REVIEW 1 cited by
Visual Indeterminacy in GAN Art
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper explores visual indeterminacy as a description for artwork created with Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Visual indeterminacy describes images which appear to depict real scenes, but, on closer examination, defy coherent spatial interpretation. GAN models seem to be predisposed to producing indeterminate images, and indeterminacy is a key feature of much modern representational art, as well as most GAN art. It is hypothesized that indeterminacy is a consequence of a powerful-but-imperfect image synthesis model that must combine general classes of objects, scenes, and textures.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Creative Loss: Ambiguity, Uncertainty and Indeterminacy
A conceptual essay maps ambiguity, uncertainty, and indeterminacy onto machine learning creative practice and proposes half-trained latent spaces as the richest source of new form.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.