REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding parameter differences between analyses employing nested data subsets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We provide an analytical argument for understanding the likely nature of parameter shifts between those coming from an analysis of a dataset and from a subset of that dataset, assuming differences are down to noise and any intrinsic variance alone. This gives us a measure against which we can interpret changes seen in parameters and make judgements about the coherency of the data and the suitability of a model in describing those data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PRM-Free Security Alignment of Large Models via Red Teaming and Adversarial Training
A PRM-free alignment pipeline combining genetic algorithm red teaming and multi-objective adversarial training is claimed to beat PRM-based methods at 61% lower cost, but the experiments are unverifiable.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.