Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Module Networks for Reasoning over Text

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.04971 v2 pith:QAUESVR3 submitted 2019-12-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningtextmodulemodulesquestionschallenginglearnmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Answering compositional questions that require multiple steps of reasoning against text is challenging, especially when they involve discrete, symbolic operations. Neural module networks (NMNs) learn to parse such questions as executable programs composed of learnable modules, performing well on synthetic visual QA domains. However, we find that it is challenging to learn these models for non-synthetic questions on open-domain text, where a model needs to deal with the diversity of natural language and perform a broader range of reasoning. We extend NMNs by: (a) introducing modules that reason over a paragraph of text, performing symbolic reasoning (such as arithmetic, sorting, counting) over numbers and dates in a probabilistic and differentiable manner; and (b) proposing an unsupervised auxiliary loss to help extract arguments associated with the events in text. Additionally, we show that a limited amount of heuristically-obtained question program and intermediate module output supervision provides sufficient inductive bias for accurate learning. Our proposed model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art models on a subset of the DROP dataset that poses a variety of reasoning challenges that are covered by our modules.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RuleArena: A Benchmark for Rule-Guided Reasoning with LLMs in Real-World Scenarios

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RuleArena evaluates LLMs on realistic rule-guided reasoning and finds that even o1-preview solves only about half of the easiest problems and near zero of the hardest.

Pith tools