Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Coverage Testing of Deep Learning Models using Dataset Characterization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.07309 v1 pith:GXZGESF2 submitted 2019-11-17 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords deeplearningtestdatasetmodelsgenerationsystemboundary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), with its promising performance, are being increasingly used in safety critical applications such as autonomous driving, cancer detection, and secure authentication. With growing importance in deep learning, there is a requirement for a more standardized framework to evaluate and test deep learning models. The primary challenge involved in automated generation of extensive test cases are: (i) neural networks are difficult to interpret and debug and (ii) availability of human annotators to generate specialized test points. In this research, we explain the necessity to measure the quality of a dataset and propose a test case generation system guided by the dataset properties. From a testing perspective, four different dataset quality dimensions are proposed: (i) equivalence partitioning, (ii) centroid positioning, (iii) boundary conditioning, and (iv) pair-wise boundary conditioning. The proposed system is evaluated on well known image classification datasets such as MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and SVHN against popular deep learning models such as LeNet, ResNet-20, VGG-19. Further, we conduct various experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of systematic test case generation system for evaluating deep learning models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coverage-Guided Testing for Deep Learning Models: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review of coverage-guided testing for deep learning models, covering coverage criteria, test generation, optimization, and evaluation practices.

Pith tools