Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Autoregressive Models: What Are They Good For?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.07737 v1 pith:4BA7WURL submitted 2019-10-17 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords densityestimatesmodelsautoregressivefindlearningachievingbecome
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autoregressive (AR) models have become a popular tool for unsupervised learning, achieving state-of-the-art log likelihood estimates. We investigate the use of AR models as density estimators in two settings -- as a learning signal for image translation, and as an outlier detector -- and find that these density estimates are much less reliable than previously thought. We examine the underlying optimization issues from both an empirical and theoretical perspective, and provide a toy example that illustrates the problem. Overwhelmingly, we find that density estimates do not correlate with perceptual quality and are unhelpful for downstream tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Evaluation of Large Language Models on Text Summarization Tasks Using Prompt Engineering Techniques

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad benchmark of six open-weights LLMs shows prompt design and chunking affect summarization quality more than model size alone.

Pith tools