect water subtraction produces the peak, the helix readout fails, and the assignment also assumes the external molecular-mechanics dihedral angles represent the true solution-state conformations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The solution-state helical conformation of any comparatively stiff polysaccharide can be read directly from a single high-$q$ scattering measurement, without crystallization or fibre alignment.
  • Helix type (for example 2(1) versus 3(1)) is distinguishable by peak shifts of 0.1–0.2 Å$^{-1}$, so different free-energy minima can be identified in solution.
  • The persistence of the peak across degrees of polymerisation gives a direct estimate of the chain length below which the glycosidic backbone behaves as a rigid linear repeat.
  • Measured solution peaks provide an experimental benchmark for molecular-mechanics and molecular-dynamics force fields, which previously could only be compared with condensed-state structures.
  • The method should transfer to other biological macromolecules with repeating stiff linkages, including glycosylated proteins.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The linear-repeat interpretation implies the peak position directly measures the axial rise per residue $h$ through the one-dimensional Bragg relation; the tabulated $h$ values explain the observed 0.1–0.2 Å$^{-1}$ shifts between helix types.
  • A concentration series and D2O exchange would cleanly separate intramolecular repeat scattering from interchain correlation peaks or water-subtraction artifacts, and that test is the natural next experiment.
  • The same readout could become a quick screen for how pH, ionic strength, or specific ions switch the average helix, complementing optical rotation with a direct atomistic observable.
  • For flexible linkages the peak should broaden into the single-monomer form factor, so the technique should fail gracefully rather than mislead, provided a negative result is reported as such.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports synchrotron solution-state X-ray scattering measurements on alginate and pectin oligosaccharides and claims that a high-q Bragg peak directly reports the helical conformation of the polysaccharide chain in solution. The peak positions and shapes are compared with scattering calculated from rigid atomistic models built with the dihedral angles of an external molecular-mechanics study (ref. 23), using CRYSOL 3.0 and the Debye equation. At low degrees of polymerization (dp = 5 and 6) the calculated and measured peaks agree, and the comparison with the second-most-populated conformers (Figs. S2 and S3) supports the assignment. The authors interpret dp-dependent peak broadening as a signature of chain flexibility and claim that the method is generally applicable to polysaccharides with stiff glycosidic linkages.

Significance. If the peak assignment is correct, the paper provides a solution-state structural readout of a quantity previously accessible only by fiber diffraction and crystallography. The main prediction is falsifiable and is generated from externally derived dihedral angles rather than fitted to the scattering, so the peak-position match is a genuine test rather than a tautology. The internal control comparing most- vs second-most-populated conformers and the PDB-derived HG model (Fig. S1) strengthen the case. However, the evidence currently lacks a concentration series and quantitative peak-position uncertainties, and the model-data agreement is limited to a narrow q range; these gaps must be addressed before the strong claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Materials and methods (sample concentrations); Figs. 2 and 3; Eq. (1)] The intramolecular origin of the high-q peak is not tested with a concentration series. All alginate samples are measured at 50 g/L and the galacturonans at 12.5-31 g/L, with no dilution series. At these concentrations, interchain packing or correlation peaks, as well as residual artifacts from the strong-water-signal subtraction in the WAXS regime (Eq. (1) and the discussion of q >= 0.8 Å^-1), can produce features in the 1-2 Å^-1 range. The dp series is a partial control, but an interchain correlation distance is set by mass concentration rather than chain length, so invariance with dp at fixed concentration does not exclude an intermolecular origin. A concentration series (with the peak position and intensity followed as a function of concentration) is needed to demonstrate that the peak is an intramolecular monomer-repeat reflection.
  2. [Figs. 2 and 3; Table S1] The key evidence is a visual comparison of peak positions, and no error bars or quantitative peak-fit parameters are reported. The claim of 'sub Ångstrom accuracy' and the discrimination between 2(1) and 3(1) conformers rest on peak shifts of 0.1-0.2 Å^-1, so the experimental peak position must be determined with an uncertainty well below this shift. The authors should report fitted peak positions, uncertainties, and a quantitative goodness-of-fit measure (e.g., residual or chi-squared) for each dp and conformer.
  3. [Figs. 2 and 3 (discussion of dp-dependent peak shape)] The manuscript states that at higher dp 'agreement ... requires taking into account flexibility in the glycosidic linkage' and interprets the peak-shape evolution as revealing the rigidity length scale, but no flexible-chain scattering calculation or fit is shown. The dp-dependence of peak height and width is therefore not quantitatively supported; either a flexible-chain model should be fitted to the data or the qualitative interpretation should be labeled as tentative.
  4. [Page 4, paragraph beginning '(At 0.5 >= q >= 1 Å^-1 ...)'] The acknowledged discrepancy between calculated and experimental curves in the 0.5-1 Å^-1 range is deferred to future work, yet the text elsewhere says 'the calculated solution state scattering agrees with the experimentally obtained signal' (Figs. 2 and 3 captions). The paper should either demonstrate that the discrepancy is confined to a range that does not affect the high-q peak assignment, or qualify the agreement statement to reflect the limited q range over which the models are validated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The Debye equation as printed is garbled ('Nf 2 + f2 N∑...'); the standard formula is I(q) = sum_i sum_j f_i(q) f_j(q) sin(q r_ij)/(q r_ij).
  2. [References [5] and [6]] References [5] and [6] are identical; one of them should be corrected to the intended article.
  3. [Table S1] Table S1 contains five data columns for the three named polysaccharides, and the column headers do not show which conformer (2(1) or 3(1)) each column corresponds to; relabeling is required for reproducibility.
  4. [Figure 3 caption] The caption contains the typo 'conformaiton'; it should read 'conformation'.
  5. [Figs. 2 and 3] The main curves are CRYSOL 3.0 results while the insets show the in-vacuo Debye calculation; a direct overlay of the two model calculations would better support the claim that the results are independent of the software implementation.
  6. [Introduction] The 'for the first time' statement would benefit from a more precise framing, such as 'to our knowledge' and a brief comparison with earlier solution-WAXS studies on carbohydrates, to avoid overclaiming.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the high-q peak prediction is generated from externally supplied dihedral angles and compared, not fitted, to the measured scattering.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing comparison is a genuine prediction test. The atomistic models are built with POLYS using dihedral angles taken from an external molecular-mechanics calculation (ref. [23]), and the scattering is computed from those coordinates with the Debye equation and CRYSOL 3.0; no helix parameter or monomer repeat distance is fitted to the measured peak. The measured high-q peak position is therefore an independent observable against which the externally derived conformers are tested, and the discrimination between the most- and second-most-populated helices in Figures S2 and S3 provides an internal control that is not constructed from the data. The only self-citation in the derivation chain, ref. [24], is used for sample preparation of the homemade galacturonan oligomers, not for the conformational assignment, so the central claim does not reduce to an author-supplied premise. The absence of a concentration series and possible water-subtraction artifacts are experimental-validity concerns, but they are not circularity: nothing in the paper's derivation is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four borrowed or assumed inputs: external molecular-mechanics dihedral angles, an intramolecular origin for the observed peak, the adequacy of the hydration-layer models, and rigidity of short chains. None of these are fitted to the scattering data in the paper, which keeps the circularity burden low, but all four are unverified within the paper and the first two are load-bearing.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The free-energy-minimizing conformations and dihedral angles from the external molecular-mechanics study (ref. 23) represent the actual solution-state conformations of the three polyuronates.
    The entire peak-position comparison uses models built from these angles; if the force field mispredicts the solution conformation, the 'match' would be coincidental. The alternative-conformer test in Figures S2 and S3 is the only internal check.
  • domain assumption The observed high-q peak is an intramolecular Bragg reflection from the linear monomer repeat, unaffected by interchain correlations or water-subtraction artifacts.
    Samples are measured at 50 g/L (12.5 to 31 g/L for galacturonans) with no concentration series, so interchain contributions are not excluded. This enters at the interpretation of Figures 2 and 3.
  • domain assumption CRYSOL 3.0 (and the Debye in-vacuo calculation) adequately model the boundary water layer and excluded solvent volume at q up to 2 inverse Angstroms.
    The calculated peak positions are trusted to within the claimed 0.1 to 0.2 inverse Angstrom discrimination; hydration-layer inaccuracies are invoked to explain mismatches but not quantified.
  • domain assumption Rigid-chain models capture the scattering at dp 5 and 6, with no thermal fluctuations or population of secondary conformers.
    The 'slight differences' between model and data are attributed to thermal fluctuations and minor populations outside the deepest well, but these are not included in the calculation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polysaccharide conformations measured by solution state x-ray scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V5OWSGSL

@misc{pith2026190901673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polysaccharide conformations measured by solution state x-ray scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V5OWSGSL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01673}
}
read the original abstract

Polysaccharides are semi-flexible polymers composed of sugar residues with a myriad of important functions including structural support, energy storage and immunogenicity. The local conformation of such chains is a crucial factor governing their interactions, where the relative orientation of adjacent sugar rings determines the propensity for hydrogen bonding and specific ion-mediated interactions with neighbouring chains. Traditionally this conformation has only been directly accessible in the solid-state, using crystallographic techniques such as fibre diffraction. Herein it is demonstrated that improvements in the quality of synchrotron-based x-ray scattering data means that conformation-dependent features, the positions of which are related to the linear repeating distance between single saccharide monomers, can now be measured in solution. This technique is expected to be universally applicable for polysaccharides that consist of comparatively stiff glycosidic linkages, and to have extensive relevance for a number of biological macromolecules, including glycosylated proteins.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01673 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Real-space atomistic models showing the free energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimentally measured scattering from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Experimentally measured scattering from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. K. Hobbs, S. M. Lee, M. Robb, F. Hof, C. Barr, K. T. Abe, J.-H. Hehemann, R. McLean, D. W. Abbott, and A. B. Boraston, Kdgf, the missing link in the microbial metabolism of uronate sugars from pectin and alginate, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 6188 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Palmer and M

    K. Palmer and M. B. Hartzog, An x-ray diffraction in- vestigation of sodium pectate, Journal of the American Chemical Society 67, 2122 (1945)

    work page 1945

  3. [3]

    [23] which utilized molecular mechanics calculations

    Dihedral angles were obtained from ref. [23] which utilized molecular mechanics calculations. commonly carried out in an attempt to clarify aggrega- tion mechanisms that underlie phenomena such as gela- tion, this seems reasonable [15], direct comparison with solution state data has been lacking. Here for the first time it is shown that careful x-ray scatt...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Wuhrmann and W

    K. Wuhrmann and W. Pilnik, ¨Uber optik und feinbau des pektins und seiner derivate, Experientia 1, 330 (1945)

    work page 1945

  5. [5]

    Walkinshaw and S

    M. Walkinshaw and S. Arnott, Conformations and inter- actions of pectins: I. x-ray diffraction analyses of sodium pectate in neutral and acidified forms, Journal of molec- ular biology 153, 1055 (1981)

    work page 1981

  6. [7]

    Atkins, I

    E. Atkins, I. Nieduszynski, W. Mackie, K. Parker, and E. Smolko, Structural components of alginic acid. ii. the crystalline structure of poly- α-l-guluronic acid. re- sults of x-ray diffraction and polarized infrared stud- ies, Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules 12, 1879 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [8]

    Mackie, Conformations of crystalline alginic acids and their salts., Biochemical Journal 125, 89P (1971)

    W. Mackie, Conformations of crystalline alginic acids and their salts., Biochemical Journal 125, 89P (1971)

    work page 1971

  8. [9]

    N. M. Rigby, A. J. MacDougall, S. G. Ring, P. Cairns, V. J. Morris, and P. A. Gunning, Observations on the crystallization of oligogalacturonates, Carbohydrate re- search 328, 235 (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 33 references
  1. [10]

    Morris, D

    E. Morris, D. Powell, M. Gidley, and D. Rees, Confor- mations and interactions of pectins: I. polymorphism be- tween gel and solid states of calcium polygalacturonate, Journal of molecular biology 155, 507 (1982)

    1982

  2. [11]

    L. Li, Y. Fang, R. Vreeker, I. Appelqvist, and E. Mendes, Reexamining the egg-box model in calcium- alginate gels with x-ray diffraction, Biomacromolecules 8, 464 (2007)

    2007

  3. [12]

    Peri´ c, C

    L. Peri´ c, C. S. Pereira, S. Perez, and P. H. H¨ unenberger, Conformation, dynamics and ion-binding properties of single-chain polyuronates: a molecular dynamics study, Molecular Simulation 34, 421 (2008)

    2008

  4. [13]

    Plazinski and W

    W. Plazinski and W. Rudzinski, Molecular modeling of ca2+-oligo ( α-l-guluronate) complexes: toward the un- derstanding of the junction zone structure in calcium al- ginate gels, Structural Chemistry 23, 1409 (2012)

    2012

  5. [14]

    Panczyk, K

    K. Panczyk, K. Gaweda, M. Drach, and W. Plazinski, Extension of the gromos 56a6carbo/carbo r force field for 5 charged, protonated, and esterified uronates, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry B 122, 3696 (2018)

    2018

  6. [15]

    Wolnik, L

    A. Wolnik, L. Albertin, L. Charlier, and K. Mazeau, Probing the helical forms of ca2+-guluronan junction zones in alginate gels by molecular dynamics 1: Duplexes, Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules 99, 562 (2013)

    2013

  7. [16]

    Mackie, S

    W. Mackie, S. Perez, R. Rizzo, F. Taravel, and M. Vi- gnon, Aspects of the conformation of polyguluronate in the solid state and in solution, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 5, 329 (1983)

    1983

  8. [17]

    Sikorski, F

    P. Sikorski, F. Mo, G. Skj˚ ak-Bræk, and B. T. Stokke, Evidence for egg-box-compatible interactions in calcium- alginate gels from fiber x-ray diffraction, Biomacro- molecules 8, 2098 (2007)

    2007

  9. [18]

    B. T. Stokke, K. I. Draget, O. Smidsrød, Y. Yuguchi, H. Urakawa, and K. Kajiwara, Small-angle x-ray scatter- ing and rheological characterization of alginate gels. 1. ca- alginate gels, Macromolecules 33, 1853 (2000)

    2000

  10. [19]

    Yuguchi, H

    Y. Yuguchi, H. Urakawa, K. Kajiwara, K. Draget, and B. Stokke, Small-angle x-ray scattering and rheological characterization of alginate gels. 2. time-resolved studies on ionotropic gels, Journal of Molecular Structure 554, 21 (2000)

    2000

  11. [20]

    Yuguchi, A

    Y. Yuguchi, A. Hasegawa, A. M. Pado l, K. I. Draget, and B. T. Stokke, Local structure of ca2+ induced hydrogels of alginate–oligoguluronate blends determined by small- angle-x-ray scattering, Carbohydrate polymers 152, 532 (2016)

    2016

  12. [21]

    Schuster, A

    E. Schuster, A. Cucheval, L. Lundin, and M. A. Williams, Using saxs to reveal the degree of bundling in the polysaccharide junction zones of microrheologically dis- tinct pectin gels, Biomacromolecules 12, 2583 (2011)

    2011

  13. [22]

    Ventura, J

    I. Ventura, J. Jammal, and H. Bianco-Peled, Insights into the nanostructure of low-methoxyl pectin–calcium gels, Carbohydrate polymers 97, 650 (2013)

    2013

  14. [23]

    Josef and H

    E. Josef and H. Bianco-Peled, Conformation of a natural polyelectrolyte in semidilute solutions with no added salt, Soft Matter 8, 9156 (2012)

    2012

  15. [24]

    Braccini, R

    I. Braccini, R. P. Grasso, and S. P´ erez, Conformational and configurational features of acidic polysaccharides and their interactions with calcium ions: a molecular modeling investigation, Carbohydrate Research 317, 119 (1999)

    1999

  16. [25]

    B. W. Mansel, A. H. Irani, T. M. Ryan, D. J. McGillivray, H.-L. Chen, and M. A. Williams, Resolving solution con- formations of the model semi-flexible polyelectrolyte ho- mogalacturonan using molecular dynamics simulations and small-angle x-ray scattering, The European Physi- ...

    2019

  17. [26]

    See Supplemental Material attached at the end of doc- ument for detailed sample preparation information, fur- ther model fitting and table of dihedral angles used for real-space models of conformers

  18. [27]

    N. M. Kirby, S. T. Mudie, A. M. Hawley, D. J. Cook- son, H. D. Mertens, N. Cowieson, and V. Samardzic- Boban, A low-background-intensity focusing small-angle x-ray scattering undulator beamline, Journal of Applied Crystallography 46, 1670 (2013)

    2013

  19. [28]

    Svergun, C

    D. Svergun, C. Barberato, and M. H. Koch, Crysol-a pro- gram to evaluate x-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates, Journal of ap- plied crystallography 28, 768 (1995)

    1995

  20. [29]

    Franke, M

    D. Franke, M. Petoukhov, P. Konarev, A. Panjkovich, A. Tuukkanen, H. Mertens, A. Kikhney, N. Hajizadeh, J. Franklin, C. Jeffries, et al. , Atsas 2.8: a comprehen- sive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from macromolecular solutions, Journal of applied crystallog- r...

    2017

  21. [30]

    Scardi, S

    P. Scardi, S. J. Billinge, R. Neder, and A. Cervellino, Cel- ebrating 100 years of the debye scattering equation, Acta Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and Advances (Online) 72 (2016)

    2016

  22. [31]

    Debye, Scattering from non-crystalline substances, Ann

    P. Debye, Scattering from non-crystalline substances, Ann. Physik 46, 809 (1915)

    1915

  23. [32]

    Waasmaier and A

    D. Waasmaier and A. Kirfel, New analytical scattering- factor functions for free atoms and ions, Acta Crystallo- graphica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography 51, 416 (1995)

    1995

  24. [33]

    S. B. Engelsen, S. Cros, W. Mackie, and S. P´ erez, A molecular builder for carbohydrates: application to polysaccharides and complex carbohydrates, Biopoly- mers 39, 417 (1996)

    1996

  25. [34]

    Polysaccharide conformations measured by solution state x-ray scattering

    S. B. Engelsen, P. I. Hansen, and S. Perez, Polys 2.0: An open source software package for building three- dimensional structures of polysaccharides, Biopolymers 101, 733 (2014). Supplemental Material for “Polysaccharide conformations measured by solution state x-ray scatterin...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.