Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimization with soft Dice can lead to a volumetric bias

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.02278 v1 pith:SOMXMMCM submitted 2019-11-06 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords dicesegmentationbiasclinicalmedicalmethodsscoresoft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Segmentation is a fundamental task in medical image analysis. The clinical interest is often to measure the volume of a structure. To evaluate and compare segmentation methods, the similarity between a segmentation and a predefined ground truth is measured using metrics such as the Dice score. Recent segmentation methods based on convolutional neural networks use a differentiable surrogate of the Dice score, such as soft Dice, explicitly as the loss function during the learning phase. Even though this approach leads to improved Dice scores, we find that, both theoretically and empirically on four medical tasks, it can introduce a volumetric bias for tasks with high inherent uncertainty. As such, this may limit the method's clinical applicability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools