Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.00068 v6 pith:CCK6OMJH submitted 2019-10-31 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords datalabellabelslearningdataseterrorsmodelnoisy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning exists in the context of data, yet notions of confidence typically focus on model predictions, not label quality. Confident learning (CL) is an alternative approach which focuses instead on label quality by characterizing and identifying label errors in datasets, based on the principles of pruning noisy data, counting with probabilistic thresholds to estimate noise, and ranking examples to train with confidence. Whereas numerous studies have developed these principles independently, here, we combine them, building on the assumption of a class-conditional noise process to directly estimate the joint distribution between noisy (given) labels and uncorrupted (unknown) labels. This results in a generalized CL which is provably consistent and experimentally performant. We present sufficient conditions where CL exactly finds label errors, and show CL performance exceeding seven recent competitive approaches for learning with noisy labels on the CIFAR dataset. Uniquely, the CL framework is not coupled to a specific data modality or model (e.g., we use CL to find several label errors in the presumed error-free MNIST dataset and improve sentiment classification on text data in Amazon Reviews). We also employ CL on ImageNet to quantify ontological class overlap (e.g., estimating 645 "missile" images are mislabeled as their parent class "projectile"), and moderately increase model accuracy (e.g., for ResNet) by cleaning data prior to training. These results are replicable using the open-source cleanlab release.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BACON: Budgeted Human Calibration for Modeling and Evaluation with Multiple AI Judges

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BACON calibrates multiple AI judges against a small human-labeled sample, then uses cross-fitted outcome models and augmented estimating equations to produce calibrated summary estimates and item-level surrogate scores.

  2. When Models Know When They Do Not Know: Calibration, Cascading, and Cleaning

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A confidence-based, training-free routing and cleaning framework improves accuracy-efficiency trade-offs and identifies mislabeled data in image and language benchmarks.

  3. LiLAW: Lightweight Learnable Adaptive Weighting to Learn Sample Difficulty & Improve Noisy Training

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    LiLAW learns to weight samples as easy, moderate or hard using three global scalars updated by one gradient step on a validation batch to improve noisy training performance.

  4. A Data-Centric Framework for Intraoperative Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging for Glioma Surgical Guidance

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A data-centric AI framework cleans FLIm labels via confident learning and achieves 96% accuracy classifying glioma infiltration into low, moderate, and high cellularity.

Pith tools