Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Ransomware Analysis using Feature Engineering and Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.00286 v2 pith:JMUIP4TD submitted 2019-10-01 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords ransomwaredetectionanalysisengineeringfeatureimportantlearningregistry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Detection and analysis of a potential malware specifically, used for ransom is a challenging task. Recently, intruders are utilizing advanced cryptographic techniques to get hold of digital assets and then demand a ransom. It is believed that generally, the files comprise of some attributes, states, and patterns that can be recognized by a machine learning technique. This work thus focuses on the detection of Ransomware by performing feature engineering, which helps in analyzing vital attributes and behaviors of the malware. The main contribution of this work is the identification of important and distinct characteristics of Ransomware that can help in detecting them. Finally, based on the selected features, both conventional machine learning techniques and Transfer Learning based Deep Convolutional Neural Networks have been used to detect Ransomware. In order to perform feature engineering and analysis, two separate datasets (static and dynamic) were generated. The static dataset has 3646 samples (1700 Ransomware and 1946 Goodware). On the other hand, the dynamic dataset comprised of 3444 samples (1455 Ransomware and 1989 Goodware). Through various experiments, it is observed that the Registry changes, API calls, and DLLs are the most important features for Ransomware detection. Additionally, important sequences are found with the help of the N-Gram technique. It is also observed that in the case of Registry Delete operation, if a malicious file tries to delete registries, it follows a specific and repeated sequence. However, for the benign file, it doesnt follow any specific sequence or repetition. Similarly, an interesting observation made through this study is that there is no common Registry deleted sequence between malicious and benign files. And thus this discernible fact can be readily exploited for Ransomware detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MLRan: A Behavioural Dataset for Ransomware Analysis and Detection

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new open behavioural ransomware dataset with 64 families and balanced goodware, plus guidelines and a feature selection pipeline that reaches about 98% binary detection accuracy.

Pith tools