Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 43 references

Fundamental tones of clamped plates in nonpositively curved spaces

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In dimensions two and three, small clamped plates on negatively curved manifolds have fundamental tone at least as large as the equal-volume geodesic ball in constant negative curvature, with equality only for the ball itself.

desk verdict A genuine curved-space analogue of Rayleigh's clamped-plate conjecture, with a solid asymptotic core and explicit volume thresholds that currently rest on numerical verification rather than proof. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02350 v2 pith:IARNYDCF submitted 2019-09-05 math.AP math-phmath.DGmath.MP

Alexandru Kristály This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.DGmath.MP MSC 35P1553C2135J3535J40
keywords RayleighconjectureclampedplatefundamentaltoneCartan-HadamardmanifoldhyperbolicspacebiharmonicoperatorGaussianhypergeometricfunctionisoperimetricinequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a curved-space version of Lord Rayleigh's conjecture for the vibrating clamped plate: in dimensions two and three, on any simply connected complete manifold with sectional curvature at most $-\kappa^2$, a bounded domain of sufficiently small volume has fundamental tone no smaller than the equal-volume geodesic ball in the constant-curvature space. The volume thresholds are explicit constants divided by $\kappa^n$, about $21.031/\kappa^2$ in the plane and $1.721/\kappa^3$ in three dimensions. The proof also yields a spectral gap that holds for every domain, independent of volume, and sharp asymptotics for small and large hyperbolic balls. If the comparison is correct, it transfers a classical Euclidean minimax inequality to negatively curved geometry and gives a precise existence criterion for a biharmonic elliptic equation on hyperbolic discs.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a two-ball rearrangement decomposition: the first eigenfunction is split into positive and negative parts, each is radially rearranged on the model space, and the energy ratio on the arbitrary domain is bounded below by a minimization over two geodesic balls joined by a flux boundary condition. A fourth-order ordinary differential equation turns each ball's minimizer into an explicit combination of values of the Gaussian hypergeometric function ${}_2F_1$ (with Bessel functions appearing when $\kappa=0$). The decisive mechanism is an inequality, (5.5) in the paper, comparing the first zero associated with the two-ball configuration against the single-ball value; when it holds, one of the two balls disappears and the comparison to the geodesic ball follows. The paper proves the inequality analytically only in the small-radius limit, disproves it for large radius, and identifies the transition by numerical computation, yielding the stated volume thresholds.

What would settle it

Compute the two sides of (5.5) to high precision just below the claimed thresholds: for $n=2$, check whether $g_{\nu,1}(\sinh^2(\kappa L_0/2))\geq \lambda_\nu(0,\sinh^2(\kappa L/2))$ when $2V_\kappa(L_0)=V_\kappa(L)$ and $L=2.1492/\kappa$; for $n=3$ do the same at $L=0.719/\kappa$. A single radius below the threshold where the inequality reverses would shrink the constants; verifying the inequality at the endpoint would turn the numerical thresholds into proven ones.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the sharp isoperimetric comparison for the fundamental tone of clamped plates on Cartan-Hadamard manifolds. For $n\in\{2,3\}$, let $(M,g)$ have sectional curvature $K\leq -\kappa^2$, and let $\Omega$ be a bounded smooth domain with volume $V_g(\Omega)\leq c_n/\kappa^n$, where $c_2\approx 21.031$ and $c_3\approx 1.721$. If $\Omega^*$ is the geodesic ball in the space form of curvature $-\kappa^2$ with the same volume, then $\Gamma_g(\Omega)\geq \Gamma_\kappa(\Omega^*)$, with equality exactly when $\Omega$ is isometric to $\Omega^*$. A companion theorem proves the spectral gap $\Gamma_g(\Omega)\geq \frac{(n-1)^4}{16}\kappa^4$ for every bounded smooth domain, and shows it is sharp in the limit of geodesic balls exhausting the whole hyperbolic space. The Euclidean case $\kappa=0$ is the classical solution of Rayleigh's conjecture, recovered as a limiting case. An additional asymptotic formula describes the tone of a small hyperbolic ball as $\left(\frac{(n-1)^2}{4}\kappa^2 + \frac{h_\nu^2}{L^2}\right)^2$ as $L\to 0$.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative comparison relies on inequality (5.5) holding for the entire claimed interval, but the paper proves it only asymptotically for small radii and verifies the endpoint behaviour numerically; if the inequality fails anywhere below $l_2=2.1492/\kappa$ or $l_3=0.719/\kappa$, the volume constants $c_2$ and $c_3$ must be reduced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In two and three dimensions, the geodesic ball in the constant-negative-curvature space is the unique minimizer of the clamped-plate fundamental tone among all domains of fixed volume $v$, for every $v$ up to $c_n/\kappa^n$.
  • Every bounded smooth domain on such a manifold has fundamental tone at least $\left(\frac{(n-1)^2}{4}\kappa^2\right)^2 = \frac{(n-1)^4}{16}\kappa^4$, regardless of its shape or size.
  • Small hyperbolic balls satisfy $\Gamma_\kappa(B_\kappa(L))\sim \left(\frac{(n-1)^2}{4}\kappa^2 + \frac{h_\nu^2}{L^2}\right)^2$ as $L\to 0$, so the Euclidean $L^{-4}$ scaling survives with a curvature correction.
  • For the biharmonic equation $\Delta^2 u - \mu\Delta u + \gamma u = |u|^{p-2}u$ on a hyperbolic disc of radius below the threshold, a nontrivial solution exists whenever $\mu>0$ and $\gamma>-\Gamma_\kappa(B_\kappa(L))$, and when $\mu=0$ existence forces that same lower bound.
  • The Euclidean Rayleigh conjecture for clamped plates appears as the $\kappa\to 0$ limit of the comparison, unifying the flat and negatively curved cases in dimensions two and three.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The numerically located thresholds $l_2=2.1492/\kappa$ and $l_3=0.719/\kappa$ suggest a genuine transition: if inequality (5.5) could be proved rigorously on the whole interval, the constants $c_2$ and $c_3$ would be fully proven; the analytic gap is a single sharpened estimate on hypergeometric zeros.
  • Above the threshold, the rearrangement argument fails because the positive and negative parts separate into two large balls whose joint tone drops below the single-ball value; this indicates that nodal-domain effects, not merely technical restrictions, limit the range of validity of the comparison.
  • The same two-ball-to-one-ball mechanism, with the appropriate curvature-adapted special functions, is likely to transfer to clamped plates on positively curved spaces such as spheres, where the parameter range of the hypergeometric equation changes sign.
  • A direct numerical test in dimension four, using the paper's high-dimensional nonoptimal estimates as a baseline, could reveal whether the volume thresholds have analogues in higher dimensions once the relevant isoperimetric conjecture is available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies the fundamental tone of clamped plates on Cartan-Hadamard manifolds with sectional curvature bounded above by -κ². It proves a McKean-type lower bound Γ_g(Ω) ≥ ((n-1)^4/16)κ⁴ under the κ-Cartan-Hadamard conjecture, and, for n = 2,3, a sharp comparison Γ_g(Ω) ≥ Γ_κ(Ω⋆) whenever V_g(Ω) ≤ c_n/κⁿ with stated numerical constants c₂ ≈ 21.031 and c₃ ≈ 1.721. The proof combines a Talenti-type two-ball rearrangement on the model space-form with an analysis of Gaussian hypergeometric functions; an asymptotic small-radius formula and an application to a semilinear biharmonic problem are also given.

Significance. If fully established, this would be the first sharp isoperimetric comparison for clamped plates on negatively curved spaces, recovering the classical Euclidean results of Nadirashvili and Ashbaugh-Benguria as a limiting case. The method is conceptually natural and the paper is honest about its hypotheses: the κ-Cartan-Hadamard conjecture is an external geometric input, and the constants h_ν, j_ν, and the Euclidean Rayleigh results enter as independent benchmarks rather than fitted parameters. The small-L asymptotic mechanism is a promising and, in outline, credible route, and the applications to biharmonic boundary value problems are interesting. However, the exact numerical thresholds in Theorem 1.2 are not proved rigorously, and several monotonicity assertions are imported from non-public or not-fully-displayed sources, so the central quantitative claim is not yet fully secured.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.2, Step 2 and Theorem 1.2] The proof of the decisive inequality (5.5), g_{ν,1}(L0) ≥ λ_ν(0,L), is only asymptotic as L→0 (via (5.10)–(5.14)) and is shown to fail for large L in the case n=3 via (5.15). The precise claimed intervals 0 < L < 2.1492/κ and 0 < L < 0.719/κ, and hence the constants c₂ ≈ 21.031 and c₃ ≈ 1.721 in Theorem 1.2, are supported only by numerical approximation and Figure 2. Since these thresholds are load-bearing for the volume restriction in the theorem, the quantitative statement of Theorem 1.2 is not rigorously established as written; Theorem 1.3 inherits the same numerical threshold.
  2. [§5.1 and §5.2, Step 1] The monotonicity of λ ↦ K_ν(λ,t) between consecutive zeros of G_-(ν,·,t) is asserted for ν=0 by a 'long computation' and attribution to Karp [24], which is listed as a private communication and manuscript in preparation. This monotonicity is needed to justify the pole-interval bound (5.4) and the contradiction argument in Step 3; without a publicly available or displayed proof, the reduction from (5.5) to (5.3) is incomplete. Similarly, the monotonicity of α ↦ F_ν(λ_ν(0,L), α, β(α)) used in Step 3 is invoked from Karp–Sitnik [25] without a verification tailored to the specific function F_ν and the algebraic relation between α and β; this step is also load-bearing.
  3. [§5.2, Step 2, around (5.10)–(5.11)] The asymptotic expansion λ_ν(0,L) ~ sqrt(((n-1)^2/4)κ² + h_ν²/L²) as L→0 is obtained by replacing the hypergeometric functions with Bessel functions and by 'uniform-convergence reasons'. The limiting interchange is not justified in detail. This asymptotic is the rigorous core of the small-L verification of (5.5), so the paper should provide a self-contained estimate, for example by writing the hypergeometric series with remainder bounds in the relevant range of the parameters, rather than only a formal limit.
  4. [§5.3, Case 2] The proof of (1.8) for n=2 uses the asymptotic formula γ_k ∼ kπ/(κL) derived from an integral representation of the spherical Legendre function and then converts this into the two-sided estimate for λ_0(0,L) via (5.19). No rigorous control of the quantities v_k and u_k is given, and passing from an asymptotic relation to a limit for the fundamental tone requires an epsilon-N argument that is not supplied. This point affects the sharpness claim (1.8), though it is secondary to Theorem 1.2.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract and §6, Theorem 1.3] The abstract and the application section contain the typo 'necessarily and sufficient conditions'; it should read 'necessary and sufficient conditions'.
  2. [Theorem 1.3 statement] In the statement of Theorem 1.3 the notation 'Bk(L)' appears twice; it should be 'B_κ(L)' to match the rest of the paper.
  3. [Figure 2 and §5.2] The numerical thresholds l₂ and l₃ are presented without stating the numerical method, grid resolution, or error estimates; the caption and text should clarify that these are empirical values, not rigorous bounds.
  4. [Table 1] The column heading 'Algebraic value' is misleading: the values are numerical roots of a transcendental equation, not closed-form algebraic expressions. A heading such as 'Numerically computed value' would be more accurate.
  5. [References] Reference [24] is cited as 'private communication & manuscript in preparation'; such a source is not publicly verifiable, and the paper should either include the proof in an appendix or replace the reference with a published source.
  6. [Remark 2.1 and Step 1] Remark 2.1 attributes to Karp a monotonicity statement for x ↦ F(1/2−x, 1/2+x; β; −t), while Step 1 uses a different monotonicity of K_ν in λ; the relation between these two statements should be clarified to avoid confusion.
  7. [Throughout] There are minor formatting artifacts, such as the spaced header 'FUNDAMENT AL TONES' and inconsistent uses of 'K ≤ −κ²' vs 'K ≤ −κ²'; these should be fixed in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the comparison theorem is derived from independent geometric and special-function inputs; the numerical threshold verification is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 1.2 is self-contained modulo the explicitly stated external κ-Cartan-Hadamard conjecture. The two-ball reduction in Section 3 is Talenti/Ashbaugh–Benguria machinery transposed to Cartan–Hadamard spaces; it does not define the comparison Γg(Ω) ≥ Γκ(Ω*) in terms of itself. The decisive auxiliary inequality (5.5) is isolated as a sufficient condition, established asymptotically for small L, shown to fail for large L, and then bracketed numerically for the stated thresholds. No parameter is fitted to make the target inequality true: the constants h_ν and j_ν come from independent Bessel-function theory, the Euclidean Rayleigh result is an external benchmark, and the asymptotic matching in (5.11) follows from hypergeometric-to-Bessel limits rather than from imposing (1.10). The paper explicitly attributes the isoperimetric input to Bol and Kleiner, and the equality case to the equality case of that external conjecture. The main weaknesses flagged in the manuscript—numerical verification of (5.5) at §5.2, Step 2 and the monotonicity facts quoted from Karp [24] and Karp–Sitnik [25]—are correctness/rigor concerns, not circularity: these facts do not assume the theorem’s conclusion and are independent of the fitted thresholds. No circular step with the required quoted reduction is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard geometric and special-function facts, plus two load-bearing items: the kappa-Cartan-Hadamard conjecture and the numerical verification of inequality (5.5) on the claimed interval. No new physical or geometric entity is introduced. The paper is transparent about the numerical nature of the thresholds but does not supply a fully analytic proof of the quantitative range.

free parameters (1)
  • Volume thresholds c2 and c3 in Theorem 1.2 = c2 approx 21.031 (L < 2.1492/kappa), c3 approx 1.721 (L < 0.719/kappa)
    These constants enter the statement of Theorem 1.2. They are obtained from numerical root finding for inequality (5.5), not from a closed-form proof; the rigorous asymptotic part only establishes existence of some sufficiently small threshold.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The kappa-Cartan-Hadamard conjecture holds on (M,g): Ag(dOmega) >= A_kappa(dB_kappa(r)) whenever Vg(Omega) = V_kappa(r).
    Invoked in Section 2.2 and used in Theorem 3.1, inequalities (3.17)-(3.18), to dominate level-set areas of eigenfunctions by spheres in the space-form. It is a theorem for n = 2 (Bol) and n = 3 (Kleiner), and open for kappa > 0 in higher dimensions.
  • standard math Standard Gaussian hypergeometric identities: connection formula (15.10.11), differentiation formula (2.5), continued-fraction representation, and the oscillation theorem of Sugie-Kita-Yamaoka.
    Used throughout Sections 4 and 5 to analyze G_plus, G_minus, and K_nu; cited to Olver et al. [33], Cuyt et al. [17], and Sugie et al. [39].
  • ad hoc to paper Monotonicity of K_nu(lambda,t) in lambda between consecutive zeros of G_minus for nu in {0, 1/2}.
    For n = 3 it is proved explicitly via (5.7). For n = 2 it is asserted after 'a long computation' and Karp [24], a private communication and manuscript in preparation; the preprint does not contain the proof.
  • ad hoc to paper Inequality (5.5), g_{nu,1}(L0) >= lambda_nu(0,L), holds for all L below the stated numerical thresholds.
    This is the quantitative engine behind (1.10). The paper verifies it numerically for L < 2.1492/kappa (n = 2) and L < 0.719/kappa (n = 3), proves it asymptotically as L tends to 0, and disproves it for large L; it is not proven analytically on the full claimed interval.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fundamental tones of clamped plates in nonpositively curved spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IARNYDCF

@misc{pith2026190902350,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fundamental tones of clamped plates in nonpositively curved spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IARNYDCF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02350}
}
abstract

We study Lord Rayleigh's problem for clamped plates on an arbitrary $n$-dimensional $(n\geq 2)$ Cartan-Hadamard manifold $(M,g)$ with sectional curvature $\textbf{K}\leq -\kappa^2$ for some $\kappa\geq 0.$ We first prove a McKean-type spectral gap estimate, i.e. the fundamental tone of any domain in $(M,g)$ is universally bounded from below by $\frac{(n-1)^4}{16}\kappa^4$ whenever the $\kappa$-Cartan-Hadamard conjecture holds on $(M,g)$, e.g. in 2- and 3-dimensions due to Bol (1941) and Kleiner (1992), respectively. In 2- and 3-dimensions we prove sharp isoperimetric inequalities for sufficiently small clamped plates, i.e. the fundamental tone of any domain in $(M,g)$ of volume $v>0$ is not less than the corresponding fundamental tone of a geodesic ball of the same volume $v$ in the space of constant curvature $-\kappa^2$ provided that $v\leq c_n/\kappa^n$ with $c_2\approx 21.031$ and $c_3\approx 1.721$, respectively. In particular, Rayleigh's problem in Euclidean spaces resolved by Nadirashvili (1992) and Ashbaugh and Benguria (1995) appears as a limiting case in our setting (i.e. $\textbf{K}\equiv\kappa=0$). The sharpness of our results requires the validity of the $\kappa$-Cartan-Hadamard conjecture (i.e. sharp isoperimetric inequality on $(M,g)$) and peculiar properties of the Gaussian hypergeometric function, both valid only in dimensions 2 and 3; nevertheless, some nonoptimal estimates of the fundamental tone of arbitrary clamped plates are also provided in high-dimensions. As an application, by using the sharp isoperimetric inequality for small clamped hyperbolic discs, we give necessarily and sufficient conditions for the existence of a nontrivial solution to an elliptic PDE involving the biharmonic Laplace-Beltrami operator.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02350 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The first positive zero λν(α, β) of Fν(·, α, β) is between the poles gν,1(β) and gν,1(α) of Fν(·, α, β); in particular, when α and β approach to L˜ 0 = sinh( κL0 2 ) 2 (where 2Vκ(L0) = Vg(Ω)) it follows the limiting relation λν(L˜ 0,L˜ 0) = gν,1(L˜ 0). Remark 5.1. Inequality (5.5) fails for every choice of L > 0 and κ ≥ 0 whenever n ≥ 4 (thus ν ∈ {1, 3/2, 2, ...}). However, (5.5) turns to be sufficient for the valid… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. For n ∈ {2, 3} the admissible range is 0 < L < ln with l2 = 2.1492 κ and l3 = 0.719 κ , respectively; for large values of L inequality (5.5) fails. Due to its empirical nature, the latter values are not precise, but inequality (5.5) fails for any larger values than L = 2.1493 κ whenever n = 2 and L = 0.72 κ whenever n = 3, respectively. Accordingly, since Vg(Ω) = Vκ(L), the volume of Ω ⊂ M cannot exceed Vκ(ln) = nωn… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Continuity reason (when α ∈ [α0,L˜ 0]) and monotonicity argument for Fν (when α ∈ (0, α0)) imply that λν(α, β) > λν(0,L˜). We claim that for every α ∈ (0, α0), one has Fν(λν(0,L˜), α, β) > 0. (5.17) We immediately observe that Fν(λν(0,L˜), 0,L˜) = 0 and lim α→α − 0 Fν(λν(0,L˜), α, β) = +∞. In order to check (5.17) one can prove that α 7→ Fν(λν(0,L˜), α, β(α)) is increasing on (0, α0), where β = β(α) is given by (4.2… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Karp, private communication & manuscript in preparation

    D. Karp, private communication & manuscript in preparation

    work page

  2. [25]

    Karp, S.M

    D. Karp, S.M. Sitnik, Inequalities and monotonicity of ratios for generalized hypergeometric function. J. Approx. Theory 161 (2009), no. 1, 337–352

    work page 2009

  3. [1]

    Ashbaugh, R

    M. Ashbaugh, R. Benguria, On Rayleigh’s conjecture for the clamped plate and its generalization to three dimensions. Duke Math. J. 78 (1995), no. 1, 1–17

    work page 1995

  4. [2]

    Ashbaugh, R.S

    M. Ashbaugh, R.S. Laugesen, Fundamental tones and buckling loads of clamped plates. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 23 (1996), no. 2, 383–402

    work page 1996

  5. [3]

    Bauer, E

    L. Bauer, E. Reiss, Block five diagonal matrices and the fast numerical solution of the biharmonic equation. Math. Comp. 26 (1972), 311–326

    work page 1972

  6. [4]

    Bishop, R.J

    R.L. Bishop, R.J. Crittenden, Geometry of manifolds . Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. XV Academic Press, New York-London, 1964

    work page 1964

  7. [5]

    Bol, Isoperimetrische Ungleichungen f¨ ur Bereiche auf Fl¨ achen.Jber

    G. Bol, Isoperimetrische Ungleichungen f¨ ur Bereiche auf Fl¨ achen.Jber. Deutsch. Math. Verein. 51 (1941), 219–257

    work page 1941

  8. [6]

    On Clamped Plates with Log-Convex Density

    L.M. Chasman, J.J. Langford, On clamped plates with log-convex density. Preprint, 2018. Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.06423

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

Show all 43 references
  1. [7]

    Chasman, J.J

    L.M. Chasman, J.J. Langford, The clamped plate in Gauss space. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4)195 (2016), no. 6, 1977–2005

    2016

  2. [8]

    Chavel, Eigenvalues in Riemannian geometry

    I. Chavel, Eigenvalues in Riemannian geometry . Pure and Applied Mathematics 115. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1984. CLAMPED PLATES IN NONPOSITIVELY CURVED SPACES 27

    1984

  3. [9]

    D. Chen, T. Zheng, M. Lu, Eigenvalue estimates on domains in complete noncompact Riemannian manifolds. Pacific J. Math. 255 (2012), no. 1, 41-54

    2012

  4. [10]

    Cheng, T

    Q.-M. Cheng, T. Ichikawa, S. Mametsuka, Estimates for eigenvalues of a clamped plate problem on Rie- mannian manifolds. J. Math. Soc. Japan , 62 (2010), 673–686

    2010

  5. [11]

    Cheng, H

    Q.-M. Cheng, H. Yang, Universal inequalities for eigenvalues of a clamped plate problem on a hyperbolic space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), no. 2, 461–471

    2011

  6. [12]

    Cheng, H

    Q.-M. Cheng, H. Yang, Estimates for eigenvalues on Riemannian manifolds. J. Differential Equations 247 (2009), no. 8, 2270–2281

    2009

  7. [13]

    Cheng, H

    Q.-M. Cheng, H. Yang, Inequalities for eigenvalues of a clamped plate problem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), 2625–2635

    2006

  8. [14]

    Croke, A sharp four-dimensional isoperimetric inequality

    C. Croke, A sharp four-dimensional isoperimetric inequality. Comment. Math. Helv. 59 (2)(1984), 187–192

    1984

  9. [15]

    Coffman, On the structure of solutions to ∆ 2u =λu which satisfy the clamped plate conditions on a right angle

    C.V. Coffman, On the structure of solutions to ∆ 2u =λu which satisfy the clamped plate conditions on a right angle. SIAM. J. Math. Anal. 13 (1982), 746–757

    1982

  10. [16]

    Coffman, R.J

    C.V. Coffman, R.J. Duffin, D.H. Shaffer, The fundamental mode of vibration of a clamped annular plate is not of one sign . Constructive approaches to mathematical models (Proc. Conf. in honor of R.J. Duffin, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1978), pp. 267–277, Academic Press, New York-London-Toront...

    1978

  11. [17]

    Cuyt, V.B

    A. Cuyt, V.B. Petersen, B. Verdonk, H. Waadeland, W. Jones, Handbook of continued fractions for special functions. With contributions by Franky Backeljauw and Catherine Bonan-Hamada. Springer, New York, 2008

    2008

  12. [18]

    Dinghas, Einfacher Beweis der isoperimetrischen Eigenschaft der Kugel in Riemannschen R¨ aumen kon- stanter Kr¨ ummung.Math

    A. Dinghas, Einfacher Beweis der isoperimetrischen Eigenschaft der Kugel in Riemannschen R¨ aumen kon- stanter Kr¨ ummung.Math. Nachr. 2 (1949), 148–162

    1949

  13. [19]

    Duffin, Nodal lines of a vibrating plate

    R.J. Duffin, Nodal lines of a vibrating plate. J. Math. Physics 31 (1953), 294–299

    1953

  14. [20]

    Ghomi, J

    M. Ghomi, J. Spruck, Total curvature and the isoperimetric inequality in Cartan-Hadamard manifolds, preprint, 2019. Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09814

    2019 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Grunau, F

    H.-C. Grunau, F. Robert, Positivity and almost positivity of biharmonic Green’s functions under Dirichlet boundary conditions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 195 (2010), no. 3, 865–898

    2010

  16. [22]

    Hebey, Nonlinear analysis on manifolds: Sobolev spaces and inequalities

    E. Hebey, Nonlinear analysis on manifolds: Sobolev spaces and inequalities . Courant Lecture Notes in Math- ematics, 5. New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  17. [23]

    Hille, Non-oscillation theorems

    E. Hille, Non-oscillation theorems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 64 (1948), 234–252

    1948

  18. [26]

    Kleiner, An isoperimetric comparison theorem

    B. Kleiner, An isoperimetric comparison theorem. Invent. Math. 108 (1992), no. 1, 37–47

    1992

  19. [27]

    Klingenberg, Riemannian geometry

    W. Klingenberg, Riemannian geometry. Second edition. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 1. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1995

    1995

  20. [28]

    Kloeckner, G

    B.R. Kloeckner, G. Kuperberg, The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture and the Little Prince, preprint, 2017. Link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.3115

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Krist´ aly, New features of the first eigenvalue on negatively curved spaces, preprint, 2018

    A. Krist´ aly, New features of the first eigenvalue on negatively curved spaces, preprint, 2018. Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.06487

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    McKean, An upper bound to the spectrum of ∆ on a manifold of negative curvature

    H.P. McKean, An upper bound to the spectrum of ∆ on a manifold of negative curvature. J. Differential Geom. 4 (1970), 359–366

    1970

  23. [31]

    Nadirashvili, New isoperimetric inequalities in mathematical physics

    N.S. Nadirashvili, New isoperimetric inequalities in mathematical physics . Partial differential equations of elliptic type (Cortona, 1992), 197–203, Sympos. Math., XXXV, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994

    1992

  24. [32]

    Nadirashvili, Rayleigh’s conjecture on the principal frequency of the clamped plate

    N.S. Nadirashvili, Rayleigh’s conjecture on the principal frequency of the clamped plate. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 129 (1995), no. 1, 1–10

    1995

  25. [33]

    Olver, D.W

    F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, C.W. Clark (eds.), NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010

    2010

  26. [34]

    Palais, The principle of symmetric criticality

    R.S. Palais, The principle of symmetric criticality. Comm. Math. Phys. 69 (1979) 19–30

    1979

  27. [35]

    Rabinowitz, Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics Vol

    P. Rabinowitz, Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics Vol. 65, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1986

    1986

  28. [36]

    Rayleigh, The Theory of Sound

    J.W.S. Rayleigh, The Theory of Sound . I,II. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. McMillan-London, London,

  29. [37]

    Robin, Fonctions sph´ eriques de Legendre et fonctions sph´ ero¨ ıdales

    L. Robin, Fonctions sph´ eriques de Legendre et fonctions sph´ ero¨ ıdales. Tome III. Collection Technique et Scientifique du C.N.E.T. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1959

    1959

  30. [38]

    Szeg˝ o, On membranes and plates.Proc

    G. Szeg˝ o, On membranes and plates.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 36, (1950), 210–216

    1950

  31. [39]

    Sugie, K

    J. Sugie, K. Kita, N. Yamaoka, Oscillation constant of second-order non-linear self-adjoint differential equa- tions. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 181 (2002), no. 3, 309–337

    2002

  32. [40]

    Talenti, On the first eigenvalue of the clamped plate

    G. Talenti, On the first eigenvalue of the clamped plate. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 129 (1981), 265–280

    1981

  33. [41]

    Zhurina, L

    M.I. Zhurina, L. Karmazina, Tables and formulae for the spherical functions Pm −1/2+iτ(z). Translated by E.L. Albasiny Pergamon Press, Oxford-New York-Paris, 1966. 28 ALEXANDRU KRIST ´ALY

    1966

  34. [42]

    Q. Wang, C. Xia, Universal bounds for eigenvalues of the biharmonic operator on Riemannian manifolds. J. Funct. Anal. 245 (2007), 334–352. Institute of Applied Mathematics, ´Obuda University, Budapest, Hungary & Department of Economics, Babes ¸-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, ...

    2007

  35. [1926]

    Reprint of the 1894 and 1896 edition

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.