Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 76 references

Structural and electronic phenomena at oxyfluoride KTaO$_3$/K$M$F$_3$ ($M$ = Zn and Ni) superlattices: Rashba splitting and 2DEG

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Oxyfluoride superlattices of KTaO3 with KZnF3 or KNiF3 are predicted to produce two-dimensional electron and hole gases and a cubic Rashba spin splitting roughly four times larger than that of LaAlO3/SrTiO3.

desk verdict Useful computational paper that genuinely opens a new oxyfluoride interface family; the headline Rashba numbers are extracted from empty high-lying bands and extrapolated to the 2DEG without direct verification. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01921 v1 pith:SMUCRG3Y submitted 2019-09-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

A. C. Garcia-Castro , R. Ospina , Philippe Ghosez , Eric Bousquet , Aldo H. Romero This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.85.+t31.15.A71.15.Mb75.50.-y77.65.-j
keywords oxyfluorideperovskitestwo-dimensionalelectrongasholeRashbaspinsplittingKTaO3KZnF3KNipolarcatastrophe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses first-principles calculations to argue that oxide/fluoride perovskite superlattices, KTaO3 alternating with KZnF3 or KNiF3, develop two-dimensional electron and hole gases once each material is more than six unit cells thick. The charge accumulation is driven by the same polar catastrophe that operates in LaAlO3/SrTiO3, but it happens at a lower critical thickness and produces larger internal electric fields, with the mobile carriers confined to the oxide layers. The authors also find a cubic Rashba spin splitting at the interface that is four times larger than in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 and twice that of a KTaO3-based transistor. If these predictions hold, oxyfluoride interfaces become a candidate platform for spin-orbitronic devices and for combining 2D electron gases with magnetism.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the polar catastrophe at the alternating n-type TaO2/KF and p-type MF2/KO interfaces, described by a charged-plates electrostatic model and checked against the ab initio electrostatic potential. The argument is carried by the internal electric field, 105 mV/Å for KZnF3 and 98 mV/Å for KNiF3 versus 58 mV/Å for LaAlO3/SrTiO3, and by the phonon response: an electric field along z expands the KTaO3 c-axis and switches its polar instability from Amm2 to P4mm, explaining why a bulk-only electrostatic model underestimates the field. The spin splitting is described by the cubic Rashba Hamiltonian $H_{R3} = \alpha_3 E_z i(k_-^3 \sigma_+ - k_+^3 \sigma_-)$ giving $E_\pm(k) = \hbar^2 k^2/2m^* \pm \alpha_3 k^3$, and is extracted from spin-resolved band structures computed with spin-orbit coupling.

What would settle it

Compute the spin-orbit-coupled band structure of the 7/7 KTaO3/KZnF3 superlattice at its metallic Fermi level; if the Rashba $\Delta k$ and $\Delta E$ there do not approach $0.044\,\AA^{-1}$ and $64\,\mathrm{meV}$, or if no Rashba-split bands cross the Fermi energy, the extrapolation from the insulating 4/4 case fails. Alternatively, a grown 7/7 film measured by angle-resolved photoemission would reveal whether such spin-split bands exist at the Fermi level.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper predicts that stacking insulating KTaO3 with the fluoride perovskites KZnF3 or KNiF3 produces alternating n- and p-type interfaces whose uncompensated electric fields drive a polar-catastrophe insulator-to-metal transition once each slab exceeds six unit cells. At the transition, a two-dimensional electron gas appears in Ta 5dxy states at the TaO2/KF interface and a two-dimensional hole gas in O 2p states at the MF2/KO interface, both confined to the oxide layers, with internal fields of 105 mV/Å for the Zn system and 98 mV/Å for the Ni system. The same structures show a cubic Rashba spin splitting described by the Hamiltonian $H_{R3} = \alpha_3 E_z i(k_-^3 \sigma_+ - k_+^3 \sigma_-)$ with $\Delta k = 0.044\,\AA^{-1}$ and $\Delta E = 64\,\mathrm{meV}$ in the 4/4 superlattice, about four times the values computed for LaAlO3/SrTiO3 and twice those of a KTaO3-based transistor. For M = Ni, the G-type antiferromagnetic order of bulk KNiF3 survives, so the heterostructure can combine a 2DEG, a 2DHG, spin splitting, and magnetism.

Load-bearing premise

The Rashba splitting is computed in the 4/4 superlattice, which is still insulating, and the paper assumes the same splitting survives in the thicker n > 6 superlattices where the 2DEG actually appears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 2DEG/2DHG appears at n > 6 unit cells, a lower critical thickness than the roughly 8/8 threshold in LaAlO3/SrTiO3, so thinner superlattices could create conducting oxide interfaces.
  • Because electrons and holes remain in the KTaO3 layers while the fluoride acts as a condensing barrier, the conductive channel is spatially separated from the magnetic fluoride when M = Ni.
  • The cubic Rashba splitting, $\Delta k = 0.044\,\AA^{-1}$ and $\Delta E = 64\,\mathrm{meV}$, is large enough to produce spin-polarized bands in the kx–ky plane, and in the magnetic case the system can host a 2DEG, a 2DHG, k^3 Rashba splitting, and G-type antiferromagnetism simultaneously.
  • Tuning the n/l ratio shifts the Ta 5d bands relative to the Fermi energy, providing a control knob for the size of the splitting and for spin-transport properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The headline Rashba numbers come from an insulating 4/4 superlattice, and the paper assumes they carry over to the metallic n > 6 case; a direct calculation or measurement at the 7/7 interface could find that band filling and the internal field alter $\Delta k$ and $\Delta E$, so those values should be treated as an upper-bound estimate until checked.
  • The same alternating n/p interface construction could be tried with other 4d or 5d oxide perovskites paired with fluorides, since fluoride lattices are large enough to accommodate heavy cations with strong spin-orbit coupling; the paper hints at this idea but does not test it.
  • The O 2p hole gas is an unusual feature, and if hole mobilities can be improved, oxyfluoride interfaces might become a platform for hole-based spin-orbitronics, a direction the paper does not develop.
  • The predicted electrostriction-driven switch from Amm2 to P4mm polarization in KTaO3 suggests that strain state and c/a ratio control both the 2DEG and the Rashba strength, so external strain could tune the splitting continuously, which is not tested in this paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles DFT+U and hybrid-functional calculations for (KTaO3)n/(KMF3)n superlattices with M = Zn and Ni. The authors find a polar-catastrophe-driven insulator-to-metal transition for n > 6 unit cells, with a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) and two-dimensional hole gas (2DHG) confined to the oxide layers of the heterostructure. They analyze local structure, Born effective charges, phonon instabilities, and magnetic ordering for M = Ni (G-type AFM with small induced Ta moments). In the electronic-structure section, they report a cubic Rashba-type spin splitting at the 4/4 superlattice, quantified as Δk = 0.044 Å⁻¹ and ΔE = 64 meV at an energy about 2 eV above the Fermi level, and claim this is roughly four times larger than in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 and twice that of KTaO3-based transistors. The central claim of the paper is that these oxyfluoride interfaces host both a 2DEG/2DHG and a sizeable Rashba splitting, with potential for multifunctional spintronic applications.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the oxyfluoride perovskite heterostructures studied here would constitute a new platform combining a polar-catastrophe 2DEG/2DHG, a k-cubic Rashba effect, and (for M = Ni) G-type antiferromagnetism in one system. The work is exploratory and computational, but the qualitative finding that fluoride-terminated interfaces confine carriers to the oxide layers and exhibit large internal fields is of interest to the oxide-electronics and materials-design communities. The study also contains useful methodological elements: multiple exchange-correlation functionals, DFT+U calibrated to HSE06, phonon analysis, and Berry-phase polarization calculations. However, the headline quantitative claim — the size of the Rashba splitting — is currently extracted from an insulating superlattice at energies far above the Fermi level and extrapolated to the metallic 2DEG regime without a direct calculation or a rigorous scaling argument, which limits the significance of that claim until verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Cubic-Rashba spin-splitting section, Fig. 3 and Eqs. (4)-(5)] The Rashba splitting is computed in the 4/4 superlattice, which is insulating, and the quoted Δk = 0.044 Å⁻¹ and ΔE = 64 meV are read from conduction bands about 2 eV above the Fermi level. In the metallic 7/7 system, the 2DEG occupies the bottom of these same dxy-derived bands, where the Fermi level lies; the k-cubic dispersion of Eq. (5) makes the splitting strongly k-dependent, so a value at 2 eV above E_F is not representative of the splitting at E_F. The statement that “the results presented here can be extrapolated to larger n/l superlattices” is an assertion, not a derivation. The authors should either compute the band structure of the metallic 7/7 (or n>6) superlattice with spin-orbit coupling and report Δk and ΔE at the Fermi surface, or provide a quantitative argument (e.g., via the carrier density and the k-dependence of the splitting) that the 4/4 result transfers unchanged.
  2. [Electrostatic model, Eqs. (1)-(3) and Table II] The electrostatic model uses bulk polarization and dielectric constants as inputs and yields fields of 40–54 mV/Å, about half the DFT-computed internal field; the authors attribute the difference to electrostriction and phonon renormalization. However, both the model and the layer-by-layer polarization values in Table II are derived for the insulating 4/4 system. In the metallic n>6 regime, mobile carriers screen the polar field, so one cannot use the 4/4 field (or its extrapolation) as the effective Ez that enters Eq. (4) for the 2DEG. The paper should clarify how the field relevant to the proposed Rashba effect in the metallic state is determined, or explicitly state that the Rashba calculation is for the insulating interface only.
  3. [Comparison with LaAlO3/SrTiO3, paragraph after Fig. 3] The authors state that they computed the spin-texture of SrTiO3/LaAlO3 under the same conditions in a 4/4 superlattice and found Δk = 0.011 Å⁻¹ and ΔE = 11 meV, but the comparison is not shown and no computational details (same U, same energy window, same SOC treatment) are provided. Because the claim of “four-times larger” splitting is the main quantitative headline, the comparison should be documented in a figure or table with sufficient detail for the reader to judge whether the comparison is apples-to-apples.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Results and Discussion, subsection on 2DEG/2DHG] The text uses “ITM transition” where “IMT” (insulator-to-metal transition) is meant; please correct the abbreviation for consistency.
  2. [Magnetic ordering subsection] The sentence “we noticed that the same spin-texture remains at the TaO2/KO” appears to be a typo: the n-type interface is TaO2/KF, not TaO2/KO. Clarify the intended interface.
  3. [Cubic-Rashba spin-splitting section] The authors mention that the band structure was computed with PyProcar and analyzed “up to the 4/4 superlattice,” but Fig. 3 is not explicitly labeled with the superlattice size and composition; please add the system designation (e.g., 4/4 KTO/KZF) to the figure or its caption.
  4. [Table II] The labeling “Layer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8” would benefit from indicating which layers are oxide and which are fluoride, since the polarization sign changes between the two compounds.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No meaningful circularity: the U calibration and electrostatic model are not fitted to the Rashba or 2DEG outcomes, and self-citations are motivational or tool-related.

full rationale

The central claims—2DEG/2DHG formation for n>6, critical thickness, interfacial electric fields, magnetic ordering, and the cubic-Rashba Δk/ΔE—are computed from first-principles DFT+U and hybrid-functional electronic structures and Berry-phase polarizations. The only explicitly fitted quantity is the Hubbard U, calibrated to reproduce the HSE06 gap and magnetic moment in the 1/1 superlattice (Computational Details); that calibration does not encode the Rashba splitting, the 2DEG, or the critical thickness, so the subsequent predictions are not forced by the fit. The electrostatic model (Eqs. 1–3) uses bulk polarization and dielectric constants as inputs and is then compared with DFT, not fitted to the target Rashba values; the paper even reports disagreement between the model and the DFT electrostatic potential. Self-citations (Refs. 12–14 for fluoride background, Ref. 68 for the PyProcar analysis tool) are motivational or instrumental and are not load-bearing for the main conclusions. The statement that the 4/4 Rashba results 'can be extrapolated to larger n/l superlattices' is an asserted transferability assumption, not a circular definition; whether that extrapolation is valid is a scientific-risk issue, not a circularity issue. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on standard DFT approximations, the polar catastrophe picture from prior literature, and one paper-specific extrapolation from 4/4 to 7/7 thicknesses. One fitted parameter (U for Ni) is calibrated internally to HSE06. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U for Ni 3d = Not explicitly stated; text notes U > 6.0 eV stabilizes G-AFM in VASP
    U was fitted so that the DFT+U electronic gap and Ni magnetic moment match HSE06 hybrid functional results in the 1/1 superlattice. This parameter affects the predicted magnetic ordering and electronic structure of the KNiF3 layers.
  • Energy at which Rashba splitting is evaluated = 2.0 eV above the Fermi level
    The reported Δk = 0.044 Å^-1 and ΔE = 64 meV are read at 2.0 eV above E_F rather than at the Fermi energy where the 2DEG resides, so the magnitude depends on a chosen energy window.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT with the PBEsol exchange-correlation functional accurately describes oxyfluoride compounds.
    Stated in Computational Details and supported by a citation to Charles and Rondinelli; the 2DEG/Rashba predictions inherit this functional's accuracy.
  • domain assumption The polar catastrophe and electronic reconstruction model for oxide interfaces applies to these oxyfluoride superlattices.
    Used to interpret the insulator-to-metal transition and 2DEG/2DHG formation, following Ref. [53].
  • ad hoc to paper The Rashba splitting computed in the 4/4 superlattice can be extrapolated to the 7/7 system where the 2DEG forms.
    The authors state 'the results presented here can be extrapolated to larger n/l superlattices' without a direct calculation at 7/7, making the central Rashba claim depend on this transferability.
  • domain assumption KTaO3 under the superlattice strain and electric field develops a P4mm polarization along z.
    Inferred from bulk KTaO3 electrostriction and phonon calculations in Fig. 2; used to explain the electric field and the disagreement with the electrostatic model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural and electronic phenomena at oxyfluoride KTaO$_3$/K$M$F$_3$ ($M$ = Zn and Ni) superlattices: Rashba splitting and 2DEG." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SMUCRG3Y

@misc{pith2026190901921,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural and electronic phenomena at oxyfluoride KTaO$_3$/K$M$F$_3$ ($M$ = Zn and Ni) superlattices: Rashba splitting and 2DEG},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SMUCRG3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01921}
}
abstract

Here, we present the theoretical analysis of the structural and electronic degrees of freedom of two different oxide/fluoride perovskite superlattices, KTaO$_3$/KZnF$_3$ and KTaO$_3$/KNiF$_3$. Using first-principles calculations, we found the appearance of a two-dimensional electron, 2DEG, and hole, 2DHG, gases as a function of the number of layers of the different pristine materials. We demonstrate that the phonon-dynamics at the KTO/K$M$F superlattices play a crucial role in the appearance of these effects. Additionally, our results reveal a rather sizeable Rashba-type spin-splitting at these interfaces in comparison to another oxide/oxide counterparts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01921 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Band structure for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Y. Hwang, Y. Iwasa, M. Kawasaki, B. Keimer, N. Na- gaosa, and Y. Tokura, Nature Materials11, 103 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    Granozio, G

    F. Granozio, G. Koster, and G. Rijnders, MRS bulletin 38 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Mannhart, D

    J. Mannhart, D. Blank, H. Hwang, A. Millis, and J.-M. Triscone, MRS Bulletin33, 1027 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Joshua, S

    A. Joshua, S. Pecker, J. Ruhman, E. Altman, and S. Ilani, Nature communications3, 1129 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Caprara, F

    S. Caprara, F. Peronaci, and M. Grilli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 196401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Zubko, S

    P. Zubko, S. Gariglio, M. Gabay, P. Ghosez, and J.-M. Triscone, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2, 141 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    B.R.K.NandaandS.Satpathy,Phys.Rev.B 81,224408 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Bousquet, M

    E. Bousquet, M. Dawber, N. Stucki, C. Lichtensteiger, P. Hermet, S. Gariglio, J.-M. Triscone, and P. Ghosez, Nature 452, 732 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Benedek and C

    N. Benedek and C. Fennie, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 107204 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    A. T. Mulder, N. A. Benedek, J. M. Rondinelli, and C. J. Fennie, Advanced Functional Materials23, 4810 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Zanolli, J

    Z. Zanolli, J. C. WojdeÅĆ, J. Íñiguez, and P. Ghosez, Phys. Rev. B88, 060102 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    A. C. Garcia-Castro, N. A. Spaldin, A. H. Romero, and E. Bousquet, Phys. Rev. B89, 104107 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    A. C. Garcia-Castro, A. H. Romero, and E. Bousquet, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 117202 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    M. Yang, A. KC, A. C. Garcia-Castro, P. Borisov, E. Bousquet, D. Lederman, A. H. Romero, and C. Cen, Scientific Reports7, 7182 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    M. A. Carpenter, E. K. H. Salje, and C. J. Howard, Phys. Rev. B85, 224430 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    D. P. Dobson, S. A. Hunt, A. Lindsay-Scott, and I. G. Wood, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors189, 171 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    P. J. Edwardson, L. L. Boyer, R. L. Newman, D. H. Fox, J.R.Hardy, J.W.Flocken, R.A.Guenther, andW.Mei, Phys. Rev. B39, 9738 (1989)

    1989

  10. [18]

    C.-g. Duan, W. N. Mei, J. Liu, W.-G. Yin, J. R. Hardy, R. W. Smith, M. J. Mehl, and L. L. Boyer, Phys. Rev. B 69, 033102 (2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    W. Pang, R. L. Stamps, L. Malkinski, Z. Celinski, and D. Skrzypek, Journal of Applied Physics95, 7309 (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    Widuch, R

    S. Widuch, R. L. Stamps, D. Skrzypek, and Z. Celinski, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics44, 415003 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    polar catastrophe

    where substantial changes in the electric conductiv- ity and transport properties have been demonstrated. This mainly due to an induced change in the nomi- nal oxidation state of the Fe cation. Then, and even more surprising, multifunctional properties such as su- perconductiv...

    1909 arXiv

  14. [22]

    AI-Mamouri, P

    M. AI-Mamouri, P. P. Edwards, C. Greaves, and M. Slaski, Nature369, 382 (1994)

    1994

  15. [23]

    E. J. Moon, Y. Xie, E. D. Laird, D. J. Keavney, C. Y. Li, and S. J. May, Journal of the American Chemical Society 136, 2224 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Sturza, H

    M. Sturza, H. Kabbour, S. Daviero-Minaud, D. Fil- imonov, K. Pokholok, N. Tiercelin, F. Porcher, L. Al- don, and O. Mentre, Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, 10901 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Sturza, S

    M. Sturza, S. Daviero-Minaud, H. Kabbour, O. Gardoll, and O. Mentre, Chemistry of Materials22, 6726 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Yang and H

    X. Yang and H. Su, Scientific Reports5, 15849 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Yang and H

    X. Yang and H. Su, Scientific Reports4, 5420 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Charles, R

    N. Charles, R. J. Saballos, and J. M. Rondinelli, Chem- istry of Materials30, 3528 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Deng, ChemNanoMat3, 146 (2017)

    D. Deng, ChemNanoMat3, 146 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    J. K. Harada, N. Charles, K. R. Poeppelmeier, and J. M. Rondinelli, Advanced Materials1805295, 1805295 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Kageyama, K

    H. Kageyama, K. Hayashi, K. Maeda, J. P. Attfield, Z. Hiroi, J. M. Rondinelli, and K. R. Poeppelmeier, Nature Communications 9 (2018), 10.1038/s41467-018- 02838-4

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  25. [33]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  26. [34]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  28. [36]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G.E.Scuseria, L.A.Constantin, X.Zhou, andK.Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  30. [38]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. B52, R5467 (1995)

    1995

  31. [39]

    Charles and J

    N. Charles and J. M. Rondinelli, Phys. Rev. B94, 174108 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, The Journal of Chemical Physics125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  33. [41]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, The Journal of Chemical Physics118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  34. [42]

    Gonze and C

    X. Gonze and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. B55, 10355 (1997)

    1997

  35. [43]

    Hobbs, G

    D. Hobbs, G. Kresse, and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B62, 11556 (2000)

    2000

  36. [44]

    Roberto, O

    D. Roberto, O. Roberto, C. Bartolomeo, R. Carla, S. V. R., and Z.-W. C. M., Zeitschrift fr Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials220, 571 (2005)

    2005

  37. [45]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, Scr. Mater.108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    A. D. Becke, The Journal of Chemical Physics98, 1372 (1993)

    1993

  39. [47]

    D. I. Bilc, R. Orlando, R. Shaltaf, G.-M. Rignanese, J. Íñiguez, and P. Ghosez, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165107 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    J. P. Perdew, M. Ernzerhof, and K. Burke, The Journal 9 of Chemical Physics105, 9982 (1996)

    1996

  41. [49]

    A. D. Becke, The Journal of Chemical Physics96, 2155 (1992)

    1992

  42. [50]

    Knox, Acta Crystallographica14, 583 (1961)

    K. Knox, Acta Crystallographica14, 583 (1961)

    1961

  43. [51]

    ktao3 crystal structure, lattice parameters, thermal expan- sion,

    O. Madelung, U. Rössler, and M. Schulz, eds., “ktao3 crystal structure, lattice parameters, thermal expan- sion,” inTernary Compounds, Organic Semiconductors (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000) pp. 1–3

    2000

  44. [52]

    G. Pari, S. Mathi Jaya, and R. Asokamani, Phys. Rev. B 50, 8166 (1994)

    1994

  45. [53]

    Okazaki, Y

    A. Okazaki, Y. Suemune, and T. Fuchikami, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan14, 1823 (1959)

    1959

  46. [54]

    G. E. Jellison, I. Paulauskas, L. A. Boatner, and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B74, 155130 (2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    N. C. Bristowe, E. Artacho, and P. B. Littlewood, Phys. Rev. B80, 045425 (2009)

    2009

  48. [56]

    D.Vanderbilt,JournalofPhysicsandChemistryofSolids 61, 147 (2000)

    2000

  49. [57]

    Tyunina, J

    M. Tyunina, J. Narkilahti, M. Plekh, R. Oja, R. M. Nieminen, A. Dejneka, and V. Trepakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 227601 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    Bousquet, J

    E. Bousquet, J. Junquera, and P. Ghosez, Phys. Rev. B 82, 045426 (2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    Cancellieri, D

    C. Cancellieri, D. Fontaine, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, A. D. Caviglia, A.Fête, S.J.Leake, S.A.Pauli, P.R.Willmott, M. Stengel, P. Ghosez, and J.-M. Triscone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 056102 (2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics17, 6039 (1984)

    1984

  53. [61]

    P. Yu, Y. Chu, and R. Ramesh, Materials Today15, 320 (2012)

    2012

  54. [62]

    Z.Zhong, A.Tóth, andK.Held,Phys.Rev.B 87,161102 (2013)

    2013

  55. [63]

    104,126803 (2010)

    A.D.Caviglia, M.Gabay, S.Gariglio, N.Reyren, C.Can- cellieri, andJ.-M.Triscone,Phys.Rev.Lett. 104,126803 (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    Nakamura, T

    H. Nakamura, T. Koga, and T. Kimura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 206601 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Hurand, A

    S. Hurand, A. Jouan, C. Feuillet-Palma, G. Singh, J. Bis- caras, E. Lesne, N. Reyren, A. Barthélémy, M. Bibes, J. E. Villegas, C. Ulysse, X. Lafosse, M. Pannetier- Lecoeur, S. Caprara, M. Grilli, J. Lesueur, and N. Bergeal, Scientific Reports5, 12751 EP (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    Lee and H

    H. Lee and H. J. Choi, Phys. Rev. B86, 045437 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    Nakamura and T

    H. Nakamura and T. Kimura, Phys. Rev. B80, 121308 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    Herath, P

    U. Herath, P. Tavadze, X. He, E. Bousquet, S. Singh, F. Muñoz, and A. H. Romero, arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11387 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  61. [69]

    S. R. Park and C. Kim, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena201, 6 (2015), special issue on electron spectroscopy for Rashba spin-orbit interaction

    2015

  62. [70]

    The linear-Rashba effect has theE vs.k form: E±(k) = (¯h2k2/2m∗)± α|k| coming from the Hamiltonian of the form HR = αEzi(k−σ+−k+σ−)

  63. [71]

    Shanavas, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Re- lated Phenomena201, 121 (2015)

    K. Shanavas, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Re- lated Phenomena201, 121 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    P. D. C. King, R. H. He, T. Eknapakul, P. Buaphet, S.-K. Mo, Y. Kaneko, S. Harashima, Y. Hikita, M. S. Bahramy, C. Bell, Z. Hussain, Y. Tokura, Z.-X. Shen, H. Y. Hwang, F. Baumberger, and W. Meevasana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 117602 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Ishizaka, M

    K. Ishizaka, M. S. Bahramy, H. Murakawa, M. Sakano, T. Shimojima, T. Sonobe, K. Koizumi, S. Shin, H. Miyahara, A. Kimura, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, R. Arita, N. Nagaosa, K. Kobayashi, Y. Murakami, R. Kumai, Y. Kaneko, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Nat Mater1...

    2011

  66. [74]

    Moriya, K

    R. Moriya, K. Sawano, Y. Hoshi, S. Masubuchi, Y. Shi- raki, A. Wild, C. Neumann, G. Abstreiter, D. Bougeard, T. Koga, and T. Machida, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 086601 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    O.BleibaumandS.Wachsmuth,Phys.Rev.B 74,195330 (2006)

    2006

  68. [110]

    When compressive epitaxialxy-strain is 5 applied, a single polar phonon mode along thez-axis be- comes unstable, which drives the system to aP 4mm fer- roelectric ground state

    direction. When compressive epitaxialxy-strain is 5 applied, a single polar phonon mode along thez-axis be- comes unstable, which drives the system to aP 4mm fer- roelectric ground state. Thus, under thein-plane expan- sionstrainconditionsintheKTO/K MFsuperlattices, an Amm2 gr...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.