REVIEW 1 cited by
Prior Specification for Bayesian Matrix Factorization via Prior Predictive Matching
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The behavior of many Bayesian models used in machine learning critically depends on the choice of prior distributions, controlled by some hyperparameters that are typically selected by Bayesian optimization or cross-validation. This requires repeated, costly, posterior inference. We provide an alternative for selecting good priors without carrying out posterior inference, building on the prior predictive distribution that marginalizes out the model parameters. We estimate virtual statistics for data generated by the prior predictive distribution and then optimize over the hyperparameters to learn ones for which these virtual statistics match target values provided by the user or estimated from (subset of) the observed data. We apply the principle for probabilistic matrix factorization, for which good solutions for prior selection have been missing. We show that for Poisson factorization models we can analytically determine the hyperparameters, including the number of factors, that best replicate the target statistics, and we study empirically the sensitivity of the approach for model mismatch. We also present a model-independent procedure that determines the hyperparameters for general models by stochastic optimization, and demonstrate this extension in context of hierarchical matrix factorization models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Expert-elicitation method for non-parametric joint priors using normalizing flows
A normalizing-flow-based method learns non-parametric joint prior distributions for Bayesian models by matching simulated predictions to expert-elicited statistics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.