Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.02727 v3 pith:M3HDJVKS submitted 2019-11-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords datadistillationknowledgemodelsautoregressivecomplexitymodelperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Non-autoregressive machine translation (NAT) systems predict a sequence of output tokens in parallel, achieving substantial improvements in generation speed compared to autoregressive models. Existing NAT models usually rely on the technique of knowledge distillation, which creates the training data from a pretrained autoregressive model for better performance. Knowledge distillation is empirically useful, leading to large gains in accuracy for NAT models, but the reason for this success has, as of yet, been unclear. In this paper, we first design systematic experiments to investigate why knowledge distillation is crucial to NAT training. We find that knowledge distillation can reduce the complexity of data sets and help NAT to model the variations in the output data. Furthermore, a strong correlation is observed between the capacity of an NAT model and the optimal complexity of the distilled data for the best translation quality. Based on these findings, we further propose several approaches that can alter the complexity of data sets to improve the performance of NAT models. We achieve the state-of-the-art performance for the NAT-based models, and close the gap with the autoregressive baseline on WMT14 En-De benchmark.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Your LLM Knows the Future: Uncovering Its Multi-Token Prediction Potential

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A gated LoRA and a small sampler let an autoregressive LLM draft multiple future tokens per step, and self-speculative verification converts those drafts into up to roughly 5x fewer generation steps.

  2. Prepending or Cross-Attention for Speech-to-Text? An Empirical Comparison

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across controlled ASR and speech translation experiments, dense feature prepending does not outperform cross-attention in quality and is slightly slower and more memory hungry.

Pith tools