Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Gym-Ignition: Reproducible Robotic Simulations for Reinforcement Learning

Robotics · Submitted 5 Nov 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This paper presents Gym-Ignition, a new framework to create reproducible robotic environments for reinforcement learning research.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1911.01715 (version 2)
Pith ID65LLZSQC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDaniele Pucci, Diego Ferigo, Giorgio Metta, Silvio Traversaro. "Gym-Ignition: Reproducible Robotic Simulations for Reinforcement Learning." arXiv:1911.01715 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/65LLZSQC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,322 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.64.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This paper presents Gym-Ignition, a new framework to create reproducible robotic environments for reinforcement learning research. It interfaces with the new generation of Gazebo, part of the Ignition Robotics suite, which provides three main improvements for reinforcement learning applications compared to the alternatives: 1) the modular architecture enables using the simulator as a C++ library, simplifying the interconnection with external software; 2) multiple physics and rendering engines are supported as plugins, simplifying their selection during the execution; 3) the new distributed simulation capability allows simulating complex scenarios while sharing the load on multiple workers and machines. The core of Gym-Ignition is a component that contains the Ignition Gazebo simulator and exposes a simple interface for its configuration and execution. We provide a Python package that allows developers to create robotic environments simulated in Ignition Gazebo. Environments expose the common OpenAI Gym interface, making them compatible out-of-the-box with third-party frameworks containing reinforcement learning algorithms. Simulations can be executed in both headless and GUI mode, the physics engine can run in accelerated mode, and instances can be parallelized. Furthermore, the Gym-Ignition software architecture provides abstraction of the Robot and the Task, making environments agnostic on the specific runtime. This abstraction allows their execution also in a real-time setting on actual robotic platforms, even if driven by different middlewares.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This paper presents Gym-Ignition, a new framework to create reproducible robotic environments for reinforcement learning research. contribution 1.00 0.86 0.27 asserted 1.00
s1 It interfaces with the new generation of Gazebo, part of the Ignition Robotics suite, which provides three main improvements for reinforcement learning applications compared to the alternatives: 1) the modular architecture enables using the simulator as a C++ library, simplifying the interconnection with external software; 2) multiple physics and rendering engines are supported as plugins, simplifying their selection during the execution; 3) the new distributed simulation capability allows simulating complex scenarios while sharing the load on multiple workers and machines. method 0.51 0.16 0.07 asserted 1.00
s2 The core of Gym-Ignition is a component that contains the Ignition Gazebo simulator and exposes a simple interface for its configuration and execution. method 0.70 0.72 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 We provide a Python package that allows developers to create robotic environments simulated in Ignition Gazebo. contribution 0.83 0.90 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 Environments expose the common OpenAI Gym interface, making them compatible out-of-the-box with third-party frameworks containing reinforcement learning algorithms. contribution 0.66 0.67 0.06 asserted 1.00
s5 Simulations can be executed in both headless and GUI mode, the physics engine can run in accelerated mode, and instances can be parallelized. method 0.61 0.57 0.03 asserted 0.80
s6 Furthermore, the Gym-Ignition software architecture provides abstraction of the Robot and the Task, making environments agnostic on the specific runtime. method 0.56 0.80 0.06 asserted 1.00
s7 This abstraction allows their execution also in a real-time setting on actual robotic platforms, even if driven by different middlewares. contribution 0.60 0.51 0.08 asserted 0.62

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.63.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This paper presents Gym-Ignition, a new framework to create reproducible robotic environments for reinforcement learning research. It interfaces with the new generation of Gazebo, part of the Ignition Robotics suite, which provides three main improvements for reinforcement learning applications compared to the alternatives: 1) the modular architecture enables using the simulator as a C++ library, simplifying the interconnection with external software; 2) multiple physics and rendering engines are supported as plugins, simplifying their selection during the execution; 3) the new distributed simulation capability allows simulating complex scenarios while sharing the load on multiple workers and machines. The core of Gym-Ignition is a component that contains the Ignition Gazebo simulator and exposes a simple interface for its configuration and execution. We provide a Python package that allows developers to create robotic environments simulated in Ignition Gazebo. Environments expose the common OpenAI Gym interface, making them compatible out-of-the-box with third-party frameworks containing reinforcement learning algorithms. Simulations can be executed in both headless and GUI mode, the physics engine can run in accelerated mode, and instances can be parallelized. Furthermore, the Gym-Ignition software architecture provides abstraction of the Robot and the Task, making environments agnostic on the specific runtime. This abstraction allows their execution also in a real-time setting on actual robotic platforms, even if driven by different middlewares.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 7 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • For both domains, we provide the support of exposing the common OpenAI Gym interface [ref] .

    OpenAI Gym · Introduction · 0.87

Cites as background 7 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.