REVIEW 3 cited by
Neutrino oscillations in supernovae: angular moments and fast instabilities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recent theoretical work indicates that the neutrino radiation in core-collapse supernovae may be susceptible to flavor instabilities that set in far behind the shock, grow extremely rapidly, and have the potential to profoundly affect supernova dynamics and composition. Here we analyze the nonlinear collective oscillations that are prefigured by these instabilities. We demonstrate that a zero-crossing in $n_{\nu_e} - n_{\bar{\nu}_e}$ as a function of propagation angle is not sufficient to generate instability. Our analysis accounts for this fact and allows us to formulate complementary criteria. Using Fornax simulation data, we show that fast collective oscillations qualitatively depend on how forward-peaked the neutrino angular distributions are.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Collective flavor conversions are interactions of neutrinos with quantized flavor waves
Neutrino fast flavor instabilities are equivalent to stimulated emission of flavomons, quantum flavor waves, whose kinetic equations reproduce the linear growth rate and extend naturally beyond it.
-
Single-wave solutions of the neutrino fast flavor system. Part II. Weak instabilities and their resonant behavior
For shallow angular crossings, the nonlinear evolution of a single-wave fast flavor instability is a flavor pendulum whose amplitude and period are set by the linear growth rate.
-
Single-wave solutions of the neutrino fast flavor system. Part I. Mechanical properties
Single-wave neutrino flavor solutions form a non-integrable spin system without Gaudin invariants, so an exact flavor pendulum exists only for two beams and does not extend to continuous angle distributions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.