Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fully Bayesian Recurrent Neural Networks for Safe Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.03308 v2 pith:XYLC5365 submitted 2019-11-08 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords applicationsapproachbayesiandemonstratedemonstratedfullylearningmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has demonstrated state-of-the-art results in a number of autonomous system applications, however many of the underlying algorithms rely on black-box predictions. This results in poor explainability of the behaviour of these systems, raising concerns as to their use in safety-critical applications. Recent work has demonstrated that uncertainty-aware models exhibit more cautious behaviours through the incorporation of model uncertainty estimates. In this work, we build on Probabilistic Backpropagation to introduce a fully Bayesian Recurrent Neural Network architecture. We apply this within a Safe RL scenario, and demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms a popular approach for obtaining model uncertainties in collision avoidance tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the proposed approach requires less training and is far more efficient than the current leading method, both in terms of compute resource and memory footprint.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combining Bayesian Inference and Reinforcement Learning for Agent Decision Making: A Review

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes combinations of Bayesian inference and reinforcement learning, rates them on four properties, and raises ten open questions.

Pith tools