REVIEW 2 cited by
Automatic Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Background: During software maintenance and development, the comprehension of program code is key to success. High-quality comments can help us better understand programs, but they're often missing or outmoded in today's programs. Automatic code summarization is proposed to solve these problems. During the last decade, huge progress has been made in this field, but there is a lack of an up-to-date survey. Aims: We studied publications concerning code summarization in the field of program comprehension to investigate state-of-the-art approaches. By reading and analyzing relevant articles, we aim at obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the current status of automatic code summarization. Method: In this paper, we performed a systematic literature review over the automatic source code summarization field. Furthermore, we synthesized the obtained data and investigated different approaches. Results: We successfully collected and analyzed 41 selected studies from the different research communities. We exhaustively investigated and described the data extraction techniques, description generation methods, evaluation methods and relevant artifacts of those works. Conclusions: Our systematic review provides an overview of the state of the art, and we also discuss further research directions. By fully elaborating current approaches in the field, our work sheds light on future research directions of program comprehension and comment generation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Agent4cs: A Multi-agent System for Code Summarization in Large Hierarchical Codebases
A multi-agent bottom-up framework (summarizer + keyword extractor + QA) improves hierarchical code-summary consistency by ~8% and normalized keyword coverage by up to 38% over structured prompting baselines.
-
Leveraging LLMs for Legacy Code Modernization: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Generated Documentation
On legacy MUMPS code, LLM-generated line comments are rated almost as good as human-written ones; on IBM assembly they are rated low, and standard automated metrics do not predict human quality scores.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.