Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Using Contextual Information to Improve Blood Glucose Prediction

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A multi-signal Gaussian process that learns a shared representation of glucose and context outperforms glucose-only models.

desk verdict Interesting application of multi-signal GPs to glucose prediction, but the social-media experiment probably leaks future information through user-level aggregate features; the CGM result is the defensible part. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01735 v1 pith:7TKKBL2W submitted 2019-08-24 stat.ML cs.LGq-bio.QM

Mohammad Akbari , Rumi Chunara This is my paper · ORCID
classification stat.MLcs.LGq-bio.QM
keywords bloodglucosepredictionGaussianprocesssharedlatentspacecontextualinformationsocialmediahealthdatacontinuousmonitoringperson-generatedmulti-signallearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that contextual information—survey-reported diet and activity, or passively mined social-media text—can improve short-term blood glucose prediction, despite being noisier and sparser than glucose readings themselves. It proposes a multi-signal Gaussian Process that maps blood glucose and context into one shared latent space, then predicts future blood glucose from that space. Across two datasets (CGM with self-reported context, and #bgnow social-media posts), the model beats glucose-only Gaussian processes and standard multi-view baselines on glycemic-event detection and continuous glucose regression. If right, the result matters for diabetes management because it shows everyday context signals can be useful predictors, and it opens a route to forecasting health states from wearable and person-generated data.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the shared-latent-space multi-signal Gaussian process. A latent matrix $Q$ is assumed to generate both the glucose signal $V$ through one Gaussian process mapping $f_v: Q \rightarrow V$ and the contextual signal $S$ through another $f_s: Q \rightarrow S$; conditional independence given $Q$ gives the posterior $p(Q, \theta_v, \theta_s | V, S) \propto p(V | Q, \theta_v) p(S | Q, \theta_s) p(Q)$. Training minimizes $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_v + \mathcal{L}_s + \frac{1}{2}\sum_i \|q_i\|^2$, with RBF kernels for the covariance matrices, by scaled conjugate gradient. This lets the model borrow information from sparse, noisy context while still modeling temporal smoothness in glucose, which early or late fusion baselines do not.

What would settle it

Rebuild the social media experiment with a strict temporal split—construct each user's context features from tweets timestamped strictly before the glucose observation—and compare GP+Context against GP; if the precision/recall gap shrinks to near zero, the reported 0.82/0.80 result depends on future context.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that blood glucose prediction improves when the glucose time series and noisy, sparse contextual signals are fused through a shared latent representation rather than used alone or concatenated. The proposed multi-signal Gaussian process assumes blood glucose values $V$ and contextual features $S$ are independent given a latent space $Q$, and learns $Q$ together with two Gaussian process mappings so that it captures temporal dependencies in both signals. On the OhioT1DM CGM dataset, adding context lowers regression RMSE by 11.6 percent and improves glycemic-event detection, with overall precision 0.79 and recall 0.77; on sparse #bgnow social media data, GP+Context reaches overall precision 0.82 and recall 0.80 versus 0.40 and 0.40 for a glucose-only GP. The authors conclude that context, including text-derived mood and lifestyle signals, can add predictive value beyond glucose history itself.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each social-media context feature vector is built only from tweets that precede the blood glucose value being predicted, so the context signal contains no future information.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Contextual information can improve blood glucose prediction even when the context data are sparse and noisy, as in social media.
  • The shared-latent Gaussian process improves detection of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events relative to glucose-only models, which is the clinically important use case.
  • Different context signals contribute unevenly: meal and exercise features reduce CGM regression error most, and self-reported carbohydrates, basal insulin, and hypocorrection meals rank above several prior glucose windows.
  • The same multi-signal framework can be applied to other medical time series where side information such as wearables, surveys, or social streams is available.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The social-media result would be stronger evidence if the context features were recomputed from only the tweets preceding each glucose value; the paper's reported feature construction aggregates over a one-year timeline, so a strict temporal split is the natural check.
  • Read as a modeling claim rather than a clinical claim, the paper suggests that a shared latent context space can rescue predictions from extremely sparse time series; that design pattern could transfer to other sparse health streams such as self-reported symptoms or pharmacy refills.
  • If validated on denser data, the latent context representation could be used to estimate when a user's mood or lifestyle context is pushing glucose toward an adverse range, enabling preemptive alerts; the paper does not implement such an alerting rule.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a multi-signal Gaussian process model that learns a shared latent representation of blood glucose values and contextual side information, then uses this representation to predict future glucose values (regression) or glycemic categories (classification). The method is evaluated on two datasets: the OhioT1DM CGM dataset with survey/insulin/meal context, and a Twitter #bgnow dataset where user timelines provide social-media context. The central claims are that the proposed GP+Context outperforms glucose-only GP and standard multi-view baselines (LR, KCCA, GP+Social), with social-media overall precision/recall of 0.82/0.80 versus 0.40/0.40 for glucose-only GP (Table 3), and an 11.6% RMSE reduction on the CGM regression task when context is added (Section 4.4 and Figure 3). The paper also reports feature-importance analyses for both datasets.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper addresses a real gap in blood glucose prediction: incorporating sparse, noisy, person-generated contextual data through a principled Gaussian process latent-space model. The two-dataset evaluation and the inclusion of multiple baselines are strengths, and the method is clearly motivated by the known limitations of early/late fusion for multimodal health data. The social-media experiment in particular is potentially valuable because it targets a large, passively collected context source. However, the validity of the social-media result hinges on whether the context features are temporally aligned with each glucose observation, and the manuscript as written does not establish this. The CGM experiments also omit key evaluation-protocol details. The central claims are therefore defensible but not yet fully supported; the paper needs a revision that resolves the temporal-alignment question and reports uncertainty-aware, reproducible evaluation.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2.1 and Appendix B] The social-media context features do not appear to be temporally aligned with each blood glucose observation. Appendix B defines user-centric features (Table 5) such as 'total number of tweets' and 'avg. number of tweets/day' as aggregates over the user's one-year timeline, and content-centric unigram frequencies are normalized by the total number of tweets posted by the user. Nothing in this description restricts these aggregates to tweets posted before the glucose value being predicted. If S^u is constant or slowly varying per user, then future tweets can leak into features for past glucose values, and the large jump from GP+Social (0.64/0.63) to GP+Context (0.82/0.80) in Table 3 could be an artifact of memorizing user-level posting style rather than evidence that contextual information predicts future glucose. This is load-bearing because the social-media experiment is the larger of the two evaluations; the paper must either demonstrate that each row of S^u uses only tweets with timestamps strictly preceding the target BG value, or re-run the experiment with a properly chronological feature construction.
  2. [Section 4.2.2] The evaluation protocol for the main social-media experiment is not described. The text states that users with fewer than five BG values are removed but does not state how the data are split into training and test sets, whether the split is chronological, whether all users appear in both train and test, or how the reported precision/recall numbers are aggregated across users. Section 4.3, by contrast, explicitly mentions a random one-week holdout for the sparsity experiments, which suggests that the main results may use a different protocol. Without this information, the reader cannot assess whether the social-media results reflect genuine temporal generalization or whether user-identity information leaks across the split.
  3. [Section 4.1 versus Section 4.4] There is a direct internal inconsistency about which CGM side-information signals are used. Section 4.1 states, 'Due to misalignment of values in time dimensions, we do not use the other side information sources', referring to sleep, work, exercise, heart rate, GSR, and skin temperature. Section 4.4, however, reports an 11.6% RMSE reduction when contextual information is added and Figure 3 shows RMSE values for '+Sleep', '+Work', '+Exercise', '+HeartRate', '+GSR', and '+Skin Temperature' as contextual signals. These statements cannot both describe the reported experiments. The authors need to clarify which signals actually entered the models whose results appear in Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 2 versus the feature-importance analysis in Figure 3, and describe how the temporal misalignment was handled in each case.
  4. [Tables 1-4 and Figures 2-3] All performance comparisons are reported as single point estimates without confidence intervals, repeated-run statistics, or per-user variability. For example, Table 3's GP+Context overall precision 0.82 and recall 0.80 are given without any measure of uncertainty, so it is impossible to know whether the differences among GP+Social, KCCA, and GP+Context are statistically meaningful, especially given the small number of users (306) and the class imbalance visible in Table 2. The authors should provide error bars, confidence intervals, or a per-user performance summary for the main comparisons, and ideally report the variance across random train/test splits or across users.
  5. [Section 4.1 and Figure 2] The CGM regression and classification evaluations lack essential protocol details. The OhioT1DM dataset has six patients, but the paper does not state whether models are trained and tested per patient or pooled, how the 30-minute prediction window is formed from the 5-minute CGM readings, what length of history window is used, or how missing values are handled. Figure 2 reports RMSE but no error bars. These details are necessary to interpret the claim that GP+Context has the 'lowest error' and to reproduce the experiment.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 4 caption/text] The sentence 'Precision may be highest on the overall dataset again due to the low number of such events' is unclear; it seems to refer to hypoglycemic events, but the table shows highest precision on Data-50, not on Data-All. Please rephrase.
  2. [Figure 2] The y-axis label 'RSME' is a typo; it should read 'RMSE'.
  3. [Equation (9)] Equation (9) contains an extra closing parenthesis in 'tr(K_s^{-1} S S^T))'; the formula should be cleaned up.
  4. [Section 4.4] The feature-importance analysis for social media uses a linear model's normalized weight vector, but the preceding comparisons are for GP+Context; the text should clarify that the feature ranking is a post hoc explanatory analysis and not an attribution within the GP model itself.
  5. [Appendix B] The appendix states that word embeddings are learned on a 'Twitter reference corpus' but does not cite or describe this corpus; please provide a reference or a description.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GP+Context results are empirical out-of-sample comparisons, not relabeled fits or self-citation-driven deductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The proposed model (Eqs. 5-9) optimizes a joint latent representation Q to reconstruct the two input signals V (glucose) and S (context), and the reported evaluations compare a classifier/regressor on this representation against baselines on held-out data; the objective does not contain the target y, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Kernel hyperparameters and Q are estimated from training folds, and Tables 1 and 3 report out-of-sample comparisons. The only author self-citation (Akbari et al. 2018) supports the background assumption that #bgnow users are plausibly managing type 1 diabetes; it is not invoked as a proof of the method's performance. Two internal documentation concerns are noted for correctness, not circularity: Section 4.1 says sleep/work/exercise/heart-rate/GSR/skin-temperature signals were not used while Section 4.4 reports their effects, and Appendix B describes user-level yearly aggregates rather than per-observation time-aligned context (a potential temporal leakage risk). These are reproducibility/validity issues, not cases where the claimed prediction is equivalent to its inputs by construction, so they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model contributes a latent variable and kernel design, while the empirical results depend on several hand-chosen thresholds and unstated hyperparameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • RBF kernel hyperparameters theta_1 and theta_2 = not reported
    Eq. (10); optimized via scaled conjugate gradient; not fixed by theory, and final values are not given.
  • Latent space dimension of Q = not reported
    Section 3.2; the dimensionality of the shared latent space must be chosen, but the paper does not state it.
  • Minimum BG posts thresholds = 5, 25, 50
    Sections 4.2.1 and 4.3; hand-chosen user inclusion criteria that change the evaluation cohort and improve scores as thresholds rise.
  • Vocabulary frequency threshold and embedding dimension = 10 and 50
    Appendix B; unigram vocabulary keeps terms appearing more than 10 times, and word2vec layer size is 50. These choices affect the context features.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard Gaussian process regression and GP latent variable model equations are valid for this task
    Section 3.1 uses standard GP predictive equations; these are accepted as background mathematical results.
  • domain assumption GP prior with RBF kernel is a suitable model for glucose and context dynamics
    Sections 3.1 and 3.2 use an RBF kernel without comparing alternatives; the conclusion notes that RBF may miss periodic glucose behavior.
  • domain assumption Conditional independence of V and S given latent Q
    Eq. (5); the factorization of the posterior, and therefore the entire inference scheme, depends on this assumption.
  • domain assumption Self-reported survey entries and #bgnow lexical extractions provide accurate ground-truth glucose values
    Sections 4.1 and 4.2.1; no validation of extracted glucose values against clinical measurements is reported.
  • domain assumption Social media text features carry temporally relevant context for each BG observation
    Sections 4.2.1 and Appendix B; features are described as aggregates over a one-year timeline, and temporal alignment with each glucose post is not demonstrated.
invented entities (1)
  • Shared latent representation Q
    purpose: Unify blood glucose and contextual signals so a single temporal model can use both
    Postulated model construct; no external falsifiable prediction is attached to Q itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Using Contextual Information to Improve Blood Glucose Prediction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7TKKBL2W

@misc{pith2026190901735,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Using Contextual Information to Improve Blood Glucose Prediction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7TKKBL2W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01735}
}
read the original abstract

Blood glucose value prediction is an important task in diabetes management. While it is reported that glucose concentration is sensitive to social context such as mood, physical activity, stress, diet, alongside the influence of diabetes pathologies, we need more research on data and methodologies to incorporate and evaluate signals about such temporal context into prediction models. Person-generated data sources, such as actively contributed surveys as well as passively mined data from social media offer opportunity to capture such context, however the self-reported nature and sparsity of such data mean that such data are noisier and less specific than physiological measures such as blood glucose values themselves. Therefore, here we propose a Gaussian Process model to both address these data challenges and combine blood glucose and latent feature representations of contextual data for a novel multi-signal blood glucose prediction task. We find this approach outperforms common methods for multi-variate data, as well as using the blood glucose values in isolation. Given a robust evaluation across two blood glucose datasets with different forms of contextual information, we conclude that multi-signal Gaussian Processes can improve blood glucose prediction by using contextual information and may provide a significant shift in blood glucose prediction research and practice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01735 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example tweets from the #bgnow hashtag; the identity of users have been removed due to privacy concerns [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of different methods in prediction future blood glucose values on the CGM dataset. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The effects of distinct contextual information in CGM data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  2. [2]

    Sentiment analysis of twitter data

    Apoorv Agarwal, Boyi Xie, Ilia Vovsha, Owen Rambow, and Rebecca Passonneau. Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In Proceedings of the workshop on languages in social media, pages 30--38. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    A kernel method for canonical correlation analysis

    Shotaro Akaho. A kernel method for canonical correlation analysis. arXiv preprint cs/0609071, 2006

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    From the user to the medium: Neural profiling across web communities

    Mohammad Akbari, Kunal Relia, Anas Elghafari, and Rumi Chunara. From the user to the medium: Neural profiling across web communities. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Personalized glucose forecasting for type 2 diabetes using data assimilation

    David J Albers, Matthew Levine, Bruce Gluckman, Henry Ginsberg, George Hripcsak, and Lena Mamykina. Personalized glucose forecasting for type 2 diabetes using data assimilation. PLoS computational biology, 13 0 (4): 0 e1005232, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Class-based n-gram models of natural language

    Peter F Brown, Peter V Desouza, Robert L Mercer, Vincent J Della Pietra, and Jenifer C Lai. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational linguistics, 18 0 (4): 0 467--479, 1992

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    Deep Mixed Effect Model using Gaussian Processes: A Personalized and Reliable Prediction for Healthcare

    Ingyo Chung, Saehoon Kim, Juho Lee, Sung Ju Hwang, and Eunho Yang. Mixed effect composite rnn-gp: A personalized and reliable prediction model for healthcare. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01551, 2018

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Latent sentiment topic modelling and nonparametric discovery of online mental health-related communities

    Bo Dao, Thin Nguyen, Svetha Venkatesh, and Dinh Phung. Latent sentiment topic modelling and nonparametric discovery of online mental health-related communities. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 4 0 (3): 0 209--231, 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Seeking and sharing health information online: comparing search engines and social media

    Munmun De Choudhury, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Ryen W White. Seeking and sharing health information online: comparing search engines and social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1365--1376. ACM, 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Deep multi-output forecasting: Learning to accurately predict blood glucose trajectories

    Ian Fox, Lynn Ang, Mamta Jaiswal, Rodica Pop-Busui, and Jenna Wiens. Deep multi-output forecasting: Learning to accurately predict blood glucose trajectories. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05357, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Learning to detect sepsis with a multitask gaussian process rnn classifier

    Joseph Futoma, Sanjay Hariharan, and Katherine Heller. Learning to detect sepsis with a multitask gaussian process rnn classifier. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04152, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    High-resolution temporal representations of alcohol and tobacco behaviors from social media data

    Tom Huang, Anas Elghafari, Kunal Relia, and Rumi Chunara. High-resolution temporal representations of alcohol and tobacco behaviors from social media data. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 1 0 (CSCW): 0 54, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Multimodal affect recognition in learning environments

    Ashish Kapoor and Rosalind W Picard. Multimodal affect recognition in learning environments. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 677--682. ACM, 2005

    2005

  6. [14]

    Modelling the working week for multi-step forecasting using gaussian process regression

    Pasan Karunaratne, Masud Moshtaghi, Shanika Karunasekera, Aaron Harwood, and Trevor Cohn. Modelling the working week for multi-step forecasting using gaussian process regression. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1994--...

    1994

  7. [15]

    Re-using an argument corpus to aid in the curation of social media collections

    Clare Llewellyn, Claire Grover, Jon Oberlander, and Ewan Klein. Re-using an argument corpus to aid in the curation of social media collections. In LREC, volume 14, pages 462--468, 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    Depression in diabetic patients: the relationship between mood and glycemic control

    Patrick J Lustman and Ray E Clouse. Depression in diabetic patients: the relationship between mood and glycemic control. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 19 0 (2): 0 113--122, 2005

    2005

  9. [17]

    The ohiot1dm dataset for blood glucose level prediction

    Cindy Marling and Razvan Bunescu. The ohiot1dm dataset for blood glucose level prediction. In The 3rd International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Healthcare Data, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Evaluation of the portable healthwear armband: a device to measure total daily energy expenditure in free-living type 2 diabetic individuals

    Diane Mignault, Maxime St Onge, Antony D Karelis, David B Allison, and Remi Rabasa-Lhoret. Evaluation of the portable healthwear armband: a device to measure total daily energy expenditure in free-living type 2 diabetic individuals. Diabetes care, 28 0 (1): 0 225--227, 2005

    2005

  11. [19]

    Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space

    Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, 2013 a

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality

    Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 3111--3119, 2013 b

    2013

  13. [21]

    A review of personalized blood glucose prediction strategies for t1dm patients

    Silvia Oviedo, Josep Veh \' , Remei Calm, and Joaquim Armengol. A review of personalized blood glucose prediction strategies for t1dm patients. International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 33 0 (6): 0 e2833, 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    A machine learning approach to predicting blood glucose levels for diabetes management

    Kevin Plis, Razvan C Bunescu, Cindy Marling, Jay Shubrook, and Frank Schwartz. A machine learning approach to predicting blood glucose levels for diabetes management. In AAAI Workshop: Modern Artificial Intelligence for Health Analytics, number 31, pages 35--39, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Gaussian processes in machine learning

    Carl Edward Rasmussen. Gaussian processes in machine learning. In Advanced lectures on machine learning, pages 63--71. Springer, 2004

    2004

  16. [24]

    Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition

    Lev Ratinov and Dan Roth. Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 147--155. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009

    2009

  17. [25]

    Physical exercise improves glucose metabolism in lifestyle-related diseases

    Yuzo Sato, Masaru Nagasaki, Naoya Nakai, and Takashi Fushimi. Physical exercise improves glucose metabolism in lifestyle-related diseases. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 228 0 (10): 0 1208--1212, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Time series regression and exploratory data analysis

    Robert H Shumway and David S Stoffer. Time series regression and exploratory data analysis. In Time series analysis and its applications, pages 47--82. Springer, 2011

    2011

  19. [27]

    Early versus late fusion in semantic video analysis

    Cees GM Snoek, Marcel Worring, and Arnold WM Smeulders. Early versus late fusion in semantic video analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 399--402. ACM, 2005

    2005

  20. [28]

    Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series

    Giovanni Sparacino, Francesca Zanderigo, Stefano Corazza, Alberto Maran, Andrea Facchinetti, and Claudio Cobelli. Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, 54 0 (5): ...

    2007

  21. [29]

    Unsupervised feature selection for multi-view data in social media

    Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, Huiji Gao, and Huan Liu. Unsupervised feature selection for multi-view data in social media. In Proceedings of the 2013 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pages 270--278. SIAM, 2013

    2013

  22. [30]

    Canonical correlation analysis

    Bruce Thompson. Canonical correlation analysis. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, 2005

    2005

  23. [31]

    Gaussian process modelling of blood glucose response to free-living physical activity data in people with type 1 diabetes

    John Joseph Valletta, Andrew J Chipperfield, and Christopher D Byrne. Gaussian process modelling of blood glucose response to free-living physical activity data in people with type 1 diabetes. In 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biol...

    2009

  24. [32]

    Efficient manifold ranking for image retrieval

    Bin Xu, Jiajun Bu, Chun Chen, Deng Cai, Xiaofei He, Wei Liu, and Jiebo Luo. Efficient manifold ranking for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval, pages 525--534. ACM, 2011

    2011

  25. [33]

    Mobile phone name extraction from internet forums: a semi-supervised approach

    Yangjie Yao and Aixin Sun. Mobile phone name extraction from internet forums: a semi-supervised approach. World Wide Web, 19 0 (5): 0 783--805, 2016

    2016

  26. [34]

    Software-specific named entity recognition in software engineering social content

    Deheng Ye, Zhenchang Xing, Chee Yong Foo, Zi Qun Ang, Jing Li, and Nachiket Kapre. Software-specific named entity recognition in software engineering social content. In Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), 2016 IEEE 23rd International Conference on, volume ...

    2016

  27. [35]

    Robust late fusion with rank minimization

    Guangnan Ye, Dong Liu, I-Hong Jhuo, and Shih-Fu Chang. Robust late fusion with rank minimization. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pages 3021--3028. IEEE, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.