REVIEW 2 cited by
How to Incorporate Monotonicity in Deep Networks While Preserving Flexibility?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The importance of domain knowledge in enhancing model performance and making reliable predictions in the real-world is critical. This has led to an increased focus on specific model properties for interpretability. We focus on incorporating monotonic trends, and propose a novel gradient-based point-wise loss function for enforcing partial monotonicity with deep neural networks. While recent developments have relied on structural changes to the model, our approach aims at enhancing the learning process. Our model-agnostic point-wise loss function acts as a plug-in to the standard loss and penalizes non-monotonic gradients. We demonstrate that the point-wise loss produces comparable (and sometimes better) results on both AUC and monotonicity measure, as opposed to state-of-the-art deep lattice networks that guarantee monotonicity. Moreover, it is able to learn differentiated individual trends and produces smoother conditional curves which are important for personalized decisions, while preserving the flexibility of deep networks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Structure-Informed Deep Reinforcement Learning for Inventory Management
A generic DirectBackprop deep RL policy, trained only on historical demand across many products, matches or beats classical inventory heuristics in five problem settings, and structural monotonicity penalties improve ...
-
MERIT: A Merchant Incentive Ranking Model for Hotel Search & Ranking
MERIT adds a monotonic merchant-quality tower and a stratified pairwise loss to a hotel ranking model, improving merchant quality scores by 3.02% in an online A/B test.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.