REVIEW 1 cited by
BERT for Evidence Retrieval and Claim Verification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Motivated by the promising performance of pre-trained language models, we investigate BERT in an evidence retrieval and claim verification pipeline for the FEVER fact extraction and verification challenge. To this end, we propose to use two BERT models, one for retrieving potential evidence sentences supporting or rejecting claims, and another for verifying claims based on the predicted evidence sets. To train the BERT retrieval system, we use pointwise and pairwise loss functions, and examine the effect of hard negative mining. A second BERT model is trained to classify the samples as supported, refuted, and not enough information. Our system achieves a new state of the art recall of 87.1 for retrieving top five sentences out of the FEVER documents consisting of 50K Wikipedia pages, and scores second in the official leaderboard with the FEVER score of 69.7.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CRAVE: A Conflicting Reasoning Approach for Explainable Claim Verification Using LLMs
CRAVE combines LLM-generated true and false rationales with a fine-tuned small language model judge, reporting state-of-the-art accuracy on HOVER and FEVEROUS.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.