RECORD
Variable selection with false discovery rate control in deep neural networks
Machine Learning · Submitted 17 Sep 2019
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim More importantly, SurvNet is able to estimate and control the false discovery rate of selected variables, while no existing methods provide such a quality control.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are famous for their high prediction accuracy, but they are also known for their black-box nature and poor interpretability. We consider the problem of variable selection, that is, selecting the input variables that have significant predictive power on the output, in DNNs. We propose a backward elimination procedure called SurvNet, which is based on a new measure of variable importance that applies to a wide variety of networks. More importantly, SurvNet is able to estimate and control the false discovery rate of selected variables, while no existing methods provide such a quality control. Further, SurvNet adaptively determines how many variables to eliminate at each step in order to maximize the selection efficiency. To study its validity, SurvNet is applied to image data and gene expression data, as well as various simulation datasets.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Deep neural networks (DNNs) are famous for their high prediction accuracy, but they are also known for their black-box nature and poor interpretability. | background 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We consider the problem of variable selection, that is, selecting the input variables that have significant predictive power on the output, in DNNs. | background 0.94 | 0.22 | 0.03 | asserted 0.72 |
| s2 | We propose a backward elimination procedure called SurvNet, which is based on a new measure of variable importance that applies to a wide variety of networks. | method 0.55 | 0.94 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | More importantly, SurvNet is able to estimate and control the false discovery rate of selected variables, while no existing methods provide such a quality control. | contribution 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.60 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Further, SurvNet adaptively determines how many variables to eliminate at each step in order to maximize the selection efficiency. | method 0.77 | 0.86 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | To study its validity, SurvNet is applied to image data and gene expression data, as well as various simulation datasets. | method 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.05 | asserted 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are famous for their high prediction accuracy, but they are also known for their black-box nature and poor interpretability. We consider the problem of variable selection, that is, selecting the input variables that have significant predictive power on the output, in DNNs. We propose a backward elimination procedure called SurvNet, which is based on a new measure of variable importance that applies to a wide variety of networks. More importantly, SurvNet is able to estimate and control the false discovery rate of selected variables, while no existing methods provide such a quality control. Further, SurvNet adaptively determines how many variables to eliminate at each step in order to maximize the selection efficiency. To study its validity, SurvNet is applied to image data and gene expression data, as well as various simulation datasets.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.