Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Validity of Bayesian Neural Networks for Uncertainty Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.01530 v2 pith:S7Q3UJ3K submitted 2019-12-03 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords neuralnetworksbayesiandeepuncertaintyestimatepointaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNN) are versatile parametric models utilised successfully in a diverse number of tasks and domains. However, they have limitations---particularly from their lack of robustness and over-sensitivity to out of distribution samples. Bayesian Neural Networks, due to their formulation under the Bayesian framework, provide a principled approach to building neural networks that address these limitations. This paper describes a study that empirically evaluates and compares Bayesian Neural Networks to their equivalent point estimate Deep Neural Networks to quantify the predictive uncertainty induced by their parameters, as well as their performance in view of this uncertainty. In this study, we evaluated and compared three point estimate deep neural networks against comparable Bayesian neural network alternatives using two well-known benchmark image classification datasets (CIFAR-10 and SVHN).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Zero-Shot Scene Understanding for Automatic Target Recognition Using Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A YOLO-world detector plus a vision-language model can label military vehicle crops zero-shot, but post-hoc label alignment and missing baselines make the headline numbers unreliable.

Pith tools