Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Defense in Depth: The Basics of Blockade and Delay

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.00111 v1 pith:IFXPI4LK submitted 2019-09-30 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords attackersdefensesnumberblockadedefendersdefense-in-depthdelayindividual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Given that individual defenses are rarely sufficient, defense-in-depth is nearly universal and options for individual defensive layers abound. We develop a simple mathematical theory that can help in selecting the type and quantity of defenses for two different defense-in-depth strategies: Blockade and Delay. This theoretical approach accounts for budgetary constraints and the number, skill, and diversity of attackers. We find that defenders have several reasons to be optimistic including that the number of required defenses increases more slowly than the number of attackers, that similar attackers are defended more easily than similar defenses are defeated, and that defenders do not necessarily need to act as quickly as attackers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Defending Against Intelligent Attackers at Large Scales

    cs.CR 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Small linear increases in the number or quality of defense layers can repel exponential increases in the number or speed of independent intelligent cyber attacks, within an idealized defense-in-depth model.

  2. The Impact of AI on the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance and the Character of Cyber Conflict

    cs.CR 2025-04 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    After reviewing 66 arguments about cyber conflict, the paper concludes AI's effect on the offense-defense balance is mixed and lists 44 pathways through which AI could change cyber conflict.

Pith tools